Delhi Court October 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Teena vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-24-2016
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RESERVED ON :27. h SEPTEMBER, 2016 DECIDED ON :24. h OCTOBER, 2016 CRL.A.626/2014 ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Joginder Tuli, Advocate with versus Ms.Joshini Tuli, Advocate. TEENA STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through : MsMeenakshi Dahiya, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Challenge in this appeal is a judgment dated 19.04.2014 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.93/2013 arising out of FIR No.78/2013 PS Kamla Market by which the appellant - Teena was held guilty for committing offences punishable under Sections 368/120B IPC and Sections 3/4/of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 (In short ITP Act). By an order dated 19.04.2014, she was sentenced to undergo various prison terms with fine.2. Briefly stated, the prosecution case as reflected in the charge- sheet was that on 09.05.2013 at around 07.15 p.m. a raid was conducted by the police of PS Kamla Market at Kotha No.56, GB Road, Delhi. The vic...
Rajeev & Ors vs.the State (Govt of Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-24-2016
THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Richa Sharma, Mr. Sanjay Sharma, Advocate Versus Through: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with Sub-Inspector Sandeep Singh, Police Station Bharat Nagar, Delhi Mr. Surender Rana, Advocate for respondent No.2 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 2300/2016 RAJEEV & ORS Date of Decision: October 24th, 2016 ........ Petitioners CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners, namely, Sh. Rajeev, Smt. Rani, Sh. Om Parkash, Sh. Rahul and Ms. Barkha for quashing of FIR No.120/2011 dated 13.06.2011, under Sections 498-A/406 IPC registered at Police Station Bharat Nagar on the basis of the Compromise Deed executed between petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2, namely, Smt. Kavita on 11.01.2012.2. respondent-State submitted that the respondent No.2, present in the Court has been identified to be...
Master Ajeet Kumar Das vs.brahm Singh & Ors. (United India Insurance C ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-24-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:24. h October, 2016 $~2 * % + MAC.APP. 592/2016 MASTER AJEET KUMAR DAS Through: Mr.S.N. Parashar, Advocate ..... Appellant Versus BRAHM SINGH & ORS. (UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: Mr.Sameer Nandwani, Advocate for Respondent no.3. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal 1. whereby compensation of Rs.5,33,900/- has been awarded to the appellant. The appellant is seeking the enhancement of the award amount. The accident dated 30th October, 2014 resulted in 90% disability 2. to the appellant. The appellant is present in Court and his disability has been seen. The appellant cannot even wear and take off his cloths on his own and is dependent on his family even for the basic necessities. The injuries suffered by the appellant cannot be expressed in words and therefore, this Court has taken the photograph of the appellant which is rep...
Manjeet Singh vs.indrapastha Gas Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-24-2016
$~82 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:24. 10.2016 + MANJEET SINGH W.P.(C) 6352/2016 ........ Petitioner Through: Atyab Siddiqui and Tibah Siddiqui, Advocates. versus INDRAPASTHA GAS LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanat Kumar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. S. K. Pandey and Mr.Yogender Verma, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J(Oral) 1. The petitioner seeks quashing of the report dated 31.03.2016 of the Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) of the respondent; quashing of the order dated 18.05.2016 which has reduced the rank of the petitioner to one lower post, i.e., from Vice President (Level-5 Grade) to Chief General Manager (Level-4 Grade); quashing of the order dated 08.07.2016 passed by the Appellate Authority as well as the communication of the order dated 14.07.2016.2. The petitioner was charged and was found guilty of misconduct which, according to the respondent, would be considered sexual harassment under the Sexual Ha...
Sandeep Chauhan vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-24-2016
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON : OCTOBER24 2016 + CRL.REV.P. 620/2016 & Crl.M.A.16624/2016 SANDEEP CHAUHAN ........ Petitioner Through : M.Hasibuddin, Advocate with Mr.B.K.Das, Advocate. VERSUS ........ RESPONDENTS STATE & ANR. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG Through : Ms.Manjeet Arya, APP. Mr.Sudhir Balyan, Advocate with Mr.Dhiraj Kochar, Advocate for R2 along with R2 in person. S.P.GARG, J.(ORAL) 1. Present Revision Petition has been preferred by the petitioner- Sandeep Chauhan to challenge the legality and correctness of a judgment dated 20.08.2016 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in Crl.A.No.81whereby the judgment dated 3.3.2016 and Order on Sentence dated 4.3.2016 of learned Metropolitan Magistrate in Complaint Case No.817/2015 under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act were upheld. The petitioner was convicted under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act and was sentenced Crl.Rev.P.620/2016 Page 1 of 3 to undergo Simple Imprisonment for three ...
