Delhi Court May 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Prince Kumar and Ors. Vs. State (Nct of Delhi) and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-06-2015
I-15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 06, 2015 + CRL.M.C.448/2015 PRINCE KUMAR & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Advocate versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. .... Respondents Through: Mr. Navin Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Mahendra Pratap PS Narela Respondent No.2-in-person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.425/2011 under Sections 498-A/406/34 of IPC registered at Police Station Narela, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 31st January, 2012 arrived at Mediation Centre, Rohini District Courts, Delhi (Annexure 2). Upon notice, respondent No.2-Poonam has appeared today. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so by SI Mahendra Pratap on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Crl.M.C...
Durga Precision Udyog Vs. Siya Ram Tiwari
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-06-2015
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:09. hMarch, 2015 Date of Decision:06. h May, 2015 % + W.P.(C) 3171/2012 DURGA PRECISION UDYOG Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Pranay Trivedi, Adv. versus SIYA RAM TIWARI Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Brijballabh Tiwari, Adv. W.P.(C) 3224/2013 SIYA RAM TIWARI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Brijballabh Tiwari, Adv. versus DURGA PRECISION UDYOG Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Pranay Trivedi, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.P.VAISH JUDGMENT1 These two petitions arise out of the award dated 25.02.2012 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Labour Court No.IX, Karkardooma Courts, New Delhi in ID No.34/08 (Unique Case ID No.02402CO143652008) wherein the Presiding Officer held that the services of the workman were terminated illegally and unlawfully by the management and further held that the workman is entitled to full back wages for 5 months w.e.f. 01.08.2005 to 31.12.2005 at the rate of Rs.2,500/- (Rupees Two thousand five hundred)...
Pallavi Sinha and Anr Vs. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-06-2015
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:06. 05.2015 W.P.(C) 7404/2013 & CM158722013 PALLAVI SINHA & ANR ..... Petitioners versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr Shuvodeep Roy. For the Respondents : Mr Mukul Talwar with Mr Vipin Singh for R-1. Ms Priyank Khattar for UOI/R-3. Mr Aditya Garg for R-4. Mr Braham Singh with Mr N.S. Vidhudi and Ms Manju for R-5. Mr Arvind Kr Sharma for R-7. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioners have filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning the basis on which seats in respect of Post-graduate Medical for the academic year 2013-14, were allotted by the respondent University (hereafter GGSIU). The petitioners are, particularly, aggrieved by the manner in which the Roster Point system has been implemented by GGSIU.2. According to petitioners the roster for admission for academic year 2...
Dinesh Kumar Tyagi and Ors. Vs. State Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-06-2015
I-3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 06, 2015 + CRL. M.C. No.456/2015 DINESH KUMAR TYAGI & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Utsav Pandey, Advocate versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Vijender Kumar. Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.03/2009, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of the IPC, registered at police station Ranhola, Delhi is sought in this petition on the ground that petitioner-husband and respondent No.2-wife are living together happily since July, 2014. Notice. Mr.Karan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so by SI Vijender Kumar on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Crl. M.C.No.456/2015 Page 1...
Tnt India Private Limited Vs. Union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-06-2015
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 348/2014 & CM6912014 TNT INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv. with Mr Ajay Bhargav, Mr Susmit Pushkar & Mr Ayush A. Mehrotra, Advs. versus % UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Amit Mahajan, CGSC with Mr Krishanu Barua, Adv. for R-1. Mr Rahul Kaushik & Dr. Ashwani Bhardwaj, Advs. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER ORDER0605.2015 1. This is a writ petition which throws up a very curious circumstance. The petitioner, which is a courier company, was, amongst others, served a show cause notice dated 15.01.2013. In the said show cause notice the petitioner, apart from the importer (i.e., Mr P.K. Tiwari), who, as the narration of facts hereinafter will indicate, according to the respondents, is a spectre, was called upon to answer the following:.....B. Further, M/s TNT Express India Pvt. Ltd., EICI Terminal, IGI Airport, New Delhi, Shri Rakesh Kumar Gupta S/o Shri Shiv ...
