Delhi Court May 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Om Prakash Vs. Gurdev Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-20-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 275/2014 & CM134372014 (stay) Reserved on:21. t April, 2015 Decided on:20. h May, 2015 % OM PRAKASH Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Puneet Goel, Adv. versus GURDEV SINGH Through ..... Respondent Mr. Sudhir Batra, Adv. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. An eviction petition was filed by the respondent Gurdev Singh under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act (in short the DRC Act). In the eviction petition it was stated that Gurdev Singh was a senior citizen who has two sons and two daughters. Both the daughters were married. His two sons Tarsem and Dalvir had two children each. Dalvir Singh is residing in U.K. and keeps coming to Delhi to meet his family. Gurdev Singh is the owner of premises No.507, Street No.5A, Govindpuri, Kalkaji property admeasuring 116 sq.yards (in short the suit property) consists of ground floor, first floor in which 5 rooms on the ground floor have been let out to 5 tenants and out ...
Dr. Amiya Bhushan Sharma Vs. Indira Gandhi National Open University an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-20-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.4588/2002 % 20th May, 2015 DR. AMIYA BHUSHAN SHARMA Through: None. ..... Petitioner Versus INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: None. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. No one appears for the petitioner. No one appeared for the petitioner even on 6.5.2015 when the matter was adjourned in the interest of justice.2. By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner seeks appointment by promotion to the post of Professor under the Career Advancement Scheme of the respondent no.1/University w.e.f 27.7.1998. Effectively the petitioner questions the selection process to the post of Professor conducted on 9.10.2001 whereby the Selection Committee did not find the petitioner fit to be appointed as a Professor and put another candidate at no.1 in the panel for appointment. Petitioner was placed...
Siddharth Khanna Vs. State of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-20-2015
I-36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 20, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2151/2015 SIDDHARTH KHANNA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. B. Badrinath, Advocate versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Vinod Diwakar, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Surender Singh Mr. Deepak Yadav, Advocates for respondents No.2 & 3. CORAM: HON' BLE MR. J USTICE SUNIL GAUR J UDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.239/2015, under Sections 279/337 of the IPC, registered at police station Fetehpur Beri, Delhi is sought on the ground that no culpable negligence can be attributed to petitioner and that the accident in question took place on the error of judgment. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the on 10th April, 2015, an accident took place wherein respondents No.2 & 3 had sustained minor injuries, which led to registration of FIR against the petitioner. It is submitted that respondent No.2 realized that the accident took place due to error...
Hira Nand Vs. The State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-20-2015
$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 20, 2015 + CRL.M.C.1406/2015 & Crl.M.A.No.5154/2015 HIRA NAND Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. D.K.Sharma, Advocate versus THE STATE & ANR. Through: .... Respondents Mr. Vinod Diwakar, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with ASI Devender Kumar PSDabri Mr. Ashwani Katoch, Authorized Representative of Respondent No.2 CORAM: HON' BLE MR. J USTICE SUNIL GAUR J UDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.712/2006, under Sections 63/65/68A of Copyright Act, 1957 registered at Police Station Dabri, Delhi is sought on the ground that the matter has been compromised with respondent No.2/first-informant of FIR in question and the said FIR has been quashed qua 6 accused out of the 12 accused. Upon notice, Mr. Vinod Diwakar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State submits that Authorized Representative of respondent No.2-company/first-informant of FIR in question, is Crl.M.C.No.1406/2015 Page 1 present in the...
Jeetu Saini Vs. State, N.C.T. of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-20-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 829/2014 Date of decision:20. 05.2015 JEETU SAINI Through ..... Appellant Mr.S.S.Gandhi, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Arvind Nayyar, Adv. versus STATE, N.C.T. OF DELHI Through ..... Respondent Mr. Varun Goswami, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) 1. Jeetu Saini challenges his conviction by the impugned judgment dated 28th May, 2014 for having committed murder of Sonu Rana on 26th August, 2008. By the order on sentence dated 31st May, 2014, the appellant Jeetu Saini has been sentenced to imprisonment for life and ordered to pay a fine of Rs.5000/-. In default of payment of fine, he shall further undergo simple imprisonment for six months. The conviction and sentence arises from the charge-sheet filed in FIR No.222/2008, Police Station Vikas Puri.2. The impugned judgment acquits Shivani Wasan. The State and the legal heirs of the victim have not questioned the sai...
