Delhi Court May 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Sidvi Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Sh. Ravinder Sethi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2015
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA(OS) 101/2014 & CMs No.11089/2014 & 7876/2015 Date of decision:29. h May, 2015 % M/S SIDVI ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Harish Katyal, Ms. Vinny Shangloo & Ms. Renuka Katyal, Advs. versus SH. RAVINDER SETHI & ORS .... Respondents Through: Mr. Abhay Narula, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI GITA MITTAL, J.(Oral) C.M. No.7876/2015 1. This application has been filed seeking discharge of the Vakalatnama by the counsel for the appellant. It is submitted that no instructions have been received from Sh. Sapan Dhawan, Managing Director of the appellant company to prosecute the present appeal. Notice was issued by counsel on his last known address as well as to the registered address of the appellant company.2. It is submitted that on 25th May, 2015, Sh. Sapan Dhawan filed an affidavit with his objections under Order 22 Rule 6 CPC, in the case entitled Renuka Katyal vs. Sapan Dhawan...
L.S.Monga Karta of Vs. M/S Harvik Brothers (India)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 175/2014 Reserved on:6. h May, 2015 % Decided on:29. h May, 2015 L.S.MONGA KARTA OF L.S.MONGA & SONS HUF Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Vineet Chadha, Advocate. versus M/S HARVIK BROTHERS (INDIA) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. B.L. Chawla, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 Aggrieved by the order dated 19th February, 2014 dismissing the eviction petition filed by the Petitioner under Section 14 (1) (e) and Section 25B of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (in short the DRC Act) against the Respondent, the Petitioner prefers the present petition.2. Shri L.S. Monga the Petitioner/Landlord and Karta of L.S. Monga and Sons HUF claims himself to be the owner of the premises Shop No.73, South Patel Nagar, New Delhi-110008 which was let out to the Respondent M/s Harvik Brothers (India) Ltd., (in short M/s Harvik) a partnership firm for commercial purposes. The tenanted shop had been let out by the previous owner wherein car and sc...
M/S Airworth Travel and Tours Pvt. Ltd. Vs. International Air Transpor ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:22. d May, 2015 Judgment Pronounced on:29. h May, 2015 OMP (I) 28/2015 M/S AIRWORTH TRAVEL & TOURS PVT. LTD. .... Petitioner Through: Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Saket Sikri, Ms. Ekta Kalra Sikri, Mr. Vikalp Mudgal & Mr. Aditya Sikka, Advs. versus INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION .... Respondent Through: Mr. Gopal Jain, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Meenakshi Sood & Mr. Vidur Bhatia, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.1. By this order, I shall dispose of the application/petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed with the prayer to restrain the respondent from invoking Bank Guarantee dated 24.12.2012 amounting Rs.4.10 crores, insurance cover amounting to Rs.14,28,72,000/- and directing the respondent to revoke the notice of default dated 16.02.2015.2. In the petition, it is averred that the petitioner is a private limited company incorporated under the Companies Act and is...
M/S Shree Laxmi Trading Corporation and Ors. Vs. M/S Pec Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:29. h May, 2015 % + CRL.M.C. NO.1509/2015 & CRL.M.A. NOS. 5553/2015 M/S SHREE LAXMI TRADING CORPORATION & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through Ms.Shanta Devi Raman, Adv. with Mr. Garud M.V., Adv versus M/S PEC LTD. ..... Respondent Through None CRL.M.C. NO.1949/2015 & CRL.M.A. NOS.6961/2015 M/S SHREE LAXMI TRADING CORPORATION & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through Ms.Shanta Devi Raman, Adv. with Mr. Garud M.V., Adv versus M/S PEC LTD. ..... Respondent Through None CRL.M.C. NO.1951/2015 & CRL.M.A. NOS.6965/2015 M/S SHREE LAXMI TRADING CORPORATION & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through Ms.Shanta Devi Raman, Adv. with Mr. Garud M.V., Adv versus M/S PEC LTD. ..... Respondent Through None CRL.M.C. NO.1952/2015 & CRL.M.A. NOS.6967/2015 M/S SHREE LAXMI TRADING CORPORATION & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through Ms.Shanta Devi Raman, Adv. with Mr. Garud M.V., Adv versus M/S PEC LTD. ..... Respondent Through None CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMO...
Mukesh @ Bittoo Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on 22.05.2015 Judgment delivered on 29.05.2015 + Crl. A. 660/1999 ROHIT BANSAL ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Rajeev Gaur Naseem, Advocate. Versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for the State + Crl. A. 661/1999 BALBIR @ BALLI ..... Appellant Through : Mr. M. L. Yadav, Advocate. Versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for the State + Crl. A. 677/1999 ANIL RAWAT & ORS. ..... Appellants Through : Mr. M. L. Yadav, Advocate. Versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for the State + Crl. A. 678/1999 MUKESH @ BITTOO ..... Appellants Through : Mr. Rajeev Gaur Naseem, Advocate. Versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for the State + Crl. A. 692/1999 PARVEEN KUMAR Through : ..... Appellant Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Senior Advocate with Ms. Aeshna Dahiya, Advocate. Versus STATE Through : ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for the State C...
Mahinder Kaur and Anr. Vs. Pamela Manmohan Singh and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:14. 11.2014 Date of Decision:29. 05.2015 + CM(M) 572/2011 & CM No.9312/2011 MAHINDER KAUR & ANR. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Praveen Kumar, Adv. versus PAMELA MANMOHAN SINGH & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Mahender Rana, Adv. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, impugns an order dated 05.02.2011 (hereafter impugned order) passed by the Additional District Judge (for short Appellate Court), whereby the petitioners application under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 (for short Act) was dismissed. Consequently, the petitioners appeal also, bearing No.RCA No.7/2010, against the order dated 30.03.2006 passed by the learned Civil Judge, was dismissed as barred by limitation. Background facts 2. The respondents, being Decree Holders (for short DHs) in Suit No.1080/79, had sought execution of the same. The petitioners resisted the same...
Noorjadi Khatoon and Anr. Vs. Pintu Yadav and Ors (United India Insura ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2015
$-15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:29. h May, 2015 + MAC.APP. 458/2015 NOORJADI KHATOON & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Rupika Singh, Adv. for Mr. Navneet Goyal, Adv. versus PINTU YADAV & ORS (UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Adv. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The instant appeal is directed against the judgment dated 02.01.2015 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby compensation of `23,24,314/- was awarded in favour of the Appellants for the death of their bachelor son Mohd. Sarwar Ali Siddiqui, who suffered fatal injuries in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 05.08.2013.2. The short ground raised in the instant appeal is that sum of `5,00,000/which was received by the legal representatives of the deceased Mohd. Sarwar Ali Siddiqui on account of Group Accident Insurance Policy taken by the employer is not liable to be de...
Parveen Kumar Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on 22.05.2015 Judgment delivered on 29.05.2015 + Crl. A. 660/1999 ROHIT BANSAL ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Rajeev Gaur Naseem, Advocate. Versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for the State + Crl. A. 661/1999 BALBIR @ BALLI ..... Appellant Through : Mr. M. L. Yadav, Advocate. Versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for the State + Crl. A. 677/1999 ANIL RAWAT & ORS. ..... Appellants Through : Mr. M. L. Yadav, Advocate. Versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for the State + Crl. A. 678/1999 MUKESH @ BITTOO ..... Appellants Through : Mr. Rajeev Gaur Naseem, Advocate. Versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for the State + Crl. A. 692/1999 PARVEEN KUMAR Through : ..... Appellant Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Senior Advocate with Ms. Aeshna Dahiya, Advocate. Versus STATE Through : ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for the State C...
Rohit Bansal Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on 22.05.2015 Judgment delivered on 29.05.2015 + Crl. A. 660/1999 ROHIT BANSAL ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Rajeev Gaur Naseem, Advocate. Versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for the State + Crl. A. 661/1999 BALBIR @ BALLI ..... Appellant Through : Mr. M. L. Yadav, Advocate. Versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for the State + Crl. A. 677/1999 ANIL RAWAT & ORS. ..... Appellants Through : Mr. M. L. Yadav, Advocate. Versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for the State + Crl. A. 678/1999 MUKESH @ BITTOO ..... Appellants Through : Mr. Rajeev Gaur Naseem, Advocate. Versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for the State + Crl. A. 692/1999 PARVEEN KUMAR Through : ..... Appellant Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Senior Advocate with Ms. Aeshna Dahiya, Advocate. Versus STATE Through : ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for the State C...
Ankush Garg and Ors. Vs. The State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2015
I- 35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 29, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2451/2015 & Crl. M.A.No.8513/2015 ANKUSH GARG & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Nitin Bhrdwaj, Advocate versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Parveen Bhati, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with WSI Brahmo Devi Ms. Chitra Gera, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.174/2014, under Sections 323/341/506/34 of the IPC, registered at police station South Campus, Delhi is sought on the basis of Memorandum of Understanding of 20th October, 2014 (Annexure P-2 colly) and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR now stands cleared between the parties. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that petitioner No.4 is the wife and respondent No.2 is the complainant of the instant FIR, which springs out of a matrimonial dispute. It is submitted that...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »