Delhi Court October 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mohd. Jahid @ Jahid Hasan & Ors vs.state (Govt of Nct of Delhi ) & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-20-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 1640/2016 MOHD. JAHID @ JAHID HASAN & ORS Date of Decision: October 20th, 2016 ........ Petitioners Through Mr.M.Sohail Alam, Adv. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ) & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.M.P. Singh, APP with SI Suresh Pal, PS Jama Masjid. Respondent no.2 & 3 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by 1. the petitioners, namely, Sh. Mohd. Jahid @ Jahid Hasan, Sh. Mohd. Naseemul Zafar, Sh. Mohd. Sarfaraz, Sh. Shahbar, Sh. Shadim, Sh. Arif, Sh. Mohd. Shariq, Sh. Saad and Sh. Jawad Zahid for quashing of FIR No.134/2013 dated 11.11.2013, under Sections 3IPC registered at Police Station Jama Masjid on the basis of Memorandum of Settlement executed between the petitioners and respondent nos.2 & 3 namely, Sh. Mohd Hamid and Sh. Addil on 22.03.2016.2. respondent-State submitted that the respondent no.2 present in the Court has been identified t...
Apu Banik vs.the Secretary General, Supreme Court of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-20-2016
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:20. 10.2016 ........ Petitioner % + W.P.(C) 6957/2016 versus APU BANIK Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : None. THE SECRETARY GENERAL, SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ..... Respondent : Mr. Sunil Baloni, Advocate with petitioner in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition contending that the Registry of the Supreme Court has altered the original number of the suit and the law and registered the appeal being Civil Appeal No.7948/2004 in an incorrect subject category.2. It is contended that the appeal originated from Suit No.2/1987 which was for cancellation of sale deed, which should have been registered under the subject category 1806 (Matters relating to allotment, cancellation, fixation of prices of plots/flats) whereas the Registry registered the same in subject category 1805 (Matter...
S Birender Singh Bajaj & Anr vs.s Avtar Singh Bajaj & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-20-2016
$~12. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % CS(OS) 2555/2013 Judgment dated 20th October, 2016 S BIRENDER SINGH BAJAJ & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through : Ms.Deepika V. Marwaha and Mr.Vaibhav Asthana, Advs. versus S AVTAR SINGH BAJAJ & ORS ..... Defendants Through : Mr.A. Tiwari, Adv. for defendants Adv. for for Sharma, Adv. no.1-3. Ms.Megha Katari, Adv. for defendants no.4, 9, 10 and Legal Heirs of defendant no.14. Mr.Lalit Bhardwaj, defendants no.5 and 6. Mr.Pramod defendant no.7. Mr.Himanshu defendant no.8. Ms.Namita Wali, Adv. for defendants no.11 to 13. Mr.A.K. Vali, Mr.Tuhin Vali, Mr.Bhaskar Vali and Mr.Farid Khan, Advs. for the intervenor, Mr.Inderjeet Singh in OA No.82/2016. Saini, Adv. for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Plaintiffs have filed the present suit for partition and permanent injunction with respect to the property bearing no.S-195, Greater Kailash, Part-I, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the suit property).2. The plaintiffs...
Ram Avtar Tyagi vs.narender Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-20-2016
* + % RAM AVTAR TYAGI IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RSA No.385/2015 20th October, 2016 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. B.S. Chaudhary and Mr. Chirag Goswami, Advocates. versus NARENDER SINGH ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Nawab Singh Jaglan, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) RSA No.385/2015 and C.M. Appl. No.24274/2015 (for stay under Order XLI Rule 5 read with Section 151 CPC) 1. Counsel for the parties have been heard at length.2. This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the Judgments of the courts below; of the Trial Court dated 3.9.2013 and the First Appellate Court dated 6.6.2015; by which the plaint was rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. RSA No.385/2015 Page 1 of 4 3. It is seen that the disputes between the parties pertain to half area of 2 bighas of land situated in khasra No.228 of Village Kadipur, Delhi, and which land is part of ...
Raminder Singh vs.union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-20-2016
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :28. h SEPTEMBER, 2016 DECIDED ON :20. h OCTOBER, 2016 + BAIL APPLN. 2647/2015 RAMINDER SINGH ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Vikas Padora, Advocate with Mr.Vaibhav Aggarwal, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr.Neeraj Jain, Advocate with Ms.Rajul Jain, Advocate for R1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. This is a petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (to be referred as Code) for seeking bail. Status report is on record.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. The petitioner, admittedly, is facing inquiry before learned ACMM under Section 5 of the Extradition Act.3. Admittedly, arrest warrants against the petitioner were issued by Honble Sheriff of Lothian and Borders at Edinburgh on 05.11.2012 BAIL APPLN. 2647/2015 Page 1 of 4 (Annexure P2). The petitioner was arrested by the police of PS Crime Branch, Chanakyapu...
New Delhi Municipal Council vs.asha Devi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-20-2016
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: October 20, 2016 + FAO2972016 & C.M. 24349/2016 NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Anil Grover, Standing Counsel with Ms. Kanika Singh, Advocate Versus ASHA DEVI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Jatinder Kamra, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) Impugned order of 29th February, 2016, grants compensation of `10 lacs odd, to the legal heirs of the deceased. Sole contention raised by learned Standing Counsel for appellant is that the amount of `1 lac deposited by appellant has not been set off. It is submitted by learned Standing Counsel for appellant that ex gratia payment of `1 lac was promptly made to the legal heirs of the deceased in order to meet the funeral expenses etc. and infact, the said payment was an interim compensation, which is required to be paid in such a situation and so, the amount of `1 lac paid ex gratia has to be treated as interim Page 1 of 3 FAO29...
Noor Fatma vs.the State Govt Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-20-2016
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: September 26, 2016 Judgment Delivered on: October 20, 2016 CRL.REV.P. 164/2015 & Crl.M.A. 4115/2015 versus NOOR FATMA CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA THE STATE GOVT NCT OF DELHI & ORS Represented by: Mr. R.N. Mishra, Adv. ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP. Mr. Nasimuddin, Adv. for R-2 to 11. MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. By the present revision petition, the... Petitioner seeks setting aside of the order dated 21st November, 2014 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge discharging respondents 2 to 11 from the offence punishable under Section 395 IPC.2. Factual matrix of the case is that on 1st June, 2013, a PCR call was received which was recorded vide DD No.30A stating about a quarrel and the same was assigned to SI Mukesh. In the meantime, the petitioner came to the police station and alleged that her landlord had thrown her household articles on the street. SI Mukesh along...
Naresh Bhatt & Ors vs.state (Govt of Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-20-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 1434/2016 NARESH BHATT & ORS Date of Decision: October 20th, 2016 ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Alok Dev, Adv. with Ms.Richa Singh, Adv. Versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.G.M. Farooqui, APP for the State SI Rajiv Kumar, PS M.S. Park. Mr.Vipin Kumar, Adv. with Respondent no.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by 1. the petitioners, namely, Sh. Naresh Bhatt, Smt. Shanta Bhatt, Sh. Mathura Dutt Bhatt, Sh. Satish Bhauguna, Sh. Puneet Bhagat, Smt. Sunita Bhagat and Smt. Vandana Keelor for quashing of FIR No.125/2013 dated 16.05.2013, under Sections 498-A/4IPC registered at Police Station Mansarover Park on the basis of mediation report of the Delhi Mediation Centre, Karkadooma Courts, Delhi between petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2, namely, Ms. Ranjana on 30.01.2014. respondent-State 2. submitted that the resp...
Rudermani @ Rukmani vs.state (Gnct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-20-2016
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. No.374/2015 & Crl.M.A. No.3841/2016 Date of Decision:20. h October, 2016 + RUDERMANI @ RUKMANI ..... Appellant Through Mr.Ajay Verma, Adv. Appellant in custody. versus STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State. HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI GITA MITTAL, J (Oral) 1. The police has undertaken the exercise of verification of the extract of the Parivar Register maintained by the Gram Panchayat, PS Bhatpara Rani, Village Bhaiyari Bhagel, District Devaria. As per status report dated 27.05.2016, no authentication of the document relied upon by the appellant was possible.2. On 30.08.2016, we had observed that the document relied upon by the appellant was not reliable. Consequently, the medial examination of the appellant was directed to be conducted by the medical Board of Deen Dayal Upadhyay Hospital to ascertain the probable age of the appellant.3. It appears from the rec...
M/S New Delhi Hotels Ltd & Anr vs.association of Apartment Owners of M ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-20-2016
$~10 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:20. 10.2016 CM(M) 634/2013 M/S NEW DELHI HOTELS LTD & ANR ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Mohit Gupta and Mr.Rohit Aggarwal, Advocates versus ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF MERCANTILE HOUSE (REGD) ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH Through Ms.Sunita Bhardwaj,Advocate for R1 JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) The present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has 1. been filed seeking to challenge the order dated 04.06.2013 passed by the Appellate Court setting aside the order of the Senior Civil Judge and passing an injunction order in favour of the respondent.2. This is an old petition filed in 2013 and is the subject matter of protracted litigation by filing of various miscellaneous applications which seem to have been filed over time.3. The basic facts are that the petitioners constructed a multi storeyed building at 15, Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi known as Mercantile House. The main...
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Next ›
- Last »