Delhi Court May 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Pankaj Verma Vs. Brandhouse Retails Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-18-2015
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:18. 05.2015 + CS(OS) 791/2010 PANKAJ VERMA Through ..... Plaintiff Mr. T.K. Tiwari, Advocate for Mr. Abhay Kumar Verma, Advocate along with plaintiff in person VERSUS BRANDHOUSE RETAILS LTD. Through ..... Defendant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. This is a suit for recovery of Rs.28,21,629/-. Issues were framed on 17.04.2012. The defendant was proceeded ex parte on 18.02.2015 and its counter claim bearing No.96/2010 was dismissed for nonprosecution. Accordingly, issue Nos. 3, 4, 5 & 6, where the onus of proof is on the defendant, are irrelevant and can be disregarded. Since Issue No.2 is with respect to the jurisdiction of this Court, it is being dealt with first. Issue No.2: Whether this Court has the territorial jurisdiction to entertain and try the suit?. OPP1 The learned counsel for the plaintiff relies upon Section 20(c) of the CPC to contend that since a part of the cause of action a...
Deepshikha Vs. Medical Council of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-15-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:15. 05.2015 + W.P.(C) 4218/2014 DEEPSHIKHA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. S.K. Rungta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Prashant Singh, Adv. Versus + MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. T. Singhdev, Adv. for R-1. Mr. B.S. Shukla, CGSC for R-2. Mr. Atul Kumar, Adv. for R-3. Mr. Vikram Jetly, Adv. for R-4. W.P.(C) 4344/2014 RAVI CHAUBEY Through: Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Bhupesh Narula Adv. ..... Respondents Mr. Sanjeev Narula, CGSC with Mr. Sunil Dalal & Mr. Ajay Sondhi, Adv. for R-1/UOI. Mr. T. Singhdev, Adv. for R-2. Mr. Atul Kumar, Adv. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW JUDGMENT Ms.G.ROHINI, CHIEF JUSTICE1 The Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) issued a notification proposing to conduct All India Pre-Medical/Pre-Dental Entrance Test (AIPMT-2014) for admission to MBBS and Dental courses in the Government Medical Colleges for the Acad...
State Vs. Bhupinder Singh Bisht and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-15-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :20. h MARCH, 2015 DECIDED ON :15. h MAY, 2015 + CRL.REV.P. 162/2014 & Crl.M.A.4214/2014 STATE ..... Petitioner Through : Mr.Atul Kumar Shrivastava, SPP. Insp.Vijay and Insp.Jitender, Crime Branch. Versus BHUPINDER SINGH BISHT & ORS. ..... Respondents Through : Mr.Manu Sharma, Advocate with Mr.Abhir Datt and Ms.Ridhima Mandhar, Advocates for R1,R5 & R6. Mr.Sushil Bajaj, Advocate with Mr.Harsh Bora, Advocate for R2 & R3. Ms.Rebecca M.John, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Vishal Gosain, Ms.Rudrani Tyagi & Mr.Nikhil Ahjuja, Advocates for R4 & R12. Mr.R.S.Malik, Advocate with Mr.Sahil Malik, Advocate for R7. Mr.R.S.Yadav, Advocate for R8. Mr.K.K.Manan, Advocate with Mr.Nipun Bhardwaj and Mr.Ankush Narang, Advocates for R11. Ms.Rebecca M.John, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Kushdeep Gaur, Advocate for R13 to R18. Ms.Rebecca M.John, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Bhavook Chauhan, Advocate for R19 & R20. AND + CRL.REV.P. 298/2014 & Crl.M.A.8062/2014 (Stay) NARENDER KUMAR A...
Star India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Telecom Regulatory Authority of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-15-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.M.No.8130/2015 in W.P.(C) 5161/2014 Reserved on:06. 05.2015 Pronounced on:15. 05.2015 STAR INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Dr.A.M.Singhvi, Mr.Amit Sibal, Sr.Advs. along with Mr.Saikrishna Rajagopal, Mr.Sidharth Chopra, Mr.Gopal Singh, Ms.Savni Dutt, Mr.L.Ahmed, Advs. Versus TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Amit Kapoor , Adv. for TRAI. Mr.Ramji Srinivasan, Sr.Adv. with Ms.Rukmini Bobde, Mr.Kumar Shashank, Ms.Aakanksha Nehra, Ms.Sara Sundaram, Mr.Rishabh, Adv. for R-2/FHRAI. Mr.Ravi Sikri, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Gaurav Goyal, Ms.Divyangana Singh, Advs. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW JUDGMENT MS.G.ROHINI, CHIEF JUSTICE C.M.No.8130/2015 (stay) 1. This application is filed by the writ petitioner with a prayer to stay the operation of (i) the Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable Services) Interconnection (Eighth Amendment) Regulation, 2014 dated 18.07.2014...
