Delhi Court July 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vikas @ Monu and Anr Vs. State (Govt of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-20-2015
$~39 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A.1539/2011 Date of decision:20. 07.2015 VIKAS @ MONU & ANR Through: ..... Appellants Mr.Vinod Puggal, Advocate. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. SI Kailash Kumar, P.S.Mangolpuri. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORDER2007.2015 % ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J.(ORAL) 1. The appellants herein have challenged the judgment and order of conviction dated 24.11.2011 and 1.12.2011 whereby they have been convicted for the offence under Section 307 with the aid of 34 of the IPC and have been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years and pay a fine of Rs.2500/- each with the default stipulation of rigorous imprisonment for three months.2. According to the prosecution version, the appellants had uttered indecent language about the sister of the complainant when she was being accompanied by the complainant to her home. The prosecution case, further, is that the complainant came ba...
Jagan Nath Syal (Deceased) Vs. Commissioner of Gift Tax
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-20-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI R-38 + GTR12002 JAGAN NATH SYAL (DECEASED) ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Shashwat Bajpai, Advocate. versus COMMISSIONER OF GIFT TAX Through: CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU ..... Respondent ORDER2007.2015 % 1. This reference under Section 26 (1) of the Gift Tax Act, 1958 pertains to Assessment Year (AY) 1992-93.2. The questions framed by the Special Bench A of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) by its order dated 2 nd September 2002 for consideration before this Court read as under:(1) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the Tribunal was justified in holding that a share in the DSE as also membership of DSE were property/assets and transfer thereof was exigible to tax under the Gift-tax Act, 1958?. (2) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the Tribunal was justified in opining that composite value of share and ticket was to be adopted?.3. The Ass...
Gyanender Singh and Ors Vs. State ( Govt of Nct of Delhi) and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-20-2015
$~40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:20th July, 2015 + Crl. M.C. No.2839/2015 GYANENDER SINGH & ORS ..... Petitioners Mr.R.S. Rai, Advocate. Represented by: versus STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Jasbir Kaur, APP for State with SI Bhram Parkash in person. Mr.Amit Kain, Adv for respondent No.2 with R2 in person. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) Cr. M.A. No.10145/2015 (for exemption) Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, the application is allowed. CRL.M.C. 2839/2015 1. By way of this petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.25/2012 registered at Police Station Ranhola, Delhi for the offences punishable under Sections 406/498-A/34 IPC and the consequential proceedings emanating therefrom against the petitioners on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Learned...
Vikas Goyal and Anr. Vs. Yogesh Aggarwal and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-20-2015
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : July 20, 2015 + RFA (OS) 15/2015 VIKAS GOYAL & ANR. Represented by: ..... Appellants Mr.Rishi Pal Singh, Advocate versus YOGESH AGGARWAL & ANR. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.J.M.Bari, Advocate with Ms.Meenakshi Bari, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) CM No.1769/2015 For the reasons stated in the application the delay of 166 days in filing the appeal is condoned. RFA (OS) No.15/2015 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Record of the suit has been perused.2. The only relevant record is the pleadings of the parties, because vide impugned decree dated January 29, 2013, noting that the plaintiffs gave up relief for specific performance of the written agreement dated January 29, 2013, under which the first defendant was to sell the agreed property comprising second floor, without roof rights, on the building on plot No.G202, Puskhar En...
Shivali Dhillon Vs. Managing Director, Army Welfare Education Society
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-20-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: July 20, 2015 + W.P.(C) 5819/2015 SHIVALI DHILLON ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. V.S. Tomar, Adv. versus MANAGING DIRECTOR, ARMY WELFARE EDUCATION SOCIETY (AWES) AND ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Dipak Kumar, Adv. with Mr. P.P. Nayak, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner inter-alia seeking the following reliefs:A. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, directing the Respondents to release DA arrears of the petitioner w.e.f 03 Oct 2006 as declared for the employees of the State of Madhya Pradesh from time to time which come to more than seven lakhs in this case; and B. Issue direction to the Respondents to fix her pay as per Sixth Central Pay Commission recommendations/acceptance w.e.f 03 Oct. 2006 instead of 01 July 2009; and C.2. Grant 12% interest on the arrears. It is the case of the petitioner that she was a...
