Delhi Court October 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
National Highways Authority of India vs.hindustan Steelworks Construct ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-19-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~30 * + NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA O.M.P. (COMM.) 94/2016 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Parag Tripathi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Mukesh Kumar & Ms. Gunjan Sinha Jain, Advocates. versus HINDUSTAN STEELWORKS CONSTRUCTION LTD + SIPL ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. P.S. Patwalia, Additional Solicitor General with Mr. G. Umapathy, Mr. Kishore Sen, Ms. R. Mekhala & Mr. Vinod Tiwari, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR ORDER1910.2016 % IA No.4908/2015 (for condonation of delay 1. This is an application filed by the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) seeking to explain the delay of 296 days in filing the petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (the Act) to challenge the Award dated 24th February, 2015 of the Arbitral Tribunal (AT) in the disputes between NHAI and the Respondent, Hindustan Steelworks Construction Ltd + SIPL (HSCL) arising out of a contract dated 18th July, 2005 for the construction...
Praveen Kumar . Vs.d a v Pitampura Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-19-2016
$~51 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 8056/2016 & CM No.33365/2016 (for interim directions) Judgment delivered on:19. 10.2016 PRAVEEN KUMAR ........ Petitioner D A V PITAMPURA DELHI AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS versus Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Partha Mandal, Advocate. :Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and 3. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1910.2016 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents not to cancel the admission of the son of the petitioner and to allow the son of the petitioner to continue in the school. The name of the son of the petitioner had been struck off from the roll on the ground that the income certificate furnished at the time of seeking admission was forged.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the income of the petitioner is less than Rs. One lakh per annum which is below the prescribed l...
Sushil Narang vs.the Registrar of Cooperative Societies & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-19-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 6730/2015 Date of decision:19. h October, 2016 ........ Petitioner SUSHIL NARANG Through Mr. Praveen K. Singh, Advocate. $~46 * + versus THE REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES & ORS Through Ms. Manika Tripathy Advocate for R-1. Mr. Sandeep Bajaj and Mr. Pratap Parmar, Advocates for R-2. ..... Respondent Pandey, CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) Sushil Narang, the petitioner is a member of Jhang Cooperative Society Ltd., the second respondent before us.2. He has filed the present writ petition seeking direction that his name should be included in the list of members who are to be included in the draw of lots for allocation of flats. He objects to the list of members dated 19th November, 2013 sent by the Cooperative Society to the Registrar, Cooperative Societies, as per the notification published on 29th April, 2013. W.P. (C) No.6730/2015 Page 1 of 16 3. The petitioner is an o...
Imran vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-19-2016
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI IMRAN STATE Judgment Reserved on: August 10, 2016 Judgment Delivered on: October 19, 2016 CRL.A. 398/2000 Represented by: Mr. M. Shamikh, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus Represented by: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP with Insp. Birender Singh PS Shahdara. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Imran challenges the impugned judgment dated May 22, 2000 convicting him for offence punishable under Section 376 IPC and the order on sentence dated May 26, 2000 directing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years and to pay a fine of `200/- for offence punishable under Section 376 IPC. By the aforesaid impugned judgment Mohd Ali, Rahisa, Sakina and Rani were acquitted of the charges against them but Yusuf was convicted along with Imran. Crl A. No.329/2001 filed by co- convict Yusuf was dismissed as infructuous on December 10, 2007 as he had already undergone the period of sentence. Thus, this Co...
Suresh Thomas vs.mod Enterprises
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-19-2016
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Crl.Revision Petition No.512/2016 Date of Decision: October 19, 2016 SURESH THOMAS ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Jatin Sapra and Mr.Vineet DSilva, Advs. versus MOD ENTERPRISES ...... Respondent Through Mr.Prateek Kumar, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.1. The present revision petition has been filed under Section 397/399/401 Cr.P.C. for quashing the order dated 25.07.2016 whereby the Appellate Court has dismissed the appeal and judgment dated 18.11.2015 and order dated 26.11.2015 whereby the petitioner was convicted of the offence under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and sentenced to RI for 4 months and to pay fine of Rs.2.70 lakhs in default to undergo SI for a period of one month.2. The brief facts of the case, leading to the filing of Crl.Revision Petition No.512/2016 Page 1 of 12 present petition are that the respondent had filed a complaint u/s 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act against M/s Crescend...
Devi Ram & Anr. Vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-19-2016
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: October 19, 2016 DEVI RAM & ANR. FAO2102016 ..... Appellants Through: Mr. D. Sabharwal, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rakesh Mittal, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR + % (ORAL) JUDGMENT Impugned order of 25th January, 2016 rejects appellants claim petition seeking compensation on account of unfortunate death of their son in a railway accident on 6th April, 2014. The case put forth by appellants counsel is that the deceased with his friend-Rajender was travelling from Okhla to Palwal Railway Station by EMU Local train on 6th April, 2014 and he had got down at Ballabhgarh Railway Station to visit his uncle and after taking meals, he had boarded the train from Ballabhagah Railway Station to Palwal at 6 P.M.. It is the case of appellants that due to heavy rush in the compartment, the deceased, who was standing near the door of train's compartment, suddenly fell down from the runnin...
Mahavir Prasad Garg vs.canara Bank & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-19-2016
$~31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5126/2015 1. MAHAVIR PRASAD GARG Through : Mr. Rajesh Sharma with Mr. Ravi Data, Advocates ........ Petitioner versus CANARA BANK & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. V.K. Tandon, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Vikram Jit Saini, Advocate for R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % The present petition has been filed by the petitioner impugning inter ORDER1910.2016 alia an order dated 1.4.2015, passed by the learned CMM dismissing his application filed in proceedings pending under Section 14 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (in short the SARFAESI Act). Secondly, directions are sought to the respondent No.1/Bank to restore the actual physical possession of two shops situated on the ground floor of premises bearing No.4635-4638, Deputy Ganj, Sadar Bazar, Delhi on the ground that he is a bona fide tenant of the shops much prior to the creation of a mortgage th...
Sunil Kumar Sharma & Ors. Vs.the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-19-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 2513/2016 Date of Decision: October 19th, 2016 SUNIL KUMAR SHARMA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Avnish Rana, Advocate. Versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Izhar Ahmad, APP for the State. Respondent no.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI Learned Additional Public Prosecutor P.S.TEJI, J.1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners, namely, Sh. Sunil Kumar Sharma, Sh. Om Parkash Sharma and Smt. Raj Rani for quashing of FIR No.422/2013 dated 01.08.2013, under Sections 498-A/4IPC registered at Police Station Dabri on the basis settlement arrived at between the petitioners and respondent no.2, namely, Smt. Renu Sharma on 14.11.2014.2. respondent-State submitted that the respondent No.2, present in the Court has been identified to be the complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question by SI Kamlesh. The factual matrix of the present case is th...
s.k.sharma & Anr. Vs.sunita Gaur & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-19-2016
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:10. h August, 2016 Decided on:19. h October, 2016 CRL.M.C. 4083/2011 RAKESH KUMAR GAUR & ORS Represented by: Mr. Anuj Arora, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus STATE & ANR ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP with SI Rajender, PS Malviya Nagar. Complainant in person. W.P.(CRL) 2821/2006 S.K.SHARMA & ANR. Represented by: In person. ........ Petitioner versus SUNITA GAUR & ANR. ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Anuj Arora, Adv. Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel, GNCTD with Mr. Jamal Akhtar, Adv. & SI Rajender, PS Malviya Nagar. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 By CRL.M.C.4083/2011 the petitioners Rakesh Kumar Gaur and Harish Kumar Gaur seek quashing of FIR No.1175/2006 under Sections 354/506/5IPC registered on the complaint of Sanjeev Kumar Sharma. CRL.M.C.4083/2011 & W.P.(CRL) 2821/2006 Page 1 of 5... Petitioner Rakesh Kumar Gaur has since died and hence proceedings qua him stand abated. In W.P.(CR...
govt.of Nct of Delhi vs.y D Builders & Hotels Pvt. Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-19-2016
$~38 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. (COMM) 338/2016 & IA Nos.8718-20/2016 GOVT.OF NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioner Through : Ms Jyoti Singh, Sr Adv with Mr Saurabh Chadda , & Mr Ishan Kashyap, Advs versus Y D BUILDERS & HOTELS PVT. LTD ..... Respondent Through : Mr M K Ghosh, Ms Tina Garg & Mr CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU Rohit Dutta, Advs. % VIBHU BAKHRU, J ORDER1910.2016 IA No.8720/2016 The present application has been filed by the petitioner, inter alia, 1. seeking condonation of delay of 110 days in re-filing of the above captioned petition.2. The petitioner has filed the above petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act) impugning an arbitral award dated 22.10.2015. The present petition was filed on 23.01.2016 which is apparently beyond the period of three months from the date of passing of the award. However, the petitioner asserts that the concerned department had received the copy of award only on 27....
- ‹ Prev
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- Next ›
- Last »