Delhi Court October 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ravneet Takhar vs.commissioner of Income Tax Ix and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-19-2016
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Decided on :19. 10.2016 + W.P.(C) 3898/2013 RAVNEET TAKHAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Salil Kapoor, Mr.Sanat Kapoor, Mr.Sumit Lalchandani and Ms.Ananya Kapoor, Advocates versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX IX AND ORS. Through: Mr.Dileep Shivpuri, Sr.Standing ........ RESPONDENTS Counsel, Mr.Sanjay Kumar, Jr.Standing counsel and Mr.Vikrant A.Maheshwari, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) 1. In this writ petition, the assessee impugns notice dated 24.04.2012 under Section 127 (1) of the Income tax Act as well as the order made subsequently on 11.09.2012. It is contended that the impugned notice and order are contrary to law inasmuch as they do not contain any reasons.2. The assessee was subjected to search and seizure proceedings under Section 132 pursuant to warrant issued in that regard. The warrant was not only in respect of the assessee but also...
Rishi Raj Singh & Ors vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-19-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 1188/2016 Date of Decision: October 19th, 2016 ........ Petitioners RISHI RAJ SINGH & ORS Through Mr.Varun Mehlawat, Adv. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Izhar Ahmad, APP for the State. SI Vineeta Prasad, PS Saraswati Vihar. Respondent no.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by 1. the petitioners, namely, Sh. Rishi Raj Singh, Sh. Harjinder Singh, Smt. Tajinder Kaur and Ms. Garvita Kaur for quashing of FIR No.98/2013 dated 07.03.2013, under Sections 498-A/4IPC registered at Police Station Saraswati Vihar on the basis of the Settlement Deed executed between petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2, namely, Smt. Jasvinder Kaur on 21.05.2015. respondent-State 2. submitted that the respondent No.2, present in the Court has been identified to be the complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question by her counsel. The factual...
Abdul Wazid @ Wazid vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-19-2016
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + RUKSAR Judgment Reserved on: September 26, 2016 Judgment Delivered on: October 19, 2016 CRL.A. 43/2015 Represented by: Mr. Shaad Anwar, Adv. ..... Appellant versus + GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP with SI Mohd. Faizan Ghani PS Ghazipur. CRL.A. 404/2015 ABDUL WAZID @ WAZID Represented by: Mr. Sumeet Verma, Mr. Abhijeet Sharma, Advs. ..... Appellant STATE versus Represented by: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP with SI Mohd. Faizan Ghani PS Ghazipur. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Vide impugned judgment dated December 5, 2014, Ruksar, the appellant in Crl. A. 43/2015 was convicted for offences punishable under Sectionsread with Sections 506 and 376 IPC and Abdul Wazid, the appellant in Crl. A. 404/2015 was convicted for offences punishable under SectionIPC. Vide order on sentence dated December 19, 2014 Crl.A. 43/2015 & 404/2015 Page 1 of 8 Ruksar was sentenced to undergo...
Kumari Ananya Shorewala (Minor) Thr Her Father Anand Shorewala vs.dav ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-19-2016
$~94 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 7980/2016 & CM No.33094/2016 (for interim directions) Judgment delivered on:19. 10.2016 KUMARI ANANYA SHOREWALA (MINOR) THR HER FATHER ANAND SHOREWALA ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Khagesh B. Jha, Advocate. versus DAV PUBLIC SCHOOL JASOLA VIHAR & ANR. Through ....Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr Khagesh B. Jha, Advocate For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Jeewan S. B. from respondent No.1 school. Mr. Shatrajit Banjerji, Advocate for Mr. Gautam Narayan, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1910.2016 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking quashing of letter dated 03.05.2016 whereby the admission of the petitioner has been cancelled and name of the petitioner has been struck off from the rolls of the school on the ground that income certificate furnished at the time of seeking admission was fake and forged. W.P...
Ram Kumar Sharma vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-19-2016
$~2. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WRIT PETITIN (C) No.6811/2015 Date of decision:19. h October, 2016 RAM KUMAR SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Shesh Datt Sharma, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Harsh Ahuja, Advocate for Ms. Manika Arora, CGSC for UOI-respondent Nos. 1 to 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): The petitioner-Ram Kumar Sharma in this writ petition impugns the order dated 1st April, 2015 passed by the Principal Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal, for short) whereby OA No.3312/2014 has been rejected.2. Ram Kumar Sharma had challenged the order dated 4th April, 2014, passed by the Revisionary Authority imposing an enhanced penalty of withholding of next increment of pay for a period of three years without cumulative effect. Earlier, vide order dated 14th February, 2012, the W.P. (C) No.6811/2015 Page 1 of 7 Disciplinary Authority...
Ramit Kohli & Ors vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-19-2016
STATE & ANR Through Mr. Sahil Kakkar, Adv. Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Izhar Ahmad, APP for the State. SI Surender Singh, PS Bindapur. Mr. Deepak M. Singh, Adv. with Respondent no.2 in person. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 1017/2016 RAMIT KOHLI & ORS Date of Decision: October 19th, 2016 ........ Petitioners CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners, namely, Sh. Ramit Kohli, Sh. Rajender Kumar Kohli and Smt. Nirmal Kohli for quashing of FIR No.307/2013 dated 05.07.2013, under Sections 498-A/4IPC registered at Police Station Binda Pur on the basis of the Memorandum of Understanding executed between petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2, namely, Ms. Poonam Kohli on 25.10.2013.2. respondent-State submitted that the respondent No.2, present in the Court has been identified to be the complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question by her counsel.3. The factual matrix o...
Rakesh Kumar Gaur & Ors vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-19-2016
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:10. h August, 2016 Decided on:19. h October, 2016 CRL.M.C. 4083/2011 RAKESH KUMAR GAUR & ORS Represented by: Mr. Anuj Arora, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus STATE & ANR ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP with SI Rajender, PS Malviya Nagar. Complainant in person. W.P.(CRL) 2821/2006 S.K.SHARMA & ANR. Represented by: In person. ........ Petitioner versus SUNITA GAUR & ANR. ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Anuj Arora, Adv. Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel, GNCTD with Mr. Jamal Akhtar, Adv. & SI Rajender, PS Malviya Nagar. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 By CRL.M.C.4083/2011 the petitioners Rakesh Kumar Gaur and Harish Kumar Gaur seek quashing of FIR No.1175/2006 under Sections 354/506/5IPC registered on the complaint of Sanjeev Kumar Sharma. CRL.M.C.4083/2011 & W.P.(CRL) 2821/2006 Page 1 of 5... Petitioner Rakesh Kumar Gaur has since died and hence proceedings qua him stand abated. In W.P.(CR...
Angle Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs.capital Builders & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-19-2016
$~ * 1. + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ARB.P. 30/2015 ANGLE INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal and Ms. Bina Gupta, Advocates. versus M/S CAPITAL BUILDERS & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sudhanshu Batra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Atul Sharma and Mr. Lakshay Khanna, Advocates for Respondent No.1. Mr. Ravinder Singh and Ms. Raveesha Gupta, Advocates for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER1910.2016 1. Angle Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. (AIPL) has filed this petition against M/s. Capital Builders (CB) (Respondent No.1), Capital Buildventures Pvt. Ltd. (CBPL) (Respondent No.2), Oasis Infra Developers Pvt. Ltd. (OIDPL) (Respondent No.3), J.R. Modi Associates Ltd. (JRMAL) (Respondent No.4) under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) seeking the appointment of an Arbitral Tribunal (AT) to adjudicate the disputes between the parties arising out of a Development Rights Agreement (DRA) dated 5th Ju...
United India Insurance Co. Ltd vs.omi @ Om Dutt & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-19-2016
$~14 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:19th October, 2016 MAC.APP. 807/2014 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur and Mr. Amit Gaur, Advs. versus OMI @ OM DUTT & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Peeush Sharma, Mr. S.M. Tomar and Mr. Kartikey Nayyar, Advs. for R1 to R6. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.14,20,200/- has been awarded to claimants/respondents No.1 to 6. The accident dated 07th February, 2010 resulted in the death of 2. Sandeep. The deceased was aged 22 years at the time of the accident and was working as House Keeping Supervisor in PVR City Mall, Prashant Vihar earning Rs.6,594/- per month. The deceased was survived by his parents and four un-married sisters who filed the claim petition before the Claims Tribunal.3. took the income of the deceased as Rs.5,950/- per month, added 50% towards futur...
Lettuce Entertain You Limited vs.pvr Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-19-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:19.10.2016 CO.PET. 854/2015 IN THE MATTER OF:-"LETTUCE ENTERTAIN YOU LIMITED .Petitioner No.1/Transferor Company AND Petitioner No.2/Transferor Company AND PVR LEISURE LIMITED PVR LIMITED .Transferee/Non-petitioner Company AND THEIR RESPECTIVE SHAREHOLDERS AND CREDITORS Through: Mr. Deepak Diwan, Mr. Vinod Kumar and Ms. Himanshi Taneja, Advocates for the... Petitioners Ms. Aparna Mudiam, Deputy Registrar of Companies for the Regional Director Mr. Rajiv Bahl, Advocate Liquidator for the Official CORAM: HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL CO.PET.854/2015 Page 1 of 10 SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J JUDGMENT1 This Joint Petition has been filed under sections 391(2) & 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 by the... Petitioner / Transferor Company No.1& 2 respectively seeking sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation of Lettuce Entertain You Limited (Transferor /... Petitioner Company No.1) and PVR Leisure Limited (Transferor /Petitioner Company No.2) ...
- ‹ Prev
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- Next ›
- Last »