Delhi Court May 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Col Avtar Singh Malhotra Vs. State (Govt of Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2015
$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 01, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 4953/2014 & Crl.M.A.16951/2014 COL AVTAR SINGH MALHOTRA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Satish Tamta, Ms. Ruchi Kapur and Ms. Nitu Wali, Advocates versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vinod Diwakar, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Pawan Kumar Mr. Arjun Mitra, Advocate with Mr. Nanak Chand Chauhan, DR (Legal), IIT, Delhi for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.335/2006, under Sections 409/420 of IPC registered at police station Hauz Khas, Delhi is sought on the basis of Settlement Agreement of 22nd August, 2014 arrived at Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre. Notice. Mr. Vinod Diwakar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and Mr. Arjun Mitra, Advocate, accepts CRL.M.C. 4953/2014 Page 1 notice on behalf of respondent No.2 and submits that M...
Balvir Singh and Ors. Vs. Union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.2414/2002 1st May, 2015 % BALVIR SINGH & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Ms. Shobhana Takiar, Advocate with Mr. Udayan Khandelwal, Advocate. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Anjana Gosain, Advocate with Mr. Arnab Naskar, Advocate for R-2/AAI. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by a total of six petitioners. This writ petition is filed in April, 2002 seeking the relief that the petitioners from the year 1994 must be given seniority i.e effectively appointments as Assistant Executive Engineers (in short AEE). Petitioners also question the Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) which was held for promotion to the posts of AEEs in May, 1994 for 74 posts of AEE and in which DPC petitioners did not get promotion.2. (i) The facts of the case are that there were be...
Jaswinder Singh Kohli and Ors. Vs. State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2015
$~34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 01, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 1803/2015 JASWINDER SINGH KOHLI & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Pawan Kawrani and Me. Jitesh Talwani, Advocates versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Anand Prakash Mr. Rajiv Bhardwaj and Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Adovcates for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.352/2013, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of IPC registered at police station Khayala, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 7th November, 2013 arrived at Delhi Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (Annexure P-4). Notice. Mr. Karan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and Mr. Rajiv Bhardwaj, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. CRL.M.C. 1803/2015 Page 1 Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState submi...
Balbir Chand Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :23. d MARCH, 2015 DECIDED ON :1. t MAY, 2015 + CRL.A. 499/2008 BALBIR CHAND ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Vivek Sood, Advocate with Mr.Rakesh Sharma, Advocate. VERSUS STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through : ..... Respondent Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The appellant - Balbir Chand impugns a judgment dated 01.05.2008 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.41/07 arising out of FIR No.122/05 PS Vivek Vihar by which he was held guilty for committing offences under Sections 376/506 IPC. By an order dated 05.05.2008, he was awarded RI for ten years with fine ` 10,000/- under Section 376 IPC and RI for one year under Section 506 IPC. Both the sentences were to operate concurrently.2. Briefly stated, the prosecution case as set up in the charge- sheet was that on 13.02.2005 and 03.04.2005, the appellant committed rape upon her daughter X (assumed name) aged around 16 years against her wishes. ...
Yatender Kumar Vs. The State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:06. h April, 2015 Judgment Pronounced on:01. t May, 2015 CRL.REV.P. 432/2006 YATENDER KUMAR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Prag Chawla & Ms. Ruchi Kapur, Advocates versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Mr. P.K. Mishra, APP SI Manu Sahrawat, PS: Pandav Nagar, Delhi CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.1. Aggrieved by the order on conviction dated 10.08.2005 and the order on sentence dated 24.08.2005 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, awarding the sentence to the petitioner to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years and fine of Rs.5,000/under Section 304-A IPC, in default of payment of fine to further undergo RI for four months; rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months and a fine of Rs.1,000/- under section 279 IPC, in default to undergo RI for one month and upholding the same by the learned Additional Sessions Judge vide judgment dated 15.05.2006, the present revision petitio...
Dr. Sharad Agarwal Vs. Lov Verma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2015
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:1. t May, 2015 + CONT.CAS(C) 882/2014 DR. SHARAD AGARWAL Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Shailender Saini, Advocate. Versus LOV VERMA Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC with Mr.Prashant Ghai, Advocate with Mr.Sube Singh, Consultant, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks directions thereby to initiate contempt proceedings under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, against the respondent for wilful disobedience of the order dated 29.09.2014 passed in WP(C) No.6713/2014.2. Vide the aforesaid order, this Court directed the respondent No.1 to consider the petition filed by the petitioner as a complaint and take a view within a period of six weeks from the said date uninfluenced by any observation made therein.3. Thereafter, the petitioner filed an application bearing No...
Govind Gopal Garg and Ors. Vs. The State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2015
I-48 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 01, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 1829/2015 GOVIND GOPAL GARG & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. J.S. Dagar, Advocate versus THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Navin Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with ASI Rajneesh Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.516/2013, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of the IPC, registered at police station Najafgarh, Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated settlement of 5th April, 2014, arrived at The Mediation Centre, Dwarka Courts, Delhi. Notice. Mr. Navin Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so by her counsel as well as by ASI Rajneesh on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Crl.M.C.No.1829/20...
Ramesh Vs. The State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRIMINAL APPEAL No.635/1999 Reserved on:13. h April, 2015 Date of Decision:1. t May, 2015 % RAMESH ...Appellant Through Mr. Rakesh Walia, Advocate. Versus THE STATE Respondent Through Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP along with ASI Shyam Sunder, P.S. Mukherjee Nagar. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.Ramesh (the appellant, for short) impugns his conviction under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC, for short) vide judgment dated 29th October, 1999 passed in Sessions Case No.6/1999 arising out of FIR No.224/1998, Police Station Mukherjee Nagar. By the impugned order on sentence dated 1st November, 1999, the appellant-Ramesh has been sentenced to imprisonment for life and ordered to pay fine of Rs.500/and on failure to pay the same, undergo Simple Imprisonment for one month.2. The appellant was also charge sheeted under Section 498A IPC, but was not convicted on the said charge.3. The ...
Vinod Kumar and Ors. Vs. State of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2015
$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 01, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 1792/2015 & Crl.M.A.6488/2015 VINOD KUMAR & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Tarun Gaur and Mr. Atul Kumar, Advocates versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr.Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with ASI Rajneesh Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.391/2012 under Sections 498-A/406/34 of IPC registered at police station Geeta Colony, Delhi is sought on the basis of Compromise Deed of 16th April, 2015 (Annexure-C) and on the ground that petitioner-husband and respondent No.2-wife are happily living together for the last six months. Notice. Mr. Karan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, has been identified to be the complainant/first-informant of the CRL.M.C. 1792/2015 Page 1 FIR in question ...
Delhi State Industrial Infrastructure and Developome Vs. M/S Roshan Re ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2015
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:01. 05.2015 FAO (OS) 243/2015 & CM No.7983/2015 DELHI STATE INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE & DEVELOPOMENT CORPORATION versus .... Appellant M/S ROSHAN REAL ESTATES PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the Respondent : Mr Moni Cinmoy, Advocate : Mr Sandeep Sharma, Advocate. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) CM No.7982/2015 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CAV. No.437/2015 The learned counsel for the respondent/Caveator is present The caveat stands discharged. FAO (OS) 243/2015 & CM No.7983/2015 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 05.02.2015 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in OMP16712014. The said OMP was a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) and was in res...
- ‹ Prev
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 53
- Next ›
- Last »