Delhi Court July 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Tripti Jha Vs. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-10-2015
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:10. h July, 2015 + W.P.(C) No.6073/2015 & CM No.11032/2015 (for interim relief) TRIPTI JHA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Rana Mukherjee, Sr. Adv. with Mr. C.D. Singh, Advocate. Versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mukul Talwar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vaibhav Kalra, Advocate for GGSIPU. AND + W.P.(C) No.6066/2015 SHIVIN CHAUDHARY Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Girdhar Govind and Mr. Puneet Maheshwari, Advs. Versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mukul Talwar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Vaibhav Kalra, Adv. for GGSIPU. CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. The petitioner in W.P.(C) No.6073/2015 had appeared in the Common Entrance Test (CET) conducted by the respondent no.1 Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha (GGSIP) University [the respondent no.2 is the In-charge (Admission) of the respondent no.1 GGSIP University]. ...
J.K. Ansell Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-10-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:10. h July, 2015 + W.P.(C) 7705/2013, CMs No.1744/2014 (for directions), 3126/2014 (for addl. grounds) & 10105/2014 (u/O VI R-17 CPC) RECKITT BENCKISER (INDIA) LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Kapil Sibal & Mr. Arvind Nigam, Sr. Advs. with Mr. Jawahar Lal, Mr. Amar Gupta and Mr. Raghav G., Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr.Akshay Makhija, Mr. Kirtiman Singh, Mr.Vidur Mohan, Mr.Gyanesh Bhardwaj, Mr.Mansimran Singh, Ms. Noor Anand, Mr.Waize Ali Noor, Ms. Mahima Bahl and Mr.Rohitendra Deb, Advs. for UOI. AND + W.P.(C) 2245/2014 & CM No.4708/2014 (for stay) J.K. ANSELL LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Arvind P. Datar, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Ramesh Singh and Mr. Debarshi Bhuyan, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr.Akshay Makhija, Mr. Kirtiman Singh, Mr.Vidur Mohan, Mr. Gyanesh Bhardwaj, Mr.Mansimran Singh, Ms. Noor Anand, M...
Shivin Chaudhary Vs. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-10-2015
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:10. h July, 2015 + W.P.(C) No.6073/2015 & CM No.11032/2015 (for interim relief) TRIPTI JHA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Rana Mukherjee, Sr. Adv. with Mr. C.D. Singh, Advocate. Versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mukul Talwar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vaibhav Kalra, Advocate for GGSIPU. AND + W.P.(C) No.6066/2015 SHIVIN CHAUDHARY Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Girdhar Govind and Mr. Puneet Maheshwari, Advs. Versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mukul Talwar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Vaibhav Kalra, Adv. for GGSIPU. CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. The petitioner in W.P.(C) No.6073/2015 had appeared in the Common Entrance Test (CET) conducted by the respondent no.1 Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha (GGSIP) University [the respondent no.2 is the In-charge (Admission) of the respondent no.1 GGSIP University]. ...
Suman Bansi Dhar and Ors. Vs. Uoi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-10-2015
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:10. 07.2015 W.P.(C) 2366/2011 & CM No.2155/2013 SUMAN BANSI DHAR AND ORS. ..... Petitioners versus UOI ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr Vikas Dhawan, Mr S. P. Das and Mr S. Panda. For the Respondent : Ms Monika Arora, CGSC with Mr Harsh and Mr Abhishek. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioners have filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning the demand raised by the respondent by a letter dated 19/27.01.2011 for conversion of the property bearing no.16, block No.48, Diplomatic Enclave, New Delhi from lease hold to free hold. The petitioners further pray that the respondent be directed to execute a conveyance deed in respect of the said property in favour of the petitioners.2. The property bearing no.16, block No.48, Diplomatic Enclave, New Delhi, now known as 27, Sardar Patel Marg, Chanakyapuri, New Delhi110011 (hereafter the said prop...
Trigen Electronics Private Limited Vs. South Delhi Municipal Corporati ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-10-2015
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:10. h July, 2015 % + W.P.(C) 5485/2015 TRIGEN ELECTRONICS PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. B.L. Wali and Ms. Deepti Gupta, Advs. Versus SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Vikas Chopra, Adv. CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 This order is in continuation of the order dated 8th July, 2015.2. The counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has under the cover of letter dated 8th July, 2015 to the Assistant Commissioner, (RP Cell) of the respondent No.1 South Delhi Municipal Corporation (SDMC) handed over Pay Orders of the total value of Rs.52,16,018/- being the amount for deposit for which statement was made on 27th May, 2015. A copy of the said letter along with the photocopies of the Pay Orders is handed over in the Court and taken on record. A copy of the same has also been handed over to the counsel for the respondent No.1 SDMC.3. Thoug...
Directorate of Revenue Intelligence Vs. Guo Zhisheng and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-10-2015
$~59 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:10. h July, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2577/2015 DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Satish Aggarwala, Advocate. Versus GUO ZHISHENG & ANR ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. Pallav Shisodhia, Sr. Advocate with Mr. A. Raj Narayanan, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) CRL.M.C. 2577/2015 1. Vide order dated 30.06.2015, this Court passed the order as under:1. Vide the present petition, petitioner seeks directions thereby setting aside the order dated 29.06.2015 passed in cases titled as DRI v. GuoZhisheng and DRI v. Jiang-Xichao.2. It is averred in the instant petition that Officers of Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, Delhi Zone Unit, New Delhi had recovered and seized six Gold bars of 999.9 purity collectively weighing 6 Kg. from respondent no.1 who arrived at Terminal-3 of IGI Airport, New Delhi from Hong-Kong by Cathay Pacific Flight CX-695 on 10.06.2015 at ...
Gurminder Jit Singh Modi and Ors. Vs. The State ( Nct of Delhi) and An ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-10-2015
$~56 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:10. h July, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2714/2015 GURMINDER JIT SINGH MODI & ORS. ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr. Rahul Jain and Mr. M.P. Bhargava, Advocates with the Petitioner No.1 in person. Versus THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Represented by: Ms. Jasbir Kaur, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with Inspector Anant Kumar, PS Safdarjung Enclave. Mr. K.K.Manan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ankush Narang, Mr. Raunak Satpathy and Mr.Kartik Gandotra, Advocates for Respondent No.2 with Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) Crl. M.A.9715/2015 (for exemption) Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, the application is allowed. CRL.M.C. 2714/2015 1. By way of this petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.564/2013 registered at Police Station Safdarjung Enclave for t...
Sandeep Bhatnagar Vs. State , Govt of Nct Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-10-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P.275/2015 Reserved on:07. 07.2015 Date of Decision:10.07.2015 % SANDEEP BHATNAGAR ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Jitender Kumar Dhingra, Adv. versus STATE , GOVT OF NCT DELHI ..... Respondent Through Mr.M.P. Singh, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J: Crl. M.A. No.6974/2015. Exemption allowed subject to just exemptions. The Application is disposed of accordingly Crl. Rev. P. 275/2015 1. The revisionist questions the order dated 16.02.2015, passed by the Ld. ASJ Rohini, in connection with SC No.40/13 (FIR No.255/2006, PS Vikaspuri), whereby the prayer made on behalf of the Petitioner to summon 7 witnesses to be led as defence witnesses has been partially allowed and only three of such witnesses, namely, V.K. Dass, Neeta Bhatnagar and the concerned record clerk from the office of DCP Traffic, have been summoned to be led in defence of the petitioner.2. The Petitioner is also aggrieved by the aforesaid order o...
Surinder Kumar Babbar Vs. State Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-10-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :06.07.2015. Judgment delivered on :10.07.2015 CRL.A. 284/2013 SURINDER KUMAR BABBAR Through ..... Appellant Mr. K.K. Manan, Mr. Nipun Bhardwaj, Mr. Ankush Narang and Mr. Kartik Gandotra, Advs. Versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Through + ..... Respondent Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State. CRL.A. 382/2013 YOGESH KUMAR ..... Appellant Through Mr. Rakesh Wadhwa and Mr. Amit Alok, Advs. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 There are two appellants before this Court Surinder Kumar Babbar and Yogesh Kumar. They have both been convicted and sentenced vide judgment and order on sentence dated 23.01.2013 and 29.01.2013 respectively wherein the first appellant has been convicted for the offence punishable under Sections 376/366/509/506 of the IPC; the second appellant has been convicted for the offence punishable under Sections ...
Vinod Kumar and Ors. Vs. The State, (Nct of Delhi) and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-10-2015
$~45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:10. h July, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2689/2015 VINOD KUMAR & ORS. ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr. Arvind Chaudhary, Adv. Versus THE STATE, (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. M.N. Dudeja, APP for the State. Mr. Inderdeep Singh, Adv. for respondent no.2 with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. By way of this petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.104/2013 registered at PS-Punjabi Bagh for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC and the consequential proceedings emanating therefrom against the petitioners on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the aforesaid case was registered on the complaint of respondent No.2, Ms.Renu, consequent upon certain matrimonial...
- ‹ Prev
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- Next ›
- Last »