Delhi Court June 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Avtar Singh and Ors. Vs. Raj Kumar and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-30-2015
$~3, 4 & 5. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % Date of Decision:30. 06.2015 RSA1132015 and CAV No.270/2015 and C.M. No.5294/2015 AVTAR SINGH & ORS Through: ..... Appellants Mr. Chaman Lal Sachdeva Ms.Priyam Mehta, Advocates. & versus RAJ KUMAR & ORS ..... Respondents Through: + RSA1152015 and C.M. No.5317/2015 AVTAR SINGH & ORS Through: ..... Appellants Mr. Chaman Lal Sachdeva Ms.Priyam Mehta, Advocates. & versus RAJ KUMAR ..... Respondent Through: + RSA1172015 and C.M. No.5327/2015 AVTAR SINGH & ORS Through: ..... Appellants Mr. Chaman Lal Sachdeva Ms.Priyam Mehta, Advocates. & versus RAJ KUMAR ..... Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. The present second appeals under Section 100 CPC have been preferred to assail the common judgment dated 25.11.2014 passed by Sh. Paramjit Singh, ADJ (West)-02, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in respect of RC No.4/2012 (arising out of Suit No.801/2008 Old No.09/1991); RC No.5/2012 (arising ou...
Avtar Singh and Ors. Vs. Raj Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-30-2015
$~3, 4 & 5. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % Date of Decision:30. 06.2015 RSA1132015 and CAV No.270/2015 and C.M. No.5294/2015 AVTAR SINGH & ORS Through: ..... Appellants Mr. Chaman Lal Sachdeva Ms.Priyam Mehta, Advocates. & versus RAJ KUMAR & ORS ..... Respondents Through: + RSA1152015 and C.M. No.5317/2015 AVTAR SINGH & ORS Through: ..... Appellants Mr. Chaman Lal Sachdeva Ms.Priyam Mehta, Advocates. & versus RAJ KUMAR ..... Respondent Through: + RSA1172015 and C.M. No.5327/2015 AVTAR SINGH & ORS Through: ..... Appellants Mr. Chaman Lal Sachdeva Ms.Priyam Mehta, Advocates. & versus RAJ KUMAR ..... Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. The present second appeals under Section 100 CPC have been preferred to assail the common judgment dated 25.11.2014 passed by Sh. Paramjit Singh, ADJ (West)-02, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in respect of RC No.4/2012 (arising out of Suit No.801/2008 Old No.09/1991); RC No.5/2012 (arising ou...
Gmr Kishangarh Udaipur Ahmedabad Expressway Ltd. Vs. National Highway ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-29-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on March 25, 2015 Judgment delivered on June 29, 2015 + O.M.P No.1234 /2012 GMR KISHANGARH UDAIPUR AHMEDABAD EXPRESSWAY LTD Petitioner Through: Mr. Gopal Jain & Mr. Parag Tripathi, Senior Advocates with Ms.Mrinalini, Mr.Chinmayee Chandra and Mr.R.S. Bobde, Advocates Versus NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA .Respondent Through: Mr.Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Mukesh Kumar, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. This is a Petition filed under Section 9 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act in short) seeking the following reliefs:i) Restrain the Respondent from invoking or encashing the Performance Guarantee bearing No.120377IBGP00479 dated 23.5.2012 till the disposal of this petition. (ii) Restrain the Respondent from making any demand or receiving any money under the, Performance Guarantee bearing No.120377IBGP00479 dated 23.5.2012 till the disputes between the parties are fin...
Sanjay Bhandari and Anr Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-29-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment pronounced on: June 29, 2015 + CRL.M.C. No.5798/2014 & Crl. M.A. No.19744/2014 SANJAY BHANDARI & ANR ..... Petitioners Through Mr.K.T.S.Tulsi, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Suman Kapoor, Mr.Raj Kamal & Mr.K.Shrivastava, Advs. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Through Mr.Narender Mann, Spl. PP, CBI with Mr.Manoj Pant, Adv. for respondent-CBI, along with Inspector Mr.R.K.Sangwan, IO in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The petitioner have filed the present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C for quashing of the proceedings pending against the petitioners, on the basis of settlement arrived at between the petitioners and the complainant bank arising out of R.C. No.4A/94/SIU(X) dated 23rd May, 1994, titled as 'CBI vs. N.Bhojraj Shetty & Ors.', being C.C. No.65/11, pending in the Court of Special Judge (CBI), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.2. Brief facts of the case are that a case RC-4(A)/94/SIU(X) was...
Jindal Steel and Power Limited Vs. M/S. Sap India Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-29-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on May 25, 2015 Judgment delivered on June 29, 2015 + OMP1192015 & IA92642015 JINDAL STEEL AND POWER LIMITED Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Manish Sharma, Ms.Ranjana Roy Gawai, Mr.Krishna Keshav, Advs. versus M/S. SAP INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Parag Tripathi, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Vikas Dutta, Mr.Siddharth Silwal, Mr.Nikhil Varshney, Ms.Mahima Gupta, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. This petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act has been filed by the petitioner initially seeking a restraint order against the respondent from terminating the SAP Software End-User License Agreement dated September 27, 2005 entered into between the parties.2. This relief was in view of the legal notice issued by the respondent dated December 30, 2014 threatening termination of the License. I may only note here that during the pendency of the petit...
Air Marshal Harish Masand Vs. State (Govt of Nct of Delhi) and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-29-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:29. h June, 2015 % + CRL.M.C. No.840/2008 AIR MARSHAL HARISH MASAND ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Arvind K. Nigam, Sr. Adv. along with Mr.Samrat Nigam and Mr.Manish Sangwan, Advs. versus + STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP for the State Mr.A.J.Bhambani, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Siddharth Yadav and Mr.Arvind Kumar, Advs. for R-2 to 6. CRL.M.C. No.1584/2008 AJITH PILLAI Through ..... Petitioner Mr.A.J.Bhambani, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Siddharth Yadav and Mr.Arvind Kumar, Advs. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP for the State Mr.Arvind K. Nigam, Sr. Adv. along with Mr.Samrat Nigam and Mr.Manish Sangwan, Advs. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the impugned portion ...
Credential Leasing and Credits Ltd. Vs. Shruti Investments and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-29-2015
$~11. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:19. 02.2015 % + Judgment delivered on:29. 06.2015 CRL. L.P. 558/2014 CREDENTIAL LEASING & CREDITS LTD Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Ankur Sethia & Mr. Sameer Chand, Advocates. versus SHRUTI INVESTMENTS & ANR Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Arun Sukhija, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. After hearing learned counsel, leave granted.2. Let the appeal be registered and numbered. Crl.A. No.729/2015 3. I heard learned counsel finally at the admission stage with their consent and reserved judgment. Accordingly, I now proceed to dispose of the appeal.4. The present appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 26.05.2014 passed by Sh. Vikram, MM-03, South-West District, Dwarka Courts, Delhi in CC No.1798/2014 under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act (NI Act). The respondent/accused was acquitted by the impugned judgment and the complaint preferred by the appellant h...
Suman Kapoor Vs. Rakesh Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-29-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 181/2015 and CM No.4063/2015 (Stay) Reserved on:20. h May2015 Decided on:29. h June, 2015 % SUMAN KAPOOR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Atul T.N., Advocate. versus RAKESH KUMAR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ashok Kr. Nenwani, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Aggrieved by the order dated 15th November, 2014 whereby the application under Section 151 CPC of the petitioner/plaintiff in suit CS No.359/2012 titled as Suman Kapoor Aka Seema Kapoor vs. Rakesh Kumar seeking permission to lead additional evidence was declined, the petitioner prefers the present petition. Vide the impugned order Learned Additional District Judge held that issues in the suit were settled on 19 th March, 2008, the parties had already led their evidence and the matter was listed for final arguments when the application was filed by the petitioner/plaintiff seeking permission to lead additional evidence. The reason assigned for permiss...
Saroj Bhutani Vs. Harjeet Singh and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-29-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 297/2015 and CM No.6199/2015 (Stay) Reserved on:27. h May, 2015 Decided on:29. h June, 2015 % SAROJ BHUTANI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Jatan Singh, Mr. Akhilesh and Ms. Aastha Dhawan, Advocates. versus HARJEET SINGH & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Yogender Vashisth, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Advocate for DDA. Mr. Surender Sachdeva, Manager of Respondent No.2, in person. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Aggrieved by the order dated 23rd February, 2015 whereby the application of the petitioner Saroj Bhutani who was the defendant No.1 in CS No.42/14 titled as Harjeet Singh Vs. Saroj Bhutani & Ors. under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC was dismissed, Saroj Bhutani prefers the present petition.2. Vide the impugned order, the learned Trial Court while dismissing the application held that Saroj Bhutani has not been able to explain the reason for non-filing the ...
Jagmohan Khera Vs. Gopal Krishan Khera
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-29-2015
$~3. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % Date of Decision:29. 06.2015 RSA1832015 JAGMOHAN KHERA Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Pradeep Kumar Kaushik & Dr.Sunil Kumar, Advocates. versus GOPAL KRISHAN KHERA Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Diwan Singh Chauhan, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(OPEN COURT) Caveat No.474/2015 1. Since the caveator has put in appearance, the caveat stands discharged. C.M. No.8633/2015 2. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.3. The application stands disposed of. C.M. No.8634/2015 4. This application has been filed to seek condonation of five days delay in filing the present appeal.5. Subject to all just exceptions, the application is allowed. The delay of five days in filing the present appeal stands condoned. RSA1832015 and C.M. Nos.8631-32/2015 6. This is a regular second appeal under Section 100 CPC to assail the judgment and decree dated 15.12.2014 passed by Sh. Lalit Kumar, ADJ, Saket Courts, New Delhi...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »