Delhi Court October 2016 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2016 Page 2 of about 298 results (0.019 seconds)Khan Market Welfare Association vs.new Delhi Municipal Council & Ors
Court: Delhi
% + *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h October, 2016 W.P.(C) 3107/2013 KHAN MARKET WELFARE ASSOCIATION ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Bhagat & Mr. Pulkit Gupta, Advs. Versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ORS........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anil Grover with Ms. Kanika Singh & Ms. Noopur, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Varun Nischal, Adv. for R-3&4 i.e. Delhi Police and Delhi Fire Service. Mr. Jasmeet Singh, Adv. for R-2 UOI. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The petitioner, claiming to be a registered Association comprising of various individual flat owners and traders of Khan Market, New Delhi has filed this petition pleading (i) that in pursuance to show cause notices from the New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC) received by the members of the petitioner on 15th March, 2011 stating that the Monitoring Committee constituted by the Supreme Court had directed the respondent NDMC to initiate action against the first floor lessees/occupants of Khan Marke...
Tag this Judgment!Phool Singh vs.municipal Corporation of Delhi Through Its Chairman (So ...
Court: Delhi
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :25. 10.2016 Judgment delivered on :27. 10.2016 + W.P.(C) 3633/2012 PHOOL SINGH Through Mr. Naresh Thanai, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN (SOUTH) AND ANR Through Mr. Mini Pushkarna, ........ RESPONDENTS Standing Counsel, South MCD with Ms. Namrata Mukim, Ms. Anushruti and Ms. Vasundhara Nayyar, Advocates Mr. Ajay Verma, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Vaibhav Mishra, Advocate for DDA Mr. Rajiv Kumar Ghawana, aDvocate for R-4 and R-5(a) to (f) CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner namely Phool Singh. In the course of these proceedings, Phool Singh had expired. His legal representatives have been brought on record. They are now pursuing this litigation. W.P. (C) No.3633/2012 Page 1 of 9 2 At the outset, this Court had noted that prayers (a) and (c) cannot be granted and the petition...
Tag this Judgment!Shriram General Insurance Co Ltd vs.razia & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Date of Decision: October 27, 2016 MAC.APP. 525/2014 SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Advocate versus ..... Respondent RAZIA & ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR Through: Nemo % (ORAL) JUDGMENT The challenge in this appeal is to Award of 14th March, 2014 pertaining to grant of compensation of `41,07,804/- with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum on account of death of a young businessman aged 27 years. The brief facts, as noted in the impugned, are as under: - Briefly stating the facts, as stated by petitioners, are that on 14.02.2013, Mohd. Yusuf, the deceased, was driving the Hero Honda Passion motorcycle bearing registration No.DL-1ST-9079 and was going from his home towards Nand Nagari and when he reached on Wazirabad road, in front of Hernam Palace, a recovery van bearing No.HR- 38G-2502, driven by its driver rashly, negligently and at a high speed, hit the motorcycle. Mohd. Y...
Tag this Judgment!M/S. d.p. Bags (P) Ltd. Vs.m/s. Nav Bharat International Ltd.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:28. h September, 2016 Pronounced on:27th October, 2016 CS (OS) 2049/2014 M/S. D.P. BAGS (P) LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Arjun Singh Bhati, Advocate Versus M/S. NAV BHARAT INTERNATIONAL LTD. .... Defendant Through: Mr. Karan Batura, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER IA No.5392/2015 (u/S. 22(1) of SICA by the defendant) 1. The application at hand has been moved by the defendant invoking Section 22 (1) of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 (SICA) praying for dismissal of the suit instituted by the non-applicant (plaintiff) for recovery of 1,08,43,173/- alongwith interest at 15% p.a. and pendente lite from the date of the suit till realization, primarily on the ground that the applicant company (defendants), incorporated in the State of UP on 13.02.2004, having commenced commercial production on 01.04.2011, it being engaged in the processing of rice paddy had suffered erosion of its en...
Tag this Judgment!Jadhav Vishwas Haridas vs.union Public Service Commission and Ors.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:03. 05.2016 Pronounced on:27. 10.2016 LPA2222013, C.M. APPL.6087-6089/2013, 12337/2013 & 3344/2014 JADHAV VISHWAS HARIDAS Appellant Through: Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Sr. Advocate with Sh. M.G. Kapoor, Sh. Raj Patil and Ms. Aditi Deshpande, Advocates. Versus UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION AND ORS ..Respondents Through: Sh. Naresh Kaushik, Advocate, for UPSC. Sh. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC with Ms. Mohita, Advocate, for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The appellant, in this Letters Patent Appeal is aggrieved by the judgment of a learned Single Judge, dismissing his petition W.P.(C)447/2013 under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein a challenge was laid to Section 33 of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation), Act 1995 ("PWD Act") as being unconstitutional to the extent that it excludes persons...
Tag this Judgment!Smt. Dayawanti Thr. Smt. Sunita Gupta vs.commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Delhi
* + + + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:02. 09.2016 Pronounced on:27. 10.2016 ITA3582015 ITA3592015 ITA5652015 ITA5662015 SMT. DAYAWANTI THROUGH SMT. SUNITA GUPTA (LEGAL HEIR) Appellant Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..Respondent ITA3602015 ITA3612015 AJAY GUPTA Versus Appellant COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..Respondent Through: Sh. Salil Kapoor, Ms. Ananya Kapoor, Sh. Sumit Lal Chandani and Sh. Sanat Kapoor, Advocates, for the appellants Sh. Dileep Shivpuri, Sr. Standing Counsel with Sh. Sanjay Kumar, Jr. Standing Counsel, for revenue, in ITA3572015, 358/2015, 359/2015, 565/2015 & 566/2015. Sh. Anup Kumar Kesari, for Sh. Rahul Chaudhary, Sr. Standing Counsel, for revenue in ITA3602015 & 361/2015. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA ITA3582015 & connected matters Page 1 MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % The appeals lack merit and are accordingly dismissed. For detailed decision, the judgment dated 27.10.2016 in ITA3572015...
Tag this Judgment!Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs.imran Khan & Ors.
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:27th October, 2016 $~23 & 30 * % + MAC.APP. 945/2013 & CM306842016 ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. IMRAN KHAN & ORS. 30 + MAC.APP. 1055/2014 IMRAN KHAN & ORS. ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Tarkeshwar Nath, Mr.Onkar Nath, Mr. Saurabh Kumar Tuteja, Advocates Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Kavita Agrawal, Mr. Ashok for Kumar Garg, Advocates respondent no.1. ..... Appellants Through: Ms.Kavita Agrawal, Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, Advocates versus Through: Mr.Tarkeshwar Nath, Mr.Onkar Nath, Mr. Saurabh Kumar Tuteja, Advocates ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Both the parties have challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.6,45,349/- has been awarded to Imran Khan. The accident dated 18th June, 2010 resulted in permanent 2. disability of 16% in respect of right lower limb to Imran Khan. The MAC. APP. Nos.945/2013 & 1055/2014 Page 1 of ...
Tag this Judgment!The Indian Hotels Company Ltd. Vs.new Delhi Municipal Council
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On :October 24, 2016 Judgment Delivered On :October 27, 2016 RFA (OS) 67/2016 THE INDIAN HOTELS COMPANY LTD. .....Appellant Represented by: Mr.Harish N.Salve, Sr.Advocate Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Rishi Agrawala, Mr.Karan Luthra and Ms.Niyati Kohli, Advocates versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL .....Respondent Represented by: Mr.Sanjay Jain, Additional Solicitor General instructed by Mr.Akshay Makhija, Advocate with Mr.Vidur Mohan, Ms.Rhea Verma, Ms.Malina Bahal and Ms.Bani Dikshit, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Since the documents exhibited at the trial have been admitted by the appellant and the respondent, save and except letter dated November 09, 2011 which has been denied by the NDMC, we shall be referring to the documents with reference to their caption and recording the date of the RFA (OS) No.67/2016 Page 1 of 52 do...
Tag this Judgment!Global Transnational Trading Fze vs.the State Trading Corporation of I ...
Court: Delhi
$~16 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. (I)(COMM) 427/2016 GLOBAL TRANSNATIONAL TRADING FZE ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Gopal Jain, Senior Advocate with Mr Ajay Bhargava, Ms Vanita Bhargava and Mr Arvind Kumar Ray, Advocates. THE STATE TRADING CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD & ANR. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Ravi Sikri, Senior Advocate with Mr Deepank Yadav, Ms Divyangna Singh Jasbir Bidhuri, Advocates. Ms Chetna Bhalla and Mr Rachit, Advocates for R-2. and Mr CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER2710.2016 VIBHU BAKHRU, J IA No.13523/2016 1.2. Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. O.M.P. (I)(COMM) 427/2016 3. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act), inter alia, praying as under:-"(a) That pending the constitution of the Arbitral Tribunal and final disposal of the arbitration proceedings including O.M.P. (I)(COMM)...
Tag this Judgment!Gaon Sabha Karawal Nagar Thr Bdo (North East) Deputy Commissioner Offi ...
Court: Delhi
$~2 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CONT.CAS(C) 605/2013 GAON SABHA KARAWAL NAGAR THR BDO (NORTH EAST) DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OFFICE ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Satyakam, ASC for GNCTD with Mr.P.K.Jayanat, BDO, NE, Delhi. versus SHRI MANGAL SAIN AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.P.P.Malhotra, Sr.Advocate with Ms.Protima Parihar, Advocate for Revisionist. Date of Decision :27. h October, 2016 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) C.M.No.37992/2016 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of. Review Petition No.467/2016 & C.M.No.37991/2016 1. Present review petition has been filed by Sh.Mangal Sain, Mr.Jagat Sain and Mr.Brahm Sain, who claim themselves to be the co-owners of late Sh.Ghasi Ram on the ground that by virtue of the order dated 1st September, 2016, the possession of land in question could not have been handed over to the petitioner contrary to the status quo order dated 22nd ...
Tag this Judgment!