Delhi Court May 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Smt. Nirmala Devi Vs. Directorate of Education and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-18-2015
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.3575/2015 & CM.No.6367/2015 18th May, 2015 % SMT. NIRMALA DEVI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Dinesh Singh Chaudhary, Advocate. versus DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms.Nikhita Khetrapal, Advocate for R1. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India petitioner seeks appointment with the respondent no.2/School as a Water Woman in terms of the selection process conducted in the year 2008. Be it noted that the writ petition is filed after about seven years in April, 2015.2. Petitioners case is that a fraud has been played upon her because she had applied for and was selected to the post of Water Woman in the OBC category pursuant to the advertisement issued on 09.3.2008, but instead of the petitioner being given the appointment, the respondent no.3 was given appointment ...
Smt Praveen Sharma Vs. Shri Jai Prakash Sharma and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-18-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 1339/2013 & CM198892013 (stay) Reserved on:17. h April, 2015 Decided on:18. h May, 2015 % SMT PRAVEEN SHARMA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Rajat Aneja, Ms. Rashmi Verma and Mr. Kartikeya Bhargava, Advocates. versus SHRI JAI PRAKASH SHARMA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Sharma, Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 and 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 Aggrieved by the order dated 26th October, 2013 whereby the application of the Petitioner under Order XXIII Rule 1 (3) (b) CPC was dismissed the Petitioner prefers the present petition.2. The Petitioner Smt. Praveen Sharma filed a suit against Jai Prakash Sharma, his wife Asha Sharma and Ms. Ashima Sharma, the Defendants and Respondents herein seeking mandatory injunction and directions to the Defendants to vacate and hand over the possession in respect of one room on first floor of property No.H-34, Rajouri Garden, New Delhi being owner of half portion of property No.H-34,...
Kamal Thakur and Ors. Vs. State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-18-2015
$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 18, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2062/2015 & Crl.M.A.7340/2015 KAMAL THAKUR & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Puneet Singhal, DHCLSC Panel Advocate versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.180/2014 under Sections 498-A/406/34 of IPC registered at police station Subzi Mandi, New Delhi is sought on the basis of Settlement Deed of 6th May, 2015 (Annexure-2) and the fact that petitioner-husband and respondent No.2-wife are happily living together since April, 2014. Notice. Mr. Karan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is identified to be the complainant/first-informant of the FIR CRL.M.C. 2062/2015 Page 1 in question by him on the basis of ...
Mohd Arif Vs. M/S Dnd Buildcon and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-18-2015
21 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 2989/2014 & I.As. 19103/2014, 1364-1365/2015 MOHD ARIF ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Gaurav Mitra, Advocate with Mr. N. Raja Singh, Advocate. versus M/S DND BUILDCON & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Himanshu Bohara, Advocate for Mr. S.P. Aggarwal, Advocate for defendants No.3 and 4. Mr. R.M. Sinha, Advocate for defendants No.5 and 6. Mr. Yogesh Kumar Rana, Advocate for defendants No.7 and 8. Mr. Sarvesh Rai, Advocate for Mr. Ankit Jain, Advocate for defendant No.9. Date of Decision :18. h May, 2015 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present suit has been filed for specific performance, damages, mandatory and permanent injunction.2. On 26th September, 2014, this Court granted an ex parte ad interim CS(OS) 2989/2014 Page 1 of 7 injunction order restraining the defendants from selling, alienating, transferring or parting with possession of suit property i.e. second floor of the property bearing N...
Ramesh Vs. State (Nct of Delhi) and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-18-2015
$~41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 18, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2097/2015 RAMESH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. P.K. Shrivastava, Advocate versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Surender Singh Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.435/2008 under Sections 498-A/406/34 of IPC registered at police station Bindapur, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of respondent No.2 and the fact that petitioner-husband and respondent No.2-wife are happily living together since 25th July, 2014. Notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is identified to be the complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question by SI Surender Singh on the basis of identity proof produced by her. CRL.M.C. 2097/2015 Page 1 Respond...
Ved Pal Vs. State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-18-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:18. h May, 2015 + CRL.A. 75/2012 & Crl. M.B. 901/14 VED PAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Nitin Sangra and Mr. Vishnu Dutt Sharma, Advocates versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP along with SI M.P. Saini, PS Mahendra Park CRL.A.830/2012 & Crl.M.B.3243/15 ANIL @ RAJU @ ANU ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Gautam Chakraverty and Mr. Manoranjan Gaur, Advocate Kumar Vaibhav, Advocate for Mr. Sidharth Aggarwal, Advocate (DHCLSC) versus STATE Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP along with SI M.P. Saini, PS Mahendra Park CRL.A. 817/2013 & Crl. M.B. No.10001/14 SHAILESH PANDEY ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Vivek Sood and Mr. Prem Prakash, Advocates versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through: Crl.A.Nos.75/2012, 830/2012 and 817/2013 ..... Respondent Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP along with SI CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. Vide this common judgment, I shall dispose of C...
Salim @ Amir S/O Late Mustafa Vs. The State (Govt. of Nct) Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-18-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:18. h May, 2015 + CRL.A. 1322/2013 & Crl.M.B.2103/2013 (suspension of sentence) SALIM @ AMIR S/O LATE MUSTAFA ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Sushant Mehra, Advocate versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.O.P.Saxena, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State alongwith SI Suresh Pal from Police Station Jama Masjid, Delhi. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment dated 10.07.2013 and order on sentence dated 12.07.2013 vide which the appellant Salim alias Amir was convicted for offence under Section 376 IPC and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 7 years in addition to payment of fine of Rs.5000/- in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for one year.2. The prosecution case, as borne out from the chargesheet, is that on 14.02.2011 at about 10.15 pm on receipt of information about commission of rape upon...
Ankit Bansal and Ors. Vs. State of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-18-2015
I- 25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 18, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2060/2015 & Crl. M.A.No.7334/2015 ANKIT BANSAL & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Puneet Khurana, Advocate versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Vinod Diwakar, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with ASI Rajnessh Mr. Abdul Salim, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.441/2009, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of the IPC, registered at police station Prashant Vihar, Delhi is sought in this petition. Notice. Mr. Vinod Diwakar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and Mr.Abdul Salim, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/firstCrl. M.C.No.2060/2015 Page 1 informant of the FIR in question and she has been identi...
Executive Director, School of Open Learning, Unive Vs. Arjun Deo Batra ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-18-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2402/2015 Date of decision:18. h May, 2015 % EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, SCHOOL OF OPEN LEARNING, UNIVERSITY OF DELHI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.G.K. Pathak, Adv. versus ARJUN DEO BATRA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: None for R-1. Mr.Apoorv Kurup & Mr.Rohit Rathi, Advs. for R-4/UGC. Mr.Ajay Digpaul, Adv. for R-5 & 6. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH VED PRAKASH VAISH, J.(ORAL) CM No.8343/2015 The application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CM No.8792/2015 This is an application under Order VI Rule 17 read with Section 151 CPC for bringing on record the amended memo of parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to inadvertence, the petition was filed by University of Delhi instead of Executive Director, School of Open Learning, University of Delhi. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for taking on record amended memo of parties. For the reasons mentioned i...
Shri Sant Kumar Jain Vs. State Govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-18-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:18. h May, 2015 + W.P.(CRL) 638/2015 SHRI SANT KUMAR JAIN ..... Petitioner Through: versus Mr Shiv Charan Garg, Adv. STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR Through: ..... Respondent Ms Rajdipa Behura, ASC for State alongwith Ms Monica Gupta, Adv. alongwith Sub Inspector Pawan Kumar Police Station Bindapur, Delhi Mr Deepak Jain, Adv. for the respondent no.2 alongwith the respondent no.2 in person % CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 482 Cr.PC moved by the petitioner for quashing of FIR No.954 /2014 registered at Police Station Bindapur, Delhi under Sections 376/511/506/451/380/34 IPC and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom on the ground that the parties have compromised the matter.2. The FIR in the instant case was registered on the basis of a complaint made by respondent No.2/complainant Ms. Arti Sharma alleging therei...
- ‹ Prev
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- Next ›
- Last »