Delhi Court July 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
R.R. Cargo Services Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-14-2015
#20 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3353/2014 & CM APPL. 6895/2014 R.R. CARGO SERVICES Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Ashish Mohan with Mr. Cheten Rai Wahi and Mr. Mohit Kumar, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through ..... Respondents Mr. Jagjit Singh, St. Standing Counsel with Mr. N. Prashant Kumar and Mr. Shivanshu Bajpai, Advocates Date of Decision :14. h July, 2015 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. One of the primary prayers in the present writ petition is to quash Clause 1.3 of paragraph (II) of the Comprehensive Leasing Policy (as amended vide Freight Marketing Circular No.11/2007 dated 12th April, 2007) on the ground that it is arbitrary, irrational, suffers from nonapplication of mind and in direct conflict with Clause 1.7 of the paragraph (II) of the same policy.2. Mr. Ashish Mohan, learned counsel for the petitioner points out that in the Clause 1.3 of the amended policy, it is stated that Railways may in additio...
Dipankar Paul Vs. M/S. Consulting Engineering Services (India) Pvt.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-14-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:20. h May, 2015 Date of Decision:14. h July, 2015 % + W.P.(C) 6930/2012 DIPANKAR PAUL Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. R.P. Sharma, Advocate. versus M/S. CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES (INDIA) PVT. LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Jivesh Chandrayan, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH JUDGMENT1 By way of the present petition the petitioner has impugned the order dated 06.05.2011 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Labour Court-V, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in Misc. Application No.11/2010 (Unique case ID No.02402C0381962010), whereby the claim filed by the petitioner was dismissed on the ground of limitation. The petitioner has also challenged the order dated 29.09.2012 passed by learned Labour Court whereby an application filed by the petitioner for setting aside the order dated 06.05.2011 was dismissed as not maintainable.2. The brief facts as culled out from the petition are that the petitioner was working as...
Trilok Singh Bakshi and Ors. Vs. State Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-14-2015
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: July 14, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 5081/2014 TRILOK SINGH BAKSHI & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Satdev Singh Dogra, Advocate versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr.Vinod Diwakar, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Manohar Lal Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.354/2000, under Sections 420/468/471 of IPC registered at police station Rajouri Garden, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of respondent No.2. Notice. Mr. Vinod Diwakar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, has been identified to be so the complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question by SI Manohar Lal on the basis of identity proof produced by him. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState has also placed the status report. Respondent No.2, present...
Rahul Vaid Vs. Balraj Vaid and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-14-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 835/2004 14th July, 2015 % RAHUL VAID Through ..... Plaintiff Mr. Pankul Nagpal, Advocate along with plaintiff versus BALRAJ VAID AND ORS. Through .... Defendants Mr. Sunil Aggarwal, Adv. for LRs of deceased Shri Balraj Vaid Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Swastik Singh, Adv. for def. Nos. 9 and 10 Mr. Gagan Mathur, Adv. for def. nos. 2(a), 3, 4 and 7 CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) O.A Nos. 94/2014 and 95/2014 [Chamber appeals by legal heirs of defendant No.1 against the orders dated 20.11.2013 and 23.4.2014 passed by the Joint Registrar refusing to implead the legal heirs of defendant No.1 and allowing the application of the plaintiff under Order XXII Rule 4(4) CPC being IA No.1293/2013 for exempting the plaintiff from substituting the legal heirs of defendant No.1 in place of defendant No.1 as also to condone the delay under Section 5 of the Limitation...
Dharam Pal Aggawal Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-14-2015
$~46 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:14. 07.2015 W.P.(C) 2613/2015 and CM No.4671/2015 DHARAM PAL AGGAWAL ... Petitioner ... Respondents versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Advocates who appeared in this case:- For the Petitioner For the Respondent No.1 For the Respondent No.2 For the Respondent No.3 : Mr Sumit Bansal : Mr Prasanta Verma and Mr Santosh Kumar Pandey : Mr Yeeshu Jain with Ms Jyoti Tyagi : Mr Dhanesh Relan with Mr Arush Bhandari CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The counter-affidavit handed over by Mr Yeeshu Jain on behalf of the respondent No.2 is taken on record. The learned counsel for the petitioner does not wish to file any rejoinder-affidavit inasmuch all the necessary averments are contained in the writ petition.2. The petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and...
Dipak Kumar Sharma Vs. U.O.I. Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-14-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on July 07, 2015 Judgment delivered on July 14, 2015 + W.P.(C) 5307/2014, CM No.10554/2014 DIPAK KUMAR SHARMA ..... Petitioner Through: Ms.Anu Mehta, Advocate with Mr.Rubinder Ghumman, Advocate versus U.O.I. ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr.J.P. Sengh, Sr. Advocate with Ms.Zubeda Begum, Ms.Sana Ansari and Ms.Vanessa Singh, Advocates for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:(a) Issue a Writ of Certiorari quashing the selection/result dated 25.06.2014 and alongwith with the entire selection process or alternatively; (b) Revaluate the candidates who participated in the third stage of the Entrance Test and declare the result of the SIT based on merit and proper marks sheet under the supervision of a competent independent panel for such revaluation and further hold the interview as per the revised marks obtained ...
Premwati Vs. The Lt. Governor, National Capital Territory of De
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-14-2015
$~34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:14. 07.2015 W.P.(C) 2579/2015 and CM No.4611/2015 PREMWATI ... Petitioner ... Respondents versus THE LT. GOVERNOR, NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI & ORS. Advocates who appeared in this case:- For the Petitioner For the Respondent Nos. 1, 2 & 4 For the Respondent No.3 : Mr Akhil Sachar with Mr J.Singh : Mr Yeeshu Jain with Ms Jyoti Tyagi : Mr Dhanesh Relan with Mr Arush Bhandari CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The counter-affidavit handed over by Mr Yeeshu Jain on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1, 2 & 4 is taken on record. The learned counsel for the petitioner does not wish to file any rejoinder affidavit inasmuch as he would be relying on the averments made in the writ petition.2. The petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Reset...
Archana Gupta Vs. The Lt. Governor, National Capital Territory of De
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-14-2015
$~35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:14. 07.2015 W.P.(C) 2580/2015 and CM No.4613/2015 ARCHANA GUPTA ... Petitioner versus THE LT. GOVERNOR, NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI & ORS. ... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case:- For the Petitioner For the Respondent Nos. 1, 2 & 4 For the Respondent No.3 : Mr Akhil Sachar with Mr J.Singh : Mr Yeeshu Jain with Ms Jyoti Tyagi : Mr Dhanesh Relan with Mr Arush Bhandari CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The counter-affidavit handed over by Mr Yeeshu Jain on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1, 2 & 4 is taken on record. The learned counsel for the petitioner does not wish to file any rejoinder affidavit inasmuch as he would be relying on the averments made in the writ petition.2. The petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and ...
Jagdeep Kaur Vs. The Lt. Governor, National Capital Territory of De
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-14-2015
$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:14. 07.2015 W.P.(C) 2586/2015 and CM No.4630/2015 JAGDEEP KAUR ... Petitioner ... Respondents versus THE LT. GOVERNOR, NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI & ORS. Advocates who appeared in this case:- For the Petitioner For the Respondent Nos. 1, 2 & 4 For the Respondent No.3 : Mr Akhil Sachar with Mr J.Singh : Mr Yeeshu Jain with Ms Jyoti Tyagi : Mr Dhanesh Relan with Mr Arush Bhandari CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The counter-affidavit handed over by Mr Yeeshu Jain on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1, 2 & 4 is taken on record. The learned counsel for the petitioner does not wish to file any rejoinder affidavit inasmuch as he would be relying on the averments made in the writ petition.2. The petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and R...
Yashwati Vs. The Lt. Governor, National Capital Territory of De
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-14-2015
$~44 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:14. 07.2015 W.P.(C) 2599/2015 and CM No.4650/2015 YASHWATI ... Petitioner ... Respondents versus THE LT. GOVERNOR, NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI & ORS. Advocates who appeared in this case:- For the Petitioner For the Respondent Nos. 1, 2 & 4 For the Respondent No.3 : Mr Akhil Sachar with Mr J.Singh : Mr Siddharth Panda : Mr Dhanesh Relan with Mr Arush Bhandari CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The counter-affidavit handed over by Mr Siddharth Panda on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1, 2 & 4 is taken on record. The learned counsel for the petitioner does not wish to file any rejoinder affidavit inasmuch as he would be relying on the averments made in the writ petition.2. The petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act,...
- ‹ Prev
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- Next ›
- Last »