Kashi Vishwanath Steels Ltd Vs. M/S Kys Manufacturer and Exporter Pvt. ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-20-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Judgment:20.05.2015. CS(OS) 2110/2009 KASHI VISHWANATH STEELS LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through Mr. Umesh Mishra and Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advs. versus M/S KYS MANUFACTURER AND EXPORTER PVT. LTD. ..... Defendant Through None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.(Oral) 1. Present suit has been filed by the plaintiff for the relief of permanent injunction, infringement, passing off and rendition of accounts.2. The plaintiff is a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act. It is engaged in the business of manufacturing all kinds of structural steels, angels, shapes and sections such as beams, channels, rounds, flats, squares steels bars etc.3. The plaintiff in the year 1998 had adopted the trademark/label KVS and KVS (Label) in respect of setting up steels furnaces and continuous casting forging and rolling and re-rolling mill plant for producing and manufacturing of steels and alloy steels ingots, steels and all...
Nishant Jain Vs. Shefali Jain
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-20-2015
$~21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of hearing and Order:20. 05.2015 MAT.APP.(F.C.) 67/2015 NISHANT JAIN Through ..... Appellant Mr. Pradeep Kumar, Adv. along with appellant in person. versus SHEFALI JAIN ..... Respondent Through Nemo CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA ORDER KAILASH GAMBHIR, J (ORAL) C.M. Appl. No.9437/2015 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. MAT.APP.(F.C.) 67/2015& C.M. Appl. No.9436/2015 1. Challenge in the present appeal is to the order dated 13.02.2015 passed by the learned Family Court, Rohini, New Delhi whereby the learned Family Court has granted the interim maintenance in favour of the respondent to the tune of Rs.17,350/- per month after assessing the income of the appellant at Rs.52,000/- per month.2. Assailing the legality and correctness of the impugned order, Mr. Pradeep Kumar, counsel representing the appellant submits that the appellant has bee...
Mukesh Rohilla and Ors. Vs. State (Govt of Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-20-2015
$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 20, 2015 + CRL.M.C.2131/2015 MUKESH ROHILLA & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Narender Gautam, Advocate versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .... Respondents Through: Mr.Praveen Bhati, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Birender PS Sagar Pur Respondent No.2-in-person CORAM: HONBLE MR. J USTICE SUNIL GAUR J UDGMENT (ORAL) % Crl.M.A.No.7580/2015 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl.M.C.No.2131/2015 Quashing of FIR No.44/2011, under Sections 498-A/406 of IPC registered at Police Station Sagarpur, Delhi is sought on the basis of joint statement of 24th December, 2014 made by the parties before the Family Court. Crl.M.C.No.2131/2015 Page 1 Notice. Mr.Praveen Bhati, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so ...
Smt Madhu Manak Tala Vs. Sh Mohd Hanif
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-20-2015
$ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:20. h May, 2015 % + RC.REV. 256/2015 and CM No.9430/2015 (Stay) SMT MADHU MANAK TALA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Purushottam Kumar, Advocate. versus SH MOHD HANIF Through: + ..... Respondent None. RC.REV. 259/2015 and CM No.9442/2015 (Stay) MADHU MANAK TALA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Purushottam Kumar, Advocate. versus BHIM SEN ..... Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J (ORAL) 1. The two petitions are being taken up together for the reason in the two eviction petitions under Section 14 (1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (in short the DRC Act) filed by the Petitioner Smt. Madhu Manak Tala, the two Respondents, that is Mohd. Hanif and Bhim Sen were granted leave to defend vide the impugned orders dated 13th April, 2015.2. Mohd. Hanif and Bhim Sen are tenants in respect of private shop Nos. 8 and 2 respectively in the property bearing No.106, Ground Floor, Malviya Nagar, New Del...
Manish Dabas and Ors. Vs. State (Govt of Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-20-2015
I- 34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 20, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2149/2015 MANISH DABAS & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. M. Bhushan, Advocate versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ... Respondents Through: Mr. Navin Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with ASI Hari Om Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON' BLE MR. J USTICE SUNIL GAUR J UDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.56/2012, under Sections 498-A/307/34 of the IPC, registered at police station Moti Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of Settlement Agreement of 1st July, 2013 and affidavit of respondent No.2 in support of this petition. Notice. Mr. Navin Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, has been identified to be the complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question by ASI Hari Om on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Crl.M.C.No.2149/2015 Page 1 Learned Additional Pub...
- ‹ Prev
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- Next ›
- Last »