Delhi Court May 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sri Sahidul Islam Mondal @ Saidul Vs. Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-21-2015
$~ 16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 510/2015 % Judgment dated 21.05.2015 SRI SAHIDUL ISLAM MONDAL @ SAIDUL ISLAM MONDAL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.J.K. Srivastava, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Sanjay Jain, Additional Solicitor General with Mr.Neeraj Jain and Ms.Shreya Sinha, Advocate CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Pleadings in this matter are complete.2. Rule D.B. With the consent of counsel for the parties, the present petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.3. Petitioner has filed the present petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of a writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus in the matter of detention of the petitioner, who is detained under Order FN.673/17/2014-CUS VIII dated 26.9.2014, passed by the Joint Secretary, Government of India (COFEPOSA), New Delhi.4. The necess...
Mrs. Shashi Sharma and Ors. Vs. Doon Public School and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-21-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No.6868/2012 21st May, 2015 MRS. SHASHI SHARMA AND ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. K.P.Gupta, Adv. Versus DOON PUBLIC SCHOOL AND ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Rakesh Tiku, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Manoj V. George and Mr. Aakarsh Kamra, Advocates for Review Petitioner/R-1 Ms. Purnima Maheshwari, Adv. and Mr. D.K.Singh, Adv. for R-3,4 and 5 (DOE). CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CM No.8128/2015 (delay of 485 days) For the reasons stated in the application, delay is condoned. CM stands disposed of. Review Petition No.252/2015 1. This review petition is filed seeking review of the judgment dated 13.11.2013 passed in W.P.(C) No.6868/2012. The writ petition was filed by five petitioners who were teachers in the respondent no.1/School/Doon Public School. The claim of the petitioners was predicated on Section 10(1) of the Delhi School Education Act and Rules, 197...
Shanti Devi and Ors. Vs. Kishan Gupta and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-21-2015
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + R.S.A. No.127/2009 & C.M. Nos.14545/2009, 4686/2011 Decided on :21. t May, 2015 SHANTI DEVI & ORS. Through: Appellants None. Versus KISHAN GUPTA & ORS. Through: Respondents Mr. J.P. Gupta, Advocate for R-4. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) 1. There is no appearance on behalf of the appellant despite second call. Further time is sought. The matter cannot be adjourned. I have heard the learned counsel for the respondent and have also gone through the record.2. This is a regular second appeal which is pending since 2009 and only on 23.8.2013, the substantial question of law was formulated which reads as under :Whether the judgment of the first appellate court suffers from any perversity keeping in view the applicability of Article 64 or 65 of the Limitation Act?. If so, to what effect?.3. The contention of the learned counsel for the appellant in the past had been that Article 64 of the Limitation Act, 1963 would be applicabl...
Smt. Deepa Singh Vs. Smt. Sharda Jootla and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-21-2015
$~A-4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 21, 2015 + CS(OS) 554/1996 SMT. DEEPA SINGH Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Girdhar Govind, Mr.Sharat Kapoor and Mr.Noor Alam, Advs. versus SMT. SHARDA JOOTLA AND ORS. ..... Defendant Through Mr.Manish Vashisht and Mr.Rikky Gupta, Advs. for D-1 Mr.Y.R.Sharma, Adv. for LRs of D-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) IA No.14304/2014 1. This is an application under Order VI Rule 17 CPC seeking amendment of the plaint filed by the plaintiff. The suit is filed by the plaintiff seeking a decree of partition, rendition of accounts of properties which are detailed in Annexure A to the plaint. The parties are said to be the Legal Heirs of late Shri Gurbax Singh Jootla who is said to have died intestate on 13.1.1989 leaving behind plaintiff and defendants as co-owners. Defendant No.1 is the mother of the plaintiff, defendant No.2 is the brother and defendant No.3 is the sister.2. By the present application ...
S M Matloob Vs. Director General, Indian Council for Cultural Rela
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-21-2015
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5226/2014 S M MATLOOB ..... Petitioner Through Petitioner in person versus DIRECTOR GENERAL, INDIAN COUNCIL FOR CULTURAL RELATIONS .Respondent Through Mr. M.K. Bhardwaj, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA ORDER % 21.05.2015 KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.(ORAL) CM APPL. No.10395/2014 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 5226/2014 1. By way of the present Writ Petition, the petitioner seeks to question the tenability of the order dated 09.05.2014 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the learned Tribunal) in Original Application (in short OA) No.4473/2013 and order dated 23.07.2014 in R.A. No.119/2014 whereby the Tribunal has denied full back wages to the petitioner along with all consequential benefits from the date of his transfer, i.e. 20th May, 2004 till the date...
Ideb Projects Pvt. Ltd Vs. Airports Authority of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-20-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. 616/2013 Reserved on : April 24, 2015 Date of decision: May 20, 2015 IDEB PROJECTS PVT. LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. V. Seshagiri with Mr. Alok Tiwari, Advocates. versus AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Digvijay Rai, Advocate. AND O.M.P. 698/2013 AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Digvijay Rai, Advocate. versus IDEB PROJECTS PVT. LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. V. Seshagiri with Mr. Alok Tiwari, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR % JUDGMENT2005.2015 1. These two petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seek the setting aside of the arbitral Award dated 30th January, 2013 of the Sole Arbitrator.2. Airports Authority of India (AAI) awarded the contract of construction of the New Terminal Building Complex at Khajuraho Airport to IDEB Projects Pvt. Ltd. (IDEB) A contract was entered into between the parties on 15th June, 2007. The work was to comme...
Priyanka Vs. State and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-20-2015
$ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:20. h May, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 3589/2014 PRIYANKA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr Vinay Jaidka and Mr Ankit Batra, Advs. versus STATE & ANR Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Ritu Gauba, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State alongwith WASI Sushma Police Station Uttam Nagar, Delhi Mr Vimal Puggal, Adv. for respondent no.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. This is a petition u/s 482 read with Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, (hereinafter referred as `Cr.P.C), 1973 against the order for grant of bail dated 26.04.2014 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate in case FIR No.549/2013, P.S. Uttam Nagar u/s 354/376/506/34 IPC.2. The FIR in the instant case was registered on the basis of a complaint made by the petitioner regarding commission of rape upon her by respondent no.2 which resulted in registration of the aforesaid FIR.3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitione...
Airports Authority of India Vs. Ideb Projects Pvt. Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-20-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. 616/2013 Reserved on : April 24, 2015 Date of decision: May 20, 2015 IDEB PROJECTS PVT. LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. V. Seshagiri with Mr. Alok Tiwari, Advocates. versus AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Digvijay Rai, Advocate. AND O.M.P. 698/2013 AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Digvijay Rai, Advocate. versus IDEB PROJECTS PVT. LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. V. Seshagiri with Mr. Alok Tiwari, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR % JUDGMENT2005.2015 1. These two petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seek the setting aside of the arbitral Award dated 30th January, 2013 of the Sole Arbitrator.2. Airports Authority of India (AAI) awarded the contract of construction of the New Terminal Building Complex at Khajuraho Airport to IDEB Projects Pvt. Ltd. (IDEB) A contract was entered into between the parties on 15th June, 2007. The work was to comme...
Pal Radiator and Oil Coller Vs. Rakesh Kumar and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-20-2015
$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4933/2015 & C.M.No.8924/2015 (for stay) Judgment reserved on:18. 05.2015 Judgment pronounced on:20. 05.2015 PAL RADIATOR AND OIL COLLER ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Anil Kumar Chandel, Advocate. versus RAKESH KUMAR AND ORS. Through: Nemo. ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA JUDGMENT1 Vide the present writ petition the petitioner has made a request for quashing the impugned orders dated 21.05.2014, 21.02.2013 and 17.09.2013 passed by the Authority under the Delhi Shops and Establishment Act, 1954 (hereinafter referred to as the Act).2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner is a partnership firm and running an establishment which is covered under the Act. Its employees filed an application under Section 21 (2) of the Act claiming their due earned wages for the period from 01.08.2012 to 09.09.2012. The Authority under the Act on 08.11.2012 issued a notice to the petitioner through speed post for 1...
M/S. Sunshine India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Bhai Manjit Singh (Huf) and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-20-2015
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.S. (OS) No.2501/2011 Decided on : M/S. SUNSHINE INDIA PVT. LTD. Through: May 20, 2015 Plaintiff Mr. P.V. Kapur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sudhir Makkar, Advocate. Versus BHAI MANJIT SINGH (HUF) & ORS. Through: Defendants Mr. A.K. Mata, Senior Advocate with Mr.Suresh Dutt Dobhal and Mr. Arun Arora, Advocate for D-1 & 3. Mr. Amit Sibal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Apoorv Kapur, Mr.Alok K.Aggarwal & Mr. Arun Arora, Advocates for D-2 & 4. Mr. Anil Airi, Advocate for D-5. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.I.A. No.17960/2011 (under Section 151 CPC by the plaintiff) 1. The question to be decided by this order (in I.A. No.17960/2011) is as to whether the plaintiff company is to be given permission for the purpose of raising construction on the property bearing No.61, Golf Links, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the suit property), which was agreed to be sold by D-1 to D-4 to the plaintiff vide agreement to sell dated 29.07.2005. This p...
- ‹ Prev
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- Next ›
- Last »