Delhi Court May 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rupak Gupta Vs. The National Capital Territory of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-27-2015
I- 49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 27, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2376/2015 & Crl. M.A.No.8261/2015 RUPAK GUPTA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sanjeev Sindhwani, Senior Advocate with Mr. Prosenjeet Banerjee & Ms. Mansi Sharma, Advocates Versus THE NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Vinod Diwakar, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Yad Ram Mr. Shridhar Y Chitale & Mr. Varun Mohan, Advocates with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.32/2015, under Section 363 of the IPC, registered at police station Tuglak Road, Delhi is sought on the basis of Memorandum of Settlement of 24th May, 2015 (Annexure-I) reached between the parties. Notice. Crl.M.C.No.2376/2015 Page 1 Mr. Vinod Diwakar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and Mr. Shridhar Y Chitale, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. Learned ...
Manjeet Singh Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-27-2015
$~14 & 15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 27, 2015 + CRL.M.C.3448/2014 AVTARJEET SINGH MADAN ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. J.L.Behl, Advocate versus DELHI STATE & ORS. Through: + .... Respondents Mr.Praveen Bhati, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Amit Dutt Mr. Pradeep Kumar Saini, Advocate with Respondents No.2&3-in-person CRL.M.C.5522/2014 MANJEET SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Pradeep Kumar Saini, Advocate versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .... Respondents Through: Mr.Praveen Bhati, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Amit Dutt Mr. J.L.Behl, Advocate with Respondent No.2-in-person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % JUDGMENT (ORAL) Crl.M.C.Nos.3448 & 5522 of 2014 Page 1 Quashing of FIR No.174/1999 under Section 324/34 IPC registered at Police Station Gandhi Nagar, Delhi [Crl.M.C.No.3448/2014]. and Complaint Case No.201/2003 under Section 452/323/34 IPC [Crl.M.C.No.5522/2014]. pending at Police Sta...
Hitesh Bajaj and Ors. Vs. The State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-27-2015
I- 29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 27, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2334/2015 & Crl. M.A.No.8147/2015 HITESH BAJAJ & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Ms. Gurmeet Kaur Kapoor, Advocate versus THE STATE & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Subhash Mr. Vineet Aggarwal, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.583/2012, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of the IPC, registered at police station Jagat Puri, Delhi is sought in this petition. Terms of settlement are reflected in the judgment of 14th November, 2014 passed by the learned Family Court. Notice. Mr. Karan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and Mr. Vineet Aggarwal, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. Crl.M.C.No.2334/2015 Page 1 Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent State submits that respondent No.2...
Vikram Yadav and Ors. Vs. Govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-27-2015
* I- 35 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 27, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2348/2015 & Crl. M.A.No.8188/2015 VIKRAM YADAV & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. R.N. Singh & Mr. M.K. Singh, Advocates versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Parveen Bhati, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Nagender Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.70/2011, under Sections 498-A/323/406/34 of the IPC, registered at Police Station Vijay Vihar, Delhi is sought on the ground that the subject matter of this FIR stands amicably resolved in terms of mediated settlement of 26th April, 2015 reached at Delhi Mediation Centre, Rohini Courts, Delhi and that petitioner-husband and respondent No.2-wife are happily living together since October, 2014. Notice. Mr. Parveen Bhati, Additional Public Prosecutor accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State and submits that respondent No.2, present...
Avtarjeet Singh Madan Vs. Delhi State and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-27-2015
$~14 & 15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 27, 2015 + CRL.M.C.3448/2014 AVTARJEET SINGH MADAN ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. J.L.Behl, Advocate versus DELHI STATE & ORS. Through: + .... Respondents Mr.Praveen Bhati, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Amit Dutt Mr. Pradeep Kumar Saini, Advocate with Respondents No.2&3-in-person CRL.M.C.5522/2014 MANJEET SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Pradeep Kumar Saini, Advocate versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .... Respondents Through: Mr.Praveen Bhati, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Amit Dutt Mr. J.L.Behl, Advocate with Respondent No.2-in-person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % JUDGMENT (ORAL) Crl.M.C.Nos.3448 & 5522 of 2014 Page 1 Quashing of FIR No.174/1999 under Section 324/34 IPC registered at Police Station Gandhi Nagar, Delhi [Crl.M.C.No.3448/2014]. and Complaint Case No.201/2003 under Section 452/323/34 IPC [Crl.M.C.No.5522/2014]. pending at Police Sta...
Modern Industries Vs. Executive Director Railway Stores
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-26-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. 1314/2014 Reserved on: May 15, 2015 Date of decision: May 26, 2015 MODERN INDUSTRIES ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. P.K.Bansal, Advocate Versus EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR RAILWAY STORES ... Respondent Through: Ms. Geetanjali Mohan, Advocate CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR % 1. JUDGMENT2605.2015 The challenge in this petition under Section34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) is to an Award dated 1st July, 2014 passed by the learned Sole Arbitrator in disputes arising between Modern Industries, the Petitioner, and the Respondent, the Executive Director, Railway Stores.2. The Contract dated 16th January, 2012 was entered into by and between the parties whereby the Petitioner was to manufacture and supply 1771 VUs of four specific wagon types, BOXNHL, BCNHL, BTPGLN, BTPN. Clause 1.1 of the Contract stated that out of the allocation of 1771 wagons, it had been decided to release the order for manufacture and supply of 886 wagons, the...
National Insurance Company Vs. Harpal Singh @ Harphool Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-26-2015
$~11 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on :26. 05. 2015 + MAC.APP. 877/2006 NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY ..... Appellant Through Mr.Kamal Deep, Advocate. versus HARPAL SINGH @ HARPHOOL SINGH ..... Respondent Through Mr.Suresh Kumar, Advocate for R2 & 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.1. The present appeal is filed seeking to impugn the Award dated 28.7.2006 by the appellant/insurance company.2. The brief facts which led to filing of the claim petition are that the claimant, namely, respondent No.1 on 4.8.2003 was injured while going to his house to Ambika Vihar, Paschim Vihar on his two wheeler scooter. Near Behra Enclave at the outer ring road he was hit by a motorcycle said to be driven rashly and negligently by respondent No.2 and the motorcycle was owned by his sister respondent No.3.3. Based on the evidence on record the Tribunal concluded that the negligence of the claimant Harpal Singh/respondent No.1 can be stated to the extent of 25% to w...
New India Assurance Co Ltd Vs. Nirmala Devi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-26-2015
$~A-17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on :26. 05.2015 + MAC.APP. 309/2011 & CM No.6975/20111 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through Mr.Pankaj Seth, Advocate versus NIRMALA DEVI & ORS ..... Respondent Through Mr.Rajnish K.Jha, Advocate for R1 to R-5 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.1. The present appeal is filed by the appellant insurance company seeking to impugn the Award dated 10.2.2011. The brief facts are that on 1.9.2010 the deceased Shalik Ram was crossing the road in front of Chowk Nangloi Depot, Rohtak Road, Delhi and was hit by a car driven by respondent No.6 in a rash and negligent manner.2. Based on the evidence on record the Tribunal held that the accident took place due to the rash and negligent driving of respondent No.6.3. On compensation the Tribunal noted that the deceased was 46 years of age on the date of the accident. The Tribunal relied upon the minimum wages of a skilled worker which was Rs.6,448/- per month i...
the New India Assurance Co. Ltd Vs. Smt Afsana Khatoon and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-26-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on :26.05.2015 + MAC.APP. 585/2013 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD ..... Appellant Through Mr.J.P.N.Shahi, Adv. versus SMT AFSANA KHATOON & ORS ..... Respondent Through Mr.Ai Murtaza and Ms.Tarannum Rani, Advs. for R-1 to R-4 Mr.Sanjeev Behl, Adv. for R-6 /Vikram Chopra CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.1. By the present appeal the appellant seeks to impugn the Award dated 27.04.2013.2. The brief facts which led to the filing of the present claim petition are that on 26.06.2012 Sh.Muzzaffar Ali, the deceased was travelling in an auto rickshaw. When he reached in front of GATTA factory, the auto rickshaw in which he was travelling was hit by a Tata 407 truck said to be driven rashly and negligently at a high speed. Sh. Muzzaffar suffered injuries and died on the way to the hospital.3. Based on the evidence on record, the Tribunal concluded that the accident took place due to rash and negligent driving o...
Joshi Nelesh Kumar Vs. Union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-26-2015
$~21,26 & 34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision : May 26, 2015 W.P.(C) 5301/2015 SAMSEN PAT Represented by: ..... Petitioner Dr.Vijendra Mahndiyan, Advocate with Ms.Pallavi Awasthi, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Sarat Chandra, Advocate for R-1 to R-3 W.P.(C) 5362/2015 ASHA KANTA KERKETTA ..... Petitioner Represented by: Dr.Vijendra Mahndiyan, Advocate with Ms.Pallavi Awasthi, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Sarat Chandra, Advocate for R-1 & R-2 W.P.(C) 5456/2015 JOSHI NELESH KUMAR Represented by: ..... Petitioner Dr.Vijendra Mahndiyan, Advocate with Ms.Pallavi Awasthi, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. W.P.(C) No.5301/2015 & conn.matters ..... Respondents Page 1 of 6 Represented by: Mr.Rakesh Kumar, Advocate with Mr.Gulam Mohd.Asstt.Commandant, CISF CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) CM No.9582/2015...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »