Delhi Court May 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Suresh Kalmadi Vs. Cbi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-22-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:22. d May, 2015 % + Crl.M.C. No.2143/2015 SURESH KALMADI Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Kapil Sibal, Sr. Adv. and Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Siddarth Aggarwal, Ms. Shyel Trehan Mr. Dhritiman Roy, Advs. versus CBI Through ..... Respondent Ms. Sonia Mathur, Standing Counsel for CBI with IO Anand Swarup for CBI CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. In view of the fact that the cross examination of PW-18 in the matter is fixed before the trial court, the matter is being heard at the interim stage itself. The respondent has filed the short written submission.2. Mr. Suresh Kalmadi, petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of order dated 16th May, 2015 passed by the Special Judge (PC ACT) (CBI-01), Patiala House Courts in C.C. No.22 of 2011.3. The petitioner is facing tri...
National Highways Authority of India Vs. M/S Oriental Structure Engine ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-22-2015
$~37 THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:22. 05.2015 FAO(OS) 282/2015 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ... Appellant versus M/S ORIENTAL STRUCTURE ENGINEERS LTD GAMMON INDIA LTD (JV) ... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case:- For the Appellant : Mr A.B. Dayal, Sr Advocate with Ms Tanu Priya Gupta and Ms Khushbu Sahu For the Respondent : Nemo CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) CM No.9564/2015s The exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. FAO(OS) 282/2015 and CM No.9563/2015 This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 05.03.2015 passed by a learned Single Judge of this court in OMP2472014 which was a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act). The said petition had been filed by the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI), the appellant herein. It was in challenge t...
Union of India and Anr. Vs. Sudhanshu Kumar Khare and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-22-2015
$~S-1&2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:22. 05.2015 + REVIEW PET.561/2014, 567/2014, 8/2015 IN W.P. (C) 7370/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Petitioners versus SUDHANSHU KUMAR KHARE & ORS ..... Respondents REVIEW PET.560/2014, 566/2014, 9/2015, C.M. Nos.20614, 20830/2014 IN W.P. (C) 7371/2010 BHUPINDER KUMAR & ORS. ..... Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Appearance: Mr. Ruchir Mishra, CGSC with Mr. Vikram Jetely, Mr. Mukesh Kumar Tiwari, Ms. Kritika and Ms. Astha, Advocates for UOI. Mr. Tarun Sharma with Ms. Boudh Prabha, Advocates for petitioners in W.P.(C)7371/2010 and for respondent nos.14,33,41, 47, 73 & 84 in W.P. (C)7370/2010. Mr. Siddharth Luthra, Sr. Advocate with Ms.Supriya Juneja and Mr. Viraj Gandhi, Advocates for review petitioner in Review Pet.560-561/2014. Mr. Naresh Kaushik with Ms. Amita Kalkal Chaudhary and Ms. Aditi Gupta, Advocates for UPSC. Mr. Sudhanshu Kumar Khare, Review petitioner in person. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTI...
Virender Kumar Malhotra Vs. Mukesh Kumar Khurana and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-22-2015
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + R.S.A. No.182/2015 & C.M. No.8617/2015 (for stay) Decided on :22. d May, 2015 VIRENDER KUMAR MALHOTRA Appellant Through: Mr. Rakesh Tiku, Senior Advocate with Mr. Yudhishter Sharma & Ms. Soumya Kumar, Advocates. Versus MUKESH KUMAR KHURANA & ANR Respondent Through: Mr. Arun Kr. Gupta & Mr. Achal Gupta, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a regular second appeal filed by the appellant against the judgment dated 9.3.2015 passed by the learned Additional District Judge in RCA No.30/2014 upholding the judgment and decree dated 13.3.2014 passed by the learned Civil Judge in Suit No.272/2009.2. Mr. Tiku, the learned senior counsel for the appellant has contended that the only question of law which arises for consideration is that both the learned trial court as well as the first appellate court have fallen into error in not accepting the report of the CFSL which had given a categorical opinion that the rent re...
Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Sh.Joginder Singh and O ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-22-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment Pronounced on :22. 05.2015 MAC APPL.707/2014 and CM No.12415/2014 (stay) RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Appellant Through Mr.S.K.Bhattacharya, Advocate. versus SH.JOGINDER SINGH & ORS. Through None. ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.1. The present appeal is filed seeking to impugn the Award dated 30.04.2014.2. The brief facts are that on 01.02.2013 Sh.Ravinder Singh, the deceased was coming from Gurgaon on his motorcycle. At about 1.10 a.m when he reached on Mahipalpur Flyover, he was hit by a bus belonging to the appellant driven by respondent No.5. The bus was being driven in a rash and negligent manner and came from behind and hit the motorcycle. Sh.Ravinder Singh fell down and sustained fatal injuries.3. The Tribunal based on his evidence on record concluded that the accident took place due to the rash and negligent driving of respondent No.5.4. 5. On compensation, the ...
Garvit Indora Vs. State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-22-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : FEBRUARY24 2015 DECIDED ON : MAY22 2015 + CRL.A.1553/2014 GARVIT INDORA Through : ..... Appellant Mr.K.Singhal, Advocate. VERSUS STATE NCT OF DELHI Through : ..... Respondent Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Aggrieved by a judgment dated 10.10.2014 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.36/14 arising out of FIR No.112/14 under Sections 376/420/506 IPC registered at Police Station Dwarka South by which he was convicted under Section 376/420 IPC, the appellant-Garvit Indora has preferred the instant appeal. By an order dated 15.10.2014, the appellant was awarded RI for five years with fine `50,000/- under Section 420 IPC and RI for ten years with fine `50,000/under Section 376 IPC. Both the sentences were to operate concurrently.2. Allegations against the appellant, as reflected in the charge- sheet, were that on 22.01.2013 he contracted second marriage with the prosecutrix X(...
Firoz Ahmed @ Gandhi and Others Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-22-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:22. d May, 2015 + CRL.A. 374/2012 FIROZ AHMED @ GANDHI & ORS. ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Saurabh Kansal and Ms.Pallavi S. Kansal, Advs. for appellant No.1 Mr.Anil Hooda, Adv. for appellant No.2 versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Ritu Gauba, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State along with Sub Inspector Sukhbir Malik, Special Staff (North), Delhi CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. This appeal has been preferred by the appellants Firoz Ahmed @ Gandhi, Surender Kumar and Mohd. Shamim Akhtar challenging the impugned judgment dated 21.02.2012 and order on sentence dated 28.02.2012 vide which the appellant Shamim Akhtar was convicted under Section 489B & 489C IPC while the appellants Firoz and Surender Kumar were convicted for offence under Section 489C IPC. The appellant/accused Mohd. Shamin Akhtar was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for a period of five years and fine of Rs.10,...
Sanjay Gambhir and Ors. Vs. Beekman Helix India Consulting Pvt Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-22-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on April 20, 2015 Judgment delivered on May 22, 2015 + ARB.P. 113/2012 SANJAY GAMBHIR & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr.K.Datta, Adv.with Mr.Diggaj Pathak, Advocate versus BEEKMAN HELIX INDIA CONSULTING PVT LTD. Through: ..... Respondent Mr.Divjyot Singh, Advocate with Ms.Avsi Malik, Adv. for R-1 Mr.Manish Sharma, Adv. with Ms.Chandni Mehra, Mr.Pranay Raj Singh, Advs. for R-2 and R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. The present petition has been filed by the four petitioners namely Sanjay Gambhir, Karan Gambhir, Kanish Raaj Gambhir and M/s D.D. Global Capital Ltd. under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act in short).2. The facts as noted are that the petitioner Nos.1 and 2 are the former shareholders and founding promoter and director and petitioner Nos.3 and 4 are the former shareholders of the D.D Housing Ltd. (Subsequently known as New Age Town Planners Ltd, and now kn...
Manju Gupta and Ors Vs. Pratap Singh and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-22-2015
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Pronounced on:22. 05-2015 + MAC.APP. 77/2005 MANJU GUPTA AND ORS. ..... Appellants Through Mr.O.P.Mannie, Advocate. versus PRATAP SINGH AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr.Pankaj Seth, Advocate for Insurance Company. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.1. By the present appeal the appellant seeks to impugn the Award dated 17.4.2004.2. The brief facts are that the Tribunal by the impugned Award disposed of two claim petitions. The claim petition in question was filed by the dependents of deceased Sanjay Gupta who was travelling in a tempo on the intervening night of 4th and 5th April 1995. The tempo met with an accident near District Shahjahanpur U.P. The driver of the tempo was driving the same at a fast speed in a rash and negligent manner and hit against a truck coming from the opposite direction. Based on the evidence on record the Tribunal concluded that the accident took place due to the rash and negligent dr...
Sushila Pareek Vs. Delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-22-2015
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (C) No.4189/2013 Decided on :22. d May, 2015 SUSHILA PAREEK Through: Petitioner Mr. Dilip Singh, Advocate. Versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Respondent Through: Ms. Manika Tripathy Pandey, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a writ petition filed by the petitioner for issuance of a writ, order or directions to quash the order of cancellation passed by the respondent/DDA by virtue of which allotment of plot No.87, Pocket 21, Sector 24, Rohini was cancelled.2. A writ of mandamus has also been sought to direct the respondent/DDA to allot the aforesaid plot No.87, Pocket 21, Sector 24, Rohini or a similarly situated plot in a developed sector to the appellant under the Rohini Scheme-MIG and deliver the possession thereof.3. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the husband of the petitioner, Pokhar Mal Pareek, got himself registered for allotment of a plot on 30.3.1981 under the Rohini Residenti...
- ‹ Prev
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Next ›
- Last »