Smt. Vedwati Vs. Sh. Shetan Singh and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-06-2015
$~ 2 & 3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:6. h May, 2015 + MAC.APP. 419/2013 SMT. VEDWATI .... Appellant Through: Mr. O.P. Mannie, Adv. versus SH. SHETAN SINGH & ORS. Through: + .... Respondents Mr. Rajat Brar, Adv. MAC.APP. 213/2015 BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURNACE CO. LTD. .... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajat Brar, Adv. versus VEDWATI & ORS. Through: .... Respondents Mr. O.P. Mannie, Adv. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. These two appeals arise out of the judgment dated 22.08.2012 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby compensation of ` 3,33,400/- was awarded for the death of Manoj, a bachelor, who suffered fatal injuries in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 18.10.2009.2. For the sake of convenience, the Appellant in MAC APP. 419/2013, who is the mother of the deceased, shall be referred to as the Claimant and the Appellant in MAC APP. 213/2015 shall be referred to as the Insu...
Oriental Insurance Co Ltd Vs. Ganesh Chaurasia and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-06-2015
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:6. h May, 2015 + MAC.APP. 1152/2012 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Adv. versus GANESH CHAURASIA & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Sanjeev Srivastava, Adv. for R-1 to R-5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) CM APPL.6964/2014 (Restoration) For the reasons as stated in the application, the same is allowed. The appeal is restored to its original number. Order dated 02.11.2012 also stands revived. The application stands disposed of. MAC.APP. 1152/2012 1. With the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for final disposal.2. The Appellant impugns the judgment dated 08.08.2012 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby compensation of Rs.18,23,520/- was awarded in favour of Respondents No.1 to 5 for the death of Smt. Rekha, who suffered fatal injuries in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 09.09.2011.3. On appreciatio...
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Gargi Singh and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-06-2015
$-7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:06. h May, 2015 + MAC.APP. 136/2010 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Pradeep Gaur, Advocate with Mr. Amit Gaur, Advocate versus GARGI SINGH & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate for Respondent no.6 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The Appellant has filed the appeal against the judgment dated 27.11.2009 challenging the quantum of compensation and its liability. Compensation of Rs.18,96,000/- was awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal(Claims Tribunal) in favour of Respondents no.1 to 4 for the death of Veer Singh, who suffered fatal injuries in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 04.08.2000. The learned Single Judge of this Court by an order dated 08.03.2010 issued notice to Respondents no.5 and 6 only with regard to the liability.2. An application for additional evidence was moved by the Appellant which was allowed by this Court. ...
Vicky Vs. State of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-06-2015
$~01. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 611/2014 % Judgment dated 06.05.2015 VICKY Through : ..... Appellant Mr.V. Madhukar and Mr.Sachin Dev Sharma, Advs. versus STATE OF DELHI Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Sunil Sharma, APP for the State with Inspr.Ajay Kumar, P.S. Jahangir Puri. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Present appeal has been filed by the appellant under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment dated 13.1.2014 and order on sentence dated 24.1.2014 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rohini Courts, Delhi, whereby the appellant (husband of the deceased, Janki), for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, has been sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for life with fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default of payment of fine Simple Imprisonment for a period of one year. For the offence punishable under Section 498-A of the Ind...
M/S. Arjun Dairy Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M/S. God County Eden Homes Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-06-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:6. h May, 2015 + CS(OS) 875/2013 M/S. ARJUN DAIRY PVT. LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through Mr. D.S. Narula, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ravi Sikri, Senior Advocate with Ms. Manmeet Arora, Advocate, Ms. Princy Ponnan, Adv. and Mr. Pratyush Sharma, Adv. versus M/S. GOD COUNTY EDEN HOMES PVT. LTD. Through: .... Defendant Mr. Sanjay S. Chhabra, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.IA No.3091/2014 (u/S. 8 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996) 1. This suit for possession, recovery of `8,12,220/- towards arrears of license fee, service tax, recovery of `9,00,000/- towards arrears of damages, mesne profits, pendente lite interest and future damages, etc. has been filed by the Plaintiff against the Defendant with the averment that the Defendant through its Director approached the Plaintiff Company in May, 2011 for taking the suit premises, i.e. commercial office space bearing unit no.502, 5th Floor, Elegance...
- ‹ Prev
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- Next ›
- Last »