Delhi Court May 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bharti Axa General Insurance Co. Ltd Vs. Smt. Poonam and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-27-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:27. h May, 2015 + MAC.APP. 79/2014 BHARTI AXA GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD...... Appellant Through: Mr. Navneet Kumar, Advocate versus SMT. POONAM AND ANR. Through: + ..... Respondents Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate MAC.APP. 413/2015 POONAM @ PUNAM Through: ...... Appellant Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate Versus VIKAS PANCHAL & ANR. (BHARTI AXA GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.) ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Navneet Kumar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. These two appeals arise out of the judgment dated 11.09.2013 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby compensation of `16,02,882/- was awarded in favour of Respondents No.1 and 2 (in MAC APP. 79/2014) for the death of Nitin Raj, a bachelor who suffered fatal injuries in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 30.11.2012.2. The finding on negligence has not been challenged by the Appellant Insurance Company in MAC APP.79/2...
Shri Ravinder Pratap Singh Vs. Hema
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-27-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: May 27, 2015 + % MAT.APP.(F.C.) 45/2014 SHRI RAVINDER PRATAP SINGH Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Murari Tiwari, Mr. B. R. Sharma, Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advs. versus HEMA Through: .....Respondent Mr A. K. Mishra, Mr. Ajay Tiwari, Ms. Rita Vashisht, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA JUDGMENT I. S. MEHTA, J.1. The appellant has preferred the present appeal under Section 19(1) of The Family Courts Act, 1984 against the order/judgment/decree dated 31.01.2014 passed by Sh. Kamlesh Kumar, Addl. Principal Judge, Rohini, Delhi in HMA No.1320/2012.2. The brief facts are that the marriage between the parties was solemnized on 11.05.2011 in accordance with the Hindu rites and ceremonies at Keshav Puram, A-1, Community Centre, New Delhi. The marriage was consummated; however, no issue was born out of the wedlock. The parties to marriage stayed together till August, 2011. Soon af...
Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Krishna Devi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-27-2015
$-16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:27. h May, 2015 + MAC.APP.6/2014 SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. .... Appellant Through: Mr. K.L. Nandwani, Advocate versus KRISHNA DEVI & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Rajnish K. Jha, Advocate for Respondents no.1 to 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The appeal is directed against the judgment dated 16.07.2013 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal(the Claims Tribunal) whereby compensation of Rs.15,75,610/- was awarded in favour of Respondents no.1 to 4 for the death of Suresh Pal Singh, who suffered fatal injuries in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 11.03.2013.2. On appreciation of evidence, the Claims Tribunal found that the accident was caused on account of rash and negligent driving of vehicle no.DL-7-SBG-8867 by its driver Chanchal Kumar. It was the claim of Respondents no.1 to 4 that the deceased was working as a Security Guard with Kamal Jewellers, 37E,...
Commissioner, Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti Vs. D.C. Verma and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-27-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: May 27, 2015 + % 1. W.P.(C) No.2267/2005 COMMISSIONER, NAVODAYA VIDYALAYA SAMITI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. S. Rajappa, Dr. Puran Chand, Advocates. versus D.C. VERMA & ORS. Through: .....Respondents Mr. Anil Srivastava, Advocate for respondent No.1 to 4. AND2 W.P.(C) No.16486/2004 SH. S.B SHARMA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Galib Kabir, Advocate. versus D.C. VERMA & ORS. Through: .....Respondents Mr. S. Rajappa, Dr. Puran Chand, Advocates for respondent No.5 (NVS) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA JUDGMENT I. S. MEHTA, J.1. The petitioners i.e. Commissioner, Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti and Shri S. B. Sharma preferred two separate Writ Petitions i.e. WP (C) No.2267/2005 and WP (C) No.16486/2004 respectively under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India against the common order dated 19.08.2004 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delh...
Poonam @ Punam Vs. Vikas Panchal and Anr. (Bharti Axa General Insuranc ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-27-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:27. h May, 2015 + MAC.APP. 79/2014 BHARTI AXA GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD...... Appellant Through: Mr. Navneet Kumar, Advocate versus SMT. POONAM AND ANR. Through: + ..... Respondents Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate MAC.APP. 413/2015 POONAM @ PUNAM Through: ...... Appellant Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate Versus VIKAS PANCHAL & ANR. (BHARTI AXA GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.) ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Navneet Kumar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. These two appeals arise out of the judgment dated 11.09.2013 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby compensation of `16,02,882/- was awarded in favour of Respondents No.1 and 2 (in MAC APP. 79/2014) for the death of Nitin Raj, a bachelor who suffered fatal injuries in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 30.11.2012.2. The finding on negligence has not been challenged by the Appellant Insurance Company in MAC APP.79/2...
M/S Bharat Insulation Company Vs. Dr.Suraj Parkash and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-27-2015
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.S.A. 12/2002 & C.M. No.16924/2011 Decided on : May 27, 2015 M/S BHARAT INSULATION COMPANY ..... Appellant Through: Mr. H.L. Tiku, Senior Advocate with Ms. Yashmeet Kaur, Advocate. versus DR.SURAJ PARKASH & ORS.1 Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Gaurav Sarin, Ms.Charul Sarin, Ms. Veera Angrish & Mr. Ajitesh K. Kir, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.1. This is a regular second appeal (rent) filed by the appellant against the judgment dated 06.02.2002 passed by the Additional Rent Control Tribunal in RCA No.883/1996 titled M/s Bharat Insulation Company Thane (State of Maharashtra) & Ors. vs. Dr.Suraj Prakash and Ors by virtue of which the learned Addl. Rent Control Tribunal (ARCT for short) has upheld the judgment of eviction dated 01.10.1996, passed 1 Vide Order dated 30.04.2009 Ms. Shahnaz Parveen has been substituted as Respondent No.1, but no amended memo of parties is on record. against the appellant by the Addl. Rent ...
Sarla Devi Vs. State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-27-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:27. h May, 2015 % + BAIL APPLN. No.608/2015 SARLA DEVI Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Rohit Kaliyar, Adv. with Mr.Karan Sharma & Mr.Lovender Choudhary, Advs. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP for the State along with Insp. Rajesh Kumar Mishra, SHO, PS Pulprahladpur & SI Narasi Prasad, in person. Mr.Rajpal Kasana, Adv. for the complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No.65/2015 under Section 498-A/304-B/34 IPC registered at P.S. Pul Prahladpur.2. The case of prosecution is that i) a PCR call was received at the Police Station vide DD No.35 A at 9.20 pm that a lady had hanged herself at D-550, Pul Prahladpur. ii) on receipt of information, it came to notice that the incident had occurred at D-365 and not D550. On this the I.O. reached the ...
Ankush Bhanot and Ors. Vs. State Gnct Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-27-2015
I- 31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 27, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2337/2015 ANKUSH BHANOT & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. B.S. Bartwal, Advocate versus STATE GNCT DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with WSI Anuj Tyagi Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.606/2013, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of the IPC, registered at police station Tilak Nagar, New Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of respondent No.2 in support of this petition. Notice. Mr. Karan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so by her counsel as well as by WSI Anuj Tyagi on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State submits on...
Gurmukh Singh and Ors. Vs. State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-27-2015
$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 27, 2015 + CRL.M.C.2336/2015 GURMUKH SINGH & ORS. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Vineet Aggarwal, Advocate versus STATE & ANR. Through: .... Respondents Mr.Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with Inspector Aditi Lily Mr. Jagadish Sethi, Advocate with Respondent No.2-in-person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Crl.M.A.No.8152/2015 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl.M.C.No.2336/2015 & Crl.M.A.No.8153/2015 Quashing of FIR No.105/2011, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of IPC registered at Police Station CAW Cell, Nanakpura, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 13th August, 2014 arrived at Delhi Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (Annexure P-2). Notice. Crl.M.C.No.2336/2015 Page 1 Mr.Karan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State and Mr.Jagdish Sethi, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf ...
Rohan Gupta Vs. State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-27-2015
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 27, 2015 + CRL.M.C.1970/2015 ROHAN GUPTA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sonal Jain & Mr. Rajiv M., Advocates versus STATE & ANR. Through: .... Respondents Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Jagdish Respondent No.2-in-person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.282/2013 under Sections 498-A/406 of IPC registered at Police Station Dwarka (Sector-23), Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 22nd February, 2014 arrived at between the parties at Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre, Delhi (Annexure P-3). Notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she Crl.M.C.No.1970/2015 Page 1 has been identified to be so by SI Jagdish on the basis of identity proof pro...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »