Delhi Court June 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ndmc Vs. Brij Mohan Sharma and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-29-2015
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + R.S.A. No.39/2012 & C.M. No.4391/2012 Decided on :29. h June, 2015 NDMC Through: Appellant Mr. Arvind Sah, Advocate. Versus BRIJ MOHAN SHARMA & ORS. Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Kumar Porwal, Advocate for R-1 with R-1 in person. Mr. Navin Kumar Jaggi, Advocate for R-2 to 6. WITH + R.S.A. No.3/2013 DEEP KARAN LAL Through: Appellant Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Advocate. Versus BRIJ MOHAN SHARMA & ANR. Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Kumar Porwal, Advocate for R-1 with R-1 in person. Mr. Navin Kumar Jaggi, Advocate for R-3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.1. These are two regular second appeals arising out of the common judgment and decree dated 15.12.2011 passed by Mr. Ajay Goel, the learned Senior Civil Judge-cum-RC (Central), Delhi in R.C.A. No.213/2005.2. Briefly stated the facts leading to filing of the present appeals are that Brij Mohan Sharma (parties are referred by their status in the trial court), respondent No.1 in both the afore...
Jai Balaji Industries Limited and Anr. Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-29-2015
* + HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 5124/2014 & W.P.(C) 5127/2014 Decided on :29. h June, 2015 W.P.(C) 5124/2014 MADHU TRANSPORT COMPANY PVT LTD & ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Prateek Jalan, Mr. Surendra Dube, Mr. Ankit Yadav, Ms. Sonia Dube, Mr. Shatadru Chakraborty, Ms. Kanchan Yadav & Mr. Anurag Singh, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Jagjit Singh, Ms. Manita Verma, Ms. Nisha & Mr. Shivanshu Bajpai, Advs. W.P.(C) 5127/2014 JAI BALAJI INDUSTRIES LIMITED & ANR. Through: WP(C) Nos.5124/2014 & 5127/2014 ..... Petitioners Mr. Prateek Jalan, Mr. Surendra Dube, Mr. Ankit Yadav, Ms. Sonia Dube, Ms. Kanchan Yadav & Mr. Anurag Singh, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Jagjit Singh, Ms. Manita Verma, Ms. Nisha & Mr. Shivanshu Bajpai, Advs. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.1. In both these writ petitions, the challenge has been laid to orders dated 13.06.2014 & 18.06.2014 respectively pas...
Birender Govil Vs. M/S Maha Gauri Builders and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-29-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 1303/2014 & I.A. 8450/2014 BIRENDER GOVIL Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. L.K. Garg, Advocate. versus M/S MAHA GAURI BUILDERS & ORS Through: None. ..... Defendants Reserved on :18. h May, 2015 Date of Decision :29. h June, 2015 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J:1. The present suit has been filed with the following prayers: a) Pass a decree of eviction in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants whereby the defendants, their agents, servants, associates, attorneys may be evicted from the suit premises i.e. property built on plot No.A-5 measuring about 221 sq. mts. situated in Block A, PocketA, FIEE, Okhla Phase-II, New Delhi comprising of Basement, Ground Floor and Roof thereof and the plaintiff be put in actual, vacant and physical possession of the same. b) Pass a decree in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants whereby directing the defendants to pay to the plaintiff a sum of Rs. 8,25,06...
Deep Karan Lal Vs. Brij Mohan Sharma and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-29-2015
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + R.S.A. No.39/2012 & C.M. No.4391/2012 Decided on :29. h June, 2015 NDMC Through: Appellant Mr. Arvind Sah, Advocate. Versus BRIJ MOHAN SHARMA & ORS. Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Kumar Porwal, Advocate for R-1 with R-1 in person. Mr. Navin Kumar Jaggi, Advocate for R-2 to 6. WITH + R.S.A. No.3/2013 DEEP KARAN LAL Through: Appellant Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Advocate. Versus BRIJ MOHAN SHARMA & ANR. Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Kumar Porwal, Advocate for R-1 with R-1 in person. Mr. Navin Kumar Jaggi, Advocate for R-3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.1. These are two regular second appeals arising out of the common judgment and decree dated 15.12.2011 passed by Mr. Ajay Goel, the learned Senior Civil Judge-cum-RC (Central), Delhi in R.C.A. No.213/2005.2. Briefly stated the facts leading to filing of the present appeals are that Brij Mohan Sharma (parties are referred by their status in the trial court), respondent No.1 in both the afore...
Indus College of Engineering Vs. All India Council for Technical Educa ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-29-2015
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h June, 2015 % + W.P.(C) No.5982 /2015 INDUS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING .... Petitioner Through: Mr. S. Nanda Kumar with Mr. Parivesh Singh, Mr. Ravi Kant, Mr. Mayank Manish & Ms. Jyoti Sharma, Advs. Versus All INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Anil Soni, Adv. CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 The petition impugns the letter dated 30th April, 2015 of the respondent, withdrawing the approval earlier accorded to the petitioner vide letter dated 25th July, 2008 for establishing an institution for imparting education in engineering and technology. The writ petition came up first before the Vacation Bench on 12th June, 2015 when the counsel for the respondent also entered appearance and the matter was posted for today for hearing.2. The counsel for the petitioner has been heard at length.3. The petitioner, in the writ petition has pleaded: (a) that the respondent, aft...
Manpower Co-Operative Group Vs. office of the Registrar of
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-24-2015
$~06. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6054/2015 % Judgment dated 24.06.2015 MANPOWER CO-OPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY ..... Petitioner Through : Mr.Sunil Kumar and Mr.P.P. Sharma, Advs. versus OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, GNCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Naushad Ahmed Khan, ASC (Civil), for respondent no.2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. GAUBA G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) CM APPL. 10998/2015.1. Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 6054/2015 3. Present writ petition has been filed by petitioner under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to set aside the order dated 18.5.2015 passed by Assistant Registrar (Section IV), Office of Registrar of Cooperative Societies, GNCTD, whereby respondent had appointed Mr.Rajesh Jain, Superintendent (Central Excise), as Administrator to manage the affairs of the petitioner society and conduct ...
Corrtech International Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Gail India Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-24-2015
$~36. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(I) 299/2015 % Judgment dated 24.06.2015 CORRTECH INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through : Mr.Jayanth Bhushan, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Vandana Sehgal, Mr.Rohan Thawani, Mr.Dilip Daga and Mr.Anand Daga, Advocate. versus GAIL INDIA LTD. ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Purnima Maheshwari, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Present petition has been filed by petitioner under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, with the prayer that respondent no.1, GAIL (India) Limited, be restrained from invoking the bank guarantee No.1998IGPER0000914 for a sum of Rs.2,44,26,595/-, pending disposal of the arbitration proceedings between the parties.2. Notice. Mr.Dhruv Mehta, learned senior counsel on instructions from Ms.Purnima Maheshwari, accepts notice.3. The necessary facts, to be noticed for disposal of this petition, are that respondent no.1 floated a Bidding D...
Jamia Hamdard (Deemed University) and Anr. Vs. Union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-12-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 5941/2015 JAMIA HAMDARD (DEEMED UNIVERSITY) & ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Parag Tripathi, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Saket Sikri, Mrs. Ekta Sikri, Mr.Prannoy Dey, Mr. Aditya Sikka, Mr.Vikalp Mudgal, Mr. Ankit Verma and Ms. Anusuya Choudhary, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Bhagwan Swarup Shukla, CGSC for Union of India/R-1. Mr. Tushar Mehta, ASG with Mr.Gaurav Sharma, Ms. Manpreet Kaur Bhasin and Mr. Manan Khera, Advs. for MCI/R-2. 12.06.2015 CORAM: CASES OF SPL. SINGLE BENCH1 The present application bearing C.M. No.10764 of 2015 has been filed in W.P.(C) No.5941/2015 for the grant of stay of the impugned letter dated 07.06.2015 issued by the respondent no.1/Union of India during the vacation.2. Case of the petitioner is that vide letter dated 07.06.2015, the respondent no.1 directed the petitoner no.2/Hamdard Institute of Medical Sciences and Research not to admit any students in the MBBS course for the ac...
X Vs. Z
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-11-2015
$~ * 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 78/2015 X ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Geeta Luthra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Adhirath Singh, Advocate. versus Z ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA ORDER % 11.06.2015 CM APP No.11009 of 2015 (exemption from filing clear copies) 1. Allowed subject to all just exceptions.2. The application is disposed of. MAT.APP.(F.C.) 78 of 2015 & CM APP No.11008 of 2015 3. This appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 is directed against the order dated 5th June 2015 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Saket.4. The brief background to this appeal is that there were three applications filed by the Appellant father in the Family court which were decided by the Family Court on 15 th April 2015. The first application sought a direction to the Respondent mother to apprise the Appellant father of the health, education, daily activities and overall development etc. of the...
M/S Prominent Hotels Ltd and Anr Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-05-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:5. h June, 2015 % + CRL.M.C. 2254/2011 PROMINENT HOTELS PVT LTD & ANR ..... Petitioners Through Mr.Dhanesh Relan, Adv. with Mr.Arush Bhandari, Adv. versus STATE THROUGH CBI Through + ..... Respondent Ms.Sonia Mathur, Adv. CRL.M.C. 1068/2014 M/S PROMINENT HOTELS LTD & ANR ..... Petitioners Through Mr.Dhanesh Relan, Adv. with Mr.Arush Bhandari, Adv. versus STATE Through + ..... Respondent Ms.Sonia Mathur, Adv. CRL.M.C. 4153/2014 M/S PROMINENT HOTELS LTD & ANR ..... Petitioners Through Mr.Dhanesh Relan, Adv. with Mr.Arush Bhandari, Adv. versus STATE THR. CBI Through ..... Respondent Ms.Sonia Mathur, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. By this judgment, I shall decide the above mentioned three petitions. a) The petition, being Crl.M.C. No.225/2011, is filed under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. for quashing the order dated 18th May, 2011 passed by the Special Judge, CBI in the FIR bearing no.RCDA1-19...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »