Delhi Court July 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rose Valley Hotels and Vs. The Secretary, Department of
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-02-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:18. h June, 2015 Decided on:2. d July, 2015 % + W.P.(C) 6014/2015 & CM109132015 (stay) ROSE VALLEY HOTELS AND ENTERTAINMENTS LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Jayant K. Mehta, Mr. Samiron, Mr. Sumeet Singh, Mr. Biswajit, Mr. Indranil Ghosh, Advs. versus THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE & ORS ..... Respondent Through Mr. Navin Chawla, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Shamshuddin, Adv. for ED. + W.P.(C) 6020/2015 & CM109282015 (stay) GAUTAM KUNDU Through ..... Petitioner Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Jayant K. Mehta, Mr. Samiron, Mr. Sumeet Singh, Mr. Biswajit, Mr. Indranil Ghosh, Advs. versus THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE & ORS ..... Respondent Through Mr. Navin Chawla, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Shamshuddin, Adv. for ED. + W.P.(C) 6022/2015 & CM109342015 (stay) SHIBAMOY DUTTA Through ..... Petitioner Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Jayant K. Mehta, Mr. S...
Dcm Limited Vs. Shri Jassa Ram
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-02-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:27. h May, 2015 Decided on:2. d July , 2015 % + CM(M) 167/2014 DCM LIMITED Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sanjeev Anand and Mr. Arush Khanna, Advocates. versus SHRI JASSA RAM Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. S.P. Aggarwal and Mr. Himanshu Bohara, Advocates. CM(M) 169/2014 DCM LIMITED Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sanjeev Anand and Mr. Arush Khanna, Advocates. versus KRISHNA DEVI SHARMA (NOW DECEASED) THR LRS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Malhotra, Advocate for LR No.3. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Since identical orders involving identical question of law have been impugned in the present petitions, the two petitions are being decided by a common judgment.2. A brief exposition of facts is that the petitioner DCM Limited owns 52 acres of land at Bara Hindu Rao and Kishan Ganj, Delhi (in short the suit property). In the suit property the respondent Jassa Ram is a tenant in shop No.10, Ganesh Line No.6, ...
Vidya Wati Vs. Punjab Khadi Mandal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-02-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 1022/2011 Reserved on:19. h May, 2015 Decided on:2. d July, 2015 % VIDYA WATI Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Rajesh Yadav, Ms. Ruchira, Advs. versus PUNJAB KHADI MANDAL ..... Respondent Through Mr. Yogesh Swaroop, Mr. B.K.Roy, Advs. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Smt. Shanta Devi, Smt. Kanta Devi, Smt. Kaushalya Devi and Smt. Shama Devi four sisters through their attorney Shri Ram Prakash Yadav filed an eviction petition against the respondent Punjab Khadi Mandal, Sultan Bhawan under Section 14(1)(a)&(j) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (in short the DRC Act) in respect of one room, kitchen, bath and WC along with open terrace situated on the second floor in H.No.1667, Gali No.35, Abdul Rehman Road, Karol Bagh, New Delhi (in short the tenanted premises). Smt. Vidyawati Devi the 5th sister of Shanta Devi, Kanta Devi, Kaushalya Devi and Shama Devi was impleaded as a respondent. It was stated that the tenanted pr...
Dcm Limited Vs. Krishna Devi Sharma (Now Deceased)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-02-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:27. h May, 2015 Decided on:2. d July , 2015 % + CM(M) 167/2014 DCM LIMITED Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sanjeev Anand and Mr. Arush Khanna, Advocates. versus SHRI JASSA RAM Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. S.P. Aggarwal and Mr. Himanshu Bohara, Advocates. CM(M) 169/2014 DCM LIMITED Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sanjeev Anand and Mr. Arush Khanna, Advocates. versus KRISHNA DEVI SHARMA (NOW DECEASED) THR LRS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Malhotra, Advocate for LR No.3. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Since identical orders involving identical question of law have been impugned in the present petitions, the two petitions are being decided by a common judgment.2. A brief exposition of facts is that the petitioner DCM Limited owns 52 acres of land at Bara Hindu Rao and Kishan Ganj, Delhi (in short the suit property). In the suit property the respondent Jassa Ram is a tenant in shop No.10, Ganesh Line No.6, ...
Gautam Kundu Vs. The Secretary, Department of
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-02-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:18. h June, 2015 Decided on:2. d July, 2015 % + W.P.(C) 6014/2015 & CM109132015 (stay) ROSE VALLEY HOTELS AND ENTERTAINMENTS LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Jayant K. Mehta, Mr. Samiron, Mr. Sumeet Singh, Mr. Biswajit, Mr. Indranil Ghosh, Advs. versus THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE & ORS ..... Respondent Through Mr. Navin Chawla, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Shamshuddin, Adv. for ED. + W.P.(C) 6020/2015 & CM109282015 (stay) GAUTAM KUNDU Through ..... Petitioner Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Jayant K. Mehta, Mr. Samiron, Mr. Sumeet Singh, Mr. Biswajit, Mr. Indranil Ghosh, Advs. versus THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE & ORS ..... Respondent Through Mr. Navin Chawla, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Shamshuddin, Adv. for ED. + W.P.(C) 6022/2015 & CM109342015 (stay) SHIBAMOY DUTTA Through ..... Petitioner Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Jayant K. Mehta, Mr. S...
Sonu Kumar and Ors. Vs. The State of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-02-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:13. 04.2015 Judgment delivered on:02. 07.2015 Crl.A. 852/2008 SONU KUMAR & ORS. Through: ..... Appellant Mr. S.K. Duggal, Advocate. versus THE STATE OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Lovkesh Sawhney, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 15.09.2008, in SC No.73/2006, arising out of F.I.R. No.885/05, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, convicting the Appellants for the offence under Section 498A of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), and the order on sentence dated 20.09.2008 whereby for the offence under Section 498A, IPC, the appellants Sonu Kumar (hereinafter referred to as Appellant No.1), Ashok Kumar (hereinafter referred to as Appellant No.2) and Suraj (hereinafter referred to as Appellant No.3) were sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment (RI) for a period of two and a half years and to pay a fine of Rs. ...
Rose Valley Real Estate and Vs. The Secretary Department of
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-02-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:18. h June, 2015 Decided on:2. d July, 2015 % + W.P.(C) 6014/2015 & CM109132015 (stay) ROSE VALLEY HOTELS AND ENTERTAINMENTS LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Jayant K. Mehta, Mr. Samiron, Mr. Sumeet Singh, Mr. Biswajit, Mr. Indranil Ghosh, Advs. versus THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE & ORS ..... Respondent Through Mr. Navin Chawla, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Shamshuddin, Adv. for ED. + W.P.(C) 6020/2015 & CM109282015 (stay) GAUTAM KUNDU Through ..... Petitioner Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Jayant K. Mehta, Mr. Samiron, Mr. Sumeet Singh, Mr. Biswajit, Mr. Indranil Ghosh, Advs. versus THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE & ORS ..... Respondent Through Mr. Navin Chawla, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Shamshuddin, Adv. for ED. + W.P.(C) 6022/2015 & CM109342015 (stay) SHIBAMOY DUTTA Through ..... Petitioner Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Jayant K. Mehta, Mr. S...
Brand Value Communications Vs. The Secretary Department of
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-02-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:18. h June, 2015 Decided on:2. d July, 2015 % + W.P.(C) 6014/2015 & CM109132015 (stay) ROSE VALLEY HOTELS AND ENTERTAINMENTS LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Jayant K. Mehta, Mr. Samiron, Mr. Sumeet Singh, Mr. Biswajit, Mr. Indranil Ghosh, Advs. versus THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE & ORS ..... Respondent Through Mr. Navin Chawla, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Shamshuddin, Adv. for ED. + W.P.(C) 6020/2015 & CM109282015 (stay) GAUTAM KUNDU Through ..... Petitioner Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Jayant K. Mehta, Mr. Samiron, Mr. Sumeet Singh, Mr. Biswajit, Mr. Indranil Ghosh, Advs. versus THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE & ORS ..... Respondent Through Mr. Navin Chawla, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Shamshuddin, Adv. for ED. + W.P.(C) 6022/2015 & CM109342015 (stay) SHIBAMOY DUTTA Through ..... Petitioner Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Jayant K. Mehta, Mr. S...
Modern Investment and Traders Vs. The Secretary Department of
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-02-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:18. h June, 2015 Decided on:2. d July, 2015 % + W.P.(C) 6014/2015 & CM109132015 (stay) ROSE VALLEY HOTELS AND ENTERTAINMENTS LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Jayant K. Mehta, Mr. Samiron, Mr. Sumeet Singh, Mr. Biswajit, Mr. Indranil Ghosh, Advs. versus THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE & ORS ..... Respondent Through Mr. Navin Chawla, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Shamshuddin, Adv. for ED. + W.P.(C) 6020/2015 & CM109282015 (stay) GAUTAM KUNDU Through ..... Petitioner Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Jayant K. Mehta, Mr. Samiron, Mr. Sumeet Singh, Mr. Biswajit, Mr. Indranil Ghosh, Advs. versus THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE & ORS ..... Respondent Through Mr. Navin Chawla, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Shamshuddin, Adv. for ED. + W.P.(C) 6022/2015 & CM109342015 (stay) SHIBAMOY DUTTA Through ..... Petitioner Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Jayant K. Mehta, Mr. S...
Jhamman Lal Vs. Tara Chand Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-02-2015
$~1. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % Date of Decision:02. 07.2015 RSA712015 & C.M. Nos.2959/2015, 5653/2015, 6774/2015, 7036/2015 JHAMMAN LAL Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Sachin Chopra and Mr. Kamal Bansal, Advocates versus TARA CHAND SHARMA Through: ..... Respondent Mr. S.N. Gupta, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. The present second appeal under Section 100 CPC is directed against the judgment rendered by Sh. R.K. Gauba, District & Sessions Judge (South District), Saket, New Delhi (as his lordship then was) in RCA No.35/2013 titled Jhaman Lal v. S. Tara Chand Sharma dated 14.10.2014.2. The learned Judge by the impugned judgment dismissed the first appeal preferred by the appellant and affirmed the judgment and decree passed by Ms. Richa Gusain Solanki, Civil Judge in Suit No.283/2008.3. The appellant was the defendant in the said suit. The suit had been preferred to seek possession and damages in respect of an immovable pro...
- ‹ Prev
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 45
- 46
- 47
- Next ›
- Last »