Delhi Court May 2015 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

May 21 2015

Virender Kishan Gupta Vs. Lt. Governor, Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-21-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:21. 05.2015 W.P.(C) 8596/2014 TARUN PAL SINGH & ANR Petitioners versus LT. GOVERNOR, GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS Respondent AND + W.P.(C) 2888/2014 & CM149922014, 14994/2014 & 16227/2014 & CM99972015 RAJENDER KISHAN GUPTA & ORS. Petitioners Respondent versus UNION OF INDIA + W.P.(C) 4839/2014 & CM96622014 & CM99982015 SUDHIR KISHAN GUPTA Petitioner versus LT. GOVERNOR, GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI, NEW DELHI AND ORS + ... Respondents W.P.(C) 4462/2014 & CM88982014 & CM99992015 SANJAY GUPTA WP(C) 8596/2014 & ORS versus LT. GOVERNOR, GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS Respondent + W.P.(C) 5559/2014 & CM1378513786/2014 VIRENDER KISHAN GUPTA Petitioner versus LT. GOVERNOR, GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS Respondent + W.P.(C) 6017/2014 & CM176612014& CM100002015 SAROJ KUMARI GUPTA & ORS Petitioners Respondents versus LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR & ORS + W.P.(C) 6290/2014 & CM151902014 & CM99922015 VIJENDER KISHAN GUPTA Petitioners Resp...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 21 2015

Manoj Bajpai Vs. State of Delhi

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-21-2015

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:21. t May, 2015 + W.P.(CRL) 771/2014 & Crl.M.A.5999/2014 (stay) MANOJ BAJPAI Through: ..... Petitioner Ms.Geeta Luthra, Sr. Advocate with Mr.V.N.Jha and Ms.Deepti Dwivedi, Advs. versus STATE OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Mr.Rajesh Mahajan, ASC (Crl.) for State along with Ms. Shinjan Jain, Advocate with SI Pinki Rana, PS Ashok Nagar. Complainant along with her advocate. (appearance not given) CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India r/w Section 482 Cr.P.C. filed by the petitioner for quashing of FIR No.19/2013 u/s 376 IPC dated 17th January, 2013 registered with PS Ashok Nagar, Delhi and the consequential proceedings emanating there from.2. Following facts emerged from the charge sheet:- On 17th January, 2013, the complainant Seema Mohal came to police station and got recorded her statement which is as under:Statement of S...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 21 2015

Uoi and Ors Vs. Janki Devi

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-21-2015

$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of hearing and Order:21. 05.2015 W.P.(C) 1353/2015 UOI AND ORS Through ..... Petitioners Mr. J.K. Singh, Adv. versus JANKI DEVI Through ..... Respondent Mr. G.D. Bhandari, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA ORDER KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.(ORAL) C.M. Appl. No.2378/2015 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. W.P. (C) No.1353/2015 & C.M. Appl. No.2377/2015 (Stay) 1. Challenge in the present petition is the order dated 12.08.2014 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, whereby the learned Tribunal has allowed the O.A. preferred by the respondent with a direction to the petitioners herein to settle the claim of the respondent for pension and all the terminal benefits with effect from 07.11.2004 within a period of two months from the date of the receipt of copy of this order. The Tribunal further allowed in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 21 2015

Shri Kulbhushan Dania Vs. Shri Ashok Kumar Dania and Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-21-2015

$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Judgment :21. 5.2015 CS(OS) 1117/2008 SHRI KULBHUSHAN DANIA Through ..... Plaintiff Khatri and Choudhary, Mr.Sumit Kumar Mr. Siddharth Advocates Versus SHRI ASHOK KUMAR DANIA & ANR. ..... Defendants Through None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.(oral) 1 Plaintiff has filed the present suit for partition, rendition of accounts and permanent injunction. Plaintiff is the son of Shyam Sunder Dania arrayed as defendant no.2. Defendant no.2 has two sons namely the plaintiff and defendant no.1. He also has two daughters. They have not been arrayed as a party. 2 Plaint discloses that defendant no.2 had acquired a plot of land measuring 200 sq. yards bearing Khasra No.445, House No.7, New Hari Nagar, Mandawali Fazalpur, Illaqa Shahdara, Delhi in his own name the year 1967. The cost of the plot was Rs.2700/-. Defendant no.1 had constructed a small room in the aforenoted suit property and thereafter the whole f...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 21 2015

Saroj Kumari Gupta and Ors Vs. Land Acquisition Collector and Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-21-2015

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 21 2015

Rajender Kishan Gupta and Ors. Vs. Union of India

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-21-2015

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 21 2015

Vijender Kishan Gupta Vs. Lt. Governor, Nct of Delhi and Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-21-2015

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 21 2015

Sudhir Kishan Gupta Vs. Lt. Governor, Govt. of Nct of Delhi, New Delhi ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-21-2015

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 21 2015

Sanjay Gupta Vs. Lt. Governor, Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-21-2015

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 21 2015

M/S. Transstroy (India) Limited Vs. National Highways Authority

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-21-2015

$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:21. 5.2015 + W.P.(C) 443/2015 M/S. TRANSSTROY (INDIA) LIMITED ..... Petitioner versus NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the petitioner: For the respondent: Mr. M.Y. Deshmukh and Mr. Yatin M. Jagtap. Mr. Arun Bhatta, Adv. CORAM :HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J1 Essentially, the grievance of the petitioner is qua illegal encashment of its bank guarantee by the respondent. The bank guarantee furnished by the petitioner was in the sum of Rs.5.67 crores. This said bank guarantee was furnished by the petitioner in lieu of bid security, at the stage of filing of the tender. The respondent, evidently, encashed the bank guarantee as it came to the conclusion that the petitioner had filed a non-responsive bid.2. The facts, which led to the institution of the instant writ petition are set out hereinafter:2.1 The respondent, floated a Request For Proposal (...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

‹ Prev
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Next ›
Last »

Delhi Court May 2015 Judgments

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.