Delhi Court May 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Deepak Shakdher Vs. G.D. Foods Mfg (I) Pvt Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-06-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:16. h December, 2014 Decided on:6. h May, 2015 % + CRL.M.C. 3427/2011 and 12167/2011 (Stay) UDAY KOTAK Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. N.B. Joshi and Mr.Purushottam Mishra, Advocates. versus G.D. FOODS MFG (I) PVT LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.I.S. Alag and Mr.J.S. Lamba, Advocates. AND + CRL.M.C. 3538/2011 and 12551/2011 (Stay) VIPIN VERMA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. N.B. Joshi and Mr.Purushottam Mishra, Advocates. versus G.D. FOODS MFG (I) PVT LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.I.S. Alag and Mr.J.S. Lamba, Advocates. AND + CRL.M.C. 3539/2011 and 12554/2011 (Stay) DEEPAK SHAKDHER Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. N.B. Joshi and Mr.Purushottam Mishra, Advocates. versus G.D. FOODS MFG (I) PVT LTD. CRL.M.C Nos.3427/2011, 3538/2011, 3539/2011 & 3540/2011 ..... Respondent Page 1 of 20 Through: + Mr.I.S. Alag and Mr.J.S. Lamba, Advocates. AND CRL.M.C. 3540/2011 and 12557/2011 (Stay) KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. N...
Uday Kotak Vs. G.D. Foods Mfg (I) Pvt Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-06-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:16. h December, 2014 Decided on:6. h May, 2015 % + CRL.M.C. 3427/2011 and 12167/2011 (Stay) UDAY KOTAK Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. N.B. Joshi and Mr.Purushottam Mishra, Advocates. versus G.D. FOODS MFG (I) PVT LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.I.S. Alag and Mr.J.S. Lamba, Advocates. AND + CRL.M.C. 3538/2011 and 12551/2011 (Stay) VIPIN VERMA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. N.B. Joshi and Mr.Purushottam Mishra, Advocates. versus G.D. FOODS MFG (I) PVT LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.I.S. Alag and Mr.J.S. Lamba, Advocates. AND + CRL.M.C. 3539/2011 and 12554/2011 (Stay) DEEPAK SHAKDHER Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. N.B. Joshi and Mr.Purushottam Mishra, Advocates. versus G.D. FOODS MFG (I) PVT LTD. CRL.M.C Nos.3427/2011, 3538/2011, 3539/2011 & 3540/2011 ..... Respondent Page 1 of 20 Through: + Mr.I.S. Alag and Mr.J.S. Lamba, Advocates. AND CRL.M.C. 3540/2011 and 12557/2011 (Stay) KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. N...
Vikas Yadav Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-06-2015
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:6. h May, 2015 % + LPANo.220/2015 VIKAS YADAV Through: .. Appellant Mr. Sumeet Verma with Mr. Amit Kala, Advs. Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .. Respondent Through: Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC for State. CORAM :HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. This intra-court appeal impugns the orders dated 27 th March, 2015 and 10th April, 2015 of the learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.(Crl.) No.1644/2014 filed by the appellant. By the said writ petition, the appellant, convicted under Sections 302/364/201/34 IPC and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment/rigorous imprisonment for ten years and whose conviction has been upheld in appeal and sentence of life imprisonment though maintained has been made subject to a rider that he shall remain in incarceration for twenty five years without any remission, prayed for grant of parole for a period of three months on the grounds, (a) to meet his g...
M/S Signet Corporation Vs. Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-06-2015
$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:6. h May, 2015 + W.P.(C) 4526/2015 M/S SIGNET CORPORATION ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Aseem Mehtrotra, Advocate. Versus BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD. ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Deepak Pathak and Mr.Raghav Chadha, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) W.P.(C) 4526/2015 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks directions thereby quashing the Order No.SO2530002150010 dated 07.04.2015 issued by the respondent.2. Mr. Aseem Mehrotra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner is having industrial licence No.18289 dated 17.04.2000 and M/s Infocom Network Limited (INL) is having a factory licence bearing No.FL1110009937 dated 22.04.2014 issued by the Factory Licensing Department of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD), whereby it is established that both, the petitioner and INL, are engaged in industrial activities.3. Learned co...
Vinod Kumar Pathak Vs. Qazi Shamim Ahmed and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-06-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:06. 05.2015 + RC Rev. 494/2013 & CM No.20488/2013 RAJESH JAIN Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. S.K. Bhaduri, Adv. with Petitioner in person. versus QAZI SHAMIM AHMED & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh & Mr. Rajesh Gupta, Advs. + RC Rev. 13/2014 & CM Nos.378-379/2014 & 14129/2014 VINOD KUMAR PATHAK Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Yogesh Malhotra, Adv. versus QAZI SHAMIM AHMED & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh & Mr. Rajesh Gupta, Advs. + RC.REV. 49/2014 SUBHASH CHAND GERA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. J K Bhola, Advocate versus QAZI SHAMIM AHMED & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh, Mr. Rajesh Gupta & Mr. S P Gupta, Advocates _______________________________________________________________________ CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.1. These petitions under the proviso to Section 25-B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (for short Act), impugn three separate orde...
Nrp Projects Private Limited Vs. Indian Oil Corporation Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-06-2015
#29 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 1272/2015 NRP PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through Mr. K. Manoj Menon with Mr. Manu Seshadri and Mr. R.V. Prabhat, Advocates versus INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED ..... Defendant Through None Date of Decision :06. h May, 2015 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) I.A. 9534/2015 [Exemption from filing certified/typed/dim copies]. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. CS(OS) 1272/2015 Let the plaint be registered as suit. Issue summons in the suit to the defendant by registered post and dasti, returnable for 4th August, 2015 before the Joint Registrar. The summons to the defendant shall indicate that a written statement to the plaint shall be positively filed within four weeks of the receipt of the summons. Liberty is given to the plaintiff to file a replication within two weeks of the receipt of the advance copy of the written statement. The parties shall file all original documents in supp...
R.S.Chhabra Vs. Gopal Krishan Kapoor
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-06-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :29.4.2015 Judgment delivered on :06. 5.2015 I.A.Nos.2286/2010, 1460/2014, 5310/2014 in CS(OS) 353/2006 R.S.CHHABRA ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Chaman Lal Sachdeva, Mr.Preet Pal Singh and Ms.Priyam Mehta, Advocates. versus GOPAL KRISHAN KAPOOR + ..... Defendant Through Mr.Pritesh Kapoor, Miss. Radhika Sharma and Ms.Bina Gupta, Advocates. EX.P. 232/2007 & EX.APPL. (OS) 35/2010 SHRI R.S. CHHABRA ..... Decree Holder Through Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Chaman Lal Sachdeva, Mr.Preet Pal Singh and Ms.Priyam Mehta, Advocates. versus SHRI GOPAL KRISHAN KAPOOR AND OTHERS ..... Judgement Debtors Through Ms.Bina Gupta, Mr.Pritesh Kapoor and Miss. Radhika Sharma and, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1. These are three applications filed by the judgment debtor. I.A. No.2286/2010 (under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code) 2 This is an application filed by...
Rajesh Jain Vs. Qazi Shamim Ahmed and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-06-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:06. 05.2015 + RC Rev. 494/2013 & CM No.20488/2013 RAJESH JAIN Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. S.K. Bhaduri, Adv. with Petitioner in person. versus QAZI SHAMIM AHMED & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh & Mr. Rajesh Gupta, Advs. + RC Rev. 13/2014 & CM Nos.378-379/2014 & 14129/2014 VINOD KUMAR PATHAK Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Yogesh Malhotra, Adv. versus QAZI SHAMIM AHMED & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh & Mr. Rajesh Gupta, Advs. + RC.REV. 49/2014 SUBHASH CHAND GERA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. J K Bhola, Advocate versus QAZI SHAMIM AHMED & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh, Mr. Rajesh Gupta & Mr. S P Gupta, Advocates _______________________________________________________________________ CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.1. These petitions under the proviso to Section 25-B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (for short Act), impugn three separate orde...
Vinod Gahlot Vs. Air-India Ltd. and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-06-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.2662/2000 6th May, 2015 % .Petitioner VINOD GAHLOT Through: None. Versus .Respondents AIR-INDIA LTD. AND ANR. Through: None. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This case is on the Regular Board of this Court since 9.3.2015. No one appears for the petitioner when the matter is called out in the regular matters. No one appeared for the petitioner even yesterday i.e on 5.5.2015.2. By the writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner questions the actions of the employer/respondent No.1 in passing the order dated 4.4.2000 and an earlier penalty order dated 22.9.1998, the conjoint effect of which was that petitioner was not promoted to the post of Manager and he was not given ZZ category allowance w.e.f 1.1.2000. 3.(i) The petitioner was working as a Senior Check Flight Purser and on 11.3.1998 petitioner was found to have bro...
Mamta Ben Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-06-2015
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : May 06, 2015 + W.P.(C) 5085/2013 MAMTA BEN Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Vishwendra Verma, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Dev P.Bhardwaj, CGSC for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRATIBHA RANI, J.(Oral) 1. The petitioner has sought quashing of the order dated October 22, 2011 by the Disciplinary Authority imposing penalty of Removal from Service as well the order dated December 27, 2011 by the Appellate Authority and the order dated April 10, 2012 by the Revisional Authority dismissing her appeal and revision respectively.2. Brief facts relevant for the purpose of disposal of this writ petition are that the petitioner was enrolled as Constable in CISF and after completion of her training, on February 29, 2007 she was posted in BSES Unit of CISF at Delhi. Thereafter in May, 2009 she was posted in Delhi in DMRC Unit of ...
- ‹ Prev
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- Next ›
- Last »