Ircon International Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-15-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:19. 03.2015 PRONOUNCED ON:15. 05.2015 % + ITA372000 IRCON INTERNATIONAL LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. V.Giri, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Tanmay Mehta, Advocate. versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kamal Sawhney, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Basabraj Chakraborty and Mr. Shikhar Garg, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. GAUBA JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The question of law which arises in this appeal, under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter the Act) is:Whether the assessees claim that there was a loss and/or it was a capital loss is legally tenable2. The order impugned in this case was made by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) on 19.04.1999, dismissing ITA ITA372000 Page 1 4486/Del/1998. The impugned order upheld the concurrent findings of the AO and the CIT (A) with respect to the amounts accruing, during the assessment year, t...
Shadab Shakil Vs. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-15-2015
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:15. 05.2015 W.P.(C) 7308/2012 SHADAB SHAKIL ..... Petitioner versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY AND ANR. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Biswajit & Mr Manoj Gupta. For the Respondents : Mr Vaibhav Kalra for R-1. Mr Ankit Jain for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner claims to have completed the four years course of Bachelor of Technology (Electrical and Electronics Engineering) (hereafter B.Tech (EEE)) during the academic sessions 2004-2008. However, the provisional certificate issued by the respondent No.1 University (hereafter the University) indicates that the petitioner completed the degree course in May, 2010. This has led the petitioner to file the present petition, inter alia, praying that the provisional certificate issued by the University be corrected. In addition, the petitioner is also aggrieved by the c...
Ram Niwas @ Kalu Vs. State (Govt of Nct) of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-15-2015
$~ 5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 939/2013 Judgment dated 15th May, 2015 % RAM NIWAS @ KALU ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Chetan Anand, Advocate versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT) OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.1. The appellant has filed the present appeal under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment dated 05.12.2012 by which the appellant has been convicted under Section 302/201/34 of the Indian Penal Code and the order on sentence dated 10.12.2012 by which the appellant has been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and pay fine of Rs.10,000/- for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC, in default thereof further undergo simple imprisonment for six months. The appellant has also been sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of three years and pay fine of Rs.5,000/- for the offence und...
Public Works Department and Anr Vs. Ashok Kumar and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-15-2015
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:15. h May, 2015 % + LPA No.71/2015 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT & ANR. .. Appellants Through: Ms. Zubeda Begum with Ms. Sana Ansari & Ms. Vanessa Singh, Advs. Versus ASHOK KUMAR & ANR. Through: .. Respondents Mr. Ram Kumar, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Adv. with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Adv. for LAC. CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. This intra-court appeal impugns the judgment dated 4th August, 2014 of the learned Single Judge of this Court allowing W.P.(C) No.7649/2011 filed by the respondent No.1 by directing the appellants to restore possession of land bearing Khasra No.561/421 and thereafter changed to Khasra No.414 to the respondent No.1 / writ petitioner, ignoring the numbers of the khasras being Khasra No.561/421 or new Khasra No.414. The appeal is accompanied with an application for condonation of 159 days delay in filing thereof.2. Notice of the appeal as well as applica...
Anoop Tariyal Vs. State Bank of Patiala and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-15-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.4642/2015 15th May, 2015 % ANOOP TARIYAL Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Asish Nischal, Advocate. Versus STATE BANK OF PATIALA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rajiv Kapur, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner questions the orders passed against him by the departmental authorities; Disciplinary Authority dated 28.3.2014 and the Appellate Authority dated 30.7.2014; imposing the punishment of dismissal from service upon the petitioner. Petitioner was issued a charge-sheet on 18.5.2013 containing five charges. The main charge against the petitioner was that he illegally debited the accounts of the customers and credited the accounts of his family members. W.P.(C) No.4642 /2015 Therefore, there were fraudulent and Page 1 of 8 unauthorized withdrawals from the custo...
Sagar Apartment Flat Owners Scty Vs. Sequoia Const P.Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-15-2015
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :29. 4.2015 Pronounced on:15. 05.2015 + CS(OS) 3967/1992 SAGAR APARTMENT FLAT OWNERS SCTY. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sheetesh Khanna, Advocate versus SEQUOIA CONST P.LTD. ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Tuhin with Mr. A.K. Vali, Advocate for Defendant No.5 and 6 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.CCP (O) 134/2014 1. In this contempt petition, notice has been issued only to respondent nos. 5 and 6. By the present petition, it is urged that respondents have disobeyed the order of the court dated 15.04.2014 by which application of plaintiff No.1, IA No.14238/2013 was disposed of. It is urged that by the said order the Receiver appointed by this Court was discharged and in view of the changed circumstances the Receiver was directed to hand over the records to plaintiff No.1.2. It is stated that the respondents are indulging in various acts disregarding the directions and refusing to comply with the order relieving...
- ‹ Prev
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- Next ›
- Last »