Delhi Court July 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ravinder Pal Singh@rishi and Ors. Vs. The State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2015
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:16. h July, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 4478/2014 & Crl. M.A. 15351/2014 RAVINDER PAL SINGH @ RISHI & ORS. ....Petitioners Through: Mr. Yogesh Swarup & Ms. Asha Garg, Advs. for petitioners 1 & 3 versus THE STATE & ANR Through: .....Respondents Mr. Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with IO, SI Ved Prakash Mr. T.D. Tiwari, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.456/2009 under Sections 313/316/406/ 498A/506/34 IPC registered at PS Maurya Enclave, Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated settlement dated 3rd January, 2012. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State submits that respondent No.2, present in Court, is identified to be complainant/first informant of the FIR in question by SI Ved Prakash on the basis of identity proof furnished by her. Respondent No.2, present in Court, submits that she does not hold petitione...
Jasbir Singh and Ors. Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2015
$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:16th July, 2015 + Crl. M.C. No.1265/2015 JASBIR SINGH & ORS. Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr. Bharat Sharma, Advocate with Petitioner No.1 in person. Versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Neeraj Kumar Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with SI Tilak Singh, PS Nihal Vihar. Mr. Mrinal Bharti, Advocate for Respondent No.2 with Respondent No.2 in person with his father. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. By way of this petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.191/2011 registered at Police Station Nihal Vihar, for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/342/328/34 IPC and the consequential proceedings emanating therefrom against the petitioners on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that ...
Sh.Puran Chand Nehlani and Ors. Vs. The State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2015
$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:16th July, 2015 + Crl. M.C. No.1965/2015 SH.PURAN CHAND NEHLANI & ORS. ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr. Shahbaj Ahmad for Mr. Javed Ahmad, Advocate. Versus THE STATE & ANR. Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Neeraj Kumar Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with SI Lichhman, PS South Rohini. Mr. Divyakant, Advocate for Respondent No.2 with Respondent No.2 in person with his father. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. By way of this petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.774/2008 registered at Police Station Rohini, for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC and the consequential proceedings emanating therefrom against the petitioners on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Also seek directions thereby directing the Revisional Court at Rohini, Delhi,...
Samir Kumar Pujari Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2015
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: July 16, 2015 + W.P.(C) 3789/2013 SAMIR KUMAR PUJARI Through: ..... Petitioner Ms.Ankita Patnaik, Adv. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondent Ms.Archana Gaur, Adv. for R1 and R2 Mr.Vishnu Sharma, Adv. for R3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO % 1. ORDER1607.2015 The present petition has been filed by the petitioner inter-alia seeking a writ of certiorari, quashing the letters dated January 29, 2013 and August 27, 2012 issued by the respondents and with a further direction that he be granted notionally the time-scale to the next higher grade pay of Rs.8,700/with all consequential benefits.2. It is the case of the petitioner, that while working as Asst. Account Officer in the Ministry of Defence, he was sent on deputation as Accountant on March 23, 1992 to Oil Industry Development Board, a Statutory body. While on deputation, the petitioner was promoted to the post of Accounts Officer in OIDB and fin...
Icici Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Rojida Khatun and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2015
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Mac. Appeal No.514/2012 & C.M. No.8631/2012 Decided on :16. h July, 2015 ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Advocate. Versus ROJIDA KHATUN & ORS. Through: Respondents Mr. Kunwar Pal Singh, Adv. for R-1 to 4. WITH + Mac. Appeal No.1141/2012 & C.M. No.18397/2012 ROJIDA KHATOON & ORS. Appellants Through: Mr. Kunwar Pal Singh, Advocate. Versus ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS. Respondents Through: Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) 1. These are two cross connected appeals arising from the same award. The first appeal bearing Mac. Appeal No.514/2012 titled ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Limited vs. Rojida Khatun & Others is filed by the insurance company and the second appeal bearing Mac. Appeal No.1141/2012 titled Rojida Khatoon & Ors. Vs. ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Limited & Ors. is filed by the claimants seeking enhance...
Rekha Mathur Vs. Manish Khanna
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2015
$~6. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % Date of Decision:16. 07.2015 MAT.APP. 6/2013 REKHA MATHUR Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Puneet Agarwal & Mr.Anshuman Ashok, Advocates. versus MANISH KHANNA Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Rajesh Khanna & Mr. Kushal Raj Gupta, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. With the consent of learned counsel, I have heard their respective submissions in this appeal and proceed to dispose of the same at this stage.2. The present matrimonial appeal is directed against the judgment dated 24.08.2012 passed by the learned ADJ-01 (East), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in HMA No.450/2010. The appellant has preferred the aforesaid composite petition invoking Section 13(1)(ia) and Section 12(1)(a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (HMA) against the respondent. The learned ADJ passed a decree of divorce on the ground of cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the HMA in favour of the appellant and, at the same time, the relie...
M/S Visa Agro Industries Pvt Ltd (Presently Visa R Vs. Sh. Mam Chand a ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-15-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:13. h April, 2015 Decided on:15. h July, 2015 % + C.R.P. 157/2013 M/S VISA AGRO INDUSTRIES PVT LTD (PRESENTLY VISA REALTY LIMITED) ..... Petitioner Through Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rakesh Sinha, Mr. Jeemon Raju K., Ms. Harleen Singh, Advs. versus Sh. CHARAN SINGH & ANR ..... Respondent Through Dr. Suman Chaudhary, Adv. for-1. + C.R.P. 158/2013 M/S VISA AGRO INDUSTRIES PVT LTD (PRESENTLY VISA REALTY LIMITED) ..... Petitioner Through Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rakesh Sinha, Mr. Jeemon Raju K., Ms. Harleen Singh, Advs. versus Sh. MAM CHAND & ORS Through ..... Respondents Dr. Suman Chaudhary, Adv. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. These two petitions are being disposed of by a common judgment as the facts in the two petitions are similar and vide identical impugned orders dated 9th July, 2013 learned Civil Judge dismissed the applications of the petitioner under Order VII Rule 11 r...
Shri Shambhu Sharan Mishra Vs. Shri Pratap Singh Bist and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-15-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: July 13, 2015 Judgment Delivered on: July15 , 2015 % + LPA3632014 & CM82772014 THE UNIVERSITY OF DELHI Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr. Saurabh Banerjee and Mr.Sumit Nagpal, Advocates. versus MR. PRATAP SINGH BISHT & ANR ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Pankaj Sinha and Ms.Nupur Grover, Advocates for Respondent No.1. AND + LPA3802014 & CMs. 8959/2014 & 10871/2014 SHRI SHAMBHU SHARAN MISHRA ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.P.S.Bindra and Mr.Ravi Kumar, Advocates. versus SHRI PRATAP SINGH BIST & ANR ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Pankaj Sinha and Ms.Nupur Grover, Advocates for Respondent No.1. Mr.Saurabh Banerjee and Mr.Sumit Nagpal, Advocates for Respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Pratap Singh Bist, respondent No.1 herein filed a writ petition being WP(C) No.1387/2012 inter alia seeking setting aside of the appointment of Shambhu Sha...
Triloki Singh Vs. The Narcotics Control Bureau
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-15-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: Judgment delivered on: % + 14.05.2015 15.07.2015 CRL.A. 1023/2010 ASHOK KUMAR Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Biswajit Kumar Patra, Advocate versus THE NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU ..... Respondent Through: Mr. B.S. Arora & Mr. Mohit Arora, Advocates. + CRL.A. 794/2010 TRILOKI SINGH Through: ..... Appellant Mr. M. Shamikh, Advocate. versus THE NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU ..... Respondent Through: Mr. B.S. Arora & Mr. Mohit Arora, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. These appeals are directed against the common judgment dated 23.04.2010 passed by Sh. Sanjiv Jain, Special Judge, NDPS in S.C. No.N104/08, convicting Appellant Ashok Kumar and Appellant Triloki Singh for the offences punishable under Section 20 (b) (ii) C and Section 29 read with Section 20 (b) (ii) C of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred as the Act) and the order on sentence dated 23.04...
Millennium Plaza Ltd. and Anr Vs. Lecoanet Hemant India Pvt. Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-15-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. 314/2013 Reserved on: June 29, 2015 Date of decision: July 15, 2015 MILLENNIUM PLAZA LTD. & ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Atul Sharma with Mr. Milanka Chaudhury and Mr. Sarojanand Jha, Advocates. versus LECOANET HEMANT INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sudhir Chandra Agarwal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Amol Dixit and Mr. Gaurav Mukerjee, Advocates. And + O.M.P. 315/2013 MILLENNIUM PLAZA LTD. & ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Atul Sharma with Mr. Milanka Chaudhury and Mr. Sarojanand Jha, Advocates. versus IP SUPPORT SERVICES (INDIA) PVT LTD. OMP Nos. 314 & 315/2013 Through: Mr. Sudhir Chandra Agarwal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Amol Dixit and Mr. Gaurav Mukerjee, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR1 OMP Nos. 314 and 315 of 2013 have been filed by both Millennium Plaza Limited (MPL) and Unitech Limited (UL) challenging the impugned Awards dated 5th September, 2012 passed by the learned Sole Arbitrator in Arbitrat...
- ‹ Prev
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- Next ›
- Last »