Delhi Court May 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Subhash Chand Gera Vs. Qazi Shamim Ahmed and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-06-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:06. 05.2015 + RC Rev. 494/2013 & CM No.20488/2013 RAJESH JAIN Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. S.K. Bhaduri, Adv. with Petitioner in person. versus QAZI SHAMIM AHMED & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh & Mr. Rajesh Gupta, Advs. + RC Rev. 13/2014 & CM Nos.378-379/2014 & 14129/2014 VINOD KUMAR PATHAK Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Yogesh Malhotra, Adv. versus QAZI SHAMIM AHMED & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh & Mr. Rajesh Gupta, Advs. + RC.REV. 49/2014 SUBHASH CHAND GERA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. J K Bhola, Advocate versus QAZI SHAMIM AHMED & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh, Mr. Rajesh Gupta & Mr. S P Gupta, Advocates _______________________________________________________________________ CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.1. These petitions under the proviso to Section 25-B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (for short Act), impugn three separate orde...
Md.Panaullah Vs. State of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-06-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :4. h MARCH, 2015 DECIDED ON :6. h MAY, 2015 + CRL.A. 1448/2012 MD.PANAULLAH Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Sachin Dev Sharma, Advocate. VERSUS STATE OF DELHI Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Navin K.Jha, APP. AND + CRL.A. 514/2013 MOHD.MUMTAZ Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Chetan Lokur, Advocate. VERSUS STATE (GOVT. OF NCT ) OF DELHI Through : ..... Respondent Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Aggrieved by a judgment dated 04.09.2012 in Sessions Case No.05/11 arising out of FIR No.415/10 PS Narela by which Md.Panaullah (A-1) and Mohd.Mumtaz (A-2) were convicted for committing offences under Sections 328/376(2)(f) IPC, they have preferred the appeals. By an order dated 06.09.2012, A-1 was awarded RI for ten years with fine ` 10,000/- under Section 376 (2)(f) IPC and RI for five years with fine ` 5,000/- under Section 328 IPC. A-2 was sentenced to undergo RI for ten years with fine ` 10,000/- under Sec...
Shri v.S. Krishnan Vs. Union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-06-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.9096/2014 6th May, 2015 % SHRI V.S. KRISHNAN Through: .Petitioner Ms. Shantha Devi Raman, Advocate. Versus .Respondents UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. Through: Mr. Anil Soni, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner who was contractually employed by the respondent no.2/ Society of Integrated Coastal Management (SICOM) as Procurement Officer seeks the relief of quashing of the order of the respondent no.2 dated 21.11.2014 terminating the employment of the petitioner. Respondent no.2 is Society of Integrated Coastal Management (SICOM) and is engaged in the work of integrated coastal management. Petitioner was appointed by the respondent no.2 as a Procurement Officer vide respondent no.2s letter dated 26.8.2010. Clause 3(h) of this appointment letter reads as under:- 3(h) P...
Sh. M. Murugesan Vs. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-06-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.5450/2002 6th May, 2015 % SH. M. MURUGESAN Through: .Petitioner Mr. Manish K. Bishnoi, Advocate. versus BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LTD. & ORS. Through: None. .Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks the relief of quashing the appointments made by the respondent no.1/Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd to the posts of Hindi Officer and Assistant Hindi Officer and which process was initiated by the circulars dated 20.9.2000 and 28.10.2000.2. The case of the petitioner is that since he has the necessary qualifications of a graduation degree and a post graduation degree in Hindi subject, he had therefore applied for appointment to one of the ten posts of Hindi Officer in terms of the aforesaid circulars. Petitioner contends that he was eminently suitable for the post b...
Mapsa Tapes Private Ltd. Vs. Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-06-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:06. 05.2015 + WP(C) 1831/2012 M/S. MAPSA TAPES PRIVATE LTD. ....PETITIONER Versus DELHI STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. .....RESPONDENT ADVOCATES WHO APPEARED IN THIS CASE: For the Petitioners : Mr. P.D.Gupta and Mr.Kamal Gupta, Advocates For the Respondent : Ms. Anusuya Salwan and Ms. Renuka Arora, Advocates CORAM :HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J WP(C) 1831/2012 and CM No.733/2014 1. This is a writ petition in which several reliefs have been prayed for. Some of these reliefs have been rendered infructuous on account of the fact that during the pendency of the writ petition, the grievance stands addressed. This is more particularly so, with regard to a direction sought by the petitioner in prayer clauses (a), (b) and (c) which, in effect, seek a mandamus qua the respondent for release of Architectural Control Drawings (in short the ACDs). 1.1 The proceedings held on 19...
Shri G.R. Malhotra and Anr. Vs. Canara Bank and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-06-2015
$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :06. 05.2015 + W.P.(C) 3459/2011 SHRI G.R. MALHOTRA & ANR. ..... Petitioners Through : Sh. Rajeeve Mehra, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Shruti Aggarwal, Advocates. versus CANARA BANK & OTHERS ..... Respondents Through : Sh. Pradeep Dewan, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Anupam Dhingra and Sh. Ankur Rai, Advocates. Sh. Kamal Nijhawan, Advocate, amicus curiae. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. GAUBA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. The present writ petition impugns an order of the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) dated 02.05.2011 which had declined to interfere with the order of the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) dated 31.05.2010 in SA612008. In view of the final order that this Court proposes to make, elaborate facts would not be discussed.2. The petitioner claims to be a bonafide purchaser of the property, being No.401, First Floor, Gagan Vihar, New Delhi (hereafter referred to as the suit p...
Sunagro Seeds Pvt. Ltd Vs. National Seeds Corporation Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-06-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: May 06, 2015 + O.M.P. 291/2015 & IA95562015 SUNAGRO SEEDS PVT. LTD Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Ratnakar Maltiyar, Adv. versus NATIONAL SEEDS CORPORATION LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Counsel (Appearance not given) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO ORDER % 06.05.2015 IA95562015 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. O.M.P. 291/2015 1. The challenge in this petition is to the award dated February 16, 2015 passed by the Ld. Sole Arbitrator on issue No.12 whereby the Ld. Arbitrator has allowed the counter claim of the respondent granting the respondent against the petitioner an amount of Rs.1,38,58, 650/-. The counter claim of the respondent was in the nature of damages sought against the petitioner for non- lifting of onion seeds.2. The undisputed facts are that a total quantity of 1075 quintals of onion seeds were booked/indented by the petitioner. The details of the boo...
Amir Abidi and Ors Vs. Government of Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-06-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:6. h May, 2015 + W.P.(C) No.2210/2014 & CM No.20578/2014 (for condonation of 13 days delay in filing addl. affidavit) AMIR ABIDI AND ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Sarim Naved, Adv. Versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Raman Duggal, Adv. for GNCTD Mr. Raghavendra M. Bajaj & Ms. Garima Bajaj, Advs. for R-2. Mr. Ajay Arora, Adv. for NDMC. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, filed as a Public Interest Litigation (PIL), seeks, (i) a direction to the Directorate of Education (DoE) of the respondent No.1 Government of NCT of Delhi (GNCTD) to provide an alternative building provisionally for imparting education to the students of the Shafiq Memorial Higher Secondary School for a period of 18 months, till a new building is constructed; and, (ii) a direction to the respondent No...
Sunita Goel Vs. Gnct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-06-2015
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:06. 05.2015 W.P.(C) 2852/2010 SUNITA GOEL ..... Petitioner versus GNCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Mr Mukesh M. Goel with Mr Indermani. For the Respondents : Ms Ruchir Mishra, Advocate for Mr Mukesh Kr Tiwari, for DTDC. Ms Shobha Gupta and Mr Rajesh Sachdeva, for R3, MCD. Mr Ankur Garg, Mr Amit Jain and Mr Rahul Garg, for R4. Mr Gautam Narayan, Ms Asmita Singh, CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying as under:The respondent Nos. 1 and 3 be directed to revoke, cancel the L-2 license granted to the respondent No.2 and 4 and renewed from time to time for running the retail vend of liquor at premises Shop No.1, A-7, Milap Nagar, Uttam Nagar, New Delhi as the same is not in accordance with the Rules; It is further prayed that respondent No.3 be directed to close...
Siya Ram Tiwari Vs. Durga Precision Udyog
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-06-2015
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:09. hMarch, 2015 Date of Decision:06. h May, 2015 % + W.P.(C) 3171/2012 DURGA PRECISION UDYOG Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Pranay Trivedi, Adv. versus SIYA RAM TIWARI Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Brijballabh Tiwari, Adv. W.P.(C) 3224/2013 SIYA RAM TIWARI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Brijballabh Tiwari, Adv. versus DURGA PRECISION UDYOG Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Pranay Trivedi, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.P.VAISH JUDGMENT1 These two petitions arise out of the award dated 25.02.2012 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Labour Court No.IX, Karkardooma Courts, New Delhi in ID No.34/08 (Unique Case ID No.02402CO143652008) wherein the Presiding Officer held that the services of the workman were terminated illegally and unlawfully by the management and further held that the workman is entitled to full back wages for 5 months w.e.f. 01.08.2005 to 31.12.2005 at the rate of Rs.2,500/- (Rupees Two thousand five hundred)...
- ‹ Prev
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- Next ›
- Last »