Delhi Court July 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Master Davinder Singh and Ors. Vs. The Ministry of Sports and Youth Af ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-20-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:17. h July, 2015 Date of Decision:20. h July, 2015 % + W.P.(C) 6249/2015 MASTER DAVINDER SINGH & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Sulaiman Mohd. Khan with Mr. Shariq Ahmed, Advocates. versus THE MINISTRY OF SPORTS & YOUTH AFFAIRS, GOVT. OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rajesh Gogna, CGSC with Ms. L. Gangmei, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Anil Grover with Ms. Divya Jain, Advocates for R-2. Mr. Rajesh Katyal, Advocate for R-3 to R-5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH ORDER C.M. APPL. No.11368/2015 1. This is an application under Section 151 CPC filed by the petitioners for grant of stay to the selected list of sportspersons for the 14th Special Olympics World Summer Games, 2015 and seeking direction to respondents to prepare a fresh list of selected candidates including the petitioners for the said Olympic Games further staying the departure of the Indian contingent for the said Olympic Games till a fresh list of b...
Commissioner of Service Tax Vs. Japan Airlines International Co. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-20-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:13. 02.2015 Judgment delivered on:20. 07.2015 % + CEAC612014 COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX ....Petitioner Versus JAPAN AIRLINES INTERNATIONAL CO. LTD. .....Respondent ADVOCATES WHO APPEARED IN THIS CASE: For the Petitioner : Ms. Sonia Sharma, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Vijay Chandra Jha, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. J.K. Mittal and Mr. Rajveer Singh, Advocates CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J1 A Division Bench of this court vide order dated 15.12.2014 referred the two questions of law for consideration by a larger bench in order to, broadly, resolve the apparent conflict between the views taken by two separate Division Benches of this court in Commissioner of Service Tax Vs. L.R. Sharma, 2014 (4) AD (Delhi) 733 (hereinafter referred to as LR Sharma-I) and Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-1 Vs. Kundalia Industries, 2012...
Nitin Kumar and Ors. Vs. State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-20-2015
$~47 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:20. h July, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2855/2015 NITIN KUMAR & ORS. ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr. Sameer Chandra and Mr. Vinod Kumar, Advs. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. Neeraj Kumar Singh, APP for State. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) Crl. M.A. 10174/2015(for exemption) Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, the application is allowed. + 1. CRL.M.C. 2855/2015 Vide the present petition; petitioners seek directions thereby quashing FIR No.15/12, registered at PS-Palam Village for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC against the petitioners.2. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the aforesaid case was registered on the complaint made by respondent No.2 namely Neetu. After investigation, Police has filed the chargesheet and matter is pending for framing of charges. Meanwhile, the res...
Nitin Khurana Vs. Anupam Bhushan
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-20-2015
#12 & 13 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 171/2015 MAAN SINGH @ JAI NARAYAN ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Prem Prakash, Advocate versus ANUPAM BHUSHAN Through ..... Respondent Mr. Gautam Narayan, Addl. Standing Counsel for Govt. of NCT of Delhi. WITH + CONT.CAS(C) 172/2015 NITIN KHURANA Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Prem Prakash, Advocate versus ANUPAM BHUSHAN Through % ..... Respondent Mr. Gautam Narayan, Addl. Standing Counsel for Govt. of NCT of Delhi. Date of Decision:20. h July, 2015 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present contempt petitions have been filed alleging that petitioners had been arrested in complete violation of the peremptory directions given by the Supreme Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar & Anr., 2014 (8) SCALE250decided on 2nd July, 2014.2. According to Mr. Prem Prakash, learned counsel for the petitioners, police officials in the present cases did not furnish the reasons and material w...
Sunita @ Rani and Anr Vs. The State (Govt of Nct of Delhi) and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-20-2015
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:20th July, 2015 + Crl. M.C. No.878/2015 SUNITA @ RANI & ANR Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.Ajeet Kumar and Mr.Raj Kumar Rajput, Advs with petitioners in person. versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Satish Kumar Verma, APP for the State/Respondent No.1. Mr.Sushant Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.2 with complainant in person. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Vide the present petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.460/2009 registered at Police Station Sarojini Nagar for the offences punishable under Sections 406/498-A/34 IPC and the consequential proceedings emanating therefrom against the petitioners on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submit that the aforesaid case was r...
Mgs (India) Private Limited Vs. Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-20-2015
$~43 THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:20. 07.2015 W.P.(C) 910/2015 and CM No.1591/2015 MGS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED ... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner For the Respondent /UOI For the Respondent / L&B/LAC For the Respondent / DDA : Mr Sumeer Sodhi, Mr Varun Tankha and Mr Arjun Nanda : Mr Kishan Nautiyal : Ms Jyoti Tyagi for Mr Siddharth Panda : Mr Sanjeev Sabharwal CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. By way of this writ petition the petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the201. Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. The petitioner, consequently, seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceeding initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (her...
Rajesh Kapoor Vs. Public Enterprises Selection Board and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-20-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision : July 20, 2015 + LPA4632015 RAJESH KAPOOR Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Sagar Saxena, Ms.Jyoti K.Chaudhary, Mr.Suraj Prakash, Advs. versus PUBLIC ENTERPRISES SELECTION BOARD & ANR ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Arun Bhardwaj, Ms.Neha Garg, Advocates for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) CM126702015 Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. LPA4632015 1. Aggrieved by the order dated July 16, 2015 dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellant Rajesh Kappor seeking quashing of the advertisement dated February 05, 2015 and not short-listing Rajesh Kapoor as one of the candidates and directions to consider his candidature for the post of CMD TCIL as internal candidate, the appellant prefers the present appeal.2. A brief exposition of facts. Telecommunication Consultants India Limited (in short TCIL) is a Government of India enterprise, incor...
Ultra Home Construction Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Purushottam Kumar Chaubey and Or ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-20-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 2065/2015 20th July, 2015 % ULTRA HOME CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through Mr. R.P. Bhatt, Sr. Advocate along with Mr. Rakesh Kumar and Mr.Bipin Kumar, Advocates versus PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHAUBEY & ORS. Through ..... Defendants CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) I.A. No.14257/2015 (Exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. I.A. stands disposed of. CS(OS) 2065/2015 & I.A. No.14256/2015 (Stay) 2. This is a suit filed by the plaintiff seeking injunction alleging a cause of action of infringement of its trade mark AMRAPALI.3. Plaintiff alleges infringement of trade mark as also the copyright of the plaintiff in the depiction of the trade mark. In the suit the following prayers are made:(a) For a decree of permanent injunction restraining the defendants and also its individual proprietor, Partners, channel partners, agents, representativ...
Hitesh Sharma Vs. The State ( Govt of Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-20-2015
$~43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:20th July, 2015 + Crl. M.C. No.2844 /2015 HITESH SHARMA Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr. Nitish Angrish, Advocate with Petitioner No.1. Versus THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .... Respondents Represented by: Mr. Satish Kumar Verma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with SI Inderjeet, P.S. Malviya Nagar. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) Cr. M.A. No.10149/2015 (for exemption) Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, the application is allowed. CRL.M.C. 2844/2015 1. By way of this petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, petitioner seek quashing of FIR No.43/2013 registered at Police Station Malviya Nagar for the offences punishable under Sections 406/498-A/34 IPC and the consequential proceedings emanating therefrom against the petitioner on the ground that the matter has been amicably set...
Maan Singh @ Jai Narayan Vs. Anupam Bhushan
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-20-2015
#12 & 13 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 171/2015 MAAN SINGH @ JAI NARAYAN ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Prem Prakash, Advocate versus ANUPAM BHUSHAN Through ..... Respondent Mr. Gautam Narayan, Addl. Standing Counsel for Govt. of NCT of Delhi. WITH + CONT.CAS(C) 172/2015 NITIN KHURANA Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Prem Prakash, Advocate versus ANUPAM BHUSHAN Through % ..... Respondent Mr. Gautam Narayan, Addl. Standing Counsel for Govt. of NCT of Delhi. Date of Decision:20. h July, 2015 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present contempt petitions have been filed alleging that petitioners had been arrested in complete violation of the peremptory directions given by the Supreme Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar & Anr., 2014 (8) SCALE250decided on 2nd July, 2014.2. According to Mr. Prem Prakash, learned counsel for the petitioners, police officials in the present cases did not furnish the reasons and material w...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »