Delhi Court July 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kiman Dass and Ors Vs. The State and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-13-2015
$-7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Delivered on:13. h July, 2015 + CRL.M.C. No.4701/2014 KIMAN DASS & ORS Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr. Shreenivas Sharma, Advocate Versus THE STATE & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr. Ravi Nayak, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with SI Dinesh Chandra, P.S. Swaroop Nagar CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. By way of this petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.46/2008 registered at PS-Swaroop Nagar for the offences punishable under Sections consequential 498A/406/34 proceedings IPC on emanating 04.03.2008 therefrom and the against the petitioners on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the aforesaid case was registered on the complaint of respondent No.2, Kamlesh, consequent upon certain matrimonial and domestic disp...
M/S. Manu Enterprises and Anr. Vs. Ram Pratap Goel
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-13-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: July 07, 2015 Judgment Delivered on: July 13, 2015 + RFA(OS) 64/2015 M/S. MANU ENTERPRISES & ANR. ..... Appellants Represented by: Mr.Manu K.Giri, Advocate with Mr.R.K.Seewal, Advocate versus RAM PRATAP GOEL Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.A.K.Jain, Advocate with Ms.Santosh Jain and Ms.Anubha Jain, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. The admitted case of the litigating parties is that the respondent Ram Pratap Goel (the plaintiff) was carrying on business as the sole proprietor of the firm M/s.Rajit Textiles and was selling fabric. Manoj Kumar @ Manu who died on October 11, 2007 was carrying on business as the sole proprietor of the firm M/s.Manu Brothers and was purchasing fabric on credit from Ram Pratap Goel and had issued blank cheques duly signed by him, to be filled up by Ram Pratap Goel and presented for encashment on supply of fabric. ...
Surender Kumar and Ors. Vs. State (Govt of Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-13-2015
$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: July 13, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2734/2015 SURENDER KUMAR & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Anil Kumar Gupta, Advocate versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr.Vinod Diwakar, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with ASI Rajnish Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Crl.M.A.9789/2015 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 2734/2015 Quashing of FIR No.80/2011, under Sections 498-A/34 of IPC registered at police station Krishan Nagar, East District, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mutual Settlement Agreement of 3rd June, 2015 and affidavit of respondent No.2. Notice. Mr. Vinod Diwakar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice submits that respondent No.2, present in CRL.M.C. 2734/2015 Page 1 the Court, has been identified to be the complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question by ASI Ra...
Sachin Bansal and Ors. Vs. The State Govt of Nct Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-13-2015
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: July 13, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2724/2015 SACHIN BANSAL & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Naresh Gupta, Advocate versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr.P.K. Mishra, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Mahabir Prasad Mr. Ajay Uppal, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.2/2012, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of IPC registered at police station Begum Pur, Delhi is sought on the basis of Settlement whose terms find mention in the joint statement of the parties made before the concerned court of 30th October, 2014. Notice. Mr. P. K. Mishra, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and Mr. Ajay Uppal, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState submits CRL.M.C. 2724/2015 Page 1 that respondent No.2, present ...
Mukhtiar Singh Vs. The Chief Engineer Irrigation and Flood Control De
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-13-2015
$~18. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % Date of Decision:13. 07.2015 RSA2402015 and C.M. Nos. 12071-72/2015 MUKHTIAR SINGH Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Jitender Kumar Jain, Advocate. versus THE CHIEF ENGINEER (I&F) IRRIGATION AND FLOOD CONTROL DEPARTMENT & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. This regular second appeal under Section 100 CPC is directed against the judgment dated 22.04.2015 passed by Ms. Kamini Lau, ADJ-II (Central) Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in RCA No.136/2013, whereby the first appeal preferred by the appellant has been dismissed and the judgment passed by Senior Civil Judge-cum-Rent Controller, Delhi dated 11.10.2010 in Suit No.354/2007 has been affirmed.2. The brief facts are that the plaintiff-appellant along with his brothers claimed to be in possession of one Gitwar (hereinafter referred to as the Suit Property), measuring 2000 sq. yds. in Abadi of village Bawana, Delhi, which was bounde...
Shri Mani Budhankar @ Mani Ram Vs. Union of India and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-13-2015
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6532/2012 Judgment dated 13th July, 2015 % SHRI MANI BUDHANKAR @ MANI RAM..... Petitioner Through: In person. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Manish Mohan, CGSC with Ms.Sidhi Arora and Mr.Manisha Rana Singh, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Aggrieved by the order dated 25.8.2011 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal by which the OA filed by the petitioner was dismissed as being barred by limitation, the petitioner has filed the present petition. Challenge in this writ petition is also made to the order dated 7.5.2012 by which the review petition filed by the petitioner herein was also dismissed.2. The necessary facts to be noticed for disposal of the present writ petition are that the petitioner was working as Bench Officer with the Company Law Board. On account of a matrimonial dispute an FIR was registered again...
Hero Reality Limited Vs. Mr. Brajesh Nagar and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-13-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on 13th July, 2015 % + C.S. (OS) No.2140/2013 HERO REALITY LIMITED Through ..... Plaintiff Mr. M.K.Miglani, Adv. with Mr. Gaurav Miglani, Adv. versus MR. BRAJESH NAGAR & ANR. Through ..... Defendants Defendants are ex-parte. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The plaintiff has filed the suit for permanent injunction, infringement of trademark, passing off, damages and rendition of account against the defendants.2. The defendants are ex-parte. Ex-parte evidence is filed by the plaintiff by way of affidavit. Learned counsel for the plaintiff has made his submissions. He is also pressing for relief of punitive damages and cost apart from the relief of permanent injunction against the defendants.3. The brief facts of the case are that the plaintiff is a company incorporated and registered under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, having its registered office at E-2 Qutub Hotel Complex, Shaheed Jeet Singh Marg,...
Mmtc Ltd Vs. Anglo American Metallurgical Coal Pty. Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-10-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. 790/2014 Reserved on : June 1, 2015 Date of decision: July 10, 2015 MMTC LTD. Through: .... Petitioner Mr. P. Chidambaram, Mr. S. Ganesh, and Mr. Sanjeev Puri, Senior Advocates with Mr. Rohit Puri, Mr. Prateek Khanna, Mr. Akshay Chandra, and Mr. Bharya Sethi, Advocates. versus ANGLO AMERICAN METALLURGICAL COAL PTY. LTD. .... Respondent Through: Mr. Sumeet Kachwaha, Mr. Ashok Sagar, Ms. Ankit Khushu & Mr. Suryadeep Singh, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR % J U D G M E NT1007.2015 1. The Petitioner, MMTC Limited (MMTC), has filed this petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) against the final Award dated 12th May, 2014 of the Arbitral Tribunal (AT) by a majority of 2:1 in the disputes between the parties. By the impugned majority Award the claim filed by the Respondent, Anglo American Metallurgical Coal Pty. Ltd. (formerly known as Anglo Coal Australia Pty. Ltd.) [Anglo]. for damages on account ...
Reckitt Benckiser (India) Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-10-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:10. h July, 2015 + W.P.(C) 7705/2013, CMs No.1744/2014 (for directions), 3126/2014 (for addl. grounds) & 10105/2014 (u/O VI R-17 CPC) RECKITT BENCKISER (INDIA) LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Kapil Sibal & Mr. Arvind Nigam, Sr. Advs. with Mr. Jawahar Lal, Mr. Amar Gupta and Mr. Raghav G., Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr.Akshay Makhija, Mr. Kirtiman Singh, Mr.Vidur Mohan, Mr.Gyanesh Bhardwaj, Mr.Mansimran Singh, Ms. Noor Anand, Mr.Waize Ali Noor, Ms. Mahima Bahl and Mr.Rohitendra Deb, Advs. for UOI. AND + W.P.(C) 2245/2014 & CM No.4708/2014 (for stay) J.K. ANSELL LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Arvind P. Datar, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Ramesh Singh and Mr. Debarshi Bhuyan, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr.Akshay Makhija, Mr. Kirtiman Singh, Mr.Vidur Mohan, Mr. Gyanesh Bhardwaj, Mr.Mansimran Singh, Ms. Noor Anand, M...
Pallavi Sharma Vs. College of Vocational Studies and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-10-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:10. 07.2015 + LPA4242015 & CM No.11842/2015 (stay) PALLAVI SHARMA Through: ..... Appellant Mr. R.K. Saini, Adv. Versus COLLEGE OF VOCATIONAL STUDIES & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. for University of Delhi. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JUDGMENT MS. G.ROHINI, CJ1 The unsuccessful petitioner in W.P.(C) No.6398/2015 is the appellant before us. The said writ petition was filed aggrieved by the action of the respondents in not giving admission to the petitioner in the course of B.A. (Vocational Studies) as per the 3rd cut-off list declared by the first respondent College and seeking a direction to the respondent No.1 to forthwith give admission to her in the 1st Year B.A.(Vocational Studies). The writ petition was dismissed by the learned Single Judge by order dated 06.07.2015 and the same is under challenge in the present appeal.2. The ...
- ‹ Prev
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- Next ›
- Last »