Delhi Court June 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Monnet Ispat and Energy Ltd Vs. Sarda Energy and Minerals Ltd and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-05-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:3. d June, 2015 Decided on:5. h June, 2015 % + LPA3872015 and C.M. No.10951/2015 (Stay) MONNET ISPAT & ENERGY LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Chetan Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Karan Luthra, Mr. Sheller Bajaj and Ms. Aparna Mehta, Advocates. versus SARDA ENERGY & MINERALS LTD & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ratan Singh with Mr. J.K. Chaudhary, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr. Jasmeet Singh, CGSC and Ms. Kritika Mehra, Advocate for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.P.VAISH MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Aggrieved by the order dated 28th May, 2015 whereby further extension of time was granted to Respondent No.1 herein M/s Sarda Energy & Minerals Ltd. (in short Sarda Energy) for removing the coal stock lying in the mining area till 30th June, 2015, the Appellant Monnet Ispat & Energy Limited (in short Monnet Ispat) prefers the present appeal.2. The impugned order dated 28th May, 2015 came to be...
Prominent Hotels Pvt Ltd and Anr Vs. State Through Cbi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-05-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:5. h June, 2015 % + CRL.M.C. 2254/2011 PROMINENT HOTELS PVT LTD & ANR ..... Petitioners Through Mr.Dhanesh Relan, Adv. with Mr.Arush Bhandari, Adv. versus STATE THROUGH CBI Through + ..... Respondent Ms.Sonia Mathur, Adv. CRL.M.C. 1068/2014 M/S PROMINENT HOTELS LTD & ANR ..... Petitioners Through Mr.Dhanesh Relan, Adv. with Mr.Arush Bhandari, Adv. versus STATE Through + ..... Respondent Ms.Sonia Mathur, Adv. CRL.M.C. 4153/2014 M/S PROMINENT HOTELS LTD & ANR ..... Petitioners Through Mr.Dhanesh Relan, Adv. with Mr.Arush Bhandari, Adv. versus STATE THR. CBI Through ..... Respondent Ms.Sonia Mathur, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. By this judgment, I shall decide the above mentioned three petitions. a) The petition, being Crl.M.C. No.225/2011, is filed under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. for quashing the order dated 18th May, 2011 passed by the Special Judge, CBI in the FIR bearing no.RCDA1-19...
M/S Prominent Hotels Ltd and Anr Vs. State Thr. Cbi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-05-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:5. h June, 2015 % + CRL.M.C. 2254/2011 PROMINENT HOTELS PVT LTD & ANR ..... Petitioners Through Mr.Dhanesh Relan, Adv. with Mr.Arush Bhandari, Adv. versus STATE THROUGH CBI Through + ..... Respondent Ms.Sonia Mathur, Adv. CRL.M.C. 1068/2014 M/S PROMINENT HOTELS LTD & ANR ..... Petitioners Through Mr.Dhanesh Relan, Adv. with Mr.Arush Bhandari, Adv. versus STATE Through + ..... Respondent Ms.Sonia Mathur, Adv. CRL.M.C. 4153/2014 M/S PROMINENT HOTELS LTD & ANR ..... Petitioners Through Mr.Dhanesh Relan, Adv. with Mr.Arush Bhandari, Adv. versus STATE THR. CBI Through ..... Respondent Ms.Sonia Mathur, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. By this judgment, I shall decide the above mentioned three petitions. a) The petition, being Crl.M.C. No.225/2011, is filed under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. for quashing the order dated 18th May, 2011 passed by the Special Judge, CBI in the FIR bearing no.RCDA1-19...
M/S Unique Infoways Pvt Ltd Vs. V Cubed Pvt Ltd and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-05-2015
$2 & 3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Decided on:5. h June, 2015 FAO(OS) 306/2015 M/S UNIQUE INFOWAYS PVT LTD ..... Appellant Through Mr. S.S. Mishra with Mr. Mukesh Kumar and Mr. Dhananjay, Advs. Versus SAPPHIRE PROJECTS PVT LTD & ANR ..... Respondent Through Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rajesh Yadav and Mr. Neeraj Yadav, Advs. + FAO(OS) 307/2015 M/S UNIQUE INFOWAYS PVT LTD ..... Appellant Through Mr. S.S. Mishra with Mr. Mukesh Kumar and Mr. Dhananjay, Advs. Versus V CUBED PVT LTD & ANR Through ..... Respondent Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rajesh Yadav and Mr. Neeraj Yadav, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.P.VAISH MUKTA GUPTA, J (ORAL) CMs. 10968-10969/2015 in FAO(OS) 306/2015 CM109712015 in FAO(OS) 307/2015 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Caveat No.603/2015 in FAO(OS) No.306/2015 Caveat No.604/2015 in FAO(OS) No.307/2015 Learned counsel for the caveators enters appearance. Caveats are discharged. FAO...
Shivraj Gupta Vs. Hansraj Gupta and Co.P.Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-05-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:5. h June, 2015 % + Crl.M.A. Nos.4197/2011 & 17460/2014 in CRL.M.C. 1149/2011 SHIVRAJ GUPTA Through ..... Petitioner Mr.S.S. Gandhi, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Vikram Singh Panwar, Adv. versus HANSRAJ GUPTA & CO. P.LTD. ..... Respondent Through Mr.Suhail Dutt, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Sujoy Kumar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of criminal complaint No.25 of 2007 titled as "M/s. Hansraj Gupta & co. Pvt. Ltd. vs. Shri Shivraj Gupta" and the order of summoning dated 20th April, 2010, passed by the court of metropolitan magistrate, New Delhi whereby Metropolitan Magistrate took cognizance of the offence under Section 630 of the Companies Act 1956 and issued summons to the petitioner.2. In the present petition, it is alleged that respondent/complainant Company has played fraud upon the trial court by suppressing material facts. The same are : i)...
Gourav Joshiya Vs. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-05-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:03. d June, 2015 Date of Decision:05. h June, 2015 % + L.P.A No.386/2015 GOURAV JOSHIYA Through: ..... Appellant Mr. M. Rais Farooqui with Mr. A.Q. Zaidi, Advocate. versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sraohananda Mohapatra with Mr. Vipin Singh, Advocate for respondent No.1. CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH JUDGMENT VED PRAKASH VAISH, J:1. The present intra-court Appeal has been filed against the judgment dated 25.05.2015 passed by learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) No.3185/2015, whereby the writ petition filed by the appellant was dismissed.2. Brief facts of the case as borne out from the present appeal are that in 2010-11, the appellant got admitted in Amity School of Engineering & Technology for the course Bachelor of Technology (Mechanical and Automation Engineering). The appellant had passed semester wise examination up till fourth semester...
M/S Unique Infoways Pvt Ltd Vs. Sapphire Projects Pvt Ltd and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-05-2015
$2 & 3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Decided on:5. h June, 2015 FAO(OS) 306/2015 M/S UNIQUE INFOWAYS PVT LTD ..... Appellant Through Mr. S.S. Mishra with Mr. Mukesh Kumar and Mr. Dhananjay, Advs. Versus SAPPHIRE PROJECTS PVT LTD & ANR ..... Respondent Through Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rajesh Yadav and Mr. Neeraj Yadav, Advs. + FAO(OS) 307/2015 M/S UNIQUE INFOWAYS PVT LTD ..... Appellant Through Mr. S.S. Mishra with Mr. Mukesh Kumar and Mr. Dhananjay, Advs. Versus V CUBED PVT LTD & ANR Through ..... Respondent Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rajesh Yadav and Mr. Neeraj Yadav, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.P.VAISH MUKTA GUPTA, J (ORAL) CMs. 10968-10969/2015 in FAO(OS) 306/2015 CM109712015 in FAO(OS) 307/2015 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Caveat No.603/2015 in FAO(OS) No.306/2015 Caveat No.604/2015 in FAO(OS) No.307/2015 Learned counsel for the caveators enters appearance. Caveats are discharged. FAO...
Sahil Dahiya Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-03-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:3. d June, 2015 % + BAIL APPLN. 907/2015 SAHIL DAHIYA Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Sunil K. Mittal, Adv. with Mr.Vipin K. Mittal and Mr.Anshul Mittal, Advs. versus STATE Through ..... Respondent Mr.M.P.Singh, APP for the State along with Insp. Ghanshyam, P.S. North Rohini. Mr.Sanjay Jain, Adv. for complainant. AND BAIL APPLN. 957/2015 VAIBHAV DHAWAN Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Sunil K. Mittal, Adv. with Mr.Ravi Drall, Adv. versus THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT, DELHI) ..... Respondent Through Mr.M.P.Singh, APP for the State Mr.Sanjay Jain, Adv. for complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. By this order I propose to decide the abovementioned two bail applications filed under Section 439 read with Section 482 of Cr.P.C., 1973.2. Both the petitioners are in judicial custody since 29th October, 2014 for the offences originally registration of FIR No.816/2014 under Section 302/34 IPC at North Rohini, ...
Vaibhav Dhawan Vs. The State (Govt of Nct, Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-03-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:3. d June, 2015 % + BAIL APPLN. 907/2015 SAHIL DAHIYA Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Sunil K. Mittal, Adv. with Mr.Vipin K. Mittal and Mr.Anshul Mittal, Advs. versus STATE Through ..... Respondent Mr.M.P.Singh, APP for the State along with Insp. Ghanshyam, P.S. North Rohini. Mr.Sanjay Jain, Adv. for complainant. AND BAIL APPLN. 957/2015 VAIBHAV DHAWAN Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Sunil K. Mittal, Adv. with Mr.Ravi Drall, Adv. versus THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT, DELHI) ..... Respondent Through Mr.M.P.Singh, APP for the State Mr.Sanjay Jain, Adv. for complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. By this order I propose to decide the abovementioned two bail applications filed under Section 439 read with Section 482 of Cr.P.C., 1973.2. Both the petitioners are in judicial custody since 29th October, 2014 for the offences originally registration of FIR No.816/2014 under Section 302/34 IPC at North Rohini, ...
Sandeep Dalal @ Rinku Vs. The State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-02-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:2. d June, 2015 % + BAIL APPLN. 2500/2014 SANDEEP DALAL @ RINKU ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Vishal Gosain, Adv. versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP for the State along with SI Manoj. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. for grant of bail in case FIR No.50/2013, under Sections 365/384/506/171/323/34 IPC, registered at Police Station Kanjhawla, Delhi.2. The petitioner was arrested on 11th February, 2013.3. The case of the prosecution is that on 11th February, 2013, complainant Maha Singh s/o Shrilal r/o VPO Birdhana, Distt. Jhajjar, Haryana stated that he received a few calls on his cell phone regarding property dealing and sometime a lady caller claiming to be sectary to Ramesh Tiwari. They showed interest in a plot situated in Rohtak and offered higher rates...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »