Delhi Court May 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shakeel Ahmed Vs. State (Nct of Delhi) and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-26-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:26. h May, 2015 +CRL.A. 528/2012 SHAKEEL AHMED Through: ..... Appellant Dr.Vijendra Mahndiyan and Ms.Pallavi Awasthi, Advocates versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Ms.Fizani Hussain, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with SI Jagrup Singh Police Station Anand Parbat. Mr.Shamit Mukherjee, Sr.Advocate with Mr.O.P.Agarwal, Advocate for respondents 2 to 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. The moot question for consideration in the present appeal under Section 372 of Code of Criminal Procedure filed by the complainant seeking enhancement of sentence pursuant to the conviction order dated 15.02.2012 and order on sentence dated 18.02.2012 passed by learned Trial Court in Sessions Case No.38/09 arising out of FIR No.145/08 registered at Police Station Anand Parbat under Sections 308/342/34 of Indian Penal Code is:whether the sentence passed by Trial Court is not ...
Asha Kanta Kerketta Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-26-2015
$~21,26 & 34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision : May 26, 2015 W.P.(C) 5301/2015 SAMSEN PAT Represented by: ..... Petitioner Dr.Vijendra Mahndiyan, Advocate with Ms.Pallavi Awasthi, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Sarat Chandra, Advocate for R-1 to R-3 W.P.(C) 5362/2015 ASHA KANTA KERKETTA ..... Petitioner Represented by: Dr.Vijendra Mahndiyan, Advocate with Ms.Pallavi Awasthi, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Sarat Chandra, Advocate for R-1 & R-2 W.P.(C) 5456/2015 JOSHI NELESH KUMAR Represented by: ..... Petitioner Dr.Vijendra Mahndiyan, Advocate with Ms.Pallavi Awasthi, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. W.P.(C) No.5301/2015 & conn.matters ..... Respondents Page 1 of 6 Represented by: Mr.Rakesh Kumar, Advocate with Mr.Gulam Mohd.Asstt.Commandant, CISF CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) CM No.9582/2015...
Samsen Pat Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-26-2015
$~21,26 & 34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision : May 26, 2015 W.P.(C) 5301/2015 SAMSEN PAT Represented by: ..... Petitioner Dr.Vijendra Mahndiyan, Advocate with Ms.Pallavi Awasthi, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Sarat Chandra, Advocate for R-1 to R-3 W.P.(C) 5362/2015 ASHA KANTA KERKETTA ..... Petitioner Represented by: Dr.Vijendra Mahndiyan, Advocate with Ms.Pallavi Awasthi, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Sarat Chandra, Advocate for R-1 & R-2 W.P.(C) 5456/2015 JOSHI NELESH KUMAR Represented by: ..... Petitioner Dr.Vijendra Mahndiyan, Advocate with Ms.Pallavi Awasthi, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. W.P.(C) No.5301/2015 & conn.matters ..... Respondents Page 1 of 6 Represented by: Mr.Rakesh Kumar, Advocate with Mr.Gulam Mohd.Asstt.Commandant, CISF CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) CM No.9582/2015...
M/S Naturol Biochemical and Foods Limited Vs. Board for Industrial and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-26-2015
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on : May 26, 2015. + W.P.(C) 4569/2015 M/S NATUROL BIOCHEMICAL AND FOODS LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Rejeeve Mehra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Gautam Awasthey, Mr. Ayush and Ms. Shruti Aggarwal, Advs. versus BOARD FOR INDUSTRIAL & FINANCIAL RECONSTRUCTION & ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr. Sanjay Bhatt and Ms. Vidushi Shubham, Advs. for IDBI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. GAUBA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. The petitioner seeks a declaration that it is not a sick company within the meaning of the expression under the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 (SICA) by virtue of its net worth having turned positive. The petitioner had applied to be declared as a sick company which was eventually accepted and the Board of Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) registered its application and declared it to be such on 07.04.2011. Pursuant to this developmen...
Dr. Parmod Kumar Dhailwal Vs. Gnct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-26-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7942/2014 & CM APPL.18623/2014 26th May,2015 % DR. PARMOD KUMAR DHAILWAL Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sourabh Ahuja, Advocate. versus GNCT OF DELHI & ORS Through: + ..... Respondents Ms. Peeyosh Kalra, Advocate Addl. Standing Counsel GNCT of Delhi. Ms. Latika Chaudhary, Advocate for Govt. of NCT of Delhi. W.P.(C) 8194/2014 & CM APPL.19071/2014 DR. SAURABH PURWAR & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Sourabh Ahuja, Advocate. versus GNCT OF DELHI & ORS Through: + ..... Respondents Ms. Sangeeta Sondhi, Advocate for respondent (GNCT) W.P.(C) 8209/2014 & CM APPL.19092/2014 SURESH CHANDRA & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Sourabh Ahuja, Advocate. versus GNCT OF DELHI & ORS Through: W.P.(C) No.7942/2014 & conn. matters ..... Respondents Ms. Sangeeta Sondhi, Advocate for + W.P.(C) 8210/2014 & CM APPL.19094/2014 DR. RAJENDRA KUMAR SONI & ORS Through: versus GNCT OF DELHI & ORS Through: + Mr. Sourabh Ahuja, Advocate. ..... Respondents Ms. Sa...
National Research Development Corporation (Nrdc) Vs. M/S Enjayes Spice ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-26-2015
$~54 THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:26. 05.2015 FAO(OS) 290/2015 NATIONAL RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (NRDC) ... Appellant versus M/S ENJAYES SPICES & CHEMICAL OIL LTD & ANR ... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Mr R.V. Sinha and Mr R.N. Singh For the Respondents : Nemo CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) CM No.9975/2015 The exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. FAO(OS) 290/2015 and CM No.9976/2015 (Delay in filing) 1. This appeal, which has been filed belatedly, is directed against the judgment dated 21.01.2015 delivered by a learned Single Judge of this court in OMP No.103/2013 which was a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) in respect of the Award dated 29.09.2012 whereby the respondents had been asked to pay a sum of Rs 4,16,13,361/- togethe...
Vipin Kalra Vs. Vidhyawati
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-26-2015
$ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 211/2015 and CM No.8090/2015 (Stay) Decided on:26. h May, 2015 % VIPIN KALRA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Rajeev Verma and Mr. Naveen Chandra, Advocates. versus VIDHYAWATI Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Gyan Mitra, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J (ORAL) 1. Aggrieved by the order dated 23rd January, 2015, whereby the leave to defend filed by the Petitioner Vipin Kalra in an eviction petition filed by the Respondent Smt.Vidhya Wati under Section 14 (1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (in short the DRC Act) was dismissed, the Petitioner prefers the present petition.2. In the eviction petition, Smt. Vidhya Wati stated that one shop at the ground floor of property No.E-8, East Chander Nagar, Delhi, that is, privately numbered Shop No.1 (in short the tenanted premises) was let out by the deceased husband Vidhya Wati to Vipin Kalra at a monthly rent of Rs.100/- which was enhanced from time to time. V...
Kajal Jain Vs. Banarsidas Chandiwala Institute of Professional St
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-26-2015
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:26. 05.2015 W.P.(C) 5514/2015 & CM No.9911/2015 KAJAL JAIN ..... Petitioner versus BANARSIDAS CHANDIWALA INSTITUTE OF PROFESSIONAL STUDIES & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Ms Sana Ansari with Mr Sitab Ali Chaudhary. For the Respondents : Mr Vaibhav Kalra for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner has been denied an admit card/hall ticket for taking the second semester examinations of BBA Course, which is scheduled to commence from 27.05.2015, on the ground of shortfall in attendance. This has led the petitioner to approach this Court by way of the present petition.2. Briefly stated, the relevant facts are that the petitioner qualified the entrance examination and based on the order of merit, was admitted in the course of BBA, 1st Year in the academic year 2014-15 with respondent no.1 Institution (hereafter referred to as...
M/S Sobti Furniture Mart Pvt Ltd Vs. Ravinder Kumar Suri
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-26-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 110/2015 & CM41792015 (stay) Decided on:26. h May , 2015 % M/S SOBTI FURNITURE MART PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sidharth Chopra, Mr. K.K. Jha, Mr. Vineet Kumar, Adv. versus RAVINDER KUMAR SURI Through ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjiv Sindhwani, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sumit Ahuja, Adv. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) CM76182015 (by respondent) 1. An eviction petition was filed by the respondent Ravinder Kumar Suri against the petitioner M/s. Sobti Furniture Mart Pvt. Ltd. (in short the Sobti Furniture) under Section 14(1)(e) read with Section 25B DRC Act. The leave to defend application filed by Sobti Furniture was dismissed vide order dated 27th August, 2014 and an eviction order was passed by the learned ARC. The order dated 27th August, 2014 passing the eviction order was challenged by Sobti Furniture in the present revision petition.2. On 9th March, 2015 when the matter cam...
Sunil Kumar and Ors. Vs. The State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-26-2015
$~49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 26, 2015 + CRL.M.C.2289/2015 SUNIL KUMAR & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Abdul Sattar, Advocate versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .... Respondents Through: Mr.Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State Mr. Murari Tiwari, Advocate with Respondent No.2-in-person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.496/2006 under Sections 498-A/406/34 of IPC registered at Police Station Sri Niwas Puri, Delhi is sought on the basis of Compromise Deed of 20th February, 2015 arrived at between the parties (Annexure B). Notice. Mr.Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and Mr. Murari Tiwari, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is represented by her counsel Crl.M.C.No.2289/2015 Page 1 and has been identified b...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »