Delhi Court July 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ajay Kumar Gupta and Anr. Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-14-2015
$~43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:14. 07.2015 W.P.(C) 2598/2015 and CM No.4649/2015 AJAY KUMAR GUPTA & ANR. ... Petitioners ... Respondents versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Advocates who appeared in this case:- For the Petitioners For the Respondent No.1 For the Respondent No.2 For the Respondent No.3 : Ms Richa Oberoi : Mr Bhagvan Sarup Shukla : Mr Yeeshu Jain with Ms Jyoti Tyagi : Mr Dhanesh Relan with Mr Arush Bhandari CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The counter-affidavit handed over by Mr Yeeshu Jain on behalf of the respondent No.2 is taken on record. The counter-affidavit filed on behalf of the DDA vide diary No.330001 dated 13.07.2015 also be taken on record. The learned counsel for the petitioners does not wish to file any rejoinder-affidavit inasmuch all the necessary averments are contained in the writ petition.2. The petitioners seek the benefit of Sectio...
Director General, C.C.R.U.M., Ministry Vs. K.A.S. Azami
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-14-2015
$~29. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4868/2014 % Judgment dated 14.07.2015 DIRECTOR GENERAL, C.C.R.U.M., MINISTRY OF HEALTH, GOVT. OF INDIA Through : Mr.A.K. Ojha, Adv. ..... Petitioner versus K.A.S. AZAMI Through : ..... Respondent Ms.Harvinder Oberoi, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to quash/set aside the Order dated 20.12.2013 passed by the Principal Bench, Central Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) whereby the petitioner has been directed to pay pension to the respondent.2. The necessary facts, to be noticed for disposal of the present writ petition, are that the petitioner (hereinafter referred to as the Council) is a society registered under the Societies Registration Act XXI of 1860. Respondent herein joined the Counci...
Dharmender Grewal Vs. University Grants Commission
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-14-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:14. h July, 2015 % + W.P.(C) 3550/2014 DHARMENDER GREWAL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sumit Kumar, Advocate with Mr. Palav Agarwal, Advocate. Versus UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Arjun Harkauli, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The petitioner appeared in the National Eligibility Test (NET) held by the respondent University Grants Commission (UGC) on 29th December, 2013 and has remained unsuccessful therein. It is the case of the petitioner that he remained unsuccessful because in paper I of the said examination, though, the Test Booklet containing questions distributed to him was of Code Y but in the OMR answer sheet of the said Test Booklet, he erroneously shaded the code of his Test Booklet as X instead of Y and as a result whereof his answer sheet was read by the Optical Mark Reader as answering the questions in Test Booklet X and which resulted in his having very low mark...
Narender Kumar and Ors. Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-13-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5701/2015 & CM No.10239/2015 Judgment reserved on:28. 05.2015 Judgement pronounced on:13. 07.2015 NARENDER KUMAR AND ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr.Mahesh Srivastava, Advocate alogwith Mr.Vaibhav Manu Srivastava, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, Advocate alongwith Mr.Rajkumar Dahiya, Advocate for R-1 and R-2. Mr.Anuj Aggarwal, Advocate for R3. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA JUDGMENT1 The petitioners case is that Lady Hardinge Medical College/ respondent no.3 and M/s. M.S. Vigilant Security/respondent no.4 had entered into the agreement dated 15.07.2009 for providing Security Guards to respondent no.3. The petitioners have been working as security guards pursuant to the said agreement and they have been continuously discharging their duties since 2009. They have been regularly paid their wages in time but from the last two years, there was interruption/delay in pay...
Mir Singh and Ors. Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-13-2015
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3826/2014 & CM No.7719/2014 MIR SINGH & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr A.K. Nijhawan, Adv. versus % GOVT OF NCT & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Priyabrat Sahu & Mr Siddharth Panda, Advs. for R- 1 & 3. Mr Kush Sharma, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER ORDER1307.2015 1. This is a petition whereby challenge is laid to the communication dated 25.02.2014, issued by the Land & Building Department, Govt. of NCT of Delhi (in short GNCTD).2. By virtue of the impugned communication, the petitioners request for allotment of an alternate plot in lieu of the acquired land has been rejected on the ground that as per the record available with the GNCTD, the entire land had not been acquired. In this regard, in the impugned communication, reference is made to the land situate in Khasra No.11/3/1, admeasuring 4 bighas and 6 biswas. The impugned communication has been sent based on the observations of the Recommendat...
U.P. Rural Institute of Medical Science and Research Vs. Union of Indi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-13-2015
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:13. 07.2015 W.P.(C) 7988/2014 & CM No.18713/2014 U.P. RURAL INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE & RESEARCH & ANR. ..... Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr Aseem Mehrotra. For the Respondents : Mr Jasmeet Singh, CGSC for UOI. Mr Vikas Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr T. Singhdev, Mr Manan Khera and Mr Vishu Agrawal, Advocates for MCI/R-2 CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning a letter of the Central Government dated 15.10.2014 (hereafter the impugned order). By the impugned order, the application of petitioner No.1 U.P. Rural Institute of Medical Science & Research (hereafter petitioner institute), for approving the scheme of increase in seats in respect of six post graduate courses and for starting three post graduate courses from the academic year 2015-16, w...
Atul Kumar Verma Vs. Union of India and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-13-2015
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:13. h July, 2015. % + W.P.(C) 5719/2015 & CM No.10285/2015 (for stay). ATUL KUMAR VERMA Through: ..... Petitioner Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Yashvardhan, Mr. Rajat Khattry and Mr. Piyush Singh, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Vivek Goyal and Mr. Jitendra Kr. Tripathi, Advs. for R-1/UOI. Mr. Amit Bansal, Adv. for R-2. CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. The petitioner, being the father of an aspirant for admission to the Indian Institutes of Technologies (IITs), for admission whereto Joint Entrance Examination (JEE) comprising of JEE (Main) and JEE (Advance) is held by the respondent no.2 Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) and the respondent no.1 Union of India (UOI), Ministry of Human Resource and Development respectively and whose ward / daughter had appeared in the JEE (Main) held on 4th April, 2015, has filed this petition seeking declarati...
Ms Usha Dawar Vs. Management of Lady Harding
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-13-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision : July 13, 2015 + LPA6882013 MS USHA DAWAR Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Mahesh Srivastava, Mr.Ashok Kumar Sharma, Mr.Vaibhav M.Srivastava, Advs. versus MANAGEMENT OF LADY HARDING MEDICAL COLLEGE & SMT SUCHETA KRIPLANI HOSPITAL THR MEDICAL SUPERINTENDEN ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.R.V.Sinha, Mr.A.S.Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. Aggrieved by the order dated May 17, 2013 allowing the writ petition being W.P.(C) No.7210/2000 filed by the management of Lady Harding College and Smt.Sucheta Kriplana Hospital, setting aside the award dated May 29, 2000 passed by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal (in short the CGIT) the appellant prefers the present appeal. Usha Dawar, the appellant herein was appointed as a Lower Division Clerk vide letter dated July 28, 1986 with effect from August 04, 1986 and it would be appropriate to note ...
Gautam Prasad Singh Vs. The State and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-13-2015
$-50 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Delivered on:13. h July, 2015 + CRL.M.C. No.2742/2015 GAUTAM PRASAD SINGH ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Avdhesh K. Singh, Advocate Versus THE STATE & ANR Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr. Satish Verma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with SI Neeraj Kumar, P.S Mandawali Respondent No.2 in-person CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. By way of this petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.455/2015 registered at PS-Mandawali for the offence punishable under Section 380 IPC on 27th May, 2015 and the consequential proceedings emanating therefrom against the petitioner on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the aforesaid case was registered on the complaint of respondent No.2, who has compromised the matter with the petitioner...
Vinod Kumar Singh and Ors Vs. Devraj Singh and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-13-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: July 01, 2015 Judgment Delivered on: July 13, 2015 % + RFA(OS) 59/2015 VINOD KUMAR SINGH & ORS Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.G.S.Raghav, Mr.Pankaj Kumar, Advs. versus DEVRAJ SINGH & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Rajiv Khosla, Mr.R.R.Saini, Mr.Harshit Jain, Advs.for R-1 to 10. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Vinod Kumar Singh, Anil Kumar Singh and Sunil Kumar Singh all S/o Mahinder Pal; and Ashok Kumar Singh S/o late Jai Pal filed a suit being CS(OS)No.1809/2009 against Devraj, Begraj and Ajit Singh all S/o late Ran Singh; and Jagat Singh, Kanwar Singh and Narendra Singh all S/o late Ami Singh; Mahendra Pal Singh S/o late Prithi Singh and Ravindra Singh S/o late Jai Pal Singh seeking partition, possession and permanent injunction in respect of the suit properties which comprised of a total area admeasuring 23 bighas and 8 biswas in Village Rithal...
- ‹ Prev
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- Next ›
- Last »