Delhi Court June 2015 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Jun 30 2015

Shibu Vs. State Nct of Delhi

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jun-30-2015

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :6. h APRIL, 2015 DECIDED ON :30. h JUNE, 2015 + CRL.A.1392/2013 SHIBU Through : ..... Appellant Mr.K.Singhal, Advocate. VERSUS STATE NCT OF DELHI Through : ..... Respondent Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The appellant Shibu challenges the legality and correctness of a judgment dated 03.01.2013 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.18/12 arising out of FIR No.412/11 PS Mukherjee Nagar whereby he was convicted under Sections 376/506 IPC. By an order dated 04.01.2013, he was sentenced to undergo RI for seven years with fine ` 5,000/- under Section 376 IPC and RI for two years under Section 506 IPC. Both the sentences were to operate concurrently.2. Briefly stated, the prosecution case as set up in the charge- sheet was that on 05.12.2011 in front of Sewa Bharti Dispensary, Mukherjee Nagar, Delhi, the appellant and his associates Hawai Singh, Sukhbir Singh @ Bhura and Manoj @ Bo...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 30 2015

Ajit Singh Vs. Cbi

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jun-30-2015

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:30. h June, 2015 + Crl.M.B.No.10405/2014 (suspension of sentence) in CRL.A.1196/2014 AJIT SINGH Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Sidharth Luthra, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Mobin Akhtar and Mr.S.Zafar, Advocates versus CBI Through: ..... Respondent Mr.Sanjeev Bhandari, Standing Counsel for CBI CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.Crl.M.B.No.10405/2014 (suspension of sentence) 1. By this application, the appellant seeks suspension of sentence during pendency of this appeal.2. The allegations against the appellant are that being a Malkhana In-charge of Anti- Corruption Bench, CBI, Delhi, he was entrusted with a sum of Rs.6,20,000 on 28.07.1997 by the earlier Malkhana In-charge vide Charge of Malkhana Ex.PW3/A. However, the accused/appellant did not hand over this amount to his successor Malkhana In-charge while handing over the charge of Malkhana vide Ex.PW4/A and also that he did not deposit this amount in bank...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 30 2015

Quasim Ali Vs. Additional Commissioner of Customs

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jun-30-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:01. t May, 2015 Judgment Pronounced on:30. h June, 2015 CRL.REV.P. 661/2007 QUASIM ALI ..... Petitioner Through: None. versus ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Satish Aggarwal and Ms. Pooja Bhaskar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.1. Aggrieved by the judgment of conviction dated 27.02.2002 and order on sentence dated 02.03.2002 passed by the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, awarding the sentence to the petitioner to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months and fine of Rs.1,000/- for offence under Section 132 of the Customs Act, in default of payment of fine to further undergo simple imprisonment for 1 months; to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years and fine of Rs.1,000/under Section 135(1)(a) of the Customs Act, in default of payment of fine to further undergo simple imprisonment for 1 months and upholding the judgment of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 30 2015

Delhi Development Authority Vs. Shish Pal and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jun-30-2015

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + R.S.A No.15 of 2009 % 30th JUNE, 2015 Date of Decision: DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: . ... Appellant Mr.Ajay Verma, Adv. versus SHISH PAL & ORS. Through: ..... Respondent Mr. R.K Dhawan, Ms. Richa Dhawan & Ms. Archana Chaudhary Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.1. This is a regular second appeal filed by the appellant against the judgment dated 07.04.2008 passed in RCA No.123/05. The first appellant court upheld the judgment/decree dated 01.04.2005 passed by the trial court by virtue of which the suit No.0373/85 was decreed in favour of respondent/ plaintiff.2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that a suit for permanent injunction was filed by the respondent/plaintiff against the appellant/DDA claiming ownership of the suit property being property measuring 45 X20?? (2 Biswa) forming part of Khasra No.1275 in the village Tughlakabad. It was alleged in the plaint RSA1509 Page 1 that on 29.04.1985 the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 30 2015

Ramesh Yadav Vs. New Delhi Municipal Council and Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jun-30-2015

$~2 to 8, 10 to 13, 15 to 17 & 19 to 21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6115/2015 & CM No.11120/2015 (for stay) BRAHM PAL Versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ANR + W.P.(C) 6117/2015 & CM No.11124/2015 (for stay) ARPIT GUPTA Versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ANR + W.P.(C) 6118/2015 & CM No.11126/2015 (for stay) MAHENDER MANDAL Versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ANR + W.P.(C) 6119/2015 & CM No.11128/2015 (for stay) SACHIN Versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ANR + ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 6116/2015 & CM No.11122/2015 (for Direction) JAMEEL AHMAD ..... Petitioner Versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ANR + ..... Petitioner W.P.(C) 6120/2015 & CM No.11130/2015 (for stay) DEVI CHARAN Versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ANR ..... Respondents ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents ..... Petitioner + W.P.(C) 6123/2015 & CM No.11135/2015 (for direction) RAJU KHAN ..... Petitioner Versus NEW DELHI MUNICI...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 30 2015