Delhi Court May 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Neelkanth Pandey Vs. State of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-26-2015
I- 56 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 26, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2306/2015 NEELKANTH PANDEY Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. H.P. Aditya, Advocate versus STATE OF DELHI & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with ASI Devender Kumar Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.875/2005, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of the IPC, registered at police station Uttam Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated settlement of 6th June, 2013 (Annexure-D), arrived at Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi. Notice. Mr. Karan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so by her counsel as well as by ASI Devender Kumar on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Crl.M.C.No.2...
Deepak Dev Nath Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-26-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 346/2014 % Judgment reserved on 21.05.2015 Judgment pronounced on 26.05.2015 Appellant DEEPAK DEV NATH Through: Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate. Respondent Through: Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for State. STATE CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE G. S. SISTANI HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J.1. Present appeal filed by the appellant is directed against the judgment of the learned trial court dated 27.09.2013 and order on sentence dated 03.10.2013 whereby the appellant had been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs. 5,000/- for an offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and in default of payment of fine to further undergo simple imprisonment for three months. The appellant had also been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for five years and a fine of Rs. 5,000/- for an offence punishable under Section 201 of the Indian Penal Code and in default of payment of fine to furth...
Khalil Ahmed and Ors. Vs. The State of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-26-2015
I-58 & 59 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 26, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2311/2015 & Crl. M.A.No.8064/2015 KHALIL AHMED & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. S.S. Rawat, Advocate versus + THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Somil Mr. Rajneesh Kapoor, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CRL.M.C. 2312/2015 & Crl. M.A.No.8065/2015 MOHD. ATIK & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Rajneesh Kapoor, Advocate versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Somil Mr. S.S. Rawat, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % In the above captioned two petitions, quashing of FIR No.Crl.M.C.No.2311/2015 Crl.M.C.No.2312/2015 Page 1 409/2012 [in Crl.M.C.No.2311/2015]. and FIR No.410/2012 [in Crl.M.C.No.2312/2015]., both under Section 308/...
Rajesh Gola and Ors. Vs. The State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-26-2015
$~28 & 29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 26, 2015 + CRL.M.C.5057/2014 POONAM GOLA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. S.K.Dureja, Advocate with Petitioner-in-person versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .... Respondents Through: Mr. Vinod Diwakar, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with ASI Hira Lal Mr. Rajesh Kadyan, Advocate with Respondent No.2-in-person + CRL.M.C.5059/2014 RAJESH GOLA & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Rajesh Kadyan, Advocate versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .... Respondents Through: Mr.Praveen Bhati, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with ASI Hira Lal Mr. S.K.Dureja, Advocate with Respondent No.2-in-person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % JUDGMENT (ORAL) Crl.M.C.Nos.5057 & 5059 of 2014 Page 1 In the above-captioned two petitions, quashing of FIR No.38/2014 under Section 420/468/471 IPC [Crl.M.C.No.5057/2014]. and FIR No.316/2005 under Section 406/498A/34 IPC [Crl.M.C.No.5059/2014]. both regis...
Amit Shukla and Ors. Vs. State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-26-2015
$~50 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 26, 2015 + CRL.M.C.2290/2015 & Crl.M.A.Nos.8030-32/2015 AMIT SHUKLA & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Ms. Sima Gulati, Mr. Sugan Puri & Mr. Ashok Triapthi, Advocates versus STATE & ANR. Through: .... Respondents Mr. Navin Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with Inspector Harjinder Rana Ms. Suman Chauhan, Advocate with Respondent No.2-in-person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.51/2008 under Sections 498-A/406/34 of IPC registered at Police Station CAW Cell, Nanakpura, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 15th July, 2014 arrived at between the parties at Delhi High Court Mediation & Conciliation Centre, Delhi (Annexure B). Notice. Mr. Navin Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State and Ms. Suman Chauhan, Advocate accepts Crl.M.C.No.2290/2015 Page 1 notice on behalf of respondent No.2. Learned Additio...
Harjinder Singh Bansal and Ors. Vs. State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-26-2015
$~52 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 26, 2015 + CRL.M.C.2294/2015 HARJINDER SINGH BANSAL & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Harish Kumar, Advocate versus STATE & ANR. Through: .... Respondents Mr. Navin Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Satywati PS Hari Nagar Mr. Anuj Tyagi, Advocate with Respondent No.2-in-person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.423/2014 under Sections 498-A/406/34 of IPC registered at Police Station Hari Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of Settlement of 23rd May, 2014 arrived at between the parties at Counselling Cell, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi. Notice. Mr. Navin Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State and Mr. Anuj Tyagi, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState submits Crl.M.C.No.2294/2015 Page 1 that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is comp...
Mohd. Atik and Ors. Vs. The State of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-26-2015
I-58 & 59 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 26, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2311/2015 & Crl. M.A.No.8064/2015 KHALIL AHMED & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. S.S. Rawat, Advocate versus + THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Somil Mr. Rajneesh Kapoor, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CRL.M.C. 2312/2015 & Crl. M.A.No.8065/2015 MOHD. ATIK & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Rajneesh Kapoor, Advocate versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Somil Mr. S.S. Rawat, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % In the above captioned two petitions, quashing of FIR No.Crl.M.C.No.2311/2015 Crl.M.C.No.2312/2015 Page 1 409/2012 [in Crl.M.C.No.2311/2015]. and FIR No.410/2012 [in Crl.M.C.No.2312/2015]., both under Section 308/...
Poonam Gola Vs. The State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-26-2015
$~28 & 29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 26, 2015 + CRL.M.C.5057/2014 POONAM GOLA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. S.K.Dureja, Advocate with Petitioner-in-person versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .... Respondents Through: Mr. Vinod Diwakar, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with ASI Hira Lal Mr. Rajesh Kadyan, Advocate with Respondent No.2-in-person + CRL.M.C.5059/2014 RAJESH GOLA & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Rajesh Kadyan, Advocate versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .... Respondents Through: Mr.Praveen Bhati, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with ASI Hira Lal Mr. S.K.Dureja, Advocate with Respondent No.2-in-person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % JUDGMENT (ORAL) Crl.M.C.Nos.5057 & 5059 of 2014 Page 1 In the above-captioned two petitions, quashing of FIR No.38/2014 under Section 420/468/471 IPC [Crl.M.C.No.5057/2014]. and FIR No.316/2005 under Section 406/498A/34 IPC [Crl.M.C.No.5059/2014]. both regis...
Kundan House Flat Ownrs Welfare Association(Regd) Vs. Gurucharan Singh ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-26-2015
$~A-26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:26.05.2015 CS(OS) 845/2014 KUNDAN HOUSE FLAT OWNRS WELFARE ASSOCIATION(REGD) ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Bonny Laishram, Advocate for Ujjwal Jha, Advocate. versus GURUCHARAN SINGH BHASIN & ANR .... Defendants Through Mr.Mohit Madan, Advocate for D-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) IA54552014 1. This is an application seeking an injunction to restrain the defendants from obstructing the work or services being done by the plaintiff in the suit property.2. The suit is filed by the plaintiff which is said to be an association of Kundan House Flat Owners registered under the Societies Registration Act. The flats in the said property have been purchased by the members from defendant No.2 vide agreement to sell. Defendant No.2 has appointed defendant No.1 for general and overall maintenance of the building and has made the said appointment binding on the members of the plaintiff Society. Hence, ...
Anil Kumar Vs. Gnct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2015
$~2. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:20. 05.2015 % + Judgment delivered on:25. 05.2015 BAIL APPLN. 878/2015 ANIL KUMAR Through: ..... Applicant Mr. N. Hariharan, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Rajiv Mohan, Mr.Siddharth S. Yadav & Mr. Sahil Paul, Advocates. versus GNCT OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP and Inspector Arun Chouhan, PS A.C. Branch, for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. The present bail application has been preferred under Section 439 Cr.P.C. to seek regular bail in case First Information Report (FIR) No.15/2015 registered at Police Station (PS) Anti Corruption Branch (ACB), Civil Lines under Sections 7/ 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act (PC Act) read with Sections 34/120-B/201 I.P.C.2. The aforesaid FIR has been preferred on the complaint of one Javed S/o Khalil, who stated that he is running business of sale & purchase of...
- ‹ Prev
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Next ›
- Last »