Delhi Court July 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Navsansad Vihar Cghs Ltd Vs. Govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-20-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9193/2014 & CM Nos. 20901/2014, 6143, 12214/2015 Date of decision :20. h July, 2015 NAVSANSAD VIHAR CGHS LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Kuldeep Mansukhani, Adv. versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mr. Anil Amrit, Mrs. Santosh Sardana and Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Advs. for R-3 WITH + W.P.(C) 9194/2014 & CM Nos.20903/2014, 6142, 12215/2015 NAVSANSAD VIHAR CGHS LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Kuldeep Mansukhani, Adv. versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mr. Anil Amrit, Mrs. Santosh Sardana and Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Advs. for R-3 AND + W.P.(C) 1295/2015 & CM Nos.2293, 6141, 12216/2015 NAVSANSAD VIHAR COOPERATIVE ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Kuldeep Mansukhani, Adv. W.P.(C) Nos. 9193, 9194/2014, 1295/2015 1 versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mr. Anil Amrit, Mrs. Santosh Sardana and Mr. Sunil...
Lic Housing Finance Limited Vs. Mahesh Mittal and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-20-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:20. h July, 2015 % + CS (OS) No.2937/2014 LIC HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through Mr. Pankul Nagpal, Adv. versus MAHESH MITTAL & ORS Through ..... Defendants None CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The present suit has been filed by the plaintiff under Order XXXVII CPC for recovery of a sum of Rs.25,69,399.23/- along with pendent lite and future interest @ 18% p.a. against the defendants.2. Brief facts of the case as stated in the plaint are that the plaintiff is engaged in the business of giving financial assistance in the form of their loan schemes, for purchasing residential accommodation for individual etc. The defendants No.1 and 2 are the borrowers under the individual home loan scheme within the meaning of Loan Agreement executed between the plaintiff and defendants No.1 and 2. The defendant No.3 is the builder/ Society to whom the loan amount has been disbursed. The defendant No....
Ludhiana Improvement Trust Vs. M/S. Mapletree Property and Infrastruct ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-17-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :17. 07.2015 + FAO(OS) 322/2015, C.M. APPL.11287-11288/2015 + FAO(OS) 320/2015, CAV.628/2015, C.M. APPL.11279-11280/2015 LUDHIANA IMPROVEMENT TRUST ..... Appellant Versus M/S. MAPLETREE PROPERTY & INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Sh. Salil Sagar, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Ajay Pal, Sh. Samarth Sagar, Sh. Vishal Yadav and Sh. Sankalp Sagar, Advocates, for appellants. Sh. Gaurav Pachnanda, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Ashok Rajagopalan and Ms. Shruti Gupta, Advocates, for Respondent No.1. Sh. Vivek Sibal, Sh. Rahul Sharma, Ms. Nivedita Bhaskar and Ms. Pooja. M. Saigal, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The present appeals are preferred by the Ludhiana Improvement Trust (hereafter LIT) questioning the judgment and order dated 21.04.2015 of the learned Single Judge in a petition (filed by LIT), being OMP No.240 of 2015, under Section...
Aakash Vs. University of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-17-2015
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. h July, 2015 % + W.P.(C) No.6282/2015 THUFAIL & ANR Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Deepak Prakash, Ms. Shruti Srivastava & Mr. Venkat, Advs. Versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Jogy Scaria, Adv. for R-2. AND + W.P.(C) No.6325/2015 AAKANKSHA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Bharat Bhushan Jain, Adv. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. for University of Delhi. Mr. S.S. Ahluwalia, Adv. for R-2. AND + W.P.(C) No.6337/2015 AAKASH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Bharat Bhushan Jain, Adv. Versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. for University of Delhi. Mr. S.S. Ahluwalia, Adv. for R-2. AND + W.P.(C) No.6362/2015 SAUMYA ARYA & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Tanmay Mehta, Mr. Anunaya Mehta & Mr. Nikhil Palli, Advs. Mr. Deepak Prakash, Ms. Shruti Srivastava & Mr. Venka...
Sunir Khurana Vs. Appointments Committee of The
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-17-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision : July 17, 2015 + LPA4482015 SUNIR KHURANA Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.M.Ravi and Mr.Harish K.Bishnoi, Advocates. versus APPOINTMENTS COMMITTEE OF THE CABINET REPRESENTED BY CABINET SECRETARY AND ORS Represented by: None. ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) CM No.12399/2015 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CM No.12398/2015 (Delay in filing) 1. For the reasons stated in the application 37 days delay in filing the appeal is condoned.2. Application is disposed of. LPA4482015 1. The Appellant initially appointed as Assistant Divisional Manager with MMTC Ltd.in the year 1980 and rose to the post of Chief General Manager in the same organisation in the year 2005. He was selected for appointment as Director (Marketing) in MMTC Ltd.for an initial tenure for five years extendable for further period, till he attains the age of su...
Aakanksha Vs. University of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-17-2015
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. h July, 2015 % + W.P.(C) No.6282/2015 THUFAIL & ANR Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Deepak Prakash, Ms. Shruti Srivastava & Mr. Venkat, Advs. Versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Jogy Scaria, Adv. for R-2. AND + W.P.(C) No.6325/2015 AAKANKSHA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Bharat Bhushan Jain, Adv. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. for University of Delhi. Mr. S.S. Ahluwalia, Adv. for R-2. AND + W.P.(C) No.6337/2015 AAKASH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Bharat Bhushan Jain, Adv. Versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. for University of Delhi. Mr. S.S. Ahluwalia, Adv. for R-2. AND + W.P.(C) No.6362/2015 SAUMYA ARYA & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Tanmay Mehta, Mr. Anunaya Mehta & Mr. Nikhil Palli, Advs. Mr. Deepak Prakash, Ms. Shruti Srivastava & Mr. Venka...
Pcp International Limited Vs. Lanco Infratech Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-17-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % OMP (I) No.350/2015 17th July, 2015 PCP INTERNATIONAL LIMITED Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Senior Advocate with Ms. Gauri Rasgotra, Advocate, Mr. Raunak Dhillon, Advocate, Mr. George Varghese, Advocate and Mr. Sumit Attri, Advocate. versus LANCO INFRATECH LIMITED Through: ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) I.A. No.14081/2015 (exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. I.A. stands disposed of. + OMP(I) No.350/2015 2. This is a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by the petitioner with respect to disputes arising between the parties under the contract dated 3.11.2010 by which petitioner was awarded the contract for erection, testing and commissioning of 2 x 660 MW Boiler Units and Auxiliaries (Part A) at the Lanco Vidharbha Thermal Power Project situated in the village of Mandwa, Wardh...
Saumya Arya and Ors. Vs. Miranda House and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-17-2015
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. h July, 2015 % + W.P.(C) No.6282/2015 THUFAIL & ANR Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Deepak Prakash, Ms. Shruti Srivastava & Mr. Venkat, Advs. Versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Jogy Scaria, Adv. for R-2. AND + W.P.(C) No.6325/2015 AAKANKSHA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Bharat Bhushan Jain, Adv. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. for University of Delhi. Mr. S.S. Ahluwalia, Adv. for R-2. AND + W.P.(C) No.6337/2015 AAKASH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Bharat Bhushan Jain, Adv. Versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. for University of Delhi. Mr. S.S. Ahluwalia, Adv. for R-2. AND + W.P.(C) No.6362/2015 SAUMYA ARYA & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Tanmay Mehta, Mr. Anunaya Mehta & Mr. Nikhil Palli, Advs. Mr. Deepak Prakash, Ms. Shruti Srivastava & Mr. Venka...
Acn College of Pharmacy Vs. All India Council for Technical Education
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-17-2015
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. h July, 2015 % + W.P.(C) 5943/2015 INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL EXCELLENCE ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Sharawat and Mr. Ratish Kumar, Advs. Versus ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION ......Respondent Through: Mr. Anil Soni and Mr. Naginder Benipal, Advs. for AICTE. AND + W.P.(C) 6138/2015 ACN COLLEGE OF PHARMACY ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Mayank Manish, Mr. Chandrashekhar Singh and Mr. Ravi Kant, Advs. Versus ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Anil Soni and Mr. Naginder Benipal, Advs. for AICTE.. CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The petitioner institutions in both the petitions applied to the respondent All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE), within the prescribed time, for approval for imparting education in the course of Diploma in Pharmacy, with effect from the academic year 2015-16 but the application of both the petitioners was rejected by the S...
Rama Pandey Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-17-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:12. 12.2014 Judgment delivered on:17. 07.2015 % + WP(C) No.844/2014 RAMA PANDEY ..... PETITIONER Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner: Mr Sunil Kumar and Mr Rahul Sharma, Advocates For the Respondents: Mr Jasmeet Singh, CGSC with Ms Kritika Mehra, Adv. for R-1. Mr S. Rajappa & Dr. Puran Chand, Advs. for R- 2 & 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J FACTS1A synthesis of science and divinity (at least for those who believe in it), led to the culmination of the petitioners desire for a child. Married, on 18.01.1998, to one Sh. Atul Pandey, the petitioners, wish to have a child was fulfilled on 09.02.2013, albeit via the surrogacy route. Her bundle of joy comprised of twins, who were born on the aforementioned date, at a city hospital. 1.1 To effectuate the aforesaid purpose, the petitioner had entered into an arrangement with, one, Ms Aar...
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Next ›
- Last »