Satish Gupta Vs. Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-20-2015
$~42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:20th July, 2015 + Crl. M.C. No.2843/2015 SATISH GUPTA Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Rohit P. Ranjan, Mr. Bikash Shaw and Ms. Ritu Gautam, Advocates. Versus NCT OF DELHI & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr. Neeraj Kumar Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with SI Sanjeev Mandal, PS R.K. Puram. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) Cr. M.A. No.10148/2015 (for exemption) Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, the application is allowed. CRL.M.C. 2843/2015 1. By way of this petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, petitioner has assailed the order dated 18.07.2014 whereby the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ), Saket Courts, New Delhi, dismissed the Criminal Revision No.08/2014 filed by the petitioner against the order dated 19.04.2012, which is also impugned in the instant petition, whereby the respondents No...
Asif Vs. The State and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-20-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment :20. 07.2015 Crl. Appeal No.265/2015 ASIF Through ..... Appellant Appellant with his counsel Mr. Masood Hussain, Adv. versus THE STATE & ORS Through ..... Respondents Mr. Pramod Saxena, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.(Oral) 1 This appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment dated 26.11.2014 wherein the respondents Aslam and Ruksana Bano (husband and wife) had stood acquitted. 2 The present FIR i.e. FIR No.275/2013 registered at PS Sangam Vihar was on the complaint of Asif, the brother of respondent. The trial Judge had examined the evidence both oral and documentary. There were seven witnesses who had given their ocular testimonies. The Court had noted that the parties are closely related but this by itself was not sufficient to discredit the testimony of PW-2 (brother of respondent No.2). The father of the parties (i.e. father of PW-2 and respondent No.1) Kurshid Ahmad ...
Sarita Gaur Vs. Government of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-20-2015
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:20. 07.2015 W.P.(C) 764/2015 & CM13402015 SARITA GAUR ... Petitioner ... Respondents versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS Advocates who appeared in this case:- For the Petitioner : Mr B.S. Maan, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr Yeeshu Jain with Ms Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates for LAC/L&B. Mr Dhanesh Relan with Mr Arush Bhandari, Advocates for DDA. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The counter-affidavit handed over by Mr Yeeshu Jain, the learned counsel on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1 & 2, is taken on record. The learned counsel for the petitioner does not wish to file any rejoinder affidavit inasmuch as he would be relying on the averments made in the writ petition.2. The petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013...
Rajeev Gaur Vs. Government of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-20-2015
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:20. 07.2015 W.P.(C) 794/2015 & CM13752015 RAJEEV GAUR ... Petitioner ... Respondents versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS Advocates who appeared in this case:- For the Petitioner : Mr B.S. Maan, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr Yeeshu Jain with Ms Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates for LAC/L&B. Mr Dhanesh Relan with Mr Arush Bhandari, Advocates for DDA. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The counter-affidavit handed over by Mr Yeeshu Jain, the learned counsel on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1 & 2, is taken on record. The learned counsel for the petitioner does not wish to file any rejoinder affidavit inasmuch as he would be relying on the averments made in the writ petition.2. The petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013...
Prashant Kumar Singh Vs. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-20-2015
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 832/2015 & CM No.1472/2015 (for directions) PRASHANT KUMAR SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Lauv Kumar, Adv. Versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Saradhananda Mohapatra, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Sunil Kumar, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW ORDER % 20.07.2015 1. The petitioner, filed this petition in or about January, 2015, seeking a direction to the respondent No.1 Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University (GGSIPU) to immediately take steps to ensure Intra University Migration of the petitioner in the present semester either to Guru Teg Bahadur Institute of Technology, Hari Nagar, or to Maharaja Surajmal Institute of Technology, Janakpuri or to Bharti Vidyapeeth College of Engineering, Paschim Vihar.2. One Sh. Narendra Kumar, Director of Guru Premsukh Memorial College of Engineering (GPMCE), G.T. Karnal Road, Delhi was impleaded as respondent No.2 to the pe...
- ‹ Prev
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Next ›
- Last »