Delhi Court May 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vikash Goyal andors. Vs. The State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2015
I- 42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 28, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2421/2015 & Crl. M.A.No.8392/2015 VIKASH GOYAL & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Sanjay Srivastava & Ms. Chitra Gaur, Advocates versus THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Parveen Bhati, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Radhey Shyam Mr. Nitin Bhardwaj, Advocate for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.98/2014, under Sections 498A/406/34 of the IPC, registered at Crime Against Women Cell, Nanakpura, New Delhi, is sought on the basis of Memorandum of Understanding of 20th October, 2014 (Annexure-P-2) reached between the parties. Notice. Mr. Parveen Bhati, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and Mr.Nitin Bhardwaj, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent State Crl.M.C.No.2421/2015 Page 1 submi...
S.K. Jasra Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: May 28, 2015. + W.P.(C) 7699/2013 S.K. JASRA Through ..... Petitioner Mr. S. Rajappa & Dr. Puran Chand, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Manish Mohan, Ms. Sidhi Arora, Ms. Manisha Rana Singh & Ms. Mira Shaheen, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA JUDGMENT % KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.1. By way of this present Writ Petition, the Petitioner seeks the issuance of a writ of certiorari to set aside the order dated 10.09.2013 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the learned Tribunal) in O.A being No.3577/2012 and also the penalty order dated 28.09.2012.2. For better appreciation of the case at hand, it would be worthwhile to turn to the facts of the case:The petitioner was working as a Joint Director in the Directorate of Pay, Pension and Regulations (Directorate of Education of PP&R), Air Headquarters, Ministry of ...
Raj Buildcon Construction Ltd. and Ors. Vs. Today Homes and Infrastruc ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2015
I- 21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 28, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2380/2015 & Crl. M.A.Nos.8308-09/2015 RAJ BUILDCON CONSTRUCTION LTD & ORS...... Petitioners Through: Mr. Vikas Gupta, Mr. Vineet Tomar & Ms. Jaspreet Chawla, Advocates versus TODAY HOMES & INFRATRUCTURE PVT LTD .. Respondent Through: Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of Criminal Complaint No.1263/2015, Today Homes & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Raj Buildcon Construction Ltd. & ors., under Sections 138 of The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and the summoning order of 5th February, 2015 is sought on merits in this petition. At the hearing, it was disclosed by learned counsel for petitioners that Notice under Section 251 of Cr.P.C. has not yet been framed and the next date before trial court is 3rd June, 2015. At the outset, it is made clear that learned counsel for petitioners has not been heard on merits. Since petitioners have an alternate and Crl.M.C.No.2380/...
Bharat Bhushan and Anr. Vs. The State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2015
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 28, 2015 + CRL.M.C.1724/2015 BHARAT BHUSHAN & ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Mayank Sharma, Advocate versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .... Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with Inspector Saket Kumar Respondent No.2-in-person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.166/2009 under Sections 498-A/406/34 of IPC registered at Police Station Crime (Women) Cell, Nanakpura, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 10th September, 2014 arrived at Mediation Centre, Dwarka Courts, Delhi. Notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so by Inspector Saket Kumar on the basis of Crl.M.C.No.1724/2015 Page 1 identity proof produce...
Seema Chisti Vs. Major General v.K.Singh (Retd.) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2015
$~15 & 16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 28, 2015 + CRL.M.C.1030/2013 SEEMA CHISTI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Saurabh Mishra & Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advocates versus MAJOR GENERAL V.K.SINGH (RETD.) & ANR .. Respondents Through: Respondent No.1-in-person Mr. B.R.Handa, Special Public Prosecutor for CBI + CRL.M.C.1146/2012 SHISHIR GUPTA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Saurabh Mishra & Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advocates versus MAJOR GENERAL V.K.SINGH (RETD.) & ANR .. Respondents Through: Respondent No.1-in-person Mr. B.R.Handa, Special Public Prosecutor for CBI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % JUDGMENT (ORAL) In the above-captioned two petitions, quashing of complaint CC Crl.M.C.Nos.1030 & 1146 of 2012 Page 1 No.322/1/2009 titled Major General V.K.Singh (Retd.) v. CBI as well as common summoning order of 6th February, 2012 is sought on identical grounds while questioning the authority of respondent-complainant to file the aforesaid complaint and both the petiti...
Shishir Gupta Vs. Major General v.K.Singh (Retd.) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2015
$~15 & 16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 28, 2015 + CRL.M.C.1030/2013 SEEMA CHISTI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Saurabh Mishra & Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advocates versus MAJOR GENERAL V.K.SINGH (RETD.) & ANR .. Respondents Through: Respondent No.1-in-person Mr. B.R.Handa, Special Public Prosecutor for CBI + CRL.M.C.1146/2012 SHISHIR GUPTA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Saurabh Mishra & Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advocates versus MAJOR GENERAL V.K.SINGH (RETD.) & ANR .. Respondents Through: Respondent No.1-in-person Mr. B.R.Handa, Special Public Prosecutor for CBI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % JUDGMENT (ORAL) In the above-captioned two petitions, quashing of complaint CC Crl.M.C.Nos.1030 & 1146 of 2012 Page 1 No.322/1/2009 titled Major General V.K.Singh (Retd.) v. CBI as well as common summoning order of 6th February, 2012 is sought on identical grounds while questioning the authority of respondent-complainant to file the aforesaid complaint and both the petiti...
Avinash Shahney and Ors. Vs. State of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2015
I- 30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 28, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2393/2015 & Crl. M.A.No.8346/2015 AVINASH SHAHNEY & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Niraj Kumar Mishra, Advocate versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with WSI Josepha Mr. Adarsh Tiwari, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.86/2012, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of the IPC, registered at police station Sarita Vihar, Delhi is sought on the basis of Memorandum of Understanding reached between the parties. Notice. Mr. Karan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and Mr. Adarsh Tiwari, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first- Crl.M.C.No.2393/2015 Pag...
Ranjit Singh Vs. Anuradha Singh and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2015
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 28, 2015 + CRL.M.C.2385/2015 RANJIT SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Maneesh Bhardwaj & Ms. Sapna Tiwari, Advocates versus ANURADHA SINGH & ANR. .... Respondents Through: Mr. Ashutosh Verma, Advocate with Respondent No.1-in-person Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with ASI Nihal Singh, PS Chhawala CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Crl.M.A.No.8319/2015 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl.M.C.No.2385/2015 Quashing of FIR No.97/2014 under Sections 498-A/406/34 of IPC registered at Police Station Chhawala, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 24th April, 2014 arrived at Counseling Cell, Crl.M.C.No.2385/2015 Page 1 Family Courts, Dwarka Court, Delhi (Annexure B). Notice. Mr. Ashutosh Verma, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.1 and Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor accepts notice on behalf of respondent...
Satya Prakash Malik Vs. Iqbal Singh and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2015
$~A-51 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on :28.05.2015 + FAO6091999 SATYA PRAKASH MALIK Through versus IQBAL SINGH & ORS. Through ..... Appellant Mr.Pushpak Mahajan, Advocate with appellant-in-person. ..... Respondent Mr.K.L.Nandwani, Adv. for Insurance Company CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.1. The brief facts which led to the filing of the claim petition under section 110-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 is that the appellant Shri Satya Prakash Malik suffered injuries in a road accident on 28.8.1980. He was driving a two wheeler scooter. At Safdarjung Road he was hit by a car driven by respondent No.1. Shri Satya Prakash Malik suffered fracture of femur, complex fracture on right leg, fracture on right wrist and injuries on other parts of the body. He was treated in Army hospital and R.M.L.Hospital from 28.8.1980 to 4.11.1980 and from 8.12.1980 to 11.12.1980.2. Based on the evidence on record the Tribunal held that the accident took place du...
State (Nct) of Delhi Vs. Raj Kumar Mishra
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:28. h May, 2015 % + CRL.M.C. 2419/2015 STATE (NCT) OF DELHI Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Ravi Nayak, APP for the State. versus RAJ KUMAR MISHRA Through ..... Respondent None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.Crl. M.A. No.8391/2015 (for exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 2419/2015 1. The present application has been filed against the impugned judgment dated 13th November, 2014.2. The fact of the matter is that the respondent filed an application for registration under Medical Council Act on 14th May, 2001. A letter dated 4th June, 2001 was written by the Deputy Secretary, Medical Council of India, Moscow regarding confirmation of the authenticity of documents submitted by the respondent. On 17 th August, 2001 a letter received through fact transmission by the Deputy Secretary, Medical Council of India from the Counsellor (Education) & Dire...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »