Delhi Court July 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Union of India and Ors. Vs. V.P Lavania
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-15-2015
$~03. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4676/2015 Judgment dated 15th July, 2015 % UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through : ..... Petitioners Ms.Arti Bansal, Adv. versus V.P LAVANIA ..... Respondent Through CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) CM APPL. 8473/2015.1. Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 4676/2015 3. Present petition has been filed by the petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to quash the order dated 19.9.2014 passed by Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) in O.A.No.4264/2012, whereby the petitioners herein were directed to pay interest on all the retirement benefits, except gratuity, to the respondent herein for the delayed period i.e. from the date of retirement till the date of actual payment at GPF rates, within ninety days.4. The necessary fact...
Mother Dairy Fruit and Vegetable Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Sri Vinayaka Milk Produ ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-15-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:15. h July , 2015 % + CS (OS) NO.144/2011 MOTHER DAIRY FRUIT & VEGETABLE PVT. LTD... Plaintiff Through Mr. Nishchal Anand, Adv. along with Mr. Aman Taneja, Adv. versus SRI VINAYAKA MILK PRODUCTS ..... Defendant Through Defendant Ex-parte CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The plaintiff has filed the suit for permanent injunction, restraining infringement of trademark, copyright, passing off, damages, rendition of accounts, delivery up etc.2. The defendant is ex-parte. No written statement has been filed.3. The brief facts of the case as per the plaint are that the plaintiff, Mother Dairy Fruit & Vegetable Pvt. Ltd is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, having its registered office at "Mother Dairy", Patparganj, Delhi- 110092. The plaintiff is engaged in the business of manufacturing and marketing of milk and milk products, frozen foods, horticultural and other agricultural products...
U.P. Roadways, U.P.S.R.T.C, Lal Kothi Lucknow Vs. Mrs. Santosh Khurana ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-15-2015
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO No.81/1994 Decided on :15. h July, 2015 U.P. ROADWAYS, U.P.S.R.T.C, LAL KOTHI LUCKNOW ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Shadab Khan, Advocate. Versus MRS. SANTOSH KHURANA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate for Respondents No.1 to 4 CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeal has been filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short as Act) against the award dated 8.11.1993 passed by MACT seeking to set aside the impugned award.2. The brief facts of the case are that on 8.11.88 one Rattan Lal Khurana was going on the pillion of a two wheeler scooter which was being driven by Rakesh Kumar when they were hit from behind by the offending bus bearing registration No.UHN-974, which was being driven negligently at a very high speed by its driver Sobran Singh, resulting in the death of Rattan Lal Khurana. A petition was filed on 4.10.88 by the legal representatives of the deceas...
Super Cassettes Industries Ltd. Vs. Maury Diginet Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-15-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:15. h July, 2015 % + CS (OS) No.2449/2012 SUPER CASSETTES INDUSTRIES LTD ..... Plaintiff Through Ms. Prachi Agarwal, Advocate. versus MAURY DIGINET PVT LTD Through ....Defendants Defendants already ex parte CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The plaintiff has filed a suit for permanent injunction, restraining infringement of copyright, damages and rendition of accounts etc. against the defendant. Along with the suit, plaintiff also filed an application being I.A.No.14676/2012 under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC.2. The suit along with said interim application was listed before Court on 14th August, 2012. After hearing, detailed ex-parte order was passed restraining the defendant, its officers, servants, agents, representatives etc. from either engaging themselves or authorizing the recording, distributing, broadcasting, public performance/communication to the public or in any other way exploiting the cin...
Vaibhav Bhansali Vs. University of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-14-2015
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:14. 07.2015 W.P.(C) 3531/2014 VAIBHAV BHANSALI .....Petitioner versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Nitesh Kumar Singh with Ms Neha. For the Respondents : Mr Mohinder J.S. Rupal for University of Delhi. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition challenging the order dated 30.01.2014 passed by the respondent university (hereafter also the impugned order), whereby the petitioners request for migration from Deen Dayal Upadhyaya College to another college i.e. Shaheed Sukhdev College of Business Studies was rejected on the ground that there is no provision for inter-college migration in the course of Bachelor of Management Studies under the existing Ordinance-IV of the respondent university.2. Briefly stated, the facts that are relevant for examining the dispute in the present petitio...
Roop Chand Gupta Vs. Delhi Vidyut Board
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-14-2015
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : July 14, 2015 + LPA2762015 ROOP CHAND GUPTA Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Ashok Gurmani, Advocate versus DELHI VIDYUT BOARD Represented by: ..... Respondent None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Joining service on April 26, 1963 as an Inspector Grade II with the erstwhile Delhi Electric Supply Undertaking, the appellant earned promotions and when he was served with a charge memorandum which has resulted in a penalty being levied upon him, he was working as an Assistant Engineer. The undertaking had by then been taken over by the Delhi Vidyut Board.2. By a memorandum dated September 18, 1993, the appellant was charged while working as an Assistant Engineer in District Najafgarh during 1991, with mala-fide intention and ulterior motive extending undue favour to the consumers by not completing the requisite commercial formalities while sanction...
East Delhi Municipal Corporation Vs. Shri Narender Jain and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-14-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : June 30, 2015 Judgment Delivered on : July 14, 2015 + LPA2692015 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATIN & ORS ..... Appellants Represented by: Mr.Gaurang Kanth, Advocate with Ms.Biji Rajesh, Advocate versus ONIKA MEHROTRA & ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.A.S.Chandhiok, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.N.Tripathi, Advocate for R-1 to 3 Mr.Subodh Kumar, Mr.Anil Kumar, Advocates for R-4 LPA2832015 EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Gaurang Kanth, Advocate with Ms.Biji Rajesh, Advocate versus SHRI NARENDER JAIN & ORS ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.A.S.Chandhiok, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.N.Tripathi, Advocate for R-1 to 9 Mr.Raman Duggal, Advocate for R10 LPA2842015 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Gaurang Kanth, Advocate with Ms.Biji Rajesh, Advocate versus SH SURENDER SOLANKI & ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.A.S.Chandhiok, Sr.Advocate in...
North Delhi Municipal Corporation and Ors. Vs. Onika Mehrotra and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-14-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : June 30, 2015 Judgment Delivered on : July 14, 2015 + LPA2692015 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATIN & ORS ..... Appellants Represented by: Mr.Gaurang Kanth, Advocate with Ms.Biji Rajesh, Advocate versus ONIKA MEHROTRA & ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.A.S.Chandhiok, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.N.Tripathi, Advocate for R-1 to 3 Mr.Subodh Kumar, Mr.Anil Kumar, Advocates for R-4 LPA2832015 EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Gaurang Kanth, Advocate with Ms.Biji Rajesh, Advocate versus SHRI NARENDER JAIN & ORS ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.A.S.Chandhiok, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.N.Tripathi, Advocate for R-1 to 9 Mr.Raman Duggal, Advocate for R10 LPA2842015 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Gaurang Kanth, Advocate with Ms.Biji Rajesh, Advocate versus SH SURENDER SOLANKI & ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.A.S.Chandhiok, Sr.Advocate in...
Campaign for People Participation in Development P Vs. Union of India ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-14-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:14. 07.2015 + W.P.(C) 6215/2015 CAMPAIGN FOR PEOPLE PARTICIPATION IN DEVELOPMENT PLANNING ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Anil K.Aggarwal, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR Through: ..... Respondents Mr.Sanjay Jain, ASG along with Mr.Jasmeet Singh, CGSC, Mr.Vidur Mohan, Mr.Shreshth Jain and Ms.Kritika Mehra, Advs. for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JUDGMENT : Ms.G.ROHINI, CHIEF JUSTICE1 The petitioner claims to be a voluntary organization incorporated and registered as a society under the Societies Registration Act, 1860. It is averred in the writ petition that the petitioner has been taking up various problems of the people of common interest, particularly, issues relating to enforcement of constitutional provisions and furtherance of rule of law.2. The present petition is filed by way of Public Interest Litigation with the following prayers:A. Issue writ of or in the nature of mandamus and/or a...
K.V. Kulkarni Vs. Bank of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-14-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: July 02, 2015 Judgment Delivered on: July 14, 2015 % + LPA5342009 K.V. KULKARNI Represented by: ..... Appellant Ms.Vasudha Indurkar, Adv. versus BANK OF INDIA AND ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Jagat Arora, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. K.V.Kulkarni while working as Chief Manger of Bank of India was dismissed from service pursuant to an inquiry on November 21, 1989 which order was upheld by the appellate authority vide order dated April 19, 1990. K.V.Kulkarni filed a writ petition being W.P.(C) No.1609/1990 before this Court challenging the two orders of dismissal which writ petition was dismissed by the learned Single Judge of this Court on August 13, 2009 and hence the present appeal.2. The allegations of misconduct against K.V.Kulkarni were of abusing his official position to accommodate M/s.Harrison Tyres Company, a borrower of the branch, ...
- ‹ Prev
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- Next ›
- Last »