Delhi Court May 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Pepsi Foods Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-19-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:19.05.2015 + W.P.(C) 1334/2015 & CM23372015 PEPSI FOODS PVT. LTD. (NOW MERGED WITH PEPSICO INDIA HOLDING PVT. LTD . Petitioner versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR ..Respondents + W.P.(C) 1934/2014 and CM40532014 PEPSI FOODS LTD. (NOW PEPSICO INDIA HOLDINGS PVT. LTD. .Petitioner versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX&ORS .Respondents + W.P.(C) 1935/2014 and CM40542014 .Petitioner PEPSI FOODS LTD. versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX &ORS ....Respondents + W.P.(C) 2326/2014 and CM48852014 .Petitioner ERICSSON AB versus ADDL. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, ORS .Respondents + W.P.(C) 2465/2014 and CM51302014 .Petitioner ERICSSON AB versus ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR OF Respondents INCOME TAX &ORS + W.P.(C) 3650/2014 and CM74172014 PEPSI FOODS LTD. (NOW PEPSICO INDIA HOLDINGS Petitioner versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX &ANR Respondents + W.P.(C) 4280/2014 and CM86042014 .Petitioner ASPECT SOFTWARE INC versus ASTT. ...
B.K. Bhagat Vs. New Delhi Municipal Council
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-19-2015
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:19. 05.2015 W.P.(C) 3417/2015 & CM No.6115/2015 & 6891/2015 B.K. BHAGAT ..... Petitioner versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Kailash Vasdev, Sr. Advocate with Mr Ashish Bhogal and Mr Abdhesh Choudhary. For the Respondent : Mr Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Advocate with Ms Rachna Golchha, Mr Govind Kumar and Ms Pavni Poddar alongwith Mr Kishor Prashad, Sr. Assistant, NDMC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner impugns an order dated 24.03.2015 (hereafter the impugned order) passed by the District and Sessions Judge in an appeal preferred by the respondent under Section 9 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 (hereafter the Act). The said appeal (being PPA No.09/2015) was preferred by the respondent against an order dated 04.02.2013 passed by the Estate Officer under Section 5(1) and Se...
State Trading Corporation of India Ltd. Vs. M/S Global Steel Holding L ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-19-2015
$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 19, 2015 + CRL.M.C.2000/2015 & Crl.M.A.Nos.7553-54/2015 STATE TRADING CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. R.K.Anand, Mr. Madhu Sudan Bhayana, Mr. R.N.Yadav, Mr. Chetan Anand & Ms. Payal Ahuja, Advocates versus M/S GLOBAL STEEL HOLDING LIMITED & ORS. .... Respondents Through: Mr. Sidharth Luthra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vijay Aggarwal, Mr. Gaurav, Mr. Pankaj Baghla, Ms. Reha Mitra, Ms. Deepali Dwivedi & Mr. Tanveer, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % In the above-captioned petition, quashing of order of 12th March, 2015 passed by trial court in proceedings under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is sought. Vide aforesaid order, trial court has admitted respondents-accused to bail subject to their furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of `5 lac each as the offence in question is bailable Crl.M.C.No.2000/2015 Page 1 one. One of the respondents-accused, who is said...
Manju Mehra and Anr Vs. Dev Pratap Seonie and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-19-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 468/2015 Decided on:19. h May , 2015 % MANJU MEHRA & ANR Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Pramod Ahuja, Adv. versus DEV PRATAP SEONIE & ORS Through ..... Respondent Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) CM92532015 Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. CM(M) 468/2015 & CM92542015 (stay) 1. Vide order dated 23rd March, 2015 which is impugned in the present petition the respondents in eviction petition No.23/2012 were permitted to place on record the certified copy of the lease deed and to exhibit the same subject to opportunity of rebuttal by the petitioner at an appropriate stage subject to a cost of `5000/- to be paid to the petitioner.2. Dev Pratap Seonie, Harsh Pratap Seonie and Varun Pratap Seonie filed an eviction petition against the petitioners Mrs. Manju Mehra and Karan Mehra seeking eviction of shop No.9, Block No.171, Sunder Nagar Market. In the eviction petition it was claimed that the tenancy was ol...
Shri Bhim Sen Batra Vs. M/S Shreyans Buildwell Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-19-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 456/2013 & CM195802013 (stay) Decided on:19. h May, 2015 % SHRI BHIM SEN BATRA Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Pradeep Dewan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ankur Rai, Adv. versus M/S SHREYANS BUILDWELL PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through Mr. Arjun Singh Bhati, Adv. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. Aggrieved by the order dated 7th November, 2013 whereby the leave to defend application of the petitioner in an eviction petition filed under Section 14(1)(e) DRC Act by the respondent was dismissed being beyond the period prescribed, the petitioner prefers the present petition.2. The Respondent filed the eviction petition before the learned ARC under Section 14 (1) (e) of the DRC Act stating that the Respondent was a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, Shri Vinod Nair is the Principal Officer and Attorney of the Respondent Company and is duly authorized to sign, verify and institute the eviction petition. It is fu...
Pepsi Foods Ltd. (Now Merged With Pepsico India Ho Vs. Deputy Commissi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-19-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:19.05.2015 + W.P.(C) 1334/2015 & CM23372015 PEPSI FOODS PVT. LTD. (NOW MERGED WITH PEPSICO INDIA HOLDING PVT. LTD . Petitioner versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR ..Respondents + W.P.(C) 1934/2014 and CM40532014 PEPSI FOODS LTD. (NOW PEPSICO INDIA HOLDINGS PVT. LTD. .Petitioner versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX&ORS .Respondents + W.P.(C) 1935/2014 and CM40542014 .Petitioner PEPSI FOODS LTD. versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX &ORS ....Respondents + W.P.(C) 2326/2014 and CM48852014 .Petitioner ERICSSON AB versus ADDL. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, ORS .Respondents + W.P.(C) 2465/2014 and CM51302014 .Petitioner ERICSSON AB versus ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR OF Respondents INCOME TAX &ORS + W.P.(C) 3650/2014 and CM74172014 PEPSI FOODS LTD. (NOW PEPSICO INDIA HOLDINGS Petitioner versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX &ANR Respondents + W.P.(C) 4280/2014 and CM86042014 .Petitioner ASPECT SOFTWARE INC versus ASTT. ...
Amrit Lal Garg and Ors. Vs. The State (Government of Nct of Delhi) and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-19-2015
I- 29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 19, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2111/2015 & Crl. M.A.Nos.7506-07/2015 AMRIT LAL GARG & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. J.S. Bakshi, Mr. A.S. Bakshi & Mr. Chaitnya Jain, Advocates versus THE STATE ( GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with WSI Sangeeta Ms. Jyotika Kalra, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.204/2004, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of the IPC, registered at police station Preet Vihar , Delhi is sought on the basis of Compromise Deed of 13th February, 2013 (Annexure-P-III) reached between the parties. Notice. Mr. Karan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and Ms. Jyotika Kalra, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. Crl. M.C.No.2111/2015 Page 1 Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for resp...
M/S Packraft India Pvt. Ltd Vs. Central Dairy Farm and Another
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-19-2015
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + EA (OS) 86/2014, 350/2009,98/2008,504/2014,710/2009 in EX.P. 195/2007 M/S PACKRAFT INDIA PVT. LTD Through: ..... Decree Holder Mr.H.L.Tiku, Sr.Adv. with Ms.Yashmeet, Ms.Usha Mann, Advs. Versus CENTRAL DAIRY FARM & ANOTHER Through: ..... Judgement Debtor Mr.S.R.Gupta, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO ORDER % 19.05.2015 1. This execution petition has been filed seeking execution of award dated November 30, 2006 passed by the learned sole Arbitrator who was appointed vide order dated October 4, 2001 in Arbitration Application No.339/1997 passed by the learned Additional District Judge. The sole Arbitrator, has in his award, directed as under; (i) Rs.60,526.75, along with interest @ 20.5% per annum w.e.f 21st November, 1992 to 31st August, 1994, and 25.5% w.e.f 1st September, 1994, to the date of Award (strictly in terms of para 20 (h) (vi) (b) (ibid); Ex.Pet.No.195/2007 Page 1 (ii) Rs.3,000/- along with interest @ Rs.18% per ...
Jai Kishan Aggarwal and Ors. Vs. State and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-19-2015
$~21, 22 & 23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 19, 2015 + CRL.M.C6872014 JAI KISHAN AGGARWAL & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. S.K.Sharma, Mr. Pawan Sharma, Mr. Deepender Hooda, Mr. Dhruv Chandhru & Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocates versus STATE & ORS. Through: + .... Respondents Mr. Vinod Diwakar, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with Inspector Vivek Maheshwari, EOW Mr. Sandeep Kapur & Ms. Apporva Pandey, Advocates for Yes Bank with Mr. Psuhpinder Singh, AR CRL.M.C47112014 & CRL.M.A.No.16012/2014 R U K ZUBERI & ANR. Through: ..... Petitioners Petitioner No.1-in-person versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .... Respondents Through: Mr. Vinod Diwakar, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with Inspector Vivek Maheshwari, EOW Mr. Sandeep Kapur & Ms. Apporva Pandey, Advocates for Crl.M.C.Nos.687, 4711 of 2014 & 1357/2015 Page 1 Yes Bank with Mr. Psuhpinder Singh, AR + CRL.M.C13572015 & CRL.M.A4981/2015 KAPIL CHUGH Through: ..... Petit...
Sidharth Chaudhary and Ors. Vs. The State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-19-2015
I- 34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 19, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2119/2015 & Crl. M.A.No.7524/2015 SIDHARTH CHAUDHARY & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Nitin Mehta, Advocate versus THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Yogender Singh Mr. S.K. Sharma, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.226/2014, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of the IPC, registered at police station Burari, Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated settlement of 2nd August, 2014 (Annexure-P-2), arrived at Delhi Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi. Notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and Mr.S.K. Sharma , Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent State Crl. M.C.No.2119/2015 Page 1 submits that ...
- ‹ Prev
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- Next ›
- Last »