Delhi Court October 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mukhtair and Ors vs.the State & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-18-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 1192/2016 MUKHTAIR AND ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Mukesh Singh and Mr.Lucky Date of Decision: October 18th, 2016 THE STATE & ANR Versus Tiwari, Advs. Through Mr.M.P. Singh, APP. Respondent no.2 in person. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by 1. the petitioners, namely, Sh. Mukhtair, Ms. Noor Jahan, Ms. Anisha and Sh. Latafat for quashing of FIR No.254/2012 dated 03.10.2012, under Sections 498-A/406/5IPC registered at Police Station Nangloi on the basis of Mediation Report of Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari Courts, in view of the settlement arrived at between the petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2, namely, Smt. Shamma on 07.03.2013.2. respondent-State submitted that the respondent No.2, present in the Court has been identified to be the complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question by her counsel.3. The factual matrix of the pr...
Gauri Shankar vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-18-2016
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: September 20, 2016 Judgment Delivered on: October 18, 2016 CRL.A. 1573/2011 & Crl.M.B. 2270/2011 GAURI SHANKAR ..... Appellant Represented by: Ms. Rakhi Dubey, Advocate. STATE Versus ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.State.1. Convicted for offences punishable under Sections 307/174A IPC Gauri Shankar challenges the impugned judgment dated June 02, 2011 and the order on sentence dated June 06, 2011 directing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten years and to pay a fine of `500/- for the offence punishable under Section 307 IPC and rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years and to pay a fine of `500/- for the offence punishable under Section 174A IPC.2. Assailing the conviction, learned counsel for the appellant contends that there are material contradictions in the statement of PW-1, Kusum on whose testimony the conv...
Desh Vaid @ Desh Bhagat Vaid vs.umesh Kumar Vaid & Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-18-2016
$~42. * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 3129/2015 Judgment dated 18th October, 2016 DESH VAID @ DESH BHAGAT VAID ..... Plaintiff Through : Mr.J.S. Mann, Adv. along with plaintiff. versus UMESH KUMAR VAID & OTHERS ..... Defendants Through : Ms.Sakshi Vaid, Adv. for defendants no.1, 3 to 10 along with defendants no.1 and 3 to 7. Mr.K.K. Prasad, Adv. for defendant no.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) I.A. 12686/2016 1. This is a joint application filed by parties seeking early hearing in the matter on the ground that the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement before the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre.2. Heard. Having regard to the fact that the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement, present application is allowed. The matter will be taken up today itself. The date of 16.11.2016 stands cancelled.3. Application stands disposed of. CS(OS) 3129/2015 4. Plaintiff has filed the present suit for partition with ...
Akash Tyagi vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-18-2016
$~15 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18th October, 2016 W.P.(C) 8338/2016 AKASH TYAGI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Satya Saharawat, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Monika Arora, CGSC along with for Mr. Brajesh Kumar, G.P respnondent Nos. 1 to 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO INDIRA BANERJEE, J (ORAL) JUDGMENT1 In this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the findings of the Appeal Medical Board and Review Medical Board declaring the petitioner medically unfit for appointment in the Indian Army on Short Service Commission. The petitioner has also also sought orders directing the respondents to constitute a Review Medical Board comprising specialist dermatologist from All India Institute of Medical Sciences or Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, to review the medical fitness of the petitioner.2. The petitioner applied pursuant to an adve...
Shri Balram vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-18-2016
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RESERVED ON :30. h SEPTEMBER, 2016 DECIDED ON :18. h OCTOBER, 2016 CRL.A.956/2015 SHRI BALRAM ..... Appellant AND + STATE Through : Mr.K.Singhal, Advocate. VERSUS ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Amit Gupta, APP. CRL.A.950/2015 MOHD.WASIM @ PAPPU @ RIAZ ..... Appellant Through : Mr.K.Singhal, Advocate. VERSUS THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Amit Gupta, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.Crl.A.956/2015 & connected matter Page 1 of 10 1. Aggrieved by a judgment dated 17.07.2015 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.36/2013 arising out of FIR No.301/2012 PS Khyala whereby Shri Balram (A-1) was held guilty for committing offences punishable under Sections 452/3read with Section 397 IPC; and Mohd. Wasim @ Pappu @ Riaz (A-2) was convicted under Sections 452/3IPC, the instant appeals have been preferred by them. By an order dated 20.07.2015, they were awarded various prison terms with fine.2. Brief...
p.k. Dash vs.bar Council of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-18-2016
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:18. 10.2016 + W.P.(C) 8106/2010 P.K. DASH, ADVOCATE AND ORS. Petitioners Versus BAR COUNCIL OF DELHI AND ORS. ..Respondents Through: Sh. Amar Nath Sain, Advocate, for petitioners. Sh. Ravinder Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Puneet Sharma, Sh. Harsh Prabhakar and Sh. Anirudh Tanwar, Advocates, in C.M. Appl.30903 & 30904/2016. for applicants Sh. Neeraj, Advocate, for NDBA. Sh. Rajiv Talhan, Advocate, for Rohini Court Bar Association. Sh. B.S. Jakhar, Advocate, for Dwarka Court Bar Association. Sh. Vipin Chaudhary, Advocate, for Saket Court Bar Association. Sh. Abhijat, applicant Appl.36262/2016. in person in C.M. Sh. Rajiv Khosla, Advocate, for DHCBA. Sh. Kanwal Chaudhary, Advocate, for Dwarka Court Bar Association. Sh. Vikram Pradeep, proxy counsel, for Sh. Viraj. R. Datar, Advocate, for DHC. W.P.(C) 8106/2010 Page 1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. This C...
Icici Bank Limited & Anr vs.m/s Dsc Limited & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-18-2016
$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4976/2016 ICICI BANK LIMITED & ANR ........ Petitioners Through : Mr. Abhinav Vashisht, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Suresh Dutt Dobhal and Mr. Yugank Goel, Advocate for Phoenix ARC Pvt. Ltd. Mr. Arun Bhandari, proxy counsel for H.P. Bhandari, Advocate for P-2. versus M/S DSC LIMITED & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Arvind Nigam, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Deepak Khurana, Advocate for R-1 to 8. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % ORDER1810.2016 CM No.36799/2016 (by Phoenix ARC Pvt. Ltd. for substitution in place of petitioner No.1/ICICI Bank Ltd. u/O XXII R-10 CPC) 1. The present application has been filed by the applicant stating inter alia that the petitioner No.1 has assigned the debt in question to it in terms of the Assignment Agreement dated 20.9.2016 (Annexure-2). Resultantly, deletion of the name of the original petitioner No.1/ICICI Bank Ltd. and substitution thereof with Phoenix ARC Pvt. Ltd., has been prayed for.2. Not...
Super Cassettes Industries Private Limited vs.fun Cable Network
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-18-2016
$~03. * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 991/2016 Judgment dated 18th October, 2016 SUPER CASSETTES INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through : Ms.Prachi Agarwal and Mr.K.K. Khetan, Advs. versus FUN CABLE NETWORK Through ..... Defendant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Plaintiff has filed the present suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of copyright, damages, rendition of accounts, etc.2. Learned counsel for the plaintiff submits that summons in the suit and notice in the application for stay were directed to be issued vide order dated 24.11.2015, when an ex parte ad interim injunction was passed in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant. Counsel further submits that in the order dated 7.1.2016 the learned Joint Registrar had noticed that service report through ordinary process is awaited, however, as per the track report filed by the plaintiff, the defendant has been served on 11.12.2015 but no Va...
Cairn India Limited & Ors vs.directorate General of Foreign Trade & Or ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-18-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * + W.P.(C) 11600/2015 & CM APPL. 30709/2015 CAIRN INDIA LIMITED & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr. C.S. Sundaram, Senior Advocate with Ms. Fereshte Sethna, Mr. Rajat Juneja and Mr. Adhijraj Malhotra, Advocates. versus DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF FOREIGN TRADE & ORS Through Mr. Tushar Mehta, ASG with ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC with Mr. Naveen Bhardwaj, Advocate for R-1& 2/UOI. Mr. V.N. Koura with Mr. P.K. Benipal and Mr. Sumit Benipal, Advocates for R-3. Reserved on Date of Decision :10. h August, 20 18th October, 2016 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J:1.... Petitioners have filed the present writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to respondent no.1 to issue to the petitioners necessary permissions/approvals/ authorisations for direct export or in the alternative, permission/facilitation W.P.(C) 11600/2015 Page 1 of 27 for canalised export through ...
Jagdish vs.the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-18-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : October 18, 2016 CRL.REV.P. 384/2016 & Crl. M.B. No.1039/2016 JAGDISH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Abhishek Sharma, Advocate. THE STATE versus Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI JUDGMENT P.S.TEJI, J.By this petition filed under Section 401 of Cr. P.C. read with 1. Section 482 of Cr. P.C. , the petitioner seeks to challenge the order of conviction dated 30.04.2016 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi whereby the Appeal filed by the petitioner against the order on sentence passed by learned ACMM has been dismissed. Brief facts of the case of the prosecution are that the on 2. 19.08.2000 at about 2.20 PM on main Road Kondli, Opposite Dinkar Public School, Delhi the accused while driving Truck bearing No.DL- 1GB-4477 in rash and negligent manner struck it against the motorcycle bearing No.DL-3SD-7400 ...
- ‹ Prev
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- Next ›
- Last »