Delhi Court October 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Pardeep Kumar vs.vijay Kumar & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-20-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 1057/2016 PARDEEP KUMAR Date of Decision: October 20th, 2016 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. K.C. Singh, Advocate Versus VIJAY KUMAR & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI Learned Additional Public Prosecutor P.S.TEJI, J.1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner, namely, Sh. Pardeep Kumar for quashing of FIR No.95/2008 dated 27.07.2008, under Section 3IPC registered at Police Station Anand Parbat on the basis of the Settlement/Agreement entered into by the petitioner and respondent no.1, namely, Sh. Vijay Kumar before the Delhi Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi on 27.07.2013. respondent-State 2. submitted that the respondent no.1 present in the Court has been identified to be the complainant/first-informant in the FIR in question by his counsel.3. The factual matrix of the present case is on ...
Delhi Development Authority vs.usha Rani
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-20-2016
$~23. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WRIT PETITION(C) No.3194/2016 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ........ Petitioner Date of decision:20. h October, 2016 Through Mr. Arun Birbal & Mr. Sanjay Singh, Advocates. versus USHA RANI Through Mr. Saurabh Ahuja, Advocate. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): The petitioner-Delhi Development Authority in this writ petition has impugned the order dated 20th August, 2015 passed by the Principal Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal, for short) in OA No.2129/2014. The aforesaid OA was filed by Usha Rani, the respondent before us, challenging the order dated 9th January, 2014 stopping family pension and order/letter dated 12th March, 2014 directing her to refund family pension of Rs.6,38,522/- paid to her.2. The respondent is daughter of late Lala Ram, a retired employee of the Delhi Development Authority who has superannuated on 31st March, 200...
Sukhiya vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-20-2016
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment Reserved on: September 27, 2016 Judgment Delivered on: October 20, 2016 CRL.A. 1260/2015 TEJ NARAIN @ NARAIN ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. K. Singhal, Adv. STATE versus Represented by: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for ..... Respondent the State. CRL.A. 10/2016 + SUKHIYA Represented by: Ms. Rakhi Dubey, Advocate. ..... Appellant STATE versus ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State. CRL.A. 1381/2015 + RAM UDAGAR STATE Represented by: Mr. Jivesh Tiwari, Adv.. ..... Appellant versus ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.the State.1. Vide impugned judgment dated August 1, 2015, Tej Narain alias Narain, the appellant in Crl. A. 1260/2015, Sukhiya, the appellant in Crl. A. Crl.A. 1260/2015, 10/2016 & 1381/2015 Page 1 of 6 10/2016 and Ram Udagar, the appellant in Crl. A. 1381/2015 were convicted for offence punishable under Section 366...
Mohd. Hamid & Ors vs.state (Govt of Nct of Delhi) & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-20-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 1675/2016 MOHD. HAMID & ORS Through Mr.M.Sohail Alam, Adv. Date of Decision: October 20th, 2016 ........ Petitioners versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Izhar Ahmad, APP with SI Suresh Pal, PS Jama Masjid. Respondent no.2 to 5 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.dated under 21.08.2013, The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by 1. the petitioners, namely, Sh. Mohd. Hamid, Sh. Mohd. Rashidur Zafar, Sh. Suhail @ Pappu and Sh. Mohd Addil @ Adil for quashing of FIR No.83/2013 Sections 323/324/325/341/427/452/3IPC registered at Police Station Jama Masjid on the basis of the Memorandum of Understanding executed between the petitioners and respondent nos.2 to 5, namely, Sh. Jawad Jahid, Sh. Saad, Sh. Naseemul Zafar and Sh. Mohd. Sarfaraz on 26.04.2016. respondent-State 2. submitted that the respondent no.2, present in the Court has been identified to be the f...
Central Secretariat Stenographers Service Association and Ors vs.union ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-20-2016
$~01 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7446/2016 Date of decision:20. h October, 2016 Through Mr. Padma Kumar S. Advocate. ........ Petitioner CENTRAL SECRETARIAT STENOGRAPHERS SERVICE ASSOCIATION AND ORS UNION OF INDIA AND ANR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA versus Through Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, Advocate. ..... Respondent SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) Having heard counsel for the petitioner, we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order dated 27th January, 2016 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal bench, New Delhi.2. The contention of the petitioners is that the petitioners are entitled to notional fixation of pay, effective from 1st July of the year to which the select list pertains, notwithstanding the date specified in Rule 2(c) of the Central Secretariat Stenographers Service Rules, 1962 under which the term approved service is defined.3. The definition of term approved service as per Rule 2 (c) of ...
Hardwari Lal Sharma vs.pustak Mahal Publishers
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-19-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on 5th September, 2016 Decided on 19th October, 2016 LPA6162012 HARDWARI LAL SHARMA Through Mr.Mahendra Singh, Advocate ..... Appellant versus Through Mr.Harvinder Singh, Advocate ..... Respondent PUSTAK MAHAL PUBLISHERS % CORAM: HONBLE MR.JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. Hardwari Lal, in this intra court appeal impugns the judgment of learned Single Judge dated 6th August, 2012 passed in WP(C) No.1333/2008 titled as Pustak Mahal Publishers vs. Hardwari Lal Sharma whereby the award dated 10th July, 2007 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Labour Court- II directing reinstatement of appellant with continuity of service and 50% back wages and all other benefits was set aside and the writ petition filed by the respondent- management was allowed.2. The admitted case of the parties is that the appellant was employed as a clerk with the respondent on 1st November, 1978 whereafter he l...
Ruksar vs.govt of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-19-2016
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + RUKSAR Judgment Reserved on: September 26, 2016 Judgment Delivered on: October 19, 2016 CRL.A. 43/2015 Represented by: Mr. Shaad Anwar, Adv. ..... Appellant versus + GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP with SI Mohd. Faizan Ghani PS Ghazipur. CRL.A. 404/2015 ABDUL WAZID @ WAZID Represented by: Mr. Sumeet Verma, Mr. Abhijeet Sharma, Advs. ..... Appellant STATE versus Represented by: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP with SI Mohd. Faizan Ghani PS Ghazipur. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Vide impugned judgment dated December 5, 2014, Ruksar, the appellant in Crl. A. 43/2015 was convicted for offences punishable under Sectionsread with Sections 506 and 376 IPC and Abdul Wazid, the appellant in Crl. A. 404/2015 was convicted for offences punishable under SectionIPC. Vide order on sentence dated December 19, 2014 Crl.A. 43/2015 & 404/2015 Page 1 of 8 Ruksar was sentenced to undergo...
Sravanthi Infratech Private Limited vs.greens Power Equipment (China) ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-19-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~22 * + SRAVANTHI INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED O.M.P. 470/2015 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Piyush Joshi & Ms. Preksha Dugar, Advocates. versus GREENS POWER EQUIPMENT (CHINA) CO. LTD. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Chetan Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Atul Kumar, Mr. Arun Gaur & Mr. Amit Gupta, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR ORDER1910.2016 % IA No.3716 of 2016 (u/O1Rule 10 (2) CPC) 1. This is an application filed by the... Petitioner, Sravanthi Infratech Private Limited (SIPL) under Order 1 Rule 10 (2) of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908 (CPC) seeking impleadment of Joint Provisional Liquidators (JPLs) of the 100% holding company of the Respondent, Greens Power Equipment (China) Company Limited (GPECL), viz., Greens Holdings Limited (GHL), Hongkong on the ground that in terms of the announcement made in relation to the Cayman Court having appointed inspectors for examining the affairs of th...
New India Assurance Co Ltd vs.rajan Devi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-19-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~18 * % + Date of Decision:19th October, 2016 MAC.APP. 650/2015 & CM154252015 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Salil Paul, Advocate. versus RAJAN DEVI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Shyam Singh Sisodia, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 7. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.14,17,963/- has been awarded to claimants / respondents No.1 to 7. The accident dated 14th February, 2012 resulted in the death of 2. Paras Ram. The deceased was aged 41 years at the time of the accident and was survived of his widow, three minor daughters, one minor son and parents, who filed the claim petition before the Claims Tribunal. The deceased was working as a salesman and it was claimed that he was earning Rs.10,000/- per month.3. The Claims Tribunal took maximum wages of Rs. 6656/- in respect of an unskilled worker, added 30%...
Arvind Kejriwal vs.arun Jaitley & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-19-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl.M.C. 2417/2016 Date of Decision: October 19th, 2016 ARVIND KEJRIWAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ram Jethmalani, Senior Advocate with Ms.Nitya Ramakrishnan, Adv., Mr. S. Farasat, Adv., Mr.Ashwath Sitaraman, Adv., Mr.Chirag Madan, Adv., Mr.Anirudh, Adv. & Mr.Ahmed Said, Adv. versus ARUN JAITLEY & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Harish N. Salve, Senior Adv. with Mr. Siddharth Luthra, Sr. Adv., Mr. Manik Dogra, Adv., Mr. Manoj Taneja, Adv., Mr. Poonam Prasad, Adv. for respondent No.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner, under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter shall be referred to as Cr.P.C.) read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside and quashing of order dated Crl.M.C. 2417/2016 Page 1 of 30 19.05.2016 passed by the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi and for stay of the c...
- ‹ Prev
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- Next ›
- Last »