Delhi Court June 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Turn browsing into brief-ready notes
Open any judgment and get a structured AI Brief in seconds - plus Semantic Search when you need to hunt by meaning, not keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Indian Micro Electronics (P) Ltd. Vs. Chandra Industries and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-30-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:08. 04.2015 Judgment delivered on:30. 06.2015 CRL.L.P. 233/2014 INDIAN MICRO ELECTRONICS (P) LTD Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amit Anand, Mr. Rohit Kumar & Mr. Brijesh Kumar, Advocates. versus CHANDRA INDUSTRIES & ORS Through: Mr. Himanshu Advocate. ..... Respondents Anand Gupta, CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. After hearing learned counsel, leave granted.2. Let the appeal be registered and numbered. Crl.A. No.3. /2015 (to be registered and numbered) With the consent of learned counsels, I heard learned counsel finally at the admission stage and reserved judgment. Accordingly, I now proceed to dispose of the appeal.4. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 04.01.2014 passed by Sh. Apoorv Sarvaria, Civil Judge-I, New Delhi in CC No.332/11 under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act (NI Act). The complaint preferred by the appellant has been dismissed by th...
Lekh Raj Sharma Vs. Yash Pal Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-30-2015
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: Judgment delivered on: % + 17.03.2015 30.06.2015 Crl. L. P5672014 LEKH RAJ SHARMA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. S.C. Dhawan, Advocate. versus YASH PAL GUPTA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay R and Mr. S. B. Sharma, Advocates. Mr. Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. The present leave petition has been preferred under Section 378(4) Cr.P.C. to seek leave to appeal against the judgment dated 03.07.2014 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate-04 Dwarka Courts, New Delhi in CC No.1884/1/12 a complaint filed by the petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (the NI Act) titled Lekh Raj Sharma vs. Yashpal Gupta. By the impugned judgment, the learned MM has acquitted the respondent/accused of the alleged offence. After hearing the learned counsel, the Court was inclined to grant leave and with consent of learned counsel, heard their argument on...
Carzonrent India Pvt Ltd Vs. Hertz International Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-30-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. 193/2013 CARZONRENT INDIA PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Darpan Wadhwa with Mr. Manik Dogra, Advocates. versus HERTZ INTERNATIONAL LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate with Mr. A. Fraser and Mr. Jatin Zaveri, Advocates. AND + O.M.P. 732/2013 CARZONRENT INDIA PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Darpan Wadhwa with Mr. Manik Dogra, Advocates. versus HERTZ INTERNATIONAL LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate with Mr. A. Fraser and Mr. Jatin Zaveri, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR % JUDGEMENT3006.2015 1. By this order, the Court deals with the preliminary objections raised by the Respondent Hertz International Ltd., to the maintainability of these petitions by Carzonrent India Pvt. Ltd. under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) challenging the Partial Awards dated 7th March 2011 and 29th November 2012 and the Final Award dated 11th April 20...
Kranti Kumar Parakh Vs. M/S Annraj Narain Dass and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-30-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 217/2014 Reserved on:22. d April, 2015 Decided on:30. h June, 2015 % KRANTI KUMAR PARAKH ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Tanmay Mehta with Mr. Pulkit Aggarwal, Advs. versus M/S ANNRAJ NARAIN DASS & ORS ..... Respondent Through Mr. Lalit Gupta with Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advs. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Aggrieved by the order dated 21st April, 2014 whereby the eviction petition filed by the petitioner under Section 14(1)(e) read with Section 25B of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (in short the DRC Act) was dismissed, the petitioner prefers the present petition.2. Petitioner Kranti Kumar Parakh filed an eviction petition against the tenants M/s. Annraj Narain Dass & Ors. and Sukhraj Kumar Kochar through their legal heirs Kirti Kochar and Kishore Kochar being owner and landlord of the property on the ground of bonafide requirement of his own. In the eviction petition it was stated that the suit property i.e H.No.94...
Justice U.N. Bachawat (Rtd.) and Anr. Vs. Chief Post Master General an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-30-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on:22. 05.2015 Judgment delivered on:30.06.2015 + WP(C) 3712/2015 JUSTICE U.N. BACHAWAT (RTD.) & ANR. ..... Petitioners Versus CHIEF POST MASTER GENERAL & ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner: Mr P.D. Gupta, Mr R.K. Seewal, Mr G.C. Rawal & Mr V.K. Gupta, Advocates. For the Respondents: Mr Prasanta Varma, Mr Sushil Kumar Pandey & Ms Pratibha Varma, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER,J1 Petitioner no.1 has approached the court with the instant petition to lay claim to the money lying deposited in two accounts opened by his late wife Ms Vimala Devi Bachawat with the Alaknanda Post Office, New Delhi, represented by Respondent no.3. Petitioner no.1s claim is based on a Will dated 15.01.2008, executed by late Ms Vimala Devi Bachawat, in his favour. 1.1 Respondent no.3, however, has refused to entertain the claim based on an opinion received from its head of...
Santosh Kumari Mehra Since Deceased Thr Lrs Vs. Om Prakash
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-30-2015
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RC.REV. 94/2015 & CM35972015 Reserved on:20. h May, 2015 Decided on:30. h June, 2015 % SANTOSH KUMARI MEHRA SINCE DECEASED THR LRS ... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajesh Yadav, Mr. Neeraj Yadav and Mr. Sidharth Arora, Advocates. versus OM PRAKASH Through: ..... Respondent Mr. B.B. Gupta and Mr. Sanyam Khetarpal, Advocates. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Aggrieved by the order dated 13th January, 2015 whereby leave to defend was granted to the respondent Om Prakash in an eviction petition filed by Smt. Santosh Kumari Mehra since deceased, the petitioners legal heirs of Smt. Santosh Kumari Mehra prefer the present petition.2. In the eviction petition, Santosh Kumar stated that she was owner of shop bearing No.4515-A, Arya Samaj Road, Near Hathi Wala Chowk, Karol Bagh, New Delhi (in short the tenanted premises) which consists of a big hall and had been let out to Om Prakash for commercial purposes initially at a rent of Rs....
M/S Anu Products Ltd. Vs. M/S Raj Agro Tech and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-30-2015
$~8. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: Judgment delivered on: % + 29.04.2015 30.06.2015 CRL.L.P. 612/2014 M/S ANU PRODUCTS LTD Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. M.P. Sharma, Advocate versus M/S RAJ AGRO TECH & ANR Through: ..... Respondents Mr. S.K. Kashyap, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. At the time of hearing of the leave petition, the Court was inclined to grant leave and, accordingly, with the consent of parties, the arguments in appeal were heard and judgment reserved.2. Accordingly, the registry is directed to register and number the appeal. Crl.A. No.3. /2015 (to be registered and numbered) The present appeal is directed against the judgment dated 10.09.2014 passed by Sh. Bharat Chugh, Metropolitan Magistrate (NI Act)-01, Central, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in CC No.6910/2012, titled M/s Anu Products Ltd. v. Shashi Sharma, Proprietor of M/s Raj Agro Tech. By the impugned judgment, the learned MM has held that ...
Atul Aggarwal Vs. Dri
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-30-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:30. h June, 2015 + BAIL APPLN. 2149/2013 ATUL AGGARWAL Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. S.S. Dass, Advocate versus DRI Through: ..... Respondent Mr.Satish Aggarwal, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA ORDER : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. By virtue of this application under Section 439 of Cr.PC the petitioner is seeking regular bail in Sessions Case No.47A/12 DRI vs. Paramjit Singh Gulati & Atul Aggarwal.2. The case of Directorate of Revenue Intelligence [DRI]. in brief is that while acting upon a secret intelligence regarding a Delhi based drug syndicate engaged in export of narcotic drugs by way of concealment thereof, the DRI officers seized a consignment of about 151.980 kg of white colour crystal powder from the area of Air Cargo, IGI Airport, New Delhi on 18.07.2012. The above consignment of white colour crystal powder was being exported to Malaysia and it was contained in three particular cartons/boxes bearing nos.19, 21 ...
Ramji Pandey Vs. Delhi Development Authority and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-30-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:30. h June, 2015 % + W.P.(C) No.6857/2011 RAMJI PANDEY .......Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Shantanu Singh, Advocate. Versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. .....Respondents Represented by: Ms. Shobhana Takiar, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks directions whereby directing the respondent No.1(DDA) to deliver the physical possession of Flat No.156, Pocket B2, Loknayakpuram, Delhi.2. Brief facts of the case are that on 15.09.2008, the petitioner applied for booking of an LIG Flat and deposited an amount of Rs.1,50,000/- as booking amount. On 20.11.2009, the petitioner was informed by the respondent No.1 that he has been allotted a LIG Flat mentioned above and asked him to deposit a sum of Rs.9,76,141/- by 19.05.2010.3. On 22.04.2010, the respondent No.2 (Axis Bank) intimated the petitioner about the details such as rate of interest, loan ...
S. Narinder Singh Sachdeva Vs. Mrs. Dimple Sachdeva
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-30-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) No.1292/2005 30th June, 2015 % S. NARINDER SINGH SACHDEVA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Rajiv Tyagi, Advocate. versus MRS. DIMPLE SACHDEVA Through: ..... Defendant None. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) I.A. No.12651/2015 (exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. I.A. stands disposed of. O.A. No.235/2015 and I.A. No.12650/2015 (stay) 2. This chamber appeal has been preferred by the plaintiff in the suit impugning the order of the Joint Registrar dated 16.4.2015. The appellant/plaintiff impugns the order dated 16.4.2015 which has allowed further cross-examination of the witness PW-1 after re-examination was done by the plaintiff of the witness PW-1. Plaintiff/appellant contends that the defendant/respondent be not permitted to put questions to the witness PW-1 and which will be in the nature of cross-examination after reexamination of the witnes...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »