Delhi Court July 2015 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Jul 27 2015

Rajesh Kumar Gandhi Vs. Shriram Institute for Industrial Research

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-27-2015

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : July 24, 2015 Judgment Delivered on : July 27, 2015 + LPA No.102/2013 RAJESH KUMAR GANDHI Represented by: .....Appellant Appellant in person versus SHRIRAM INSTITUTE FOR INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH .....Respondent Represented by: Mr.Rupesh Kumar, A.R. of respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. The appellant : Rajesh Kumar Gandhi is aggrieved by the impugned decision dated January 23, 2013 passed in W.P.(C) No.4019/2010 filed by the respondent : Shriram Institute for Industrial Research. The grievance of the respondent in the writ petition was to the finding returned in the award dated September 04, 2009 that the appellants dismissal from service was illegal on account of non-supply of the report of the Inquiry Officer to the appellant. Further grievance was to the finding in the award that since as per the letter of appointment one month notice pay was not ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 27 2015

Surender Mohan Chopra Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-27-2015

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:27. 07.2015 W.P.(C) 3455/2012 & CM Nos.7287/2012, 9218/2012, 19625/2012 & 6301/2014 SMT. SHANTI DEVI ..... Petitioner versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. + ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 3486/2012 & CM Nos. 7348/2012, 7678/2012, 9626/2012, 19624/2012 & 6305/2014 SURENDER MOHAN CHOPRA ..... Petitioner versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. + ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 3485/2012 CM Nos. 7346/2012, 19626/2012 & 6306/2014 SH. JATINDER GULATI ..... Petitioner versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. + ..... Respondents CM Nos. 6307/2014, 9537/2012 & 19931/2012 in W.P.(C) 3631/ 2012 PRITHI PAL SINGH ARORA ..... Petitioner versus SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS. W.P.(C) 3455/2012 & other connected matters + W.P.(C) 3739/2012 & CM Nos. 7846/2012, 7920/2012, 8208-8209/ 2012, 19621/2012 & 6308/2014 RAJESH CHAWLA ..... Petitioner versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. + ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 3750/2012 & CM Nos. 7865/2012, 7918...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 27 2015

Ravinder Singh Vs. Government of Nct of Delhi and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-27-2015

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 27 2015

Rajesh Chawla Vs. Government of Nct of Delhi and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-27-2015

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 27 2015

Bhagwan Das @Chokanni Vs. State

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-27-2015

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :20.07.2015. Judgment delivered on :27.07.2015 CRL.A. 605/2010 BHAGWAN DAS @ CHOKANNI Through ..... Appellant Ms.Anu Narula, Advocate. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through Mr.O.P.Saxena, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 This appeal is directed against the impugned judgment and order on sentence dated 11.08.2009 and 18.08.2009 respectively wherein the appellant stood convicted under Sections 365/376 (2)(f) of the IPC. He had been sentenced to undergo RI for a period of five years for the offence under Section 365 of the IPC. For his second conviction under Section 376 (2)(f) of the IPC, he had been sentenced to undergo RI for a period of ten years. The sentences were to run concurrently. Benefit of Section 428 of the Cr.PC had been granted to the appellant. 2 The version of the prosecution was unfolded in the complaint made by the father of the victim namely Manikam. He wa...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 27 2015

Jagdish Kumar Lal Vs. Government of Nct of Delhi and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-27-2015

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 27 2015

Maninder Sahni Vs. Government of Nct of Delhi and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-27-2015

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 27 2015

Manish Budakoti and Ors. Vs. State (Govt of Nct of Delhi) and Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-27-2015

$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: July 27, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2949/2015 & Crl.M.A.10538/2015 MANISH BUDAKOTI & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr.Akshay Chandra, Proxy Counsel versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr.Navin Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI N.L. Yadav Ms. Astha Sharma, Proxy Counsel with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.112/2013, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of IPC registered at police station Uttam Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 23rd March, 2013 arrived at Delhi Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (Annexure P-2). Notice. Mr. Navin Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, has been identified to be complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question by SI N.L. Yadav on the basis of identi...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 27 2015

Ravinder Singh and Ors Vs. State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-27-2015

$~55 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:27. h July, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2948/2015 RAVINDER SINGH & ORS ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr. Anshul Mittal, Adv. / Proxy Counsel. Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Represented by: Ms. Vasundhara Bhardwaj, Adv. / Proxy Counsel with Ms. Jasbir Kaur, APP for State. Mr. Y.N. Singh Senger, Adv. for complainant. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) Crl. M.A.10530/2015 (for exemption) Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, the application is allowed. + 1. Crl. M.C. 2948/2015 Vide the present petition, petitioners seek directions thereby quashing of FIR No.47/2013 registered at Police Station-Sagarpur, Delhi for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A/406//34 IPC and the consequential proceedings emanating therefrom against them.2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the aforesaid case was registered on the complaint of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 27 2015

Chander Shekhar and Ors. Vs. The State (Govt of Nct of Delhi) and Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-27-2015

$~34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: July 27, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2963/2015 & Crl.M.A.10584/2015 CHANDER SHEKHAR & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr.Akshay Chandra, Proxy Counsel versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Praveen Bhati, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with ASI Rajneesh Ms. Astha Sharma, Proxy Counsel with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.119/2014, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of IPC registered at police station Punjabi Bagh, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 16th October, 2014 arrived at Delhi Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (Annexure P-2). Notice. Mr. Praveen Bhati, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, has been identified to be complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question by ASI Rajneesh on the basis o...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

‹ Prev
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Next ›
Last »

Delhi Court July 2015 Judgments

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.