Delhi Court July 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Progressive Shelters Pvt Ltd. and Ors. Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-22-2015
$~45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:22. d July, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2911/2015 PROGRESSIVE SHELTERS PVT LTD. & ORS ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr. Pushpander Kumar, Adv. versus STATE .... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Kanika Agnihotri, Adv. / Proxy Counsel for Ms. Jasbir Kaur, APP for State. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Vide the instant petition; petitioners seek directions thereby quashing FIR No.148/2013, registered at PS-Barakhamba Road for the offences punishable under Section 420 IPC against the petitioners which is now pending investigation with ALBR Section, EOW, Crime Branch, Delhi Police, PS-Mandir Marg Complex, Mandir Marg, New Delhi.2. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the aforesaid case was registered on the complaint of respondent No.2 / BLS SUMER JV through its authorised representative, Sh. Dinesh Sharma. The case is at the initial stage of investigation. Meanwhile, the mat...
Krishan Kumar and Krishanpal and Ors Vs. State (Govt of Nct of Delhi) ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-22-2015
$~39 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:22. d July, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2898/2015 KRISHAN KUMAR & KRISHANPAL & ORS ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr. S.S. Yadav and Mr. Pushpander Kumar, Advs. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Represented by: Ms. Kanika Agnihotri, Adv. / Proxy Counsel for Mr. M.N. Dudeja, APP for State with Inspr. Kamaldeep Singh, PS-Dwarka Sector-23. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Vide the instant petition; petitioners seek directions thereby quashing FIR No.347/2009, registered at PS-Dwarka Sector 23 for the offences punishable under Sections 420/409/405/418/419/467/ 468/471/506 IPC against the petitioners.2. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the aforesaid case was registered on the complaint of respondent No.2 Sh. Mani Ram Gupta. After investigation, the Police filed the chargesheet. However, the charges are yet to be framed. Meanwhile, the matter has ...
Amit Vs. The State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-22-2015
$~38 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:22. d July, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2897/2015 AMIT ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Pushpandar Kumar, Adv. versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Represented by: Ms. Kanika Agnihotri, Adv. / Proxy Counsel for Ms. Jasbir Kaur, APP for State. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) Crl. M.A.10316/2015 (for exemption) Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, the application is allowed. + CRL.M.C. 2897/2015 1. Vide the instant petition; petitioner seeks directions thereby quashing FIR No.405/2013, registered at PS-Mongol Puri, for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/406 IPC against the petitioner.2. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the aforesaid case was registered on the complaint of respondent No.2 namely Neha. After investigation, the Police filed the chargesheet. However, the charges are yet to be framed. Meanwhile, the matt...
Rajesh Yadav and Ors Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-22-2015
$~41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:22. d July, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2903/2015 RAJESH YADAV & ORS ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr. Pushpander Kumar, Adv. versus STATE ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Kanika Agnihotri, Adv. / Proxy Counsel for Ms. Jasbir Kaur, APP for State. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Vide the instant petition; petitioners seek directions thereby quashing FIR No.555/2013, registered at PS-Seema Puri for the offences punishable under Sections 406/384/506/420/34 IPC against the petitioners.2. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the aforesaid case was registered on the complaint of respondent No.2 / BLS SUMER JV through its authorised representative, Sh. Dinesh Sharma. After investigation, the Police filed the chargesheet. However, the charges are yet to be framed. Meanwhile, the matter has been settled between the petitioners / Company and respondent No.2 vide MOU dated 30...
Hemang Singh @ Himanshu Singh and Ors. Vs. State (Nct of Delhi) and Or ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-22-2015
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:22nd July, 2015 + CRL.M.C. No.1980/2015 HEMANG SINGH @ HIMANSHU SINGH & ORS. ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr. Pushpander Kumar, Advocate. Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Ms.Kanika Agnihotri, Proxy Counsel for Ms. Jasbir Kaur, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with SI Yogesh Kumar, PS Bhajanpura. Mr. Jai Gopal Garg, Advocate for Respondents No.2 to 4. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. By way of this petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.244/2012 registered at Police Station Bhajanpura for the offences punishable under Sections 324/34 IPC and the consequential proceedings emanating therefrom against the petitioners.2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the aforesaid case was registered on the complaint of respondent No.2. In the said scuff...
Chhaju Ram and Ors. Vs. State (Govt of Nct of Delhi) and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-22-2015
I- 29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:22. d July, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2912/2015 CHHAJU RAM & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Arun Vashistha, proxy counsel for petitioners with petitioners in person versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with ASI Rajneesh Respondents No.2 & 3 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.363/2015, under Section 308 of the IPC, registered at police station Palam Village, Delhi is sought on the basis of Compromise Deed of 13th July, 2015 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR now stands cleared between the parties. Notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice submits that respondents No.2 & 3, present in the Court, are the complainant party and they have identified Crl.M.C.No.2912/2015 Page 1 to be so b...
Om Krishan Sehrawat and Ors. Vs. The State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-22-2015
I-22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:22. d July, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2894/2015 & Crl.M.A.No.10312/2015 OM KRISHAN SEHRAWAT & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Arun Vashistha, proxy counsel for petitioners versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with WSI Asha Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.69/2013, under Sections 498A/406/34 of the IPC, registered at police station Neb Sarai, Delhi is sought in this petition. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that after demise of her husband in the September, 2012, the FIR in question was got registered by respondent No.2 against petitioners and the subject matter of FIR in question stands amicably settled in terms of Compromise Deed (Annexure-P-2). Ms. Nishi Jain, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent...
Sarita Kumari Verma Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-22-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on July 15 , 2015 Judgment delivered on July 22, 2015 + W.P.(C) 1543/2015 & CM No.2745/2015 SARITA KUMARI VERMA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Chandra Shekhar, Adv. with Mr.Ajesh Luthra, Ms.Jyotsna Kaushik, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr.Bhagwan Swaroop Shukla, Adv. with Mr.Suyosh Kr., Adv. for R1 and R2 Mr.Manoj, Adv. with Ms.Aparna Sinha, Adv. for R3-FCI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. The challenge in this writ petition is to the order dated December 12, 2014 passed by the respondent No.2 whereby the candidature of the petitioner for the post of Assistant, Grade-III (Technical) in the respondent No.3-Food Corporation of India was rejected. The facts:2. The case of the petitioner is that she belongs to Sumar community and was issued Other Backward Classes (OBC) certificate on June 25, 2001 by the Deputy Commissioner of Delhi. On August 25, 2012, the respond...
Ganesh Gupta @ Deepak Gupta and Anr Vs. State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-22-2015
$~35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:22nd July, 2015 + Crl. M.C. No.2889/2015 GANESH GUPTA @ DEEPAK GUPTA & ANR Represented by : ..... Petitioners Mr.Pushpender Kumar, proxy counsel with petitioners in person. Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR Represented by : ..... Respondents Ms.Kanika Agnihotri, proxy counsel for Mr.Neeraj Singh, APP for the State with SI Daljeet Singh, PS CWC, Nanakpura, New Delhi. Complainant in person. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) Crl.M.A.No.10298/2015 (exemption) Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, the application is allowed. Crl. M.C. No.2889/2015 1. Vide the present petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.23/2014 registered at Police Station CAW Cell Nanakpura, New Delhi for the offences punishable under Sections 406/498-A/34 IPC and the consequential proceedings emanating therefrom against the petiti...
Rajnish Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-22-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :16. 07.2015 Judgment delivered on :22. 07.2015 CRL.A.1009/2012 RAJNISH ..... Appellant Through Ms.Rakhi Dubey, Advocate. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through + ..... Respondent Mr.Pramod Saxena, APP for the State along with ASI Rajpal. CRL.A.700/2013 HANS RAJ Through ..... Appellant Mr.Chetan Anand, Advocate. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through ..... Respondent Mr.Pramod Saxena, APP for the State along with ASI Rajpal. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 These are two appeals filed by the two co-convicts Rajnish and Hans Raj. Vide the impugned judgment and order of sentence dated 12.4.2012 and 24.4.2012 both the convicts stood convicted under Sections 304 Part-I and 201 of the IPC. Each of them had been sentenced to undergo RI for a period of 10 years and to pay a fine of Rs.5000/-, in default, to undergo SI for a period of 1 month for the offence under Section 304 Part I of the IPC. For their ...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »