Delhi Court May 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Great Eastern Energy Corporation Limited Vs. Union of India and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-27-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h May, 2015 % + W.P.(C) No.2611/2014 GREAT EASTERN ENERGY CORPORATION LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajeev K. Virmani, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Aseem Chaturvedi, Adv. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC with Ms. Neha Garg, Adv. for UOI. Mr. Neeraj Kishan Kaul, ASG with Mr. Saurav Agarwal, Mr. Abhijit Mitra and Mr. Rakesh Diwan, Advs. for PNGRB. Mr. M.K. Pandey and Mr. Chinmayee, Adv. for applicant in CM No.6596/2015. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.CM No.1440/2015 (of petitioner for directions) & CM No.6596/2015 (of Steel Authority of India Limited for impleadment) 1. The writ petition has been filed impugning the order dated 31 st March, 2014 of the respondent no.2 Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board (PNGRB) of imposing penalty of Rupees One Crore on the petitioner under Section 28 of the Petroleum and Natural ...
Binod Kumar Vs. Union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-27-2015
$~5, 8 & 9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision : May 27, 2015 W.P.(C) 5407/2015 AVIJIT DAS Represented by: ..... Petitioner Dr.Vijendra Mahndiyan, Advocate with Ms.Pallavi Awasthi, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Sarat Chandra, Advocate for R-1 and R-2 W.P.(C) 5455/2015 ANAND KUMAR SINGH Represented by: ..... Petitioner Dr.Vijendra Mahndiyan, Advocate with Ms.Pallavi Awasthi, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Rakesh Kumar Garg, Advocate for R-1 W.P.(C) 5568/2015 BINOD KUMAR Represented by: ..... Petitioner Dr.Vijendra Mahndiyan, Advocate with Ms.Pallavi Awasthi, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR W.P.(C) No.5407/2015 & conn.matter ..... Respondents Page 1 of 6 Represented by: Ms.Archana Gaur, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) CM Nos.9743-44/2015 in W.P.(C) No.5407/2015 CM Nos.9917-18/2015 in W.P....
Shri v. Jeganathan Arulmoni and Anr. Vs. Chief Secretary, Gnctd and Or ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-27-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2833/2015 27th May, 2015 % SHRI V. JEGANATHAN ARULMONI AND ANR. Through ..... Petitioners Ms. Rashmi Chopra, Advocate versus CHIEF SECRETARY, GNCTD AND ORS. ..... Respondent Through Mr. Naushad Ahmad Khan, Addl. Standing Counsel for GNCTD Ms. Latika Chaudhury, Adv. for Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, Adv. for DTU CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by two persons who claim themselves as teachers in the respondent No.3/Delhi Technological University (in short University). The claim in the writ petition is for benefit to the petitioners of increase of age of retirement to the age of 65 years. The writ petition seeks application of the principle of equal pay for equal work and also states that the petitioners are very much lecturers/teachers and once other lecturers/ teachers of respondent no.3...
Raja Ram Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-27-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRIMINAL APPEAL No.211/2013 Reserved on:30. 04.2015 Date of Decision:27. 05.2015 % RAJA RAM Through ..... Appellant Mr.R.M.Tufail, Mr.Vishal Raj Sehijpal Mr.Farooq Chaudhary and Mr.Anwar A.Khan, Advocates. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through Ms.Aasha Tiwari, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J:1. Raja Ram has impugned the judgment of conviction dated 7.1.2013 passed in Sessions Case No.36/2007 (reference FIR No.1823/2006, P.S.Sultanpuri) by the Learned Sessions Judge-I (Outer) Rohini Courts, Delhi whereby he has been convicted for offences under Sections 364/302/201 and 120B IPC for killing Mukesh Kumar, his friend.2. By order of sentence dated 17.1.2013, appellant Raja Ram has been directed to undergo imprisonment for life, pay fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default of payment of fine, undergo Simple Imprisonment of six months, for the offence under section 302 IPC, and for crimina...
Anand Kumar Singh Vs. Union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-27-2015
$~5, 8 & 9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision : May 27, 2015 W.P.(C) 5407/2015 AVIJIT DAS Represented by: ..... Petitioner Dr.Vijendra Mahndiyan, Advocate with Ms.Pallavi Awasthi, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Sarat Chandra, Advocate for R-1 and R-2 W.P.(C) 5455/2015 ANAND KUMAR SINGH Represented by: ..... Petitioner Dr.Vijendra Mahndiyan, Advocate with Ms.Pallavi Awasthi, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Rakesh Kumar Garg, Advocate for R-1 W.P.(C) 5568/2015 BINOD KUMAR Represented by: ..... Petitioner Dr.Vijendra Mahndiyan, Advocate with Ms.Pallavi Awasthi, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR W.P.(C) No.5407/2015 & conn.matter ..... Respondents Page 1 of 6 Represented by: Ms.Archana Gaur, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) CM Nos.9743-44/2015 in W.P.(C) No.5407/2015 CM Nos.9917-18/2015 in W.P....
Avijit Das Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-27-2015
$~5, 8 & 9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision : May 27, 2015 W.P.(C) 5407/2015 AVIJIT DAS Represented by: ..... Petitioner Dr.Vijendra Mahndiyan, Advocate with Ms.Pallavi Awasthi, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Sarat Chandra, Advocate for R-1 and R-2 W.P.(C) 5455/2015 ANAND KUMAR SINGH Represented by: ..... Petitioner Dr.Vijendra Mahndiyan, Advocate with Ms.Pallavi Awasthi, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Rakesh Kumar Garg, Advocate for R-1 W.P.(C) 5568/2015 BINOD KUMAR Represented by: ..... Petitioner Dr.Vijendra Mahndiyan, Advocate with Ms.Pallavi Awasthi, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR W.P.(C) No.5407/2015 & conn.matter ..... Respondents Page 1 of 6 Represented by: Ms.Archana Gaur, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) CM Nos.9743-44/2015 in W.P.(C) No.5407/2015 CM Nos.9917-18/2015 in W.P....
the Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Mohd. Idrish and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-27-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:27. h May, 2015 + MAC. APP. 159/ 2014 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ...... Appellant Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi, Advocate Versus MOHD. IDRISH AND OTHERS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. N.K. Jha, Advocate Respondents no.1 & 2. for Mr. G.S. Sharma, Advocate for Respondents no.3 and 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.1. The Appellant Oriental Insurance Company Limited has filed the present appeal against the judgment dated 30.11.2013 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby compensation of `6,22,248/- was awarded in favour of Respondents no.1 and 2 for the death of their bachelor son Late Shri Mohd. Mustafa @ Mustaq, who suffered fatal injuries in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 23.07.2007.2. On appreciation of evidence, the Claims Tribunal found that the accident was caused on account of rash and negligent driving of the Tempo TATA407bearing Registrat...
Icici Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Sh. Aditya Kalra and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-27-2015
$-20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:27. h May, 2015 + MAC.APP. 591/2014 ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. .... Appellant Through: Ms. Arpan Wadhawan, Adv. versus SH. ADITYA KALRA & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Rajesh Mahendru, Adv. with Mr. Sagar Anand, Adv. for R-1 along with Respondent no.1 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 19.05.2014 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby compensation of `2,02,620/- was granted in favour of Respondent no.1 for having suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 07.01.2012.2. The quantum of compensation is not challenged by the Appellant Insurance Company. The only plea raised by the Appellant is that since Respondent Arun Gaur, who was the driver and the owner of the vehicle did not possess a valid and effective driving licence, the Appellant has no liability...
Rapheal Vs. Devender Singh (Intelligence officer) (Director of
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-27-2015
$ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:27. h May, 2015 + CRL.A.1394/2013 & Crl.M.B.No.11130/2014 RAPHEAL Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Rajender Chhabra , Advocate (DHCLSC) and Mr. Hemendra Jaitiya, Advocate versus DEVENDER SINGH (INTELLIGENCE OFFICER)(DIRECTOR OF REVENUE INTELLEGENCE) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Satish Agarwala and Ms. Pooja Bhaskar, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. Prosecution case, as detailed in judgment dated 09.05.2013 passed by learned Special Judge NDPS/South District, Saket Court, Delhi, is as follows: On 22.09.2005 at about 4.00 PM PW1 Raman Mishra, Intelligence Officer of DRI, DZU, gathered an intelligence through some reliable source that a person of African origin carrying around 10 kg of narcotic drugs would be coming at bus stop, opposite Hotel Shipra, Shakar Pur, Delhi at about 9.30 PM on that day. The above information was immediately reduced into writing by him as Ex. PW1/A and the...
U.P. State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Ganga Sagar and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-27-2015
$~ 7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h May, 2015 + MAC.APP. 343/2013 U.P. STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION..... Appellant Through: Ms. Garima Prashad, Adv. with Mr. Shadab Khan, Adv. versus GANGA SAGAR & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The appeal is for reduction of compensation of ` 6,61,900/- awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) in favour of Respondents no.1 and 4 for the death of Ravi Kumar, who suffered fatal injuries in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 22.03.2010.2. In the Claim Petition, it was stated that the deceased was earning a sum of `5500/- per month from his job of waiter and was earning another sum of `3500/- per month from giving tuitions. Affidavits supporting these averments were also filed by PW-1 Ganga Sagar, father and PW-2 Kumari Rekha, sister of the deceased Ravi Kumar. Evidence was also led to prove that in the month of ...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »