Delhi Court July 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ankur Rawat and Anr Vs. University of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-17-2015
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. h July, 2015 % + W.P.(C) No.6282/2015 THUFAIL & ANR Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Deepak Prakash, Ms. Shruti Srivastava & Mr. Venkat, Advs. Versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Jogy Scaria, Adv. for R-2. AND + W.P.(C) No.6325/2015 AAKANKSHA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Bharat Bhushan Jain, Adv. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. for University of Delhi. Mr. S.S. Ahluwalia, Adv. for R-2. AND + W.P.(C) No.6337/2015 AAKASH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Bharat Bhushan Jain, Adv. Versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. for University of Delhi. Mr. S.S. Ahluwalia, Adv. for R-2. AND + W.P.(C) No.6362/2015 SAUMYA ARYA & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Tanmay Mehta, Mr. Anunaya Mehta & Mr. Nikhil Palli, Advs. Mr. Deepak Prakash, Ms. Shruti Srivastava & Mr. Venka...
Anil Kumar Khanna and Ors Vs. The Indian Tourism Development Corporati ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-17-2015
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Reserve:12.2.2015 Date of Decision:17. 07. 2015 CS(OS) 119/1980 ANIL KUMAR KHANNA AND ORS. ..... Plaintiffs Through Mr.Sacchin Puri, Ms.Kaadambari Puri and Mr. Vinay Dubey, Advocate P-1 Mr. Dinesh Garg and Ms.Rachna Agrawal, Advocates for P-2. Mr.Dheeraj Malhotra and Mr. Sandeep Mittal, Advocates of P2A Mr. Sushil Dutt Salwan and Ms.Latika Dutta, Advocate for P-3. versus THE INDIAN TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. ..... Defendant Through Mr. Y.P.Narula, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Sanjay Gupta, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.1. By the present order I shall dispose of the objections to the report of the Local Commissioner filed by plaintiff No.1, plaintiff No.2, plaintiff No.3 and the defendant respectively. The plaintiffs filed the present suit for recovery of possession of property commonly known as Jiwan Roop Mansion L Block, Radial Road, Connaught Circus, New Delhi. This Court vide judgment dated 5....
Arun Lal Vs. The State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-17-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRIMINAL APPEAL No.328/2012 Reserved on:19. h March, 2015 Date of Decision:17. h July, 2015 % ARUN LAL ....Appellant Through Mr. J.S. Kushwaha, Advocate. Versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP. Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.Impugned judgment dated 21st December, 2011 convicts the appellant Arun Lal for murder of Asha and Alka, his mother-in-law and unmarried sister-in-law, in the evening on 2nd May 2008, with the motive of stealing Rs.6 lacs, lying in an attach inside a bed at the house of his in-laws. The appellant by order on sentence dated 24th December, 2011, stands sentenced to imprisonment for life with a direction that he would not be released from prison till the rest of his life. Fine of Rs.10,000/- has also been imposed.2. The factum that the two deceased Asha and Alka had suffered a homicidal death on 2nd May, 2008 in the evening in the...
Pfizer Products Inc. and Ors. Vs. M/S Seeko Biotics
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-17-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:17. h July, 2015 % + CS (OS) No.1471/2011 PFIZER PRODUCTS INC. & Ors. ..... Plaintiffs Through Ms. Shilpa Gupta, Adv. versus M/S SEEKO BIOTICS Through ..... Defendant Defendant ex-parte. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The plaintiffs have filed the suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of registered trademark, passing off, delivery up, rendition of accounts of profits and damages against the defendant.2. The product that is relevant to the present proceedings is DOLONEX, which is a highly sought after drug for the treatment of rheumatic disorders, gout, postoperative pain, juvenile idiopathic arthritis and/or musculoskeletal conditions.3. The plaintiffs have used the trademark "DOLONEX" on pharmaceutical products continuously since at least the year 1989 in India. The mark "DOLONEX" is a fanciful and coined word having no denotative meaning and is accordingly an inherently distin...
Ravi Somani Vs. Sandeep Tayal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-17-2015
$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 2585/2014 Decided on 17th July, 2015 RAVI SOMANI ..... Plaintiff Through :Mr. Rajesh Banati and Mr. Sunil Verma, Advs. versus SANDEEP TAYAL Through ..... Defendant : Mr. Purushottam Kumar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK A.K. PATHAK, J.(ORAL) IA No.10259/2015 (under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC filed by the plaintiff) in CS(OS) No 2585/2014 1. Arguments heard. Record perused.2. Plaintiff has filed this suit for possession, recovery of arrears of rent and mesne profit against the defendant. Written statement has been filed. Admission/denial of the documents is also complete. At this stage, plaintiff has filed this application under Order 12 Rule 6 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (The CPC for short) for passing a judgment on admissions.3. Relevant it would be to refer and rely upon the Order 12 Rule 6 of the CPC, which reads as under:Judgment on admissions.- (1) Where admissions of fact have been made either in the pleading or o...
Mohammad Yusuf and Ors Vs. Prof S K Sopori and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2015
8 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 918/2013 MOHAMMAD YUSUF & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Dr. Sumant Bhardwaj, Advocate with Mrs. Mridula Ray, Advocate. versus PROF S K SOPORI & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Ginny J.Rautray, Advocate with Ms. Harsha, Advocate. Date of Decision:16. h July , 2015 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) CM Appls. 11130- 11131/2015 in Cont.Cas(C) 918/2013 Keeping in view the averments in the applications, delay in filing and re-filing the rejoinder affidavit is condoned. Accordingly, the applications stand disposed of. Cont.Cas(C) 918/2013 & CM Appl. 19026/2013 1. Present contempt petition has been filed by the petitioners alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated 30th September, 2013 in W.P.(C) 6249/2013 whereby the same was disposed of with a direction to the competent authority of respondent No.1 to consider the complaint of Plagiarism against Professor Ainul Hasan in terms of the report ...
Chetan Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:01. 07.2015 Pronounced on:16. 07.2015 + CRL.A. 28/2000 CHETAN STATE + TASLEEM STATE + ASHOK STATE ..... Appellant Through: Mr. M.L. Yadav, Adv. versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Varun Goswami, APP for the State. CRL.A. 227/2000 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. M.L. Yadav, Adv. versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Varun Goswami, APP for the State. CRL.A. 533/2002 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Biswajit Kumar Patra, Adv. versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Varun Goswami, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. GAUBA R. K. GAUBA, J: % 1. The three appellants were held guilty, as charged, for the offence of gang rape punishable under Section 376(2)(g) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) statedly committed against the prosecutrix (PW-6) during 09:00 P.M. to 10:30 P.M. on 03.09.1997 in bus bearing registration No.DBP- 1735 on Outer Road, Mayur Vihar Phase-III, Near CRPF Camp within the jurisdiction of...
Kanwal Singh and Ors Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:07. 07.2015 Date of Decision:16. 07.2015 % + CRL.REV.P. 592/2013 GOVIND SINGH & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. N. S. Dalal with Mr. Amit Rana & Ms. Nidhi Dalal, , Advocates. versus STATE Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CRL.REV.P. 596/2013 KANWAL SINGH & ORS Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. N. S. Dalal with Mr. Amit Rana & Ms. Nidhi Dalal, , Advocates. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J:1. Both the cases have been heard together and a common order is being passed.2. Heard the counsels for the parties in both the cases.3. The petitioners in both the petitions have put a challenge to the order dated 3.5.2013 passed by ASJ-02, North District, Rohini Courts in Sessions Case No.89/2011 in connection with FIR No.242/2011 (P.S.Crime Branch) whereby the prayer for discharge of the offences under Sections 447/120B and 34 of the IPC...
M/S Meena Advertisers Vs. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + OMP(I) No.344/2015 & I.A.No.13973/2015 % 16th July, 2015 M/S MEENA ADVERTISERS ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohan Parasaran, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ashwin Kumar D.S, Adv. and Ms. V.E. Gayatri, Adv. versus DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD. Through: ..... Respondent Mr. R.V. Sinha, Adv. and Mr. Puneet Garg, Law Officer for DMRC. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. Yes VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by the petitioner who has been given exclusive right to advertise on trains running on Lines-5 and 6 by the respondent/Delhi Metro Rail Corporation. Petitioner by this petition seeks restraint against the respondent for encashing the bank guarantee dated 23.9.2014 for a sum of Rs.2,50,65,000/-. Respondent is seeking to encash this bank guarantee on account of failure of the petitioner to make payment of the license fee in terms ...
Ram Chander Shahni @ Chandan Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:06. 07.2015 Pronounced on:16.07.2015 + CRL.A. 736/2012 RAM CHANDER SHAHNI @ CHANDAN Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Aishwarya Rao, Adv. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aasha Tiwari, APP with Insp. Bhageshwar Kaushik, PS Vigilance CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. GAUBA MR. JUSTICE R. K. GAUBA % 1. The appellant was prosecuted in Sessions Case No.28/2010 in the Court of Shri Sanjay Sharma, Addl. Sessions Judge-01 (East), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi on the charge that on 21.05.2009 at about 06:30 A.M. in House No.84, Gali No.2, Harijan Basti, Arya Nagar, Delhi, he had caused the murder of Rajender Shah (husband of his sister) and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code (IPC). At the conclusion of the trial, he was convicted on being found guilty by judgment dated 11.05.2011. By subsequent order passed on 13.05.2011, he was awarded sentence of imprisonment for...
- ‹ Prev
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- Next ›
- Last »