Delhi Court May 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Southern Petrochemical Industires Corporation Ltd Vs. The Great Easter ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-12-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. 498/2013 Reserved on: April 09, 2015 Decided on: May 12, 2015 SOUTHERN PETROCHEMICAL INDUSTIRES CORPORATION LTD & ANR ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Gagan Gupta, Advocate. versus THE GREAT EASTERN SHIPPING CO. LTD .. Respondent Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Amitava Majumdar, Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta, Mr. Siddharth Ranka, Mr. Anshul Garg and Mr. Abhishek Goyal, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT % 12.05.2015 Introduction 1. The challenge in this petition filed by Southern Petrochemical Industries Corporation Ltd (SPICL) and the Government of India through the Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers (MoCF) under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) is to an award dated 10th January 2013 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal (AT) in the disputes between the parties arising out of a Charter Party (C/P) Agreement dated 10th June 1992 whereby the Respondent The Great Eastern Shipping Co...
Akram Vs. State (Nct) Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-12-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :19. h FEBRUARY, 2015 DECIDED ON :12. h MAY, 2015 + CRL.A. 300/2005 AKRAM ..... Appellant Through : Mr.G.P.Thareja, Advocate. versus STATE (NCT) DELHI Through : ..... Respondent Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The appellant Akram impugns a judgment dated 01.04.2005 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.5/04 arising out of FIR No.40/02 PS Seelampur by which he was held guilty for committing offences under Sections 376/511 IPC. By an order dated 02.04.2005, he was awarded RI for three and a half years with fine `5,000/-.2. Briefly stated, the prosecution case as reflected in the charge- sheet was that on 15.02.2002 at around 04.00 p.m. on the first floor of Ishtyaks factory, gali No.22, Zafrabad, Delhi, the appellant attempted to commit rape upon X (assumed name) aged about six years. The Investigating Officer lodged First Information Report after recording statement (Ex.PW-2/A) ...
Col. R.P.Mendiratta Vs. Sandeep Choudhary
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-12-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:12. h May, 2015 + CRL.A. 1125/2013 COL. R.P.MENDIRATTA Through: ..... Appellant Mr K.K. Manan, Mr Nipun Bhardwaj and Mr Ankush Narang, Advs. versus SANDEEP CHOUDHARY Through ..... Respondent Mr Jitendra Jain and Mr Syed Akhtar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. This is an appeal u/s 378(4) Cr.P.C filed by the appellant, feeling aggrieved by the judgment dated 26.05.2012 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate whereby the respondent/accused was acquitted in complaint case No.1291/1/10 for offence u/s 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act(hereinafter referred as NI Act), 1881.2. The appellant/complainant filed a complaint u/s 138 of NI Act inter alia on the allegations that he had given a loan of Rs. 44 lakhs to the accused in May, 2004 which was to be returned after a period of 3 months along with interest at the rate of 4% per month. The accused, however, failed to comply with the ...
Ram Sharan Das Batra Vs. Reliance Webstore Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-12-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :06.05.2015 Judgment delivered on :12.05.2015 CS(OS) 1003/2010 RAM SHARAN DAS BATRA Through ..... Plaintiff Plaintiff with his counsel Mr. L.S. Solanki and Ms. Geeta Bhardwaj, Advs. versus RELIANCE WEBSTORE LIMITED Through ..... Defendant Ms Manali Singhal and Ms. Gursimran Dhillon, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 The present suit has been filed by the plaintiff (Ram Sharan Das Batra) against defendant (Reliance Webstore Ltd.) seeking recovery of damages and losses totaling Rs.49,12,125/- besides interest and costs. 2 The case as set up by the plaintiff is that he is the absolute owner and in possession of the property bearing No.10, Block C-3, Janakpuri, New Delhi. It had a space of 1900 sq. feet. He had approached Jones Lang, LaSalle Meghraj, a property broker, to let out this vacant space. He was assured that he would get a good deal. A letter dated 21.7.2008 had been issued by the...
Nandan Mishra Vs. University of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-12-2015
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:12. 05.2015 W.P.(C) 6320/2012 NANDAN MISHRA ..... Petitioner versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Asmita Singh. For the Respondents : Mr Mohinder J.S. Rupal University. Mr Amit Bansal and Ms Seema Dalo for R-2. Mr V. Sudeer and Mr Alvin for R-4/UGC. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner is aggrieved by his name being excluded from the ad hoc panel list for the academic session 2012-13 prepared by the University of Delhi. This has led the petitioner to file the present petition, inter alia, praying that directions be issued to the University of Delhi to include the name of the petitioner in the ad hoc panel list for Department of Sanskrit.2. The petitioners name has been excluded from the ad hoc panel list as, according to the University of Delhi, the petitioners qualification of Acharya is not considered equiva...
Ashok Kumar Vs. Purshotam Lal Verma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-12-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 242/2013 and CM No.10460/2013 Reserved on:28. h April, 2015 Decided on:12. h May, 2015 % ASHOK KUMAR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sanjay Rathi, Advocate. versus PURSHOTAM LAL VERMA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Dilpreet Singh and Mr. Rajesh Sharma, Advocates. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. An eviction petition was filed by the respondent Purshotam Lal Verma under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (in short the DRC Act) seeking eviction of the tenanted premises i.e. Flat No.B-64A, Janta Flats, Raghubir Nagar, near Central School, New Delhi let out on a monthly rent of ` 12000/- per month excluding electricity and water charges to Ashok Kumar.2. Ashok Kumar filed a leave to defend application before the learned ARC which was dismissed being barred by limitation vide order dated 14 th January, 2013. Even the review petition filed by Ashok Kumar was dismissed vide order dated 20th May, 2013. I...
Krishan Gopal Agrawal and Ors. Vs. The State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi) a ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-12-2015
I-18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 12, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 1969/2015 & Crl. M.A.Nos.7010-11/2015 KRISHAN GOPAL AGRAWAL & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajiv Mishra, Advocate (proxy) with petitioners in person versus THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.. Respondents Through: Mr. Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Jitender Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.196/2014, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of the IPC, registered at police station Rani Bagh, New Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated settlement of 6th May, 2014 (Annexure-P-2), arrived at The Delhi Mediation Centre, Rohini Courts, Delhi. Notice. Mr. Karan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so by SI Jitender o...
Sameer Sandhir Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-12-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:12. h May, 2015 + CRL.MC.No.4739/2014 & Crl.M.A.No.16223/2014 SAMEER SANDHIR Through: .... Petitioner Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Senior Advocate with MS. Kanika Singh & Ms. Heena Khan, Advocates Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ...Respondent Through: Mr.Narender Mann, Special Public Prosecutor for respondent CBI with Mr. Manoj Pant & Ms.Utkarsha Kohli, Advocates and Inspector Lalit Phulara CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT1 Petitioner along with his co-accused is facing trial in CC No.03/2013, CBI Vs. Mahesh Kumar & Ors. for the offences under Sections 120-B of IPC r/w Section 7, 8 & 10 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Vide order of 27th September, 2014 respondent-CBIs application / request for sending two sealed compaq discs (M-137/13 & M-170/13) to Central Forensic Science Laboratory (henceforth referred to as the CFSL) for preparing ten copies of each of these two compaq disc Crl.M.C.No.4739/2014 Pag...
Samrat Singh Nirula and Ors. Vs. State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-12-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:12. h May, 2015 % + BAIL APPLN. 146/2015 SAMRAT SINGH NIRULA & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through Mr.Ashok Bhasin, Sr. Adv. and Mr.Vikas Pahwa, Sr. Adv. along with Mr.Abhishek Dhingra, Adv. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Mr.Satish Verma, APP for the State along with SI Janak Singh, in person. Mr.Amit Sibal, Sr. Adv. along with Mr.Atul Sharma, Mr.Manohar Malik, Mr.Nitesh Jain, Mr.Balbinder Jalar and Mr.Sunil K. Mittal, Advs. for complainant. AND + BAIL APPLN. 145/2015 DAMAN BABBAR NIRULA & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through Mr.Ashok Bhasin, Sr. Adv. and Mr.Vikas Pahwa, Sr. Adv. along with Mr.Abhishek Dhingra, Adv. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Mr.Satish Verma, APP for the State along with SI Janak Singh, in person. Mr.Harish Malhotra, Sr. Adv. along with Mr.Atul Sharma, Mr.Manohar Malik, Mr.Nitesh Jain, Mr.Balbinder Jalar and Mr.Sunil K. Mittal, Advs. for complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE M...
Meena Chaudhary @ Meena P.N. Singh Vs. Bses Rajdhani Power Limited and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-12-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:12. h May, 2015 % + CRL.M.C. 1002/2011 MEENA CHAUDHARY @ MEENA P.N. SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person. versus BSES RAJDHANI POWER LIMITED & ORS .... Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar Verma, Addl. Public Prosecutor for State. Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Standing Counsel for BSE-RPL with Mr. Deepak Pathak, Mr. Raghav Chandha, Ms. Mithu Jain, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The criminal complaint bearing CC No.133/2010, pending before the Special Electricity Court, Saket, New Delhi has been filed by the BSES/respondent No.1 against the petitioner alleging that direct theft of electricity was detected at the petitioners premises bearing No.Flat 1260, Sector D, Pocket I, Vasant Kunj, Delhi.2. It is alleged in the complaint that after the inspection of the petitioner's premises on 30th June, 2010, by a team from the Enforcement Department of the respondent no.1, duly autho...
- ‹ Prev
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- Next ›
- Last »