Delhi Court July 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Govind Singh and Ors Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:07. 07.2015 Date of Decision:16. 07.2015 % + CRL.REV.P. 592/2013 GOVIND SINGH & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. N. S. Dalal with Mr. Amit Rana & Ms. Nidhi Dalal, , Advocates. versus STATE Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CRL.REV.P. 596/2013 KANWAL SINGH & ORS Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. N. S. Dalal with Mr. Amit Rana & Ms. Nidhi Dalal, , Advocates. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J:1. Both the cases have been heard together and a common order is being passed.2. Heard the counsels for the parties in both the cases.3. The petitioners in both the petitions have put a challenge to the order dated 3.5.2013 passed by ASJ-02, North District, Rohini Courts in Sessions Case No.89/2011 in connection with FIR No.242/2011 (P.S.Crime Branch) whereby the prayer for discharge of the offences under Sections 447/120B and 34 of the IPC...
Asim Chowdhury Vs. M/S. Swagatam Tours and Travels (P) Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: July 14, 2015 Judgment Delivered on: July 16, 2015 + LPA352015 ASIM CHOWDHURY Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.S.Mukherjee, Advocate versus M/S. SWAGATAM TOURS AND TRAVELS (P) LTD. ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Vijay Jaiswal, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. The appropriate Government made a reference on July 21, 1995 to the Labour Court, which reads as under:Whether the services of Shri Asim Chowdhury have been terminated illegally and/or unjustifiably by the Management, and if so, to what relief is he entitled and what directions are necessary in this respect?.2. The Management referred to in the reference : the respondent, is M/s Swagatam Tours and Travels (P) Ltd.3. As per the Statement of Claim filed by Asim, he pleaded that he was employed as a driver on November 16, 1992 and that his last drawn wage was `1000/- (Rupees One Thousan...
S K Jindal Vs. Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision : July 16, 2015 + LPA4452015 S K JINDAL Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Sarvesh Bisaria with Mr.Prakash Chand Sharma, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Manish Mohan, CGSC with Ms.Manisha Rana Singh & Ms.Sidhi Arora, Advs.for R-1. Mr. K.K. Tyagi, Adv.for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. Aggrieved by the order dated 28th April, 2015 dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellant S.K.Jindal being WP(C) No.3264/2014, the appellant prefers the present appeal. In the writ petition S.K.Jindal had challenged his transfer order dated 8th May, 2014 transferring him from CO,Tech. Division Delhi to Sikar, Rajasthan and also quashing of the relieving order dated 13th May, 2014 and order dated 19th May, 2014 rejecting his representation.2. S.K.Jindal was appointed as Junior Technical Assistant with the respondent Central Wa...
Devinder Nath Narula Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2015
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :16. 07.2015 + W.P.(C) 6660/2003 DEVINDER NATH NARULA ..... Petitioner Through : Sh. A.P. Nagrath, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through : Sh. J.K. Singh, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. The review petitioner seeks direction for inclusion of two periods of service in the employment of state agencies of the Government of Punjab, i.e. between 01.12.1953 and 01.01.1955 as Panchayat Secretary and between 23.02.1960 and 23.12.1960 as Assistant Hostel Warden in the Punjab Polytechnic at Nilokheri in erstwhile Punjab, for pensionary purposes by the Railway Protection Force (RPF) which he subsequently joined after selection.2. The petitioners original claim in these proceedings was disposed off on 05.03.2014 with the following direction:4. Now, if the petitioner wants the two services to be counted as pensionary servic...
Murti Devi Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : JULY15 2015 DECIDED ON : JULY16 2015 + CRL.A. 777/2005 & Crl.M.A.9829/2005 MURTI DEVI ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Arun Sharma, Advocate. VERSUS STATE ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Amit Ahlawat, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.Crl.M.A.9829/2005 For the reasons mentioned in the application, the delay is condoned. Application is allowed and disposed of. Crl.A.777/2005 1. Aggrieved by a judgment dated 31.03.2005 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.246/96 emanating from FIR No.122/92 registered at Police Station Mukherjee Nagar by which she was convicted under Section 376 IPC read with Section 109 IPC, the instant appeal has been preferred by the appellant-Murti Devi. By an order dated 02.04.2005, she was sentenced to undergo RI for 18 months with fine `200/-.2. Briefly stated the prosecution case as set up in the charge- sheet was that on 8.7.1992 at around 2.00 p.m., the appellant abetted coa...
Hcltechnologies Limited Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2015
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:16. 07.2015 W.P.(C) 7948/2013 & CM168402013 HCLTECHNOLOGIES LIMITED .... Petitioner versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners For the Respondent : Mr Ajay Vohra, Sr Advocate with Ms Kavita Jha and Ms Shraddha : Mr Rohit Madan with Mr Zoheb Hossain and Mr Akash Vajpai CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition is directed against the notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), which was issued on 28.03.2013 in respect of the assessment year 200607. The petition is also directed against the order dated 21.11.2013, whereby the objections raised by the petitioner were disposed of by the Assessing Officer.2. The original assessment was completed under Section 143 (3) read with Section 144C(13) of th...
Mukesh Kumar Vs. The Administrator (Nzre)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2015
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:16. 07.2015 FAO(OS) 318/2015 and CM No.11218/2015 ... Appellant MUKESH KUMAR versus THE ADMINISTRATOR (NZRE) ... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Mr Milind M. Bhardwaj and Mr S.R. Singh For the Respondent : Mr Avinash Sharma CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 21.05.2015 passed by a learned Single Judge of this court in OMP(I) 211/2015 which was a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act). The appellant / petitioner had sought a restraint order against the Administrator / respondent from enforcing the second part of clause (VIII) of the notice dated 06.04.2015 as amended by the notice dated 13.04.2015 which was published for the scheduled election to the Smaller Representative General Body ...
Smt Rajni and Ors. Vs. State Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2015
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: July 16, 2015 + CRL.M.C.2222/2015 SMT RAJNI & ORS. Through: .....Petitioners Mr.B.B.Sharma, Advocate versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .... Respondents Through: Mr. Vinod Diwakar, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with W/SI Khiloni Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.23/2011 under Sections 323/342/354/452/ 506/494/34 IPC registered at Police Station Janakpuri, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of respondent No.2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState submits that upon notice, respondent No.2, present in the Court, has been identified to be complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question by W/SI Khiloni on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute between the parties has been amicably resolved and the misunderstanding, which led to the incident in que...
Rajesh Kapoor Vs. Public Enterprises Selection Board and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: July 16, 2015 + W.P.(C) 6759/2015 RAJESH KAPOOR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. J.R. Chaudhary, Adv. with Mr. Sagar Saxena, Adv. & Mr. Suraj Prakash and Ms. Swati, Advs. versus PUBLIC ENTERPRISES SELECTION BOARD AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC, Mr. Vikas Mahajan, CGSC for R-1 &2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.CM No.12340/2015 Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 6759/2015 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner inter alia challenging the advertisement/circular issued by the respondent No.1 dated February 5, 2015 being contrary to the DPE OM dated October 20, 2005.2. The petitioner is working as Director (Technical) in Telecommunications Consultants India Ltd (TCIL). On February 5, 2015, the respondent No.1 published a circular requesting the respondent No.2 to provide seniority-wise candidature of offici...
Harish @ Chirag Vs. State of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :09.07.2015 Judgment delivered on :16.07.2015 CRL.A.456/2013 HARISH @ CHIRAG Through ..... Appellant Mr. Trideep Pais, Mr.Atul Sharma, Mr. Siddharth Garg, Ms.Vrinda Bhandari, & Mr. M. L. Rajora, Advs. versus STATE OF DELHI Through ..... Respondent Mr. Pramod Saxena, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1. This appeal is directed against the impugned judgment and order of sentence dated 05.2.2013 and 14.02.2013 respectively wherein the appellant stood convicted under Sections 376/363/328/506 of the IPC and had been awarded maximum sentence of RI10years of the offences under Section 376 of the IPC besides separate incarceration and fine for his other convictions. The sentences were to run concurrently.2. Version of the prosecution is that DD No.11B was lodged in the local police station Sultanpuri on the complaint of the prosecutrix (PW13). She was a 21 year old student of Delhi U...
- ‹ Prev
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- Next ›
- Last »