Mohd Akhlaq & Ors vs.state (Govt of Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-24-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 2228/2016 MOHD AKHLAQ & ORS Date of Decision: October 24th, 2016 ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Vijay Kinger, Advocate Versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with Sub- Inspector Subhash Chand, CAW Cell/East CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by 1. the petitioners, namely, Sh. Mohd. Akhlaq, Sh. Mohd. Taqi, Smt. Manisha Begum and Sh. Firoz for quashing of FIR No.466/2013 dated 20.05.2013, under Sections 498-A/4IPC registered at Police Station Shakarpur on the basis of Mediation Report of Mediation Centre, Karkardooma Courts, in view of the settlement arrived at between the petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2, namely, Smt. Shehnaz on 03.03.2016.2. respondent-State submitted that the respondent No.2, present in the Court has been identified to be the complainant/first-in...
M/S Bharat Tourist Service & Anr vs.joginder Lal Kuthiala & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-24-2016
$~7 * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA1152016 and CM No.7972/2016 M/S BHARAT TOURIST SERVICE & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr.Shwetank Sailakwal, Advocate versus JOGINDER LAL KUTHIALA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.B.L.Walia, AR of the respondent Joginder lal Kuthiala CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % Counsel for the appellant states that during the pendency of the ORDER2410.2016 present appeal, the parties have arrived at a settlement whereunder, a fresh lease deed has been executed by the respondents in favour of the appellant in respect of the subject premises for a period of three years and the rent has been fixed @ Rs.12,000/- per month. Sh. B.L.Walia, the representative of the respondents confirms the aforesaid fact that the parties have arrived at a settlement.2. Accordingly, at the request of counsel for the appellant, the present appeal is dismissed as withdrawn along with the pending applications in view of the settlement stated to have been ar...
Lochan Singh vs.haryana Roadways
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-24-2016
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Reserved on 27th September, 2016 Decided on 24th October, 2016 LPA6012010 LOCHAN SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr Atul T.N., Advocate Versus HARYANA ROADWAYS Through: ..... Respondent Mr Devender Kr. Additional AG, Haryana Saini, % CORAM: HONBLE MR.JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. This Intra Court appeal has been preferred by the appellant (hereinafter referred to as the workman) being dissatisfied with the judgment dated 01.07.2010 passed by the Ld. Single Judge in W.P.(C) No.8983/2013. Haryana Roadways v. Lochan Singh.2. The appellant herein was employed as a conductor in the respondent Haryana Roadways (hereinafter referred to as the management). While he was working as such, he was served with a charge-sheet on the allegations that on 16.05.1987, the bus was checked by inspectors of the management at Ambala Cantt and it was found that the appellant - workman had charged Rs.25/- only fr...
Boom Investments Private Limited vs.mohair Investment and Trading Comp ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-24-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI COMPANY PETITION No.24/2016 Judgment Delivered On:24. 10.2016 In the matter of The Companies Act, 1956 & the Companies Act, 2013 (to the extent applicable): Boom Investments Private Limited... Petitioner/Transferor Company WITH Mohair Investment and Trading Company Private Limited... Petitioner/Transferee Company Through: Mr. N. Ganpathy, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Vatsala Rai, Advocate for the... Petitioners JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. This joint petition has been filed under Sections 391 & 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 by the petitioner companies seeking sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation of Boom Investments Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the transferor company) with Mohair Investment and Trading Company Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the transferee company). CO.PET.24/2016 Page 1 of 8 2. The registered offices of the transferor and transferee companies are situated at New Delhi, within the jurisdiction of this Cou...
Raj Kumar & Anr vs.state Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-24-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 2120/2016 RAJ KUMAR & ANR Date of Decision: October 24th, 2016 ........ Petitioners Through: Ms. Prerana, Advocate. Versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. M.S. Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with Sub- Inspector Prem Pal, Police Station Ashok Vihar, Delhi CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI2307.2008 under dated FIR No.257/2008 Learned Additional Public Prosecutor P.S.TEJI, J.1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners, namely, Sh. Raj Kumar and Smt. Kamla for quashing of Sections 420/448/467/471/34/120-B IPC registered at Police Station Ashok Vihar on the basis of settlement arrived at between the petitioners and respondent No.2, namely, Sh. Ajit Singh.2. respondent-State submitted that the respondent No.2 present in the Court has been identified to be the complainant/first informant by SI Prem Pal. The factual matrix of the present case is that in ...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »