Delhi Court May 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kb Watts Vs. Vipin Kalra
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-15-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:10. h April, 2015 Decided on:15. h May, 2015 % + CM(M) 390/2012 & CMs. 6037/2012, 5947/2014 KB WATTS Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Sameer Abhyankar, Adv. versus VIPIN KALRA Through + ..... Respondent Mr. A.K. Singhla, Sr. Adv. with Mr. M.L. Bhargava, Mr. S. Jaswal, Advs. RC.REV. 329/2012 & CMs. 12388/2012, 13889/2014 KB WATTS Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Sameer Abhyankar, Adv. versus VIPIN KALRA Through ..... Respondent Mr. A.K. Singhla, Sr. Adv. with Mr. M.L. Bhargava, Mr. S. Jaswal, Advs. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Since the facts in the present petitions are common the petitions are being disposed of by a common order. Vipin Kalra became the owner of suit property No.II-D/33, Lajpat Nagar, New Delhi 110024 in the year 2003. In the said property Dr. K.B. Watts was a tenant in respect of one shop measuring 22 x 7-6 at a monthly rent of `330/- per month on the ground floor. Two eviction petitions were fi...
M/S Sukumar Chand Jain Vs. Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure D ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-15-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: May 15, 2015 + O.M.P. 81/2015, IAs 949-950/2015 M/S SUKUMAR CHAND JAIN Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Sandeep Sharma, Adv. with Ms.Risha Mittal, Adv. versus DELHI STATE INDUSTRIAL & INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Amiet Andlay, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.(Oral) I.A No.949/2015 Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. I.A No.950/2015 This is an application seeking condonation of one day delay in filing the petition. For the reasons stated in the application, and the learned counsel for the respondent has no objection, the delay in filing the petition is condoned. Application stands disposed of. O.M.P. 81/2015 1. The challenge in this petition is to the award dated September 16, 2014 to the extent that the learned Arbitrator has rejected claim Nos. 1,3,5,6 and 7 of the petitioner. The petitioner had raised the...
M/S Trinity Auto Components Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-15-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:07. 05.2015 PRONOUNCED ON:15. 05.2015 % + W.P. (C) 2639/2015, CM No.4729/2015 M/S TRINITY AUTO COMPONENTS LTD. Petitioner Through: Ms. Henna George & Ms. Purti Marwaha, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. Respondents Through: Mr. Ashish Dholakia and Ms. Shradha Bhargava, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Joy Savla and Mr. Abhiman Sharma, Advocates for respondent Ex-Promoter (Deepanker Basu). CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. GAUBA S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.1. In this proceeding under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, an order of the Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (AAIFR) constituted under Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 (SICA) dated 6.2.2015 in Appeal No.207/2014 has been impugned. Though the AAIFR set aside the order of the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) dated 14.10.2014 partly, the petitioner is aggrieved to the extent of t...
All India Ex-Servicemen Bank Employees Federation Vs. The Chairman Sta ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-15-2015
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:15. h May, 2015 + LPA No.201/2014, CM No.4059/2014 (for condonation of 275 days delay in filing the appeal, CM No.8759/2014 (for stay) & CM No.5189/2015 (for directions). ALL INDIA EX-SERVICEMEN BANK EMPLOYEES FEDERATION (REGD.) .. Appellant Through: Mr. Rakesh Tiku, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sanjay Mani Tripathi, Mr. Kamal Kant Tripathi & Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Advs. Versus THE CHAIRMAN STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS. .. Respondents Through: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rajiv Kapur, Adv. CORAM :HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. This intra-court appeal impugns the judgment dated 22nd April, 2013 of the learned Single Judge of dismissal of W.P.(C) No.2533/2013 preferred by the appellant.2. Notice of the appeal as well as the application for condonation of delay was issued. A reply has been filed on behalf of the respondents opposing the application for condonation of delay of 275 ...
Sanjeev Saxena Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-15-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:27. h April, 2015 Date of Decision:15. h May, 2015 % + CRL.M.C. No.223/2014 SANJEEV SAXENA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Ajay Burman, Advocate. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through: .....Respondent Mr. Navin Sharma, APP for the State with SI Vijender Singh, STF/ Crime Branch. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH JUDGMENT1 By way of the present petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C.), the petitioner has assailed the order dated 22.11.2013 passed by learned Special Judge, (P.C. Act)-05 (ACB), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi whereby charge under Section 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act (for short, PC Act) was framed against the petitioner in case FIR No.14/2009 under Section 12 of PC Act read with Section 120B of Indian Penal Code (IPC, for short) registered at P.S. Crime Branch, Delhi.2. Succinctly stating the facts of the present case as per the prosecution are th...
Home Cable Network Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Media Pro Enterprise India Pvt. Ltd. ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-15-2015
$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4754/2015 HOME CABLE NETWORK PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Varun Mathur & Mr Lalit Valecha, Advs. versus % MEDIA PRO ENTERPRISE INDIA PVT LTD & ORS. ..... Respondents Through CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER ORDER1505.2015 CM No.8602/2015 (Exemption) 1. Allowed subject to just exceptions. WP(C) 4754/2015 & CM No.8601/2015 (Stay) 2. This is a petition by which challenge is laid to the order dated 01.05.2015, passed by the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT). 2.1 The principal grievance of the petitioner is that, the TDSAT relied upon the report of an expert authority, i.e., Broadcasting Engineering Consultants India Ltd. (in short BECIL) dated 15.04.2015; albeit erroneously. To be noted, BECIL was appointed by TDSAT to conduct an audit of the petitioners network and submit a report to it, in respect of CDs provided by both, the petitioner as well as respondent No.2 and 3.2. Briefly, the alleg...
Bijender Singh Bhati Vs. State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-15-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:15. h May, 2015 % + CRL.M.C. 5306/2014 MANJIT SINGH BHATI Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Aditya Sharma, Adv. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through Ms.Jasbir Kaur, APP for the State along with SI Dinesh Kumar, PS Jyoti Nagar, in person. Mr.Pramod Kumar, Adv. with Mr.Arvind Kumar, Adv. for R-2. + CRL.M.C. 5284/2014 BIJENDER SINGH BHATI Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Aditya Sharma, Adv. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through Ms.Jasbir Kaur, APP for the State along with SI Dinesh Kumar, PS Jyoti Nagar, in person. Mr.Pramod Kumar, Adv. with Mr.Arvind Kumar, Adv. for R-2. + CRL.M.C. 5296/2014 SANTOSH SINGH BHATI Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Aditya Sharma, Adv. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through Ms.Jasbir Kaur, APP for the State along with SI Dinesh Kumar, PS Jyoti Nagar, in person. Mr.Pramod Kumar, Adv. with Mr.Arvind Kumar, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANM...
Manjit Singh Bhati Vs. State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-15-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:15. h May, 2015 % + CRL.M.C. 5306/2014 MANJIT SINGH BHATI Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Aditya Sharma, Adv. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through Ms.Jasbir Kaur, APP for the State along with SI Dinesh Kumar, PS Jyoti Nagar, in person. Mr.Pramod Kumar, Adv. with Mr.Arvind Kumar, Adv. for R-2. + CRL.M.C. 5284/2014 BIJENDER SINGH BHATI Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Aditya Sharma, Adv. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through Ms.Jasbir Kaur, APP for the State along with SI Dinesh Kumar, PS Jyoti Nagar, in person. Mr.Pramod Kumar, Adv. with Mr.Arvind Kumar, Adv. for R-2. + CRL.M.C. 5296/2014 SANTOSH SINGH BHATI Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Aditya Sharma, Adv. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through Ms.Jasbir Kaur, APP for the State along with SI Dinesh Kumar, PS Jyoti Nagar, in person. Mr.Pramod Kumar, Adv. with Mr.Arvind Kumar, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANM...
Santosh Singh Bhati Vs. State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-15-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:15. h May, 2015 % + CRL.M.C. 5306/2014 MANJIT SINGH BHATI Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Aditya Sharma, Adv. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through Ms.Jasbir Kaur, APP for the State along with SI Dinesh Kumar, PS Jyoti Nagar, in person. Mr.Pramod Kumar, Adv. with Mr.Arvind Kumar, Adv. for R-2. + CRL.M.C. 5284/2014 BIJENDER SINGH BHATI Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Aditya Sharma, Adv. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through Ms.Jasbir Kaur, APP for the State along with SI Dinesh Kumar, PS Jyoti Nagar, in person. Mr.Pramod Kumar, Adv. with Mr.Arvind Kumar, Adv. for R-2. + CRL.M.C. 5296/2014 SANTOSH SINGH BHATI Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Aditya Sharma, Adv. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through Ms.Jasbir Kaur, APP for the State along with SI Dinesh Kumar, PS Jyoti Nagar, in person. Mr.Pramod Kumar, Adv. with Mr.Arvind Kumar, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANM...
Commissioner of Value Added Tax Vs. M/S Abhishek Electricals
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-15-2015
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on: May 15, 2015 + ST.APPL. 33/2009 COMMISSIONER OF VALUE ADDED TAX Through: None. ..... Petitioner versus M/S ABHISHEK ELECTRICALS ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Latika Choudhury Adv. for Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. GAUBA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. This appeal was originally dismissed following this Courts previous Division Benchs ruling in Commissioner of Central Excise v. M/s Kandhari Radio & Ors., CEAC No.6/2007 decided on 22.04.2009. The rationale for dismissing the appeal was that the High Court was not empowered to entertain a delayed appeal and it did not specifically assess the reason for delay in filing of the appeal. After the said decision, the provisions of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 (hereinafter referred to as the DVAT Act) were amended by insertion of two provisos to Section 81(2)(a). The second proviso provided, inter alia, ...
- ‹ Prev
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- Next ›
- Last »