Delhi Court May 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Saurabh Dubey and Ors. Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:25. 05.2015 + WP(C) No.7545 of 2011 SAURABH DUBEY & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Ms. Jyoti Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Mr. Sameer Sharma & Mr. Amandeep Joshi, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: + ..... Respondents Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr. Amit Mahajan, Mr. Manish Mohan, Ms. Monika Arora, Mr. Rajesh Gogna, Mr. Vivek Goyal, CGSCs, Mr. Arnab & Mr. Abhishek Chaudhary, Advs. for the UOI. Ms. Rekha Palli & Ms. Garima Sachdeva, Advs. for the Private Respondents. WP(C) No.596 of 2012 AMIT KUMAR GUPTA & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. P. Vinay Kumar, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr. Amit Mahajan, Mr. Manish Mohan, Ms. Monika Arora, Mr. Rajesh Gogna, Mr. Vivek Goyal, CGSCs, Mr. Arnab & Mr. Abhishek Chaudhary, Advs. for the UOI. _______________________________________________________________________ + WP(C) No.4980 of 2012 DEV SHARMA ..... Petitioner Th...
Bindu Kapurea and Ors. Vs. Government of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2015
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 827/2015 & CM No.1448/2015 BINDU KAPUREA & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr Aagney Sail, Adv. versus % GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Raman Duggal, Standing Counsel with Mr Sudhir Kumar, Adv. for R-1. Mr Sanjeev Sabharwal, Adv. for DDA. Ms Sunita Narain, Amicus Curiae. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER ORDER2505.2015 1. The petitioners had approached this court, essentially, to ventilate their grievance with regard to the decision taken by respondent No.1 and 2 to cut down 810 trees for facilitating their road widening project undertaken on the Mehrauli- Mahipalpur Road. The widening of the road is a project which has its starting point located at Andheria Modh and is supposed to terminate at the traffic light located at Fortis Hospital.2. The petitioners, who are residents of Vasant Kunj, assailed the decision taken in this behalf by respondent no.1 and 2. 2.1 Primarily, the case which ...
State Vs. Ratni Devi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRIMINAL LEAVE PETITION No.740/2014 % Date of decision:25. h May2015 STATE .APPELLANT Mr. Sunil Sharma, APP for the State with SI Parmod Kumar, PS-Patel Nagar Through : Versus RATNI DEVI & ANR. Through : ..RESPONDENT Mr. L.D. Mual and Mr. S.S. Mual, Advocates. CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE G. S. SISTANI HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G. S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. By the present Leave Petition filed under Section 378(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the State seeks leave to appeal against the judgement dated 16.09.2014, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, in Sessions Case No.23/2013, whereby the respondents were acquitted of the charges punishable under Section 302/304B/498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code.2. The facts of this case, as noticed by the learned trial court, are as under:On May 29, 2011 at about 6.45 AM, an intimation was received from Doctor Vivek Singh, RLKC Metro Hospital, near Metro Station Shadipur that one...
Javed Ali Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 664/2014 Judgment reserved on 09.04.2015 Judgment delivered on 25.05.2015 JAVED ALI Appellant Through : Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Bharat Sharma, Advocate. Versus STATE Respondent Through : Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for the State. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G. S. SISTANI, J.1. Present appeal filed by the appellant under Section 374 read with Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, is directed against the impugned judgment dated 29.04.2014 and order on sentence dated 05.05.2014 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi in Sessions Case No.51/2014 whereby the appellant has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code with a fine of Rs.1,00,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years. The appellant has been further sentenced to underg...
Balbir Singh and Ors. Vs. Government of National Capital Territory of ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2015
I-62 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 25, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2284/2015 & Crl. M.A.No.8001/2015 BALBIR SINGH & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. S.P. Rana & Mr. Abhishek Narayan, Advocates versus GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Shri Kishan Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.71/2008, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of the IPC, registered at police station Nihal Vihar, New Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated settlement of 18th March, 2014 and on the ground that petitioner No.1-husband and respondent No.2-wife are happily living together since March, 2014. Notice. Mr. Karan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, has been identified to be the complainant/first-informant of Crl...
Rachit Sharma and Ors. Vs. The State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2015
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 25, 2015 + CRL.M.C.1152/2015 RACHIT SHARMA & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. J.B.Mudgal, Advocate versus THE STATE & ANR. Through: .... Respondents Mr. Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Radhey Shyam Respondent No.2-in-person Mr. Fanish K. Jain, Advocate with Respondent No.2-in-person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.37/2014 under Sections 498-A/406/34 of IPC registered at Police Station CAW Cell, Nanakpura, Delhi is sought on the ground that petition of dissolution of marriage by mutual consent has been filed and first motion granted by the Family Court as well as on the basis of Compromise Deed of 1st February, 2015 executed between the parties. Upon notice, Mr. Fanish K. Jain, Advocate for Respondent No.2 has appeared. Mr. Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for Crl.M.C.No.1152/2015 Page 1 respondent-State submits that respondent...
Kamal Kumar Bansal and Ors. Vs. The State (Nct) of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2015
I-47 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 25, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2247/2015 KAMAL KUMAR BANSAL & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Deepak Jain & Ms. Isha Goel, Advocates versus THE STATE ( NCT) OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Virender Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.316/2012, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of the IPC, registered at police station Vijay Vihar, Delhi is sought in this petition. Notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so by her counsel as well as by SI Virender on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Crl.M.C.No.2247/2015 Page 1 Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State submits on instructi...
Rajeev Arora Vs. Registrar of Companies Nct of Delhi and Haryana
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2015
$~56 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 25, 2015 + CRL.M.C.2263/2015 RAJEEV ARORA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Yogesh K. Jagia, Mr. Rajeev Kumar & Mr. Abhijit Negi, Advocates versus REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES NCT OF DELHI & HARYANA Through: None ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of complaint case No.3098/3 titled Registrar of Companies v. PAN India Corporation Ltd. under Section 97(3) of the Companies Act, 1956 for contravention of Section 97 of the Companies Act, 1956 and summoning order of 8th December, 2014 is sought in this petition on merits. At the hearing, learned counsel for petitioner submitted that the petitioner was a mere Director and not the whole-time Director and was not responsible for day-to-day working of the accused company and so, petitioner is nowhere responsible for the alleged nonfiling of Form 5 by the accused company. Reliance was placed upon decisions in Ravindra Narayan & Ors. v. Regist...
Sartaj Singh Pannu Vs. Gurbani Media Pvt Ltd and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-22-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. 1602 of 2014 Reserved on: April 24, 2015 Date of decision: May 22, 2015 SARTAJ SINGH PANNU ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Prasad Rao, Mr. Kailash Pandey Mr. Ranjeet Singh, Ms. Arunima Pal, Advocates versus GURBANI MEDIA PVT LTD & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Chander M. Lall, Advocate with Mr. Gurmehar S.Sistani, Ms. Nancy Roy, Mr. Anuj Nair, Ms. Nayamat Sistani, Advocates CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR % JUDGMENT2205.2015 Introduction 1. Sartaj Singh Pannu (Pannu), a young film Director, is the Petitioner in this petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act). Pannu seeks orders restraining Gurbani Media Pvt. Ltd. (Respondent No.1) and its Chairman and Managing Director Mr. Harinder Singh Sikka (Respondent No.2) (Sikka) from releasing the film Nanak Shah Fakir without giving him credit as the sole Director of the film.2. The Court has, in the judgment that follows, concluded that at the present stage...
M/S.Allied Blenders and Distillers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M/S. Rock and Storm D ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-22-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : May 22, 2015 + FAO (OS) 260/2015 M/S.ALLIED BLENDERS & DISTILLERS PVT. LTD. Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Pravin Anand, Mr.Sharwan Chopra and Ms.Abhilasha, Advocates versus M/S. ROCK AND STORM DISTILLERIES PVT. LTD. Represented by: ...... Respondent Mr.Ajay Sahni, Advocate with Mr.Rahul Rajput and Ms.Kanika Bajaj, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. The appellant claims to be the registered proprietor of various trademarks, one of which is Officers Choice. Appellant also claims to be the registered proprietor of the label Officers Choice Blue for alcoholic beverages vide registration No.2159743 dated June 14, 2011. The label mark is as under:- 2. As per the appellant it is in the trade of alcohol since past over 30 years and alcohol sold by it under the trademark Officers Choice has the largest sales w...
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Next ›
- Last »