Delhi Court May 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Satpal Vs. Alaknanda Properties P. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-13-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: April 13, 2015 Pronounced on: May 13, 2015 + (i) CRL.M.C. 4445/2013 & Crl.M.A.15907/2013 DAULAT RAM GUPTA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Pankaj Vivek, Advocate versus ALAKNANDA PROPERTIES P. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Deepak Dhingra, Advocate + (ii) CRL.M.C. 4446/2013 & Crl.M.A.15911/2013 RAJMAL GUPTA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Pankaj Vivek, Advocate versus ALAKNANDA PROPERTIES P. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Deepak Dhingra, Advocate + (iii) CRL.M.C. 4447/2013 JAI PAL SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Pankaj Vivek, Advocate versus ALAKNANDA PROPERTIES P. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Deepak Dhingra, Advocate + (iv) CRL.M.C. 4886/2013 & Crl.M.A.17585/2013 RAMESH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Pankaj Vivek, Advocate versus ALAKNANDA PROPERTIES P. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Deepak Dhingra, Advocate + (v) CRL.M.C. 4887/2013 & Crl.M.A.17588/2013 BHARAM SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Pankaj Vivek, Advoc...
Karan Singh Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-13-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A.179/2013 Reserved on:20. h April, 2015 Date of Decision:13. 05.2015 % KARAN SINGH Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Chetan Anand, Advocate. Versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Ms.Aasha Tiwari, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J:1. Karan Singh has been convicted by the impugned judgment dated 22.8.2012 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Saket Courts, New Delhi in Sessions Case No.2/2009 (refer FIR No.508/2008, P.S.Sangam Vihar) for murdering Shravan by stabbing him. By the order of sentence dated 25.8.2012, the appellant has been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and has been ordered to pay a fine of Rs.50,000/and on failure to pay the same, to suffer simple imprisonment for one year for the offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC for short).2. The case of the prosecution according to the first information report (Ex.PW.14/A) is that one G...
Rajmal Gupta Vs. Alaknanda Properties P. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-13-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: April 13, 2015 Pronounced on: May 13, 2015 + (i) CRL.M.C. 4445/2013 & Crl.M.A.15907/2013 DAULAT RAM GUPTA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Pankaj Vivek, Advocate versus ALAKNANDA PROPERTIES P. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Deepak Dhingra, Advocate + (ii) CRL.M.C. 4446/2013 & Crl.M.A.15911/2013 RAJMAL GUPTA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Pankaj Vivek, Advocate versus ALAKNANDA PROPERTIES P. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Deepak Dhingra, Advocate + (iii) CRL.M.C. 4447/2013 JAI PAL SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Pankaj Vivek, Advocate versus ALAKNANDA PROPERTIES P. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Deepak Dhingra, Advocate + (iv) CRL.M.C. 4886/2013 & Crl.M.A.17585/2013 RAMESH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Pankaj Vivek, Advocate versus ALAKNANDA PROPERTIES P. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Deepak Dhingra, Advocate + (v) CRL.M.C. 4887/2013 & Crl.M.A.17588/2013 BHARAM SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Pankaj Vivek, Advoc...
Virender Vs. Alaknanda Properties P. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-13-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: April 13, 2015 Pronounced on: May 13, 2015 + (i) CRL.M.C. 4445/2013 & Crl.M.A.15907/2013 DAULAT RAM GUPTA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Pankaj Vivek, Advocate versus ALAKNANDA PROPERTIES P. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Deepak Dhingra, Advocate + (ii) CRL.M.C. 4446/2013 & Crl.M.A.15911/2013 RAJMAL GUPTA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Pankaj Vivek, Advocate versus ALAKNANDA PROPERTIES P. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Deepak Dhingra, Advocate + (iii) CRL.M.C. 4447/2013 JAI PAL SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Pankaj Vivek, Advocate versus ALAKNANDA PROPERTIES P. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Deepak Dhingra, Advocate + (iv) CRL.M.C. 4886/2013 & Crl.M.A.17585/2013 RAMESH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Pankaj Vivek, Advocate versus ALAKNANDA PROPERTIES P. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Deepak Dhingra, Advocate + (v) CRL.M.C. 4887/2013 & Crl.M.A.17588/2013 BHARAM SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Pankaj Vivek, Advoc...
Bijender Singh @ Titoo Vs. State of (Nct) Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-13-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:13. h May, 2015 +CRL.A. 191/2013 & Crl.M.B.No.10536/2014 BIJENDER SINGH @ TITOO Through: ..... Appellant Ms.Arundhati Katju with Mr.Ali Choudhary, Advocates versus STATE OF (NCT) DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Ms.Ritu Gauba, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State alongwith SI Neeraj Kumar from Police Station Mandawali Delhi. +CRL.A. 195/2013 & Crl.M.B.No.10793/2014 ASHOK KUMAR YADAV Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Ajit Sharma, Advocate versus STATE OF (NCT) DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Ms.Ritu Gauba, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State alongwith SI Neeraj Kumar from Police Station Mandawali Delhi. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. The appellants Bijender Singh alias Titoo and Ashok Kumar Yadav challenges the impugned judgment and order on sentence dated 22.12.2012 and 07.01.2013 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions case No.51/2011 arising out of FIR No.571/200...
Krishna Vs. Alaknanda Properties P. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-13-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: April 13, 2015 Pronounced on: May 13, 2015 + (i) CRL.M.C. 4445/2013 & Crl.M.A.15907/2013 DAULAT RAM GUPTA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Pankaj Vivek, Advocate versus ALAKNANDA PROPERTIES P. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Deepak Dhingra, Advocate + (ii) CRL.M.C. 4446/2013 & Crl.M.A.15911/2013 RAJMAL GUPTA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Pankaj Vivek, Advocate versus ALAKNANDA PROPERTIES P. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Deepak Dhingra, Advocate + (iii) CRL.M.C. 4447/2013 JAI PAL SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Pankaj Vivek, Advocate versus ALAKNANDA PROPERTIES P. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Deepak Dhingra, Advocate + (iv) CRL.M.C. 4886/2013 & Crl.M.A.17585/2013 RAMESH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Pankaj Vivek, Advocate versus ALAKNANDA PROPERTIES P. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Deepak Dhingra, Advocate + (v) CRL.M.C. 4887/2013 & Crl.M.A.17588/2013 BHARAM SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Pankaj Vivek, Advoc...
Daulat Ram Gupta Vs. Alaknanda Properties P. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-13-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: April 13, 2015 Pronounced on: May 13, 2015 + (i) CRL.M.C. 4445/2013 & Crl.M.A.15907/2013 DAULAT RAM GUPTA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Pankaj Vivek, Advocate versus ALAKNANDA PROPERTIES P. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Deepak Dhingra, Advocate + (ii) CRL.M.C. 4446/2013 & Crl.M.A.15911/2013 RAJMAL GUPTA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Pankaj Vivek, Advocate versus ALAKNANDA PROPERTIES P. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Deepak Dhingra, Advocate + (iii) CRL.M.C. 4447/2013 JAI PAL SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Pankaj Vivek, Advocate versus ALAKNANDA PROPERTIES P. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Deepak Dhingra, Advocate + (iv) CRL.M.C. 4886/2013 & Crl.M.A.17585/2013 RAMESH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Pankaj Vivek, Advocate versus ALAKNANDA PROPERTIES P. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Deepak Dhingra, Advocate + (v) CRL.M.C. 4887/2013 & Crl.M.A.17588/2013 BHARAM SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Pankaj Vivek, Advoc...
Wing Commander (Retd.) Dr. Bnp Singh Vs. Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-12-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:12. h May, 2015 % + W.P.(C) 1318/2014 & CM No.2742/2014 (for stay) WING COMMANDER (RETD.) DR. BNP SINGH ......Petitioner Through: Mr. Sitab Ali Chaudhary, Adv. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Kirtiman Singh with Mr. W.A. Noor, Advs. for UOI. Mr. B.K. Das, Adv. for R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, filed as a Public Interest Litigation (PIL), pleads: (i) that the respondent No.4 Quality Council of India (QCI) was set up in the year 1997 as an autonomous body, by the Govt. of India and the Indian Industry represented by the three premier Industry Associations i.e. the Associated Chambers of Commerce and Industry of India (ASSOCHAM), the Confederation of India Industry (CII) and the Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FICCI), to establish and operate natio...
Glaxo Group Ltd. and Anr. Vs. S.D. Garg and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-12-2015
$~R-3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:12. 05.2015 + CS(OS) 12/2006 GLAXO GROUP LTD. & ANR. Through: ..... Plaintiffs Mr. Manav Kumar, Adv. versus S.D. GARG & ORS. Through: ..... Defendants Mr. Inder Deep Singh, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.1. This suit seeks permanent injunction against infringement of the trademarks ZANTAC and ZINETAC and their passing-off by the defendants. Plaintiff No.1 is a company incorporated under the laws of the United Kingdom while plaintiff No.2 was incorporated in India in 1924 under the name of H.J.Foster & Co. It became a wholly owned subsidiary of Joseph Nathan & Co. in 1926. In October 2001, plaintiff No.2 was renamed as GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals Ltd, following the merger with SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals (India) with Glaxo India Limited.2. Plaintiff No.1 is the owner of the trademarks ZINETAC and ZANTAC, which were registered in the year 1985 and 1981 respectively. The trademarks are...
State of Nct of Delhi Vs. Mohd. Hassan @ Abu Qasim and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-12-2015
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl. Appeal No.1618/2013 Reserved on: Date of Decision: % 3rd February, 2015 12th May, 2015 STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Appellant Through Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP Versus MOHD. HASSAN @ ABU QASIM & ORS. Respondents Through Mr. N.D. Pancholi, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr. M.S. Khan & Mr. Akram Khan, Advocates for respondent No.2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.The Government of NCT of Delhi in this appeal questions and challenges acquittal of Mohd. Hassan @ Abu Qasim and Shafaquat Iqbal, from charges under Sections 121/121A/122/123/120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC, for short), Sections 4 and 5 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908, Sections 17, 18, 20 and 23 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 in FIR No.28/2007, Police Station Special Cell, Lodhi Colony, New Delhi. The appeal does not dispute the acquittal of Shabbir Ahmed in terms of the amended memo of parties and ...
- ‹ Prev
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- Next ›
- Last »