Delhi Court July 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Umed Singh Vs. Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-02-2015
$~R-5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:02. 07.2015 + W.P. (C) 4931/2005 UMED SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. H.S. Dahiya, Advocate. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Harsh Ahuja and Mr. Abhishek Choudhary, proxy counsel for Ms. Monika Arora, Advocate for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. The petitioner is aggrieved by an order dated 25.04.2001 removing him from the services of Central Industrial Security Force (CISF). He was issued a chargesheet including statement of imputations in respect of acts alleged to be misconduct which were said to have been committed by him on 15.01.2000. The chargesheet, inter alia, alleged that the petitioner had presented himself for duty in a state of intoxication contrary to the standing orders of CISF and furthermore had misbehaved and abused his superior officer. In support of statement of imputation, the chargesheet h...
Subhash Chand Vs. Mcd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-02-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:2. d July, 2015 Review Petition No.257/2015 and CM Nos. 8362-8363/2015 in W.P.(C) 5861/2007 SUBHASH CHAND Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Rajiv Aggarwal and Mr. Sachin Kumar, Advocates versus MCD Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Digvijay Rai with Mr. Dhiraj Kumar, Advocate for MCD CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.Review Petition No.257/2015, CM Nos. 8362/2015( (for condonation of delay in filing the review petition) & CM No.8363/2015(for Stay of recovery proceedings) 1. Vide Review Petition No.257/2015, the respondent/applicant seeks review/recall of the order/judgment dated 21st April, 2011 passed by this Court in WP(C) No.5861/2007. Vide CM No.8362/2015, condonation of delay of 1458 days in filing the review petition is sought under Section 5 of Limitation Act. Vide CM No.8363/2015, stay of recovery proceedings pursuant to aforesaid judgment is sought.2. Before considering the applications in h...
Rajesh Khanna Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-02-2015
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:02. 07.2015 + W.P.(C) 2642/2014, C.M. 18692/2014 & 3125/2015 RAJESH KHANNA NOS. 5484/2014, 16202/2014, ..... Petitioner Through : Sh. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Manish Kumar, Sh. Amit Kumar, Sh. Piyush Kaushik and Sh. Mohit Arora, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through : Sh. Jaswinder Singh, Advocate, for UOI. Sh. Yeeshu Jain and Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates, for Respondent Nos. 2 and 5. Sh. Arun Birbal and Sh. Sanjay Singh, Advocates, for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. In the present proceeding under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the relief claimed is a declaration that by reason of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, W.P.(C) 2642/2014 Page 1 Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereafter referred to as the new Act), the acquisi...
Up Airways Ltd., Now King Airways Vs. Pritam Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-02-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:06. h May , 2015 Date of Decision:02. d July, 2015 % + W.P.(C) 1490/2012 UP AIRWAYS LTD., NOW KING AIRWAYS ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rajiv Shankar Dvivedi, Ms. Omita and Mr. Unnarkar, Advocates. versus PRITAM SINGH Through: .....Respondent Mr. Shohit Chaudhry, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH JUDGMENT1 By the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has assailed the award dated 19.01.2012 passed by the Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cumLabour Court-II (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, in I.D. No.18/1999, wherein the Tribunal held that the service of the respondent was illegally terminated by the management and thereby granted a relief of reinstatement in service with full back wages with continuity of service and all other benefits to him.2. Briefly stating the facts ...
Amit Vs. The State (Govt. of Nct) Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-02-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :8. h APRIL, 2015 DECIDED ON :2. d JULY, 2015 + CRL.A.1146/2014 AMIT Through : ..... Appellant Ms.N.R.Nariman, Advocate. VERSUS THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Present appeal is directed against a judgment dated 21.02.2014 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.46/13 arising out of FIR No.156/12 PS Subhash Place by which the appellant Amit was held guilty for committing offences under Sections 120B IPC; 376 IPC read with Section 120B IPC. By an order dated 22.02.2014, he was sentenced to undergo RI for ten years with fine ` 20,000/- under Section 376 IPC read with Section 120B IPC and RI for seven years with fine ` 10,000/- under Section 120B IPC. Both the sentences were to operate concurrently.2. Briefly stated, the prosecution case as set up in the charge- sheet was that on or before January, 2012 at Delhi, the appellan...
Akshita Kohli Vs. Directorate of Education and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-02-2015
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2873/2015 & CM No.5151/2015 (for directions) AKSHITA KOHLI ..... Petitioner Through: Counsel for the petitioner (appearance not given) Versus DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Nikhita Khetrapal, Adv. for R-1&2. Col. S.S. Bhandari (Retd.), Honorary Manager of R-3. Mr. A.K. Singh, Adv. for R-4. Mr. Amit Bansal, Adv. for R-5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW ORDER % 02.07.2015 1. The petition (filed on 19th March, 2015) seeks a mandamus directing the respondent No.3 Guru Nanak Public School (GNPS), Punjabi Bagh, New Delhi and respondent No.5 Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) (wrongly impleaded as Central Board of Secondary School) to permit the petitioner to take the examination for Class XII for the academic session 2014-15 (and which examination commenced from 2nd March, 2015) as a regular student and to also allow her to appear as Eligible for Improvement of Performance (EOIP) c...
Virender Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-02-2015
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P. 206/2015 & Crl.M.B.3239/2015 Date of decision:02. 07.2015 VIRENDER ..... Petitioner Through Adv. (Appearance not given) versus STATE Through % ..... Respondent Mr. Lovkesh Sawhney, APP SI R.S. Tyagi PS Saket. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORDER0207.2015 ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner assails the judgment and order of conviction of the Trial Court in connection with FIR No.352/2012 (PS. Saket) whereby he was convicted for the offences under section 468 IPC and was sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of seven years.2. The aforementioned judgment and order of conviction and sentence, was challenged by the petitioner in criminal appeal No.19/2014 before the ASJ, Saket Distt. Courts, New Delhi. The Appellate Court vide its judgment dated 17.11.2014, differing with the Trial Court judgment, convicted the petitioner under section 474 IPC and sentenced him to undergo RI for 3 years and a fin...
Union of India Vs. Jagdamba Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-02-2015
$~11. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) 6152/2015 UNION OF INDIA Through : Judgment dated 2nd July, 2015 ..... Petitioner Mr. Rakesh Mittal, Advocate versus JAGDAMBA SINGH Through : ..... Respondent Mr. T. D. Yadav, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) CM APPL. NOS.11179/2015.1. This is an application filed by petitioner seeking condonation of five days delay in filing the present petition.2. Heard. For the reasons stated in the application and in the interest of justice, present application is allowed. Delay in filing the present petition is condoned. Let writ petition be taken on record.3. Applications stand disposed of. W.P.(C) 6152/2015.4. Present petition has been filed by petitioner/Union of India under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash/set aside the order dated 15.12.2014 passed by Central Administrative Tribunal in OA No.603/2014.5. As per the petition, t...
Shashi Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-02-2015
$~Part-A (R-6) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRIMINAL APPEAL No.355/2012 Date of decision:2. d July, 2015 SHASHI ..... Appellant Through Mr. Chetan Lokur, Advocate. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through Mr. Varun Goswami, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): The appellant Shashi impugns the judgment dated 7th July, 2011, in case arising out of the charge sheet filed in FIR No.157/2008, police station Nabi Karim, Delhi convicting him for the murder of his wife Kavita on 21st November, 2008 at about 3 P.M. in front of Kharbanda Juice Corner, Multani Dhanda, Nabi Karim, Delhi. By order on sentence dated 14th July, 2011, the appellant Shashi has been sentenced to Rigorous Imprisonment for life and fine of Rs.50,000/-. In default of payment of fine, the appellant is to undergo simple imprisonment for one year. Out of the aforesaid fine of Rs. 50,000/-, Rs. 40,000/- , it is directed, would be paid to Shanti Devi (PW...
Sudhir Bansal Vs. Shyama Devi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-02-2015
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO992010 & CM Nos.4769/2010, 4770/2010 & 7571/2015 Date of Decision :02. h July, 2015 SUDHIR BANSAL Through: ..... Appellant Mr. A.K. Mishra, Advocate. versus SHYAMA DEVI & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. S.C. Juneja and Ms. Asha Hans, Advocates with respondent no.1 & 4. Mr. O.P. Saxena, APP for State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT(ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the order dated 15 th December, 2009 where the Commissioner, Workmens Compensation has awarded compensation of Rs.3,06,180/- to the respondents.2. Respondent no.1 is the widow and respondents no.2 to 4 are the children of Late Gaend Lal who was working as a mason under the appellant at Rashtrapati Bhawan and on 24th December, 2004, he fell down from a height resulting in head injuries. Gaend Lal was taken by the petitioner to Dr. RML Hospital where he succumbed to the injuries on 26th December, 2004. The police initially registered FIR No.339/04 under S...
- ‹ Prev
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 46
- 47
- Next ›
- Last »