Delhi Court July 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Zakir Hussain Vs. The State Govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2015
$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:3. d July, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2593/2015 ZAKIR HUSSAIN Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr. Riaz Mohd., Advocate. Versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for State with SI Vishvendra, PS-Seema Puri. Respondent No.2 / complainant Shabana is present in person with her father. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. By way of this petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.96/2011 registered at PS-Seema Puri for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC on 23.03.2011 and the consequential proceedings emanating therefrom against the petitioner on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the aforesaid case was registered on the complaint of respondent No.2, Crl. M.C. 2...
Gaurav Singh and Ors. Vs. State of (Nct) Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2015
I-36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:3. d July, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2606/2015 & Crl.M.A.No.9296/2015 GAURAV SINGH & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. M.L.Chaudhary, Advocate versus STATE OF ( NCT) DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Parveen Bhati, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with ASI Rajneesh Ms. Vandana, respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.571/2003, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of the IPC, registered at police station Central Faridabad , Haryana is sought in this petition on the basis of Memorandum of Understanding (Annexure-C). Notice. Mr. Parveen Bhati, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so by counsel for petitioner as well as ASI Rajneesh on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Crl.M.C.No....
Deepak Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : APRIL30 2015 DECIDED ON : JULY03 2015 + CRL.A.1586/2013 & Crl.M.B.10080/2014 DEEPAK ..... Appellant Through : Ms.Saahila Lamba, Advocate. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Navin K.Jha, APP. SI Janak Singh, PS M.F.Colony. + CRL.A. 746/2012 NARESH ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Amlish Rai, Advocate. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Navin K.Jha, APP. SI Janak Singh, PS M.F.Colony. + CRL.A. 835/2012 SURESH ..... Appellant Through : Mr.R.C.Tiwari with Mr.Sumar Sharma, Mr.Rahul, Advocates. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Navin K.Jha, APP. + CRL.A.1332/2012 & Crl.M.A.14209/2014 DEVENDER @ TITU ..... Appellant Through : Ms.Rakhi Dubey, Advocate. versus STATE & ORS. ..... Respondents Through : Mr.Navin K.Jha, APP for State CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Appellants Deepak (A-1), Naresh (A-2) and Suresh (A-3) impugn a judgment dated 01.05.2012 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Cas...
Kartar Singh Vs. Dda
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2015
$~R-6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5951/2012 Date of judgment 03.07.2015 KARTAR SINGH ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. K. K. Jha, Advocate. Petitioner in person. versus D.D.A. Through : ..... Respondent Mr. Arun Birbal, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G. S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Petitioner was appointed with the Delhi Development Authority on temporary basis. As per the appointment letter issued on 29.07.1983, the appointment was purely temporary and valid till further orders. On 11.06.1986, an FIR was registered against the petitioner under Sections 308/304/34 of Indian Penal Code at Police Station Alipur. By an order dated 11.07.1988, the services of the petitioner were terminated.2. A writ petition bearing No.1049/1989 was filed by the petitioner in this court in the year 1989, impugning the order of termination. During the pendency of this writ petition, the petitioner was acquitted of the offences by ...
Punjab National Bank and Anr Vs. H N Wadhwa
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: July 03, 2015 + LPA4062015 PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK & ANR ..... Appellants Represented by: Mr.Ravi Sikri, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Vaibhav Kalra and Ms.Divyangana Singh, Advocates. versus H N WADHWA ..... Respondent Represented by: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) CM No.11297/2015 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. LPA4062015 1. The short issue in the present petition is whether the learned Single Judge was justified in directing the Appellant/Punjab National Bank to pay to the Respondent H.N.Wadhwa suspension allowance for the period of June 10, 1991 to October 31, 2008 along with simple interest @ 6% per annum in terms of Regulation 12(4) and 12(5) of the Appellant Bank.2. A brief exposition of facts is that H.N.Wadhwa while working in New Bank of India before its amalgamation with Punjab National Bank was placed under suspension on April 02, ...
Mahinder Singh Vs. Murti Devi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2015
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + R.S.A. No.178/2015 Decided on :3. d July, 2015 MAHINDER SINGH Through: Appellant Mr. Himanshu Upadhyay, Advocate. Versus MURTI DEVI & ORS. Through: Respondents Mr. R.C. Sharma, Adv. for LRs for R-2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) Caveat No.462/2015 Since the learned counsel has put in appearance on behalf of the caveator, the caveat stands discharged. C.M. No.8516/2015 (for exemption) Allowed, subject to the deficiency being rectified. The application stands disposed of. R.S.A. No.178/2015 & C.M. No.8515/2015 (for stay) 1. This is a regular second appeal filed by the appellant against the judgment dated 6.2.2015 passed by the learned Additional District Judge in R.C.A. No.36/12.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the appellant and have gone through the record. The appellant has not been able to show that any substantial question of law is arising from the appeal which may warrant entertaining of the present second ap...
Ramdhari Shah Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2015
$~R-21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of judgment:03. 7.2015 CRL.A. 786/2012 RAMDHARI SHAH Through ..... Appellant Mr.Saurabh Kansal, Advocate. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.(oral) 1. This appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment and order of sentence passed by the Sessions Judge dated 24.01.2012 wherein the appellant stood convicted under Section 20(C) of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (NDPS Act). He had been sentenced to undergo RI for a period of 10 years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,00,000/- in default to undergo RI for a period of five months.2. The version of the prosecution is that on 10.02.2009 SI Rajinder Dabas (PW-3) posted at Old Delhi Railway station being on patrolling duty at the DFND Gate Platform No.1A, ODRS along with Head Constable Bijender Singh (PW-1), Constable Bharat (PW-4) and Constable (RPF) Parviner Kumar (PW-7...
Munish Sharma and Ors Vs. Lalit Sharma and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2015
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Reserve: April 09, 2015 Date of Decision: July 03, 2015 + IA154732013 in CS(OS) 1857/2013 MUNISH SHARMA & ORS Through ..... Plaintiffs Mr.Rajeshwar Kr. Gupta Advocate versus LALIT SHARMA & ORS Through ..... Defendants Mr.Sudhanshu Batra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Shailesh Rana, Advocate for D-1. Mr. Abhishek Kr. Singh, Advocate for Mr.Kunal Sharma, Advocates for D-4. Mr.M.K. Vashish, Advocate for D5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.I.A. 15473/2013 1. The present application is filed by the plaintiffs seeking an injunction to restrain the defendants from selling, transferring or alienating the suit property.2. The plaintiff has filed the accompanying suit for a decree declaring the relinquishment deed dated 27.02.2004 and the Will dated 11.12.2008 in respect of the suit property i.e. House No.93, Surya Niketan, Vikas Marg, New Delhi, as void and also to declare that the plaintiffs are the owner of share of the suit p...
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Sanjay Kumar and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2015
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Pronouncement:03. July, 2015 + MAC.APP. 146/2013 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through Mr.L.K.Tyagi, Advocate. versus SANJAY KUMAR & ORS. Through + ..... Respondents Mr.Peeush Sharma, Advocate for R-1 MAC.APP. 459/2013 SANJAY KUMAR Through ..... Appellant Mr.Peeush Sharma, Advocate. versus UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr.L.K.Tyagi, Advocate for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.1. MAC APP. 146/2013 is filed by the Insurance Company seeking to impugn the Award dated 01.12.2012. MAC APP4592013 is filed by the claimant seeking enhancement of the compensation awarded by the Tribunal.2. The brief facts are that on 28.08.2008, the claimant was returning to his house from Gurgaon on his motorcycle. When he reached at Daulat Pur, he was hit by a DTC bus said to be driven in a rash and negligent manner. The claimant fell down on the road and sustained multiple/grievous...
Shibamoy Dutta Vs. The Secretary, Department of
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-02-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:18. h June, 2015 Decided on:2. d July, 2015 % + W.P.(C) 6014/2015 & CM109132015 (stay) ROSE VALLEY HOTELS AND ENTERTAINMENTS LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Jayant K. Mehta, Mr. Samiron, Mr. Sumeet Singh, Mr. Biswajit, Mr. Indranil Ghosh, Advs. versus THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE & ORS ..... Respondent Through Mr. Navin Chawla, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Shamshuddin, Adv. for ED. + W.P.(C) 6020/2015 & CM109282015 (stay) GAUTAM KUNDU Through ..... Petitioner Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Jayant K. Mehta, Mr. Samiron, Mr. Sumeet Singh, Mr. Biswajit, Mr. Indranil Ghosh, Advs. versus THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE & ORS ..... Respondent Through Mr. Navin Chawla, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Shamshuddin, Adv. for ED. + W.P.(C) 6022/2015 & CM109342015 (stay) SHIBAMOY DUTTA Through ..... Petitioner Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Jayant K. Mehta, Mr. S...
- ‹ Prev
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- Next ›